Adopted November 14, 2006
Claremont
General Plan
THE CITY OF CLAREMONT
General Plan
Adopted November 14, 2006
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
Acknowledgements
The following individuals contributed to preparation of the Claremont General Plan:
( includes both past and current members)
City Council
Sandra N. Baldonado
Corey Calaycay
Jacquelin McHenry
Ellen Taylor
Peter Yao
Paul Held ( former Council Member)
Llewellyn Miller ( former Council Member)
Planning Commission
Thomas Andersen
Bill Baker
James Burke
Lisa Donnell
Craig Hanna
Rob Ragland
Carrie Richardson
Terri Slimmer ( former Commissioner)
Architectural Commission
Robin Haulman
Marianne Kunce ( former Commissioner)
Susan Schenk
Michael Shea
Robert Tener
Jamie Walton
Marie Williamson
Community Services Commission
Keith Anderson
William Eastham
Rose Kogeman ( former Commissioner)
Muriel O'Brien
Samuel Pedroza, Jr.
Richard Weiner
Allison Westfahl
Human Services Commission
Gwen Carr
Lynn Forester
Ed Leavell
Cynthia Linton
Rycharde Martindale- Essington
Valerie Martinez
Andrew Winnick
Nancy Brower ( former Commissioner)
Susan Edwards ( former Commissioner)
Loretta Gromo ( former Commissioner)
Police Commission
Kevin Arnold
Frank Bedoya
Bruce Carter
Catherine Lombardo
Carol Painter
Gary Soto
Rose Ash ( former Commissioner)
Richard Fass ( former Commissioner)
Stuart Holmes ( former Commissioner)
Jess Romo ( former Commissioner)
Traffic and Transportation Commission
Opoku Acheampong
Susan Brunasso
Tom Lamb
Thomas Lotz
Robert Poy
Joseph Salas
Timothy Worley
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
General Plan Advisory Committee
Sharon Hightower, Chair
Kevin Arnold
Rose Ash ( former member)
Bill Baker
Nancy Brower ( former member)
Tim Cox
Lisa Donnell
Richard Fass ( former member)
Anita Hughes
Cynthia Humes
Tom Lamb
Algird Leiga
James Manifold
Muriel O’Brien
Susan Schenk
Vicke Selke
Karen Vance
Citizens’ Committee for Claremont
Sharon Hightower, Chair
Opoku Acheamong
Ardon Alger
Elaine M. Amerson
Joan Anderson Dym
Brenda Barham Hill
Adar Belinkoff
Matthew Bibbens
Carol Bowdoin Gil
Nancy Brower
Lila Brumback
Bonnie Busenberg
Robert Caragher
Debra Carlson Wood
Frank Chabre
Carol Cox
Tim Cox
Isobel Crump
Jeffery DesCombes
Thomas Dewey
Patricia Dillon
Susan E. Dollar
Sharon Douglas
Olivia Ellis
Zoltan Elo
John Paul Faranda
Steve Finn
Beatrice Frankel
Joe Fusco
David Galas
Charles Gale
Helaine Goldwater
Valerie Gustaveson
Kathy Hacker
Suzanne Hall
Thomas Handley
Lora Hess
Jeff Hubatka
Anita Hughes
Cynthia Humes
Wayne Hunzicker
John L. Hurtado
Michael Keenan
Leah Key Ketter
Connie Kimos
Michael Klein
Claralou LaBarge
Algird G. Leiga
Andrew A. Loeffler
Andrew Lohmann
James Long
James Manifold
Ken Masugi
Maureen McCluney
Hugh Menton
John Murphy
Barbara Musselman
Leslie Negritto
Maureen M. Nelson
Mary Noonan
Patricia Parisi
Sam Pedroza
Bertha Peters
Bruce Poch
Christopher Ponce
Ann G. Quinley
George Renville
Diann Ring
Karen Rosenthal
Rita Ruminski
Charles Salemi
Lynn Sarf
Susan Schenk
Sheldon Schuster
Derry Seaton
Vicke Selk
Teresa Shaw
Caitlin Siegel
Julie Smith
Jennifer A. Stockton
Ellen Taylor
Ronald Teeples
Seth Thompson
Robin Trozpek
Ludd Trozpek
Elizabeth Tulac
Barry Ulrich
Christianne Ulrich
Karen Vance
Erik Von Wodtke
Richard Watkins
Mary Weis
Allison Westfahl
Paul Wheeler
Carol Wiese
Paul Wood
Mark Wood
Suzanne Zetterberg
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
Special Thanks
City staff thanks the Claremont Community for their insight, contribution, and commitment to making
Claremont a great community.
Special thanks to Judy Wright for providing information about the City’s history.
City Staff
Lead City Staff Lisa Prasse, AICP, City Planner
Belle Newman, Principal Planner
Supporting City Staff Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
Anthony Witt, Community Development Director
Dick Guthrie, former Human Services Director
Craig Bradshaw, City Engineer
Mercy Santoro, Human Services Superintendent
Brian Desatnik, Housing & Redevelopment Project Manager
Loretta Mustafa, Associate Civil Engineer
Greg Gubman, Senior Planner
Aileen Flores, Community Informational Coordinator
Mark Carnahan, Associate Planner
Barbara Hagee, Administrative Assistant
Scott Miller ( former Economic Development Manager)
Paul Cooper, Police Captain
Consultants to the City
Lead Consultant
Supporting
Consultants IBI Group
Meyer, Mohaddes Associates, Inc.
Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc.
Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc.
True North Research, Inc.
TRG Land, Inc.
Wieland Associates, Inc.
Wilson Geosciences
T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s
P A G E T O C - 1
Table of Contents
C l a r e m o n t G e n e r a l P l a n
Sustainability Icon
The leaf icon identifies goals and policies involving sustainability ( see example). The leaf signifies that
the concept of sustainability – either economic, environmental and/ or social – is promoted by that
particular goal and policy.
Chapter Page
Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1- 1
Claremont: A Model for Sustainability................................................................................................................. ...... 1- 1
Claremont Tomorrow — Our Vision......................................................................................................................... ... 1- 3
Our Context for Planning ............................................................................................................................... ................ 1- 9
Guiding Us Toward Our Vision: Using the General Plan .................................................................................. 1- 15
Related Plans and Programs ............................................................................................................................... ....... 1- 18
Chapter 2: Land Use, Community Character, and Heritage Preservation Element ............................ 2- 1
Our Vision: A Diverse, Sustainable Community of Neighborhoods ................................................................. 2- 1
Why We Plan — Scope of this Element....................................................................................................................... 2- 2
Defining Claremont: Influences that Continue to Shape Our Community....................................................... 2- 3
Land Use Plan........................................................................................................................... ......................................... 2- 7
Community Character ............................................................................................................................... .................... 2- 23
Heritage Preservation................................................................................................................... ................................. 2- 34
Celebrating and Preserving Our Neighborhoods................................................................................................... 2- 36
A Plan for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor ............................................................................................................. 2- 66
Goals and Policies....................................................................................................................... .................................... 2- 68
Chapter 3: Economic Development/ Fiscal Element............................................................................... 3- 1
Our Vision: Fiscal Sustainability ............................................................................................................................... ... 3- 1
Context for Planning: Our Local Economy and How We Fit Within the Region......................................... 3- 2
Our Resources for Securing a Sustainable Local Economy ............................................................................... 3- 7
Maintaining Balance and Supporting Community Goals.................................................................................... 3- 14
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E T O C - 2
Chapter 4: Community Mobility Element ............................................................................................... 4- 1
Our Vision: Connecting Our Community Internally and to the Region............................................................ 4- 1
Context for Mobility: Creating Options ....................................................................................................................... 4- 3
A Plan for Our Streets ............................................................................................................................... ..................... 4- 5
A Comprehensive, Sustainable Approach to Mobility......................................................................................... 4- 26
Goals and Policies....................................................................................................................... .................................... 4- 49
Chapter 5: Open Space, Parkland, Conservation, and Air Quality Element ...................................... 5- 1
Our Vision: Valuing Our Natural Resources and the Open Space that Define Claremont....................... 5- 1
The Underpinnings of Community Sustainability: Open Space and Parkland
Preservation and Enhancement.................................................................................................................... ............... 5- 3
Conservation: A Comprehensive, Sustainable Approach to Resource
Preservation and Enhancement.................................................................................................................... ............. 5- 24
Air Quality ............................................................................................................................... .......................................... 5- 32
Goals and Policies....................................................................................................................... .................................... 5- 34
Chapter 6: Public Safety and Noise Element ........................................................................................ 6- 1
Our Vision: A Safe and Nurturing Place to Live, Work, and Play .................................................................... 6- 1
How We Identify and Guard Against Hazards ........................................................................................................ 6- 2
Public Safety......................................................................................................................... .............................................. 6- 3
Public Safety Goals and Policies....................................................................................................................... ......... 6- 32
Noise.......................................................................................................................... .......................................................... 6- 39
Chapter 7: Human Services, Recreational Programs and Community Facilities Element ................ 7- 1
Our Vision: We Celebrate and Accommodate a Vibrant, Diverse Community ............................................ 7- 1
Community Facilities..................................................................................................................... ................................... 7- 2
Human Services....................................................................................................................... ......................................... 7- 9
Cultural Arts……......................................................................................................................... ....................................... 7- 14
Life- long Learning Opportunities.................................................................................................................. .............. 7- 19
Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................... ..................................... 7- 27
Human Services and Community Facilities Goals and Policies....................................................................... 7- 36
Chapter 8: Housing Element ................................................................................................................... 8- 1
Our Vision: Meeting the Housing Needs of an Increasingly Diverse Population.......................................... 8- 1
Achieving Our Vision......................................................................................................................... .............................. 8- 2
Involving the Community...................................................................................................................... .......................... 8- 3
Community Profile........................................................................................................................ .................................... 8- 7
Housing Constraints.................................................................................................................... ................................... 8- 30
Housing Resources...................................................................................................................... ................................... 8- 55
Goals and Policies....................................................................................................................... .................................... 8- 68
Housing Plan ............................................................................................................................... ..................................... 8- 71
T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s
P A G E T O C - 3
Housing Appendix A: At- Risk Housing Analysis ................................................................................................. 8A- 1
Housing Appendix B: Report of Past Accomplishments................................................................................... 8B- 1
Chapter 9: Governance Element ............................................................................................................. 9- 1
Our Vision: We Involve a Diverse Community in Our Decision- Making Processes
and Local Governance..................................................................................................................... ............................... 9- 1
Why Claremont Has a Governance..................................................................................................................... ....... 9- 2
History of Governance in Our Community ............................................................................................................... 9- 2
Our Local Government ............................................................................................................................... .................... 9- 6
Governance Based on Diversity, Inclusiveness, and Accountability ............................................................... 9- 10
Governance Goals and Policies....................................................................................................................... ........... 9- 13
Appendix A: Implementation Plan ......................................................................................................... A- 1
Introduction ............................................................................................................................... ......................................... A- 1
I: Procedures, Plans, Permits, Agreements and Ordinances Administered by the City ............. A- 21
II: Work Programs/ Projects of City Departments ................................................................................... A- 41
III: Physical Improvements, Capital Projects and Maintenance............................................................. A- 52
IV: Conditions or Requirements Placed Upon New Development........................................................ A- 66
V. Public Education Programs....................................................................................................................... . A- 77
VI: Coordination with Other Agencies and Organizations Regarding Programs,
Plans, Permits, Agreements, and Ordinances under Their Jurisdiction....................................... A- 82
Appendix B: Glossary ............................................................................................................................. B- 1
Appendix C: Fiscal Impacts for the Incremental Growth of the Claremont General Plan ................. C- 1
Tables
2- 1 Description of Terms Used in Table 2- 2................................................................................................................... 2- 19
2- 2 Development and Population Projections Pursuant to Land Use Policy....................................................... 2- 21
2- 3 Development and Population — 2005 Conditions and General Plan................................................................ 2- 22
4- 1 Level of Service Descriptions................................................................................................................... ................... 4- 11
4- 2 Circulation System Performance Criteria................................................................................................................ 4- 12
5- 1 Claremont Parks ............................................................................................................................... .............................. 5- 14
5- 2 Park Needs.......................................................................................................................... .............................................. 5- 18
6- 1 Earthquake Magnitude and Intensity Comparison ................................................................................................. 6- 5
6- 2 Magnitude and Intensity of Maximum Credible Earthquake ( MCE)
for Faults Potentially Impacting Claremont ...................................................................................................... 6- 6
6- 3 Claremont Fire Station Locations .............................................................................................................................. 6- 28
6- 4 Arterial Segments Generating and Ldn in Excess of 65 dB.............................................................................. 6- 43
6- 5 Claremont Land Use/ Noise Guidelines .................................................................................................................... 6- 47
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E T O C - 4
7- 1 Public Community Facilities ............................................................................................................................... ........... 7- 3
7- 2 Education Facilities..................................................................................................................... .................................... 7- 20
8- 1 Historic Population Growth in Claremont — 1910- 2005......................................................................................... 8- 7
8- 2 Population Trends in Nearby Communities.............................................................................................................. 8- 8
8- 3 Age Distribution in Claremont — 1990 and 2000 ...................................................................................................... 8- 8
8- 4 Race and Ethnicity in Claremont — 1990 and 2000................................................................................................. 8- 9
8- 5 Employment by Industry: 1992 and 2000 ................................................................................................................ 8- 10
8- 6 Annual Average Salary by Industry: 2000............................................................................................................... 8- 11
8- 7 Household Type: 1990 and 2000 ............................................................................................................................... 8- 12
8- 8 Income Profile by Household Type: 2000................................................................................................................ 8- 13
8- 9 Overcrowding in Households: 1990 and 2000........................................................................................................ 8- 14
8- 10 Overcrowding by Tenure and Severity: 1990 and 2000 ..................................................................................... 8- 15
8- 11 Housing Cost Burden: 2000........................................................................................................................... .............. 8- 16
8- 12 Disabled Persons by Age: 2000........................................................................................................................... ....... 8- 18
8- 13 Changes in Housing Stock: 1990- 2004...................................................................................................................... 8- 20
8- 14 Housing Tenure and Vacancy: 1990 and 2000 ...................................................................................................... 8- 21
8- 15 Housing Age: 2005........................................................................................................................... ............................... 8- 22
8- 16 Median Prices of Single- Family Homes and Condominiums: August 2005 and August 2004............... 8- 23
8- 17 Summary of Single- Family and Condominium Home Sales: August 2005.................................................. 8- 23
8- 18 Rents by Unit Size ............................................................................................................................... ........................... 8- 24
8- 19 Housing Affordability Matrix......................................................................................................................... .............. 8- 26
8- 20 Publicly Assisted Housing........................................................................................................................ .................... 8- 27
8- 21 Housing Assistance Needs of Lower Income Households................................................................................. 8- 30
8- 22 Land Use Categories Permitting Residences.......................................................................................................... 8- 33
8- 23 Residential Development Standards ......................................................................................................................... 8- 37
8- 24 Housing Types by Residential Zone District .......................................................................................................... 8- 38
8- 25 Planning and Development Fees for Residential Projects.................................................................................. 8- 47
8- 26 Disposition of Conventional Home Purchase Loan Applications .................................................................... 8- 52
8- 27 Disposition of Conventional Home Improvement Loan Applications ............................................................ 8- 53
8- 28 Regional Housing Needs Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 8- 57
8- 29 Inventory of Vacant and Underutilized Residential Sites.................................................................................... 8- 61
8- 30 Summary of Potential Housing Sites........................................................................................................................ 8- 65
8- 31 Residential Sites by Affordability Level .................................................................................................................... 8- 66
8- 32 2006- 2008 Objectives ............................................................................................................................... ...................... 8- 82
8A- 1 Rent Subsidies Required ............................................................................................................................... .............. 8A- 1
8B- 1 Program Achievements: 2000- 2005.......................................................................................................................... 8B- 1
9- 1 Advisory Commissions ............................................................................................................................... .................... 9- 8
9- 2 Human Services Standing Committees ..................................................................................................................... 9- 9
9- 3 City Departments ............................................................................................................................... ............................. 9- 10
A- 1 Policy and Implementation Measures Matrix.......................................................................................................... A- 2
T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s
P A G E T O C - 5
Figures
1- 1 Regional Map ............................................................................................................................... .................................... 1- 10
1- 2 Planning Area Map............................................................................................................................ ............................. 1- 11
1- 3 Population Growth 1910 to 2005 ............................................................................................................................... 1- 14
1- 4 General Plan Element and Vision Statement Consistency Matrix.................................................................. 1- 16
2- 1 Land Use, Community Character, and Heritage Preservation Structure........................................................ 2- 3
2- 2 Floor Area Ratio.......................................................................................................................... ...................................... 2- 8
2- 3 Land Use Plan........................................................................................................................... ......................................... 2- 9
2- 4 Residential Densities in Claremont...................................................................................................................... ...... 2- 12
2- 5 Activity Nodes, Gateways, Public Buildings, Parks, and Schools.................................................................... 2- 25
2- 6 Neighborhood Map............................................................................................................................ ............................. 2- 37
3- 1 Redevelopment Map............................................................................................................................ .......................... 3- 10
4- 1 Roadway Cross Sections A.............................................................................................................................. ............. 4- 7
4- 1 Roadway Cross Sections B.............................................................................................................................. ............. 4- 8
4- 2 Master Plan of Roadways....................................................................................................................... ..................... 4- 13
4- 3 Bike Plan........................................................................................................................... ................................................. 4- 35
4- 4 Bikeway and Trail Cross Sections ............................................................................................................................. 4- 38
4- 5 Truck Routes......................................................................................................................... ........................................... 4- 47
5- 1 Parkland....................................................................................................................... ...................................................... 5- 15
5- 2 Trails ............................................................................................................................... .................................................... 5- 21
5- 3 Mineral Resource Zones.......................................................................................................................... ..................... 5- 30
6- 1 Faults......................................................................................................................... ............................................................ 6- 7
6- 2 Seismic Hazards Map — Landslides and Liquefaction Areas .............................................................................. 6- 9
6- 3 Dam Inundation ............................................................................................................................... ................................ 6- 13
6- 4 High Fire Zones.......................................................................................................................... ..................................... 6- 16
6- 5 Cable Airport Safety Zones ............................................................................................................................... .......... 6- 18
6- 6 Noise Contour 2005........................................................................................................................... ............................. 6- 41
6- 7 Cable Airport Noise Contours....................................................................................................................... .............. 6- 44
6- 8 Future Noise Contours ............................................................................................................................... ................... 6- 48
7- 1 Map of Community Services Facilitation ................................................................................................................... 7- 7
7- 2 Map of Water Facilitation................................................................................................................... .......................... 7- 30
8- 1 Inventory of Vacant and Underutilized Residential Sites.................................................................................... 8- 59
9- 1 City of Claremont Organizational Structure.............................................................................................................. 9- 7
Chapter 1
Introduction
TH E C I T Y O F CLAREMONT
G e n e r a l P l a n
Chapter 1
Introduction
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1- 1
Claremont: A Model for Sustainability................................................................................................................. ...... 1- 1
Claremont Tomorrow — Our Vision......................................................................................................................... ... 1- 3
Our Context for Planning ............................................................................................................................... ................ 1- 9
Guiding Us Toward Our Vision: Using the General Plan .................................................................................. 1- 15
Related Plans and Programs ............................................................................................................................... ....... 1- 18
List of Figures
1- 1 Regional Map ............................................................................................................................... .................................... 1- 10
1- 2 Planning Area Map............................................................................................................................ ............................. 1- 11
1- 3 Population Growth 1910 to 2005 ............................................................................................................................... 1- 14
1- 4 General Plan Element and Vision Statement Consistency Matrix.................................................................. 1- 16
Sustainability Icon
The leaf icon identifies goals and policies involving sustainability ( see example). The leaf signifies that
the concept of sustainability – either economic, environmental and/ or social – is promoted by that
particular goal and policy.
C l a r e m o n t G e n e r a l P l a n
I N T R O D U C T I O N
P A G E 1 - 1
Chapter 1
Introduction
C l a r e m o n t G e n e r a l P l a n
Claremont: A Model for
Sustainability
laremont didn’t happen by accident. The City is a result of
foresight and planning.
When Claremont embarked on a comprehensive update of its General
Plan in 2004, this phrase was expressed independently by many
Claremont residents, City staff, and community leaders. People in
Claremont recognize and treasure the long- range view adopted by our
City’s founders and the visionaries who have continued to shape how
Claremont looks, functions, and feels. This foresight and planning
continue with this General Plan. Through a comprehensive process to
identify our vision for the twenty- first century, we have crafted this Plan
to guide decision- making about development, resource management,
public safety, community services and programs, and the general
quality of life in our City.
Foresight requires that we look into the future to determine the needs of
the Claremont community. Inherent in our long- range view, expressed
in the Community Vision, is the concept of sustainability. We place
significant value in planning for tomorrow’s Claremont — by conserving
our natural resources, protecting our culture and heritage, meeting the
housing and community service needs of a diverse demographic, and
preserving our quality of life.
C
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 1 - 2
Planning is accomplished by establishing goals and policies consistent
with our Vision and by defining specific actions we will take to achieve
community objectives. This General Plan provides that path.
Sustainability
You take my house when you do take the prop
That doth sustain my house; you take my life
When you take the means whereby I live.
- William Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice
The concept of sustainability has gained increasing public attention
since the environmental movement began in the 1960s. However, as
William Shakespeare noted over 400 years ago, the props that sustain
our houses sustain our lives, or, in a broader sense, the land, water,
energy, open space, economy, and culture that sustain our community
support our neighborhoods and our way of life in Claremont.
Many economic, social, and environmental organizations have adopted
the concept of sustainability as a guiding principle. As a City, we
embrace sustainability as a fundamental planning tool. We define
sustainability as follows:
Sustainability. - The ability for the City and residents of
Claremont to meet the needs of the present economy, society,
and environment while preserving the ability of future
generations to meet their needs.
In this definition, we include economy because we depend upon the
strength of local businesses and institutions to provide employment and
generate the revenue that support our community and the services the
City provides. Society is highlighted because the concept addresses
our culture, heritage, and the social elements that establish our identity
as individuals and as a community. Environment forms the important
third side of this triangle, as we depend upon nature’s limited resources
to provide the air, water, energy, and open spaces fundamental to life.
Sustainability within Claremont’s General Plan emphasizes
preservation of our lifestyles, heritage, diversity, institutions, businesses,
hillsides and other open spaces, the cooperative spirit of individuals and
community groups, and above all, our neighborhoods. Establishing
sustainability as one of the main goals for Claremont ensures progress
that places equal value on our economy, society, and the environment.
The concept of sustainability is used throughout this General Plan. To
help identify goals and policies involving sustainability, a leaf icon is
shown ( see example). The leaf signifies that the concept of
sustainability related to the environment, economy, and/ or society is
incorporated into that particular goal and policy.
Sustainability Icon
Sustainability Processes at
the Local Level
Environmental
􀂂 Respect carrying capacity
􀂂 Conserve and recycle
resources
􀂂 Reduce waste
Economy
􀂂 Sustain economic growth
􀂂 Maximize private profit
􀂂 Expand markets
􀂂 Externalize costs
Society
􀂂 Increase self- reliance
􀂂 Satisfy basic human need
􀂂 Increase equity
􀂂 Guarantee participation and
accountability
􀂂 Use appropriate technology
Source: Sustainability and Cities,
Peter Newman and Jeffrey
Kenworthy, 1999.
I N T R O D U C T I O N
P A G E 1 - 3
Claremont Tomorrow –
Our Vision
Through an extensive community engagement process initiated in 2004
and continuing through 2005, the City learned how residents, the
business community, and our institutions envision Claremont. Based on
this direction, decision- makers have set the course on how this General
Plan will create the Claremont of tomorrow. This Vision Statement
provides the foundation for the General Plan and the basis for the goals
and polices.
Claremont’s Community Vision
We Are Claremont
Nestled at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains, Claremont is a
residential community and home to the renowned Claremont Colleges.
Its unique characteristics and environment are a result of careful and
deliberate planning that has produced our City’s:
􀂂 Distinct neighborhoods
􀂂 Protective environment
􀂂 Status as a leading center of learning, with excellent public and
private primary and secondary schools
􀂂 Feeling of being a village within a metropolis
􀂂 Pedestrian- friendly surroundings
􀂂 Strong historic preservation efforts
􀂂 Tree- lined streets, well- planned parks, and open spaces
􀂂 Small, thriving commercial and industrial clusters
􀂂 Community of passionate and active volunteers
We treasure Claremont, and this Vision Statement identifies ideals we
work toward.
Where We Live
Claremont distinguishes itself through its cohesive collection of distinct,
well- maintained, and safe neighborhoods, and by our character as a
diverse residential, college, and business community. Designed to
human scale, our buildings promote the aesthetic enhancement of
public spaces through design. These features contribute to the
pedestrian experience and the livability of our City. Transportation
gateways create strong entry statements, reflecting the character of our
City.
Claremont General Plan
Vision Statement
This Vision Statement was crafted by the
Citizens’ Committee for Claremont, Vision
Subcommittee and ratified by City leaders in
2004.
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 1 - 4
How We Preserve Our Heritage
New development and redevelopment builds on our history with
appropriate and compatible design to renew and reinvigorate
neighborhoods and business districts. Our commitment has led to
stable, well- maintained residential neighborhoods, a thriving
commercial Village and other commercial centers, attractive
landscaped environments and college campuses, outstanding public art,
and vibrant retirement communities. Through quality architectural
design and landscape integrity, we encourage new development to
respond to and enhance the surrounding physical environment.
How We Maintain Our Diversity
We maintain our vitality, sense of community, and tradition. We attract
a diverse population by fostering an inclusive, multi- generational, and
economically and ethnically diverse city. We achieve diversity through
public/ private partnerships, programs, and policies. Residents have
varied housing needs, reflective of all stages in life and income levels;
our City’s land use policies facilitate many housing types throughout the
City to meet these needs. To improve neighborhoods, our City
encourages the repair and use of the existing housing stock.
How We Provide for Our Needs
Our City achieves balance with sustainable economic development and
redevelopment initiatives that support the tax base required for current
and future needs. We encourage a diversity of commercial and
industrial businesses that allow individuals to both live and work in
Claremont. Because of the important relationship and interaction
between the City and The Claremont Colleges, we have embraced
these institutions of higher learning as an economic and educational
resource that attracts clean, environmentally friendly, and diverse
knowledge industries. Claremont uses its limited land resources
strategically for the benefit of current and future residents and
businesses. We encourage mixed- use development and the reuse of
developed properties, balancing our respect for nature, sustainability,
and private property rights. Through collaborations, involvement, and
cooperation with internal and external resources, Claremont is
adequately prepared to meet and address public safety issues. Police,
fire, and other emergency response services are excellent.
How We Nurture the Individual
Claremont takes advantage of the will and spirit of its residents to
collaborate and partner with all community groups. This cooperative
spirit produces a rich variety of parks, recreational opportunities,
cultural activities, and public art which are inclusive, accessible, and
innovative. These efforts build and sustain our community while
meeting the diverse needs of individuals, families, and groups. We
I N T R O D U C T I O N
P A G E 1 - 5
foster life- long growth, learning, and the well- being of community
members of all ages. Our excellent library facility helps foster this
learning.
How We Protect Our Natural Environment
The City leads the region in creating a legacy of natural and built open
space for future generations. The irreplaceable natural resources and
viewsheds, including the hillsides, serve as a distinguishing community
feature. The continued existence of natural open space within our City
is crucial to the distinctive character of Claremont, to its sense of place,
and to providing visual relief from the built environment. Natural open
spaces create beauty; recreational and educational value; provide refuge
for native plants, animals, and their ecosystems; and sustain our
cultural and environmental history. Claremont values developed open
spaces that enhance the City’s visual character and provide
opportunities for mental and physical recreation. Located throughout
the entire community, developed open space areas include easily
accessible parks and walking/ bicycle paths and trails. Campuses and a
network of greenways and view corridors link our open spaces.
How We Get Around
Traffic flows smoothly throughout the community, and traffic- calming
measures work to lessen the impacts of traffic in our neighborhoods.
Development accommodates transit needs in the design of the built
environment. Universally accessible transit connects our
neighborhoods, schools, parks, and commercial and industrial areas.
Convenient public transit and pedestrian connections provide that once
someone arrives in Claremont, use of the automobile becomes an
option rather than a requirement. Our City has appropriate parking to
meet the needs of commercial and institutional uses. We recognize
that Claremont is interconnected to the region and is easily accessible
to regional, national, and international land, sea, and air transportation
systems. Our City engages in cooperative planning with surrounding
cities and counties to solve circulation problems arising from regional
growth. Regional rail transit influences land use in Claremont and has
had a positive, significant effect on development patterns for housing,
public spaces, and commercial and industrial areas in the City.
How We Sustain Our Community
Claremont recognizes its long- term obligations to future residents by
simultaneously promoting ecological health, economic vitality, and
social well- being. Claremont has embraced sustainable “ green”
principles, and promotes and encourages developments that conserve
natural resources. New development includes environmentally
sustainable construction and landscaping that is integrated into the
established network of parks, trails, and schools that unites
neighborhoods. Through planning and land- use practices, we protect
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 1 - 6
groundwater, watersheds, and mineral deposits. The City conserves its
limited natural habitats and the diverse native plant and animal
communities within them. Claremont’s long- standing tradition of
planting street trees and maintaining our urban forest sets our City
apart from others.
Community governance sustains our traditions of open participatory
government and cooperation among local, state, and national bodies.
We have achieved the balance between our shared community values
and the respect for private property rights. We have developed new
governance and information technology models to ensure participation,
inclusion, and accountability. Residents are informed, active, and
constructive in collaborating to resolve common issues. Governing
bodies listen, respond appropriately, and provide creative leadership.
How do we imagine the Claremont of tomorrow? As part of the
General Plan program, the City undertook a substantial public outreach
program to understand community values and to establish a new
General Plan policy foundation based on those values. The outreach
effort arose from Claremont’s long- standing practice of involving its
citizenry in important policy discussions. The outreach program was
multi- faceted and included the components described below.
Formulating Our Vision
In formulating our Vision, an extensive outreach process was
conducted that enabled hundreds of Claremont residents and the
overall community to participate. Several committees were formed to
identify issues and a preliminary vision. Workshops were held to
introduce concepts to the general public. Innovative outreach tools
were used, including Visioneering, a community survey, and the
Internet.
Citizens’ Committee for Claremont
The Citizens’ Committee for Claremont ( CCC), composed of almost
100 Claremont residents and other community representatives, worked
together to craft the Community Vision for the Claremont General
Plan. The CCC met four times ( on May 1, July 29, and October 20 in
2004, and on May 4, 2005) as a large group to discuss general issues of
concern and to present recommendations.
I N T R O D U C T I O N
P A G E 1 - 7
Citizens’ Committee for Claremont Subcommittees
As part of the visioning process for the General Plan, the City formed
seven topic- based subcommittees and one Vision Subcommittee
composed of CCC members:
􀂂 Land Use/ Economic Development
􀂂 Circulation/ Mobility
􀂂 Public Safety/ Noise
􀂂 Community Design/ Historic Preservation
􀂂 Housing and Neighborhoods
􀂂 Hillsides/ Open Space/ Conservation
􀂂 Parks, Recreation, and Community Facilities
These topic- based subcommittees were charged with identifying issues
relevant to their topic, as well as policy direction to be incorporated into
the General Plan. They also drafted the vision for their topic that can
be found at the beginning of each Element.
The Vision Subcommittee, comprised of one representative from each
of the topic- based subcommittees, had the task of developing the overall
Community Vision for the Claremont General Plan. For inspiration,
the Vision Committee used the topic- based visions. The Community
Vision and topic- based visions were affirmed by the CCC, General Plan
Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council.
Visioneering
To reach out to a broader community, the City used an innovative
approach called “ Visioneering.” Claremont residents had the
opportunity to participate in the planning process by becoming
volunteer facilitators, or Visioneers. More than 20 Visioneers
representing a cross- section of Claremont were trained to solicit and
document public input into the General Plan process through a series of
facilitated workshops.
Community Festivals
Three Community Festivals were conducted in 2004 and 2005 as part
of the General Plan update program. On September 11, 2004, the City
conducted a festival aimed at identifying community issues and ideas
for Claremont’s future, and to solicit comments on the CCC’s draft
Vision Statement. Held at Blaisdell Park in south Claremont, the event
was attended by over 400 people.
On March 21, 2005, the second Community Festival showcased a “ test
drive” of potential development scenarios for targeted sites in
Claremont.
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 1 - 8
On November 30, 2005, the third Community Festival presented the
preliminary Draft General Plan to the Claremont community. The
general public was invited to review the preliminary Draft General Plan
and submit comments to City staff. Subsequently, the Draft General
Plan was presented to the subcommittees and City Commissions for
review. Their comments were also incorporated into the General Plan.
General Plan Advisory Committee
The General Plan Advisory Committee ( GPAC), consisting of
representatives from each CCC subcommittee and members of the
Planning Commission and each of the City’s other five commissions,
met ten times to discuss all General Plan topical issues. The GPAC
discussed major issues, reformulated goals and polices, and determined
land use alternatives that were recommended to the Planning
Commission and City Council.
City Council/ Planning Commission Meetings
Prior to formal public hearings on the General Plan, five meetings were
held with the Planning Commission/ City Council to explore a range of
issues related to the General Plan and the Vision. Discussions about
Claremont’s housing needs were a critical element in all discussions.
The meetings were held on April 20 ( Planning Commission only) and
November 16 of 2004, and May 17, June 7, and June 30 of 2005 ( joint
meetings).
Claremont General Plan
Community Festival
Residents single out traffic issues on Claremont
streets by marking up a map of the City. Over
400 people attended the first Community
Festival on September 11, 2005. The intent of
the festival was to identify community issues
the General Plan should address and ideas to be
incorporated into the Plan.
I N T R O D U C T I O N
P A G E 1 - 9
Focused Group Meeting
To reach residents for whom English is not their first language, a
focused group meeting was conducted in Spanish at Wheeler Park.
Participants confirmed that they value the family- oriented
neighborhoods in Claremont and take pride in maintaining their homes.
South Claremont Meeting
A focused workshop was held for residents of south Claremont to help
clarify land use alternatives for the southern portion of the City, as well
as identify the general direction the residents were interested in pursing
with regard to traffic calming, public facilities, pedestrian safety, and
high- density housing. A primary concern expressed by residents was
that affordable housing be located throughout Claremont and not
concentrated in the already higher density south Claremont
neighborhoods.
Survey of Residents
The City conducted a survey of residents as part of the General Plan
program. Four hundred randomly selected adult residents participated
in the survey between August 17 and September 2, 2004. The survey
sample was selected to be representative of the adult population in the
City on key demographic traits. Survey respondents were asked a
range of questions, including their opinion on the need for and the
appropriate type of affordable housing.
General Plan Website
The City utilized its website to provide current information on the
General Plan update program. Summaries of the public meetings and
information on program progress were posted for review. The public
was asked to comment on various aspects of the program during its
formation.
Our Context for Planning
Geographical Context
Claremont is located in the San Gabriel Valley, within the eastern
portion of Los Angeles County. The City shares its boundaries with the
cities of Upland, Pomona, La Verne, and Montclair, and the County of
San Bernardino. Two freeways — the 10 Freeway and the 210
Freeway — traverse the City east to west, providing regional linkage via
the automobile. Claremont is also regionally connected by Metrolink, a
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 1 - 10
commuter rail system that connects Claremont to San Bernardino and
other communities to the east, and to Downtown Los Angeles ( Figure
1- 1). Claremont is also located near four airports: Cable Airport,
Brackett Field Airport, Chino Airport, and Ontario International
Airport.
Planning Area
This General Plan addresses not just lands within the City’s corporate
limits, but also unincorporated Los Angeles County properties
surrounding Claremont, within its so- called sphere of influence. In this
General Plan, the combined City area and sphere of influence are
termed the “ planning area,” illustrated in Figure 1- 2. While properties
within the sphere of influence are under the jurisdiction of Los Angeles
County agencies, these properties bear a critical relationship to
Claremont’s planning activities. One day, these properties may become
part of the City proper, and planning for service extensions, integrated
infrastructure, and high design quality is timely and prudent.
Figure 1- 1
Regional Map
Claremont is traversed by the 210 Freeway and
10 Freeway, located near four airports,
including the Ontario International Airport,
and is along the San Bernardino Line of the
Metrolink commuter rail system.
Mills Av
Mt Baldy Rd
Mountain Av
Towne Av
Padua Av
Indian Hill Blvd
Harrison Av
Baseline Rd
Su
Claremont Blvd
Sumner Av
Garey Av
Grand Av
6th St
Miramar Av
Foothill Blvd
Arrow Hwy
Williams Av
College Av
Via Padova
Harvard Av
Indian Hill Blvd
Butte St
Yale Av
Oxford Av
Bonita Av
Radcliffe Dr
1st St
Monte Vista Av
San Jose Av
Bonita Av
Webb Canyon Rd
12th St
San Antonio Av
Orange Grove Av
Moreno St
Monte Vista Av
Central Av
College Wy
Bonnie Brae Av
Vista Dr
Mills Av
Sycamore Av
Live Oak Canyon Rd
Green St
W Occidental Dr
Andrew Dr
Mills Av
Meredith St
Peninsula Av
Berkeley Av
Pomello Dr
Towne Av
Arrow Hwy
Benson Av
Base Line Rd
10th St
Foothill Blvd
Baseline Rd
Santa Clara Av
San Bernardino St
Palo Verde St
7th St
Arrow Hwy
Arrow Route
Alamosa Dr
Danbury Rd
Hillsdale Dr
Occidental Dr
Bowdoin St
Mills Av
Mountain Av
Padua Av
Foothill Blvd
Claremont Planning Area
C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
Jurisdictional Boundaries
Figure 1- 2
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Mile
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Kilometers
City of Claremont Sphere of Influence
City of Claremont Incorporated Area
Los Angeles and San Bernardino
County Boundary
City of
Upland
City of
Montclair
City of
Pomona
City of
La Verne
Los Angeles
County
Unincorporated Area
Los Angeles County
San Bernardino County
Other Cities
Source: City of Claremont, 2005.
Los Angeles
County
Unincorporated Area
Los Angeles
County
Unincorporated Area
Unincorporated County Areas
Los Angeles National Forest
Angeles
National
Forest Marshall
Canyon
Regional
Park
Marshall Canyon Park
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 1 - 12
Our Beginnings
As recorded in Judy Wright’s Claremont: A Pictorial History,
“ Claremont is built on land once inhabited by Indians who were related
to the Shoshone of the Great Basin area ( Serrano Indians). Later,
during the Spanish- Mexican period, Claremont was part of the vast
land holdings of Mission San Gabriel, which was followed by the
rancho days of California.” 1 Claremont was a part of the Rancho San
Jose, which was owned by Ricardo Vejar and Don Ygnacio Palomares.
In addition to Claremont, the Rancho also included the present day city
boundaries of La Verne, Pomona, Walnut, San Dimas, and Glendora. 2
The growth of the City of Pomona also contributed to the growth of
other nearby towns. Claremont is the product of the Santa Fe land
boom and the moving of Pomona College to Claremont in 1888. Even
though the land boom anticipated by
the railroad failed, the community
prospered as an educational center.
The citrus industry also played an
important role in the City's
development. This industry made
extensive use of land, which later
was developed with housing tracts.
The community’s residential
character was established by the
City’s first General Plan and Zoning
Committee, and reinforced by the
1969 General Plan Committee.
There was not always unanimous
agreement on this concept, but the
residential proponents prevailed.
Many buildings and features
throughout Claremont – such as
railroads, college buildings, a packing
house, grove houses, and pump
houses – are testimony to the nature
of those institutions that transformed
the coastal sage scrub landscape into
a vibrant community. There is a mixture of old and new buildings –
residential, educational, and commercial – which reflect the different
architectural styles that served different periods and function. All of
this is interspersed with an urban forest and a large park system, as
well as chaparral- covered foothills nestled at the base of the San
Gabriel Mountains.
1 Judy Wright. Claremont: A Pictorial History, 2nd ed. ( Claremont: The Claremont Historic Resources, 1999), p. 5.
2 Wright, p. 8.
Pomona College’s First
Building
To give the appearance of a booming town site
in Claremont, the Claremont Hotel was built.
During the land bust in the late 1880s, the
unused Claremont Hotel and surrounding land
were given to Pomona College. The hotel was
named Claremont Hall and served as
classrooms, dorm, and dining hall.
– Wright, p. 68.
I N T R O D U C T I O N
P A G E 1 - 13
City Planning in Claremont
Such a setting has provided impetus to residents who want to maintain
Claremont's identity and character. Since Claremont's beginnings,
citizens have focused on city planning as a way to protect the
environment. Even in the early days before incorporation, those
participating in the community's informal mode of governance, the
Town Meeting, showed concern about the visual appearance of the
town. Builders were requested to put houses, barns, and other buildings
" well back from the street". The Board of Trade, a forerunner of the
Chamber of Commerce, was asked to prepare Claremont's first city
plan in 1908, one year after the City was incorporated.
As the City Beautiful movement spread across the country following
the 1893 Columbia Exposition in Chicago, Claremont's planning efforts
came of age. During 1924, the Chamber of Commerce appointed the
first Claremont Planning Commission, allocated $ 500.00 for an
" artistic" city plan, and hired David Allison and Charles Cheney to
develop that plan.
Twenty years later, Claremont residents anticipated the kind of growth
pressure that postwar activities in California would cause. Again, the
Chamber of Commerce took the lead in 1944, creating the Postwar
Planning Committee. This 77- member committee worked for over a
year and made the following recommendations that laid the
groundwork for planning decisions for subsequent decades: a street
tree program, the creation of a Parks and Recreation and Street Trees
Commission, the tightening of Claremont's zoning ordinance, a
proposal for a community park, business district improvement, and
street and public safety planning. The strength of the Planning
Commission and the 1944 Postwar Planning Committee placed
Claremont in a strong position to accept the kind of growth it deemed
desirable.
During the early 1950s, residents thought that the City needed
additional legal tools to control its destiny. In 1954, Claremont hired
Simon Eisner to draft a City master plan. The plan was adopted in
1956, making Claremont, a community of 6,000 residents, one of the
first cities in California to adopt an official master plan. The plan dealt
with land within the City boundaries and outside the original Village
area.
In 1969, the City again initiated a General Plan program. Because the
existing area of the City had been developed, much of the 1970 plan
addressed the City's then- unannexed area north of Base Line Road and
east of Mills Avenue. Hall and Goodhue Planning Consultants
prepared the plan.
During the preparation of each plan, handling Claremont's population
growth potential was a major concern. Claremont, the " City of living
and learning", had a population of 3,073 in 1944 when the Postwar
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 1 - 14
Planning Commission was appointed. However, by 1950, the
population had doubled to 6,327. The population again doubled in the
next ten years, and in 1960, had reached 12,633. By 1970, the
population reached 23,998, again doubling. During the 1970s,
Claremont's population growth slowed, and the 1980 population was
approximately 31,000 ( see Figure 1- 3).
Figure 1- 3
Population Growth 1910 to 2005
3,057
6,327
12,633
36,636
33,998
32,503
30,950
23,998
1,114 1,727 2,719
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005
Year
Population
In 1981, a committee of residents, City staff, and representatives of
local institutions prepared an updated General Plan which was, as set
forth in that Plan, “ a statement of appreciation for the physical results
of good planning, together with implementation tools for maintaining it”.
During the planning process, Claremont citizens expressed what they
considered distinctive about this community: the parks, trees,
compatible industry and commercial development, historic areas,
hillsides, healthy neighborhoods, collegiate atmosphere, small scale of
structures, and the mix of people.
Population
Claremont’s significant growth occurred after
World War II until about the 1980s. Population
continues to increase, but not at the accelerated
rates from the past. Claremont has never
experienced a decline in population.
I N T R O D U C T I O N
P A G E 1 - 15
Guiding Us Toward Our Vision:
Using the General Plan
Under California law, every city must adopt a comprehensive, long- term
General Plan to guide the physical development of the city’s
incorporated area and any surrounding unincorporated properties that
have a bearing on that city. As described above, such planning is not
just a state mandate; it simply makes good sense. State law further
indicates that the General Plan is the primary document a jurisdiction
must utilize to regulate land use. Consequently, the zoning ordinance,
specific plans, and individual public and private development proposals
must be consistent with General Plan goals, policies, and
implementation measures.
General Plan Contents
To ensure that every city and county prepares General Plans that are
comprehensive and long- term in perspective, state statutes establish
requirements for the minimum contents of a General Plan. ( Interested
readers are referred to Sections 65350 through 65590 of the
Government Code.) By law, a General Plan must contain the following
seven “ elements”, or chapters, and must be internally consistent
element to element. The required elements are:
􀂂 Land Use
􀂂 Circulation
􀂂 Housing
􀂂 Conservation
􀂂 Open Space
􀂂 Safety
􀂂 Noise
The Claremont General Plan contains eight elements. Figure 1- 4
illustrates which of the eight elements make up the seven mandated
elements and which elements address the main topics of the
Community Vision statement.
The Land Use, Community Character, and Heritage
Preservation Element focuses on the neighborhood component of
Claremont and pulls together issues and goals from the other elements,
laying the framework for balancing development with broader
community aims.
The Economic Development/ Fiscal Element addresses economic
development, redevelopment, and the importance of fiscal balance
between revenue and the provision of fundamental public services.
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 1 - 16
Figure 1- 4
General Plan Element and Vision Statement Consistency Matrix
Governance
Public Safety and Noise
Open Space, Parkland,
Conservation and Air Quality
Housing
Community Mobility
Land Use, Community
Character, and Heritage Preservation
Economic Development/ Fiscal
Human Services, Recreation
Programs, and Community Facilties
State- Mandated
Elements
How We Sustain Our Community
How We Get Around
How We Nurture the Individual
How We Provide for Our Needs
How We Maintain Our Diversity
How We Live
How We Preserve Our Heritage
How We Protect Our Natural
Environment Claremont General Plan
Elements
Claremont Vision Statement
Optional Elements
Note: State- mandated elements are land use, circulation, housing, open space, conservation, safety, and noise.
The Community Mobility Element addresses issues, goals, and
polices related to circulation, traffic congestion, parking management,
walking, and biking,
The Open Space, Parkland, Conservation, and Air Quality
Element examines both the natural and human- made environments,
and establishes policies to protect those resources that distinguish and
define Claremont. Topics addressed in this element include parks,
natural resources, groundwater, and air quality.
I N T R O D U C T I O N
P A G E 1 - 17
The Human Services, Recreation Programs, and Community
Facilities Element addresses cultural arts, recreation, educational
institutions, water supply, wastewater, and stormwater drainage.
The Public Safety and Noise Element is concerned with
identifying hazards present in the community, and ensuring that proper
planning and emergency response services can mitigate the hazards.
Sections in the element include emergency response services, natural
and human- caused hazards, police and fire protection, and noise issues.
The Housing Element addresses issues, goals, and polices related to
ensuring an adequate supply of housing opportunities for persons of all
needs and income levels. Unlike the other elements, state law sets forth
very specific regulations regarding the content of the Housing Element.
The Housing Element must be updated every five years or as
otherwise legislated by the state legislature.
The Governance Element addresses how Claremont residents and
community groups involve themselves in the workings of local
government. This element upholds Claremont’s rich tradition of open
and participatory government, and provides a context for identifying
and eliminating barriers to public participation, especially for disabled,
youth, seniors, and underrepresented groups, and for sustaining an
inclusive and inviting governing atmosphere.
Using the General Plan
Inasmuch as the General Plan is a community document intended for
use by all residents of Claremont – not just City staff and decision-makers
– the Plan has been written and organized for ease of use.
Tables, diagrams, and maps help readers understand planning
concepts, and sidebar notes define terms and direct users to elements
addressing related topics or policies.
Key Terms Used
As stated above, goals and policies represent the Plan’s foundation. A
goal is an overall statement of community desires and consists of a
broad statement of purpose or direction. For each goal in this General
Plan, associated and more definitive policy statements follow. A policy
provides guidance to the City Council, Planning Commission, other City
commissions and boards, and City staff in their review of development
proposals and the actions taken.
The organization of the General Plan allows users to turn to the section
that interests them and quickly obtain a perspective of City policies on
the subject. However, General Plan users should realize that the
policies throughout all elements are interrelated and should be
examined comprehensively. All of these policy components must be
considered together when making planning decisions.
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 1 - 18
Some readers may find that the goals and policies do not fully articulate
how the City will achieve its aims. Further articulation can be found in
the Implementation Plan in Appendix A to the General Plan. The
Implementation Plan identifies specific actions the City will undertake
toward putting goals and policies into action. The Implementation
Measures are intended to be reviewed and updated periodically to allow
decision- makers to adjust to current community priorities and funding
resources.
Related Plans and Programs
State law places the General Plan atop the hierarchy of land use
planning regulations. Several local ordinances and other City plans
must conform to General Plan policy direction and work to implement
the Plan. Also, regional governmental agencies, such as the Southern
California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air
Quality Management District, have been established in recognition of
the fact that planning issues extend beyond the boundaries of individual
cities. Efforts to address regional planning issues such as air quality,
transportation, and housing needs have resulted in the adoption of
regional plans. The policies Claremont adopts are affected by these
plans. The following paragraphs describe ordinances, plans, and
programs which should be considered in association with the General
Plan in development and planning decisions.
Federal Plans and Programs
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
As part of a multi- pronged effort to improve the quality of water
resources nationwide, the federal government authorized the State
Regional Water Quality Control Board and its regional offices such as
the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board to set up
programs to implement National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System ( NPDES) goals. Under the NPDES Stormwater Permit
issued to the County of Los Angeles and Claremont as co- permittees,
most new development projects in the City are required to incorporate
measures to minimize pollutant levels in stormwater runoff.
Compliance is required at the time that construction permits are issued,
as well as over the long term through periodic inspections. The Public
Works Department enforces NPDES requirements, which are adopted
as part of the Claremont Municipal Code.
I N T R O D U C T I O N
P A G E 1 - 19
National Flood Insurance Program
The Federal Emergency Management Agency administers the
National Flood Insurance Program ( NFIP). The NFIP provides federal
flood insurance subsidies and federally financed loans for eligible
property owners in flood- prone areas. Claremont has no mapped flood
hazard areas.
Federal Endangered Species Act
The Federal Endangered Species Act ( ESA), administered by the U. S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, applies to federally listed species and habitat
occupied by federally listed species. ESA Section 9 forbids specified
acts that directly or indirectly harm listed species. Section 9 also
prohibits “ taking” any species of wildlife or fish listed as endangered.
These restrictions apply to all federal agencies and all persons subject
to United States jurisdiction.
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of
Fish and Game
Both the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department
of Fish and Game have regulations that protect wildlife and plant
species. Special permits are required for alteration, dredging, or any
activity in a lake or stream, as well as other activities that may affect
fish and game habitat. Future development in natural habitat areas that
has the potential to affect those habitats will be subject to the
regulations of both of these federal and state agencies.
Clean Water Act
Congress passed the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
Amendments of 1972 and the Clean Water Act ( CWA) of 1977 to
provide for the restoration and maintenance of the chemical, physical,
and biological integrity of the nation’s lakes, streams, and coastal
waters. Primary authority for the implementation and enforcement of
the CWA ( 33 U. S. C. 1251) now rests with the U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency ( EPA) and, to a lesser extent, the U. S. Army Corps
of Engineers. In addition to the measures authorized before 1972, the
CWA implements a variety of programs, including: federal effluent
limitations and state water quality standards; permits for the discharge
of pollutants and dredged and fill materials into navigable waters; and
enforcement mechanisms. Section 404 of the CWA is the principal
federal program that regulates activities affecting the integrity of
wetlands. Section 404 prohibits the discharge of dredged or fill
material in jurisdictional waters of the U. S. unless permitted by the
Corps under individual permits, general permits, or unless the
discharge is exempt from regulation.
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 1 - 20
California State Plans and Programs
California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA)
The California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) was adopted by the
state legislature in 1970 in response to a public mandate for thorough
environmental analysis of projects impacting the environment. The
provisions of the law and environmental review procedure are
described in the CEQA Law and Guidelines. CEQA is the instrument
for ensuring that environmental impacts of local development projects
are appropriately assessed and mitigated, and if not fully mitigated,
ensuring that project benefits to the community are substantial. The
Planning Division reviews projects for conformance with CEQA.
California Endangered Species Act
The California Endangered Species Act ( CESA) generally parallels the
main provisions of the federal Endangered Species Act and is
administered by the California Department of Fish and Game. CESA
prohibits the “ taking” of listed species except as otherwise provided in
state law. Any future development in Claremont hillsides that has the
potential to affect wildlife will be subject to the restrictions contained in
CESA.
California Noise Insulation Standards ( Title 24)
In 1974, the California Commission on Housing and Community
Development adopted noise insulation standards for residential
buildings ( Title 24, Part 2, California Code of Regulations). Title 24
establishes standards for interior room noise ( attributable to outside
noise sources). The regulations also specify that acoustical studies
must be prepared whenever a residential building or structure is
proposed to be located near an existing or adopted freeway route,
expressway, parkway, major street, thoroughfare, rail line, rapid transit
line, or industrial noise source, and where such noise source or sources
create an exterior CNEL3 ( or Ldn) of 60 dB or greater. Such acoustical
analysis must demonstrate that the residence has been designed to
limit intruding noise to an interior CNEL ( or Ldn) of at least 45 dB.
The City of Claremont Building Division enforces Title 24, which is
adopted as part of the Claremont Municipal Code.
3 See the Chapter 6, Public Safety and Noise Element for a discussion of these noise metrics.
I N T R O D U C T I O N
P A G E 1 - 21
Seismic Hazards Mapping Act
California’s 1990 Seismic Hazards Mapping Act requires the State
Geologist to compile maps identifying and describing seismic hazard
zones throughout California. Guidelines prepared by the State Mining
and Geology Board identify the responsibilities of state and local
agencies in the review of development within seismic hazard zones.
Development on a site that has been designated as a seismic hazard
zone requires a geotechnical report, and local agency consideration of
the policies and criteria established by the Mining and Geology Board.
Over the years, the program has expanded to include mapping of
seismic- related hazards such as liquefaction- and landslide- prone areas.
The Public Safety and Noise Element discusses seismic hazards
associated with faults and those identified on state seismic hazard
maps. Claremont contains both liquefaction and landslide- prone areas.
The Public Safety and Noise Element contains maps and data
identifying these areas.
Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975
The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 provides for
reclamation of all surface mining operations on private and public lands
to a suitable, post- mining land use, and requires financial assurances to
guarantee successful reclamation of mined lands. This Act requires
mine operators to create reclamation plans. Reclamation plans assure
that:
􀂂 Adverse environmental effects are prevented or minimized and
mined lands are reclaimed to a useable condition readily
adaptable for alternate land uses;
􀂂 Production and conservation of minerals are encouraged, while
considering recreation, watershed, wildlife, aesthetic, range,
and forage values; and
􀂂 Residual hazards to public health and safety are eliminated.
Regional and County Level Plans and Programs
SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide
The Southern California Association of Governments ( SCAG)
undertakes regional planning for the six- county SCAG region of Los
Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Imperial, and Ventura
counties. SCAG’s efforts focus on developing regional strategies to
minimize traffic congestion, protect environmental quality, and provide
adequate housing. The Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide sets
forth broad goals intended to be implemented by participating local and
regional jurisdictions and the South Coast Air Quality Management
District. SCAG has adopted companion documents to the Regional
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 1 - 22
Comprehensive Plan and Guide, most notably the Regional
Transportation Plan ( see below).
Congestion Management Plan
The Congestion Management Plan ( CMP) is a program adopted by the
state legislature and approved by the voters in 1990 through
Proposition 111. As a new approach to addressing congestion
concerns, the CMP was created for the following purposes:
􀂂 To link land use, transportation, and air quality decisions
􀂂 To develop a partnership among transportation decision-makers
on devising appropriate transportation solutions that
include all modes of travel
􀂂 To propose transportation projects which are eligible to
compete for state gas tax funds
The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
( Metro) is responsible for preparing the County’s CMP. Metro is
required by state law to monitor local implementation of all CMP
elements. Local jurisdictions are required to monitor arterial
congestion levels, monitor transit services along certain corridors, and
implement an adopted trip reduction ordinance and land use analysis
program.
Regional Transportation Plan
The Regional Transportation Plan ( RTP) is a component of the
Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide prepared by SCAG to
address regional issues, goals, objectives, and policies for the Southern
California region into the early part of the 21st century. The RTP,
which SCAG periodically updates to address changing conditions in the
Southland, has been developed with active participation from local
agencies throughout the region, elected officials, the business
community, community groups, private institutions, and private
citizens. The RTP sets broad goals for the region, and provides
strategies to reduce problems related to congestion and mobility.
In recognition of the close relationship between the traffic and air
quality issues, the assumptions, goals, and programs contained in the
Plan parallel those used to prepare the Air Quality Management Plan.
Air Quality Management Plan
The federal Clean Air Act requires preparation of plans to improve air
quality in any region designated as a nonattainment area. The Air
Quality Management Plan, or AQMP, prepared by the South Coast Air
Quality Management District, first adopted in 1994 and updated on a
three- year cycle, contains policies and measures designed to achieve
federal and state air quality standards within the South Coast Air
I N T R O D U C T I O N
P A G E 1 - 23
Basin. The assumptions and programs in the AQMP draw directly
from regional goals, objectives, and assumptions in SCAG’s Regional
Comprehensive Plan and Guide.
San Gabriel River Watershed Management
The County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works ( DPW) leads
the planning and implementation of watershed management in Los
Angeles County, including the San Gabriel River Watershed. The
DPW works with stakeholders in the watersheds' future, integrates
flood protection, and manages natural resources, water conservation,
and efforts to improve the quality of storm water runoff and
groundwater.
The goals of the DPW related to watershed management are to:
􀂂 Generate partnerships and coalitions among diverse groups of
watershed stakeholders
􀂂 Bring together teams of local leaders and stakeholders for each
watershed
􀂂 Take steps to clean up water that flows to rivers, lakes, and
oceans
􀂂 Conduct and sponsor research in collaboration with education
and professional institutions
􀂂 Assist in securing funding for watershed management
priorities, including applying for grants whenever possible
􀂂 Prepare studies and develop master plans for each watershed
􀂂 Become a central source of information for residents,
stakeholders, and other government agencies
􀂂 Provide solutions to flooding problems
􀂂 Promote legislation and policies that encourage watershed
management practices
Local Plans and Programs
Claremont Land Use and Development Code
The City’s Land Use and Development Code ( LUDC) divides
Claremont into areas, called zoning districts, and establishes
regulations for each district with respect to permitted uses, allowable
density, building height, development character, etc. The LUDC
consists of a map delineating zone district boundaries, plus text that
explains the purposes of each district, specifies permitted and
conditional uses, and establishes development and performance
standards. The LUDC serves as the primary tool to achieve the goals,
policies, and development expectations established in Claremont’s
Land Use Plan. All decisions made on development applications
pursuant to the LUDC must be consistent with the General Plan.
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 1 - 24
Village Expansion Specific Plan
The Village Expansion Specific Plan is designed to expand The Village
in a way that preserves the character, ambiance, and economic vitality
of downtown. Expanding The Village also allows for the creation of a
transit- oriented neighborhood that places residential and
retail/ commercial uses in proximity to regional commuter rail service
and other public transit.
Redevelopment Plan
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Claremont administers one
redevelopment project area citywide, which is governed by a
Redevelopment Plan. The Plan does not dictate parcel- by- parcel future
development; rather, the Plan authorizes a variety of tools that the
Agency may use to eliminate blight while pursuing land use goals
specified in the Plan and the Claremont General Plan. The
Redevelopment Plan identifies the following additional and/ or more
specific goals and objectives for the Redevelopment Agency:
􀂂 Eliminate blight in the project areas.
􀂂 Provide adequate streets, curbs, gutters, street lights,
landscaping, and directional/ informational signage.
􀂂 Underground unsightly overhead utility lines.
􀂂 Promote pedestrian use in The Village, promote mass
transit for the community, and provide appropriate
vehicular circulation in the Project Area.
􀂂 Strengthen retail and other commercial functions in the
Project Area to increase employment and revenues.
􀂂 Provide adequate parking in and adjacent to The Village.
􀂂 Encourage economic and social activity within The Village
consistent with the maintenance of a small- scale, small-town
atmosphere and image.
􀂂 Enhance the role of The Village by strengthening civic,
community, and cultural functions.
􀂂 Strengthen the economic base of the Project Area and
community by preplanning and/ or installing needed site
improvements in industrial areas to stimulate new
industrial development, employment, and economic growth
compatible with the overall goals and policies of the City.
􀂂 Preserve historically and/ or architecturally worthwhile
structures and sites.
􀂂 Establish planning, zoning, design, and environmental
standards that will make the Project Area desirable
locations for development.
􀂂 Increase and improve the City's supply of very- low, low-,
and moderate- income residential uses.
I N T R O D U C T I O N
P A G E 1 - 25
Senior Master Plan
In 2002, the Committee on Aging and local organizations serving
seniors crafted the Senior Master Plan to streamline and fill gaps in
services for seniors. According to the Claremont Senior Master Plan,
by 2020, one- third of Claremont’s population will be comprised of
seniors of age 55 and over who will be, on average, older and more
racially diverse than Claremont’s seniors in 2002. This is due to higher
life expectancy and growth in the minority population. In preparation
for an increase in the number senior residents, Claremont, in
collaborative effort with community organizations, provides services in
accordance to the Senior Master Plan, The goals of the Master Plan
aim to fill the gaps in the following five service areas: At- Home and
Community Services, Health Services, Legal and Protective Services,
Successful Aging, and Transportation.
Youth Master Plan
Claremont values its youth and families. This is exemplified in the
City’s Youth Master Plan, which serves as a guideline for improving
services to its youth and families by promoting diversity, and delivering
safe and constructive programs. The vision statement of the Youth
Master Plan is to provide safe, healthy experiences that guide the youth
to become responsible and contributing members of the City.
Claremont Hills Wilderness Park Management Plan
The Claremont Hills Wilderness Park Management Plan provides
guidelines and policies regarding the management of open space and
wilderness areas located within the boundaries of the Claremont Hills
Wilderness Park. The guidelines and policies are consistent with the
Claremont General Plan, Hillside Zoning Ordinance, and the deed
restrictions on the property( ies) located within the park.
Claremont Hills Wilderness Vegetation Management Plan
The Claremont Hills Wilderness Park Vegetation Management Plan
recognizes the potential threat of wildfires in the hillsides. The plan has
been created to improve the fire safety for residents and firefighters
without compromising environmental concerns, and to manage the
fire/ flood cycle which characterizes most urban/ wildland interface
areas. The plan specifically addresses several fuel management
strategies including, but not limited to, brush clearance, maintenance of
established roadways, and the creation of fuel reduction zones.
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 1 - 26
Claremont Register of Structures of Historic and
Architectural Merit
The Claremont Register of Structures of Historic and Architectural
Merit ( Register) is a comprehensive historic resource inventory of sites
and structures in various areas of the City. First adopted in 1980, the
Register includes approximately 1,000 properties. Owner consent is
not required for listing. Applicable to properties listed on the Register
is a mandatory, 90- day delay before issuance of a demolition permit.
The intent is to allow the City time to explore alternatives with the
applicant, such as relocation or adaptive reuse, and possible mitigation
to reduce possible adverse impacts from demolition. The City
continues to add properties to the Register as they are nominated and
warrant listing.
Chapter 2
Land Use, Community
Character, and Heritage
Preservation Element
TH E C I T Y O F CLAREMONT
G e n e r a l P l a n
Chapter
Land Use, Community
Character, and Heritage
Preservation Element
C l a r e m o n t G e n e r a l P l a n
Table of Contents
Chapter 2: Land Use, Community Character, and Heritage Preservation Element ............................ 2- 1
Our Vision: A Diverse, Sustainable Community of Neighborhoods ................................................................. 2- 1
Why We Plan — Scope of this Element....................................................................................................................... 2- 2
Defining Claremont: Influences that Continue to Shape Our Community....................................................... 2- 3
Land Use Plan........................................................................................................................... ......................................... 2- 7
Community Character ............................................................................................................................... .................... 2- 23
Heritage Preservation................................................................................................................... ................................. 2- 34
Celebrating and Preserving Our Neighborhoods................................................................................................... 2- 36
A Plan for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor ............................................................................................................. 2- 66
Goals and Policies....................................................................................................................... .................................... 2- 68
List of Tables
2- 1 Description of Terms Used in Table 2- 2................................................................................................................... 2- 19
2- 2 Development and Population Projections Pursuant to Land Use Policy....................................................... 2- 21
2- 3 Development and Population — 2005 Conditions and General Plan................................................................ 2- 22
List of Figures
2- 1 Land Use, Community Character, and Heritage Preservation Structure........................................................ 2- 3
2- 2 Floor Area Ratio.......................................................................................................................... ...................................... 2- 8
2- 3 Land Use Plan........................................................................................................................... ......................................... 2- 9
2- 4 Residential Densities in Claremont...................................................................................................................... ...... 2- 11
2- 5 Activity Nodes, Gateways, Public Buildings, Parks, and Schools.................................................................... 2- 25
2- 6 Neighborhood Map............................................................................................................................ ............................. 2- 37
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
Sustainability Icon
The leaf icon identifies goals and policies involving sustainability ( see example). The leaf signifies that
the concept of sustainability – either economic, environmental and/ or social – is promoted by that
particular goal and policy.
L A N D U S E , C O M M U N I T Y C H A R A C T E R A N D H E R I T A G E
P R E S E R V A T I O N E L E M E N T
P A G E 2 - 1
Chapter 2
Land Use, Community
Character, and Heritage
Preservation Element
C l a r e m o n t G e n e r a l P l a n
Our Vision: A Diverse,
Sustainable Community of
Neighborhoods
estled at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains, Claremont is
a residential community and home to the renowned
Claremont Colleges. Our unique characteristics and
environment are a result of careful and deliberate planning that has
produced our City’s:
􀂂 Distinct neighborhoods
􀂂 Protective environment
􀂂 Status as a leading center of learning, with excellent public and
private primary and secondary schools
􀂂 Feeling of being a village within a metropolis
􀂂 Pedestrian friendly surroundings
􀂂 Strong historic preservation efforts
N
Land Use, Community
Character, and Heritage
Preservation Vision
Statement
This Vision Statement was crafted by the
Citizens’ Committee for Claremont,
Land Use Subcommittee.
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 2 - 2
􀂂 Tree- lined streets, well- planned parks, and open spaces
􀂂 Small, thriving commercial and industrial clusters
􀂂 Community of passionate and active volunteers
Claremont is a cohesive collection of distinct, well- maintained, and safe
neighborhoods. We are a diverse residential, college, and business
community. The City strives to provide universal access for all.
Designed to human scale, the City promotes the aesthetic enhancement
of public spaces. This contributes to the pedestrian experience and the
livability of the City. Transportation gateways provide a sense of entry
to Claremont and reflect the character of our city.
Critical to Claremont’s quality of life is the celebration and active
preservation of our heritage. Claremont, a regional leader in
preservation, is committed to maintaining and enhancing our cultural
and architectural heritage. We protect the character of our residential
neighborhoods and its historic downtown retail core. We value quality
development in the context of the surrounding physical environment,
with architectural and landscape integrity. New development in the
City builds on our history with appropriate and compatible design.
This renews and reinvigorates those areas. This commitment has led
to stable, well- maintained residential neighborhoods, a thriving
commercial Village and other commercial centers, attractive campuses,
outstanding public art, and vibrant retirement communities.
Why We Plan – Scope of this
Element
Claremont residents and visitors to our community drive into
Claremont and immediately experience a place like no other in
Southern California. Making a distinct impression are the tree- lined
streets, the friendly and inviting atmosphere of The Village, the stately
buildings at The Claremont Colleges, the well- maintained residential
neighborhoods that display architectural styles representative of almost
every style of the twentieth century, and our beautiful parks and public
spaces. Claremont feels like a true community, a unique collection of
people and places that has been carefully and purposefully planned.
We note in the Introduction to this General Plan that Claremont did not
happen by accident. The mix of uses, our neighborhoods and business
districts, the relationship of The Claremont Colleges to surrounding
uses, and the overall visual character of our community reflect the
foresight and deliberation of our founders, the principled decision-making
of our leaders, and the intense interest and vigilance that
residents apply to preserve what has been established. As Claremont
continues to mature in its second 100 years, we look to continue our
practice of balancing land uses to meet our housing and economic
L A N D U S E , C O M M U N I T Y C H A R A C T E R , A N D H E R I T A G E
P R E S E R V A T I O N E L E M E N T
P A G E 2 - 3
goals, and ensuring that design and heritage preservation
considerations remain strong influences on our development review
processes. We have always valued high- quality design of public spaces
and all structures in the City, recognizing that good design enhances
properties, and creates places which reflect care and pride. We
recognize our history and the heritage of all Claremont residents by
encouraging preservation of buildings and places evocative of periods,
styles, and important events. This Land Use, Community Design, and
Heritage Preservation Element establishes the policy foundation for
continuing the land use planning and decision- making processes that
have served Claremont well, toward the complementary goals of
maintaining our distinct neighborhoods, business districts, and
institutions, and ensuring that the private and public realms remain
inviting, beautiful, and inspirational.
Foremost, this Element defines Claremont as a city of neighborhoods.
Defining Claremont: Influences that
Continue to Shape Our Community
From the beginning, the people of Claremont have recognized the
importance of citizen participation in land use planning as the best
method for proper place- making. The community has been proactive
in guiding development by periodically coming together and setting
goals that help to define the public realm.
Figure 2- 1
Land Use, Community
Character, and Heritage
Preservation
Structure
In the context of land use, community design,
and historic preservation, neighborhoods are an
integral component of all three.
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 2 - 4
Land Use Influences
Claremont had its beginnings as a railroad town, with land speculation
as the first real “ business”.
In the real estate boom of the 1880s, land developers found a spot
along the Santa Fe railway line with an outstanding view of Mount
Baldy and platted the City of Claremont in 1887. The City’s identity
became that of a college town when a small liberal arts college of the
New England style moved here from Pomona in 1888. With the move
of Pomona College to Claremont, eventually the City became home to
The Claremont Colleges’ seven institutions of higher learning.
The City evolved to become a leader within the citrus industry as well,
and later, as a desired residential community. Much of Claremont’s
urban form reflects the history of the community. Many of the qualities
that define Claremont today were established during Claremont’s early
history, including the layout of residential districts and the walkable,
intimate layout of The Village.
The residents held their first Town Meeting in 1889. This was the
beginning of a participatory planning process that would be repeated
numerous times. One result of that first community meeting was a plan
to plant trees. Today, Claremont’s urban forest has become one of its
defining aesthetic features. Around that same time, Pomona College
was established, beginning a long town- and- gown relationship with The
Claremont Colleges and other institutions.
The influence of the citrus industry set the stage for the City’s
expansion. The citrus industry really began to flourish in the early
1900s. Extensive citrus ranches were established along the San
Gabriel Mountain foothills. Claremont growers established one of the
earliest citrus cooperatives. This cooperative evolved into what is
known today as Sunkist. In its prime, the industry was so successful
that Claremont became home to four citrus packing houses, an ice
house, and a pre- cooling plant along the railroad tracks. Only the
College Heights Lemon packing house remains today.
Claremont has always been an innovator in land use regulation. The
City was incorporated in 1907 and quickly produced the first City Plan
in 1909. In 1925, the City was also one of the first in California to
establish a Planning Commission.
As in many cities, early Claremont property owners placed restrictive
covenants on where non- Caucasians could live in the City. Mexican-
Americans held many jobs in the citrus industry and at The Colleges,
and many of these residents were forced to live in one of two
neighborhoods: the East Barrio ( Arbol Verde) and a small area west of
Indian Hill Boulevard and north of the tracks and the College Heights
packing house.
Citrus Industry
Claremont growers established one of the
earliest citrus cooperatives for marketing and
shipping citrus fruit, a model that led to the
organization of the Sunkist cooperative. At its
height, the industry supported four citrus
packing houses, an ice house, and a precooling
plant along the railroad tracks in Claremont.
- City of Claremont.
L A N D U S E , C O M M U N I T Y C H A R A C T E R , A N D H E R I T A G E
P R E S E R V A T I O N E L E M E N T
P A G E 2 - 5
After World War II, a number of factors helped transform the
community once again. The demand for housing, combined with a
disease that killed off many of the citrus groves and the opening of the
San Bernardino Freeway ( Interstate 10), all contributed to the growth
of the City. In 1944, a Postwar Planning Committee was created. With
easy access to Los Angeles and beyond, Claremont became an ideal
location to raise a family. The citrus groves were developed into
housing tracts.
Growth pressures in 1956 led the City to adopt its first professionally
prepared General Plan, led by renowned city planner Simon Eisner.
The Plan anticipated the completion of the surrounding freeway
network and established four major north- south routes through the
City. The General Plan also contained master plans for land use,
streets, sewers, and parks, and was followed by a new zoning
ordinance.
Reflecting the tremendous growth in the area, a new General Plan was
drafted in 1970 that called for a city of 50,000 residents. Claremont
never grew that large, and growth had slowed by the time the City
updated the General Plan in 1981. The goals of the 1981 Plan included
careful management and maintenance of existing streets, preservation
of the hillsides, and a Historic Preservation Element that established a
demolition delay policy for structures identified as historically
important.
Hillside Influences
Community concern about hillside development began to build in the
1970s as more and more housing tracts were constructed in the
foothills of surrounding communities. In 1975, the Claremont League of
Women Voters conducted a two- year study of the issue, which resulted
in a number of recommendations on how to control development in the
local hillsides.
In response to the public’s concern, the City began the process of
developing new policies governing hillside development. The first step
was adoption of the Natural Environment Element of the City’s
General Plan in 1977, which spelled out the City’s general goals and
policies regarding hillside development. It stated that development in
the hillsides is acceptable, provided it is done with extreme care in a
manner that is compatible with the environment, and keeps the area
relatively safe from hazards such as fire, flood, and erosion. These
policies formed the framework for the later Hillside Ordinance.
The 1981 General Plan also focused on development within the
Claremont hillsides, leading to adoption of a Hillside Ordinance that
successfully balances the community’s hillside/ open space preservation
and housing goals. The innovative ordinance includes a program for
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 2 - 6
the transfer of development credits to balance open space preservation
goals with private property owner economic interests.
Community Character Influences
The focus on community design and historic preservation is especially
important in Claremont. The community has demonstrated a strong
desire to preserve its past while planning for its future.
Claremont is unique among foothill communities with its strong New
England flavor. When Pomona College was being planned, the
decision was made to reflect the founders’ New England heritage. The
result is a community that has a more intimate feel than its neighbors.
The residential character of the community was determined very early
in the City’s history. In 1903, community leaders developed design
standards that required placing buildings back away from the street,
with garages and other accessory buildings at the rear of the property.
These setbacks are a common feature in older residential areas.
By the 1920s, Claremont began a process of upgrading its civic center
and fully integrating The Claremont Colleges into the urban fabric. To
gain additional control over the aesthetic of new development, the City
formed an Architectural Commission in 1965. By 1968, The Village
was beginning to show its age, and The Village Planning Task Force
was created. The Task Force recommended retaining the intimate
character of The Village at a time when urban renewal was the popular
trend. This decision ensured that the pedestrian- scale, walkable central
business district that we enjoy today could remain. This vision for The
Village was reaffirmed in the 1987 Village Design Plan.
To protect the design and aesthetic qualities of all neighborhoods and
business districts, in 1991 the City enacted regulations that required all
new structures to be subject to a design review process.
L A N D U S E , C O M M U N I T Y C H A R A C T E R , A N D H E R I T A G E
P R E S E R V A T I O N E L E M E N T
P A G E 2 - 7
Heritage Preservation Influences
The historic preservation movement in Claremont really began to take
hold in the mid- 1970s. This community- driven initiative has been
instrumental in shaping Claremont’s approach to managing its valuable
cultural resources.
The Historic Claremont Zoning District was established in 1970, and
the Arbol Verde Zoning District was created in 1991. In 1979, Russian
Village was listed in the National Register as a historic neighborhood,
In 1977, a historic resource survey was started with a grant
from the State Office of Historic Preservation. Claremont
Heritage, a non- profit organization, was formed and has
been responsible for continually updating the Register. The
Register is an inventory of local sites of architectural or
historic merit. Since 1981, when the Register was adopted
formally by the City, over 1,000 structures have been listed.
To encourage reinvestment in historic properties that are
threatened by demolition or are surrounded by non- historic
or commercial structures, the City implemented the Mills
Act in 2000.
Land Use Plan
In response to the community’s desire to maintain Claremont’s long-established
land use patterns, further hillside preservation objectives,
and enhance the pedestrian environment, we have developed this Land
Use Plan to guide the development, maintenance, and improvement of
land and properties for the next twenty years. The Land Use Plan,
illustrated in Figure 2- 3 and described below, will allow us to preserve
those qualities that define Claremont.
Density and Intensity
When describing areas of Claremont, we differentiate one area from
another by the principal use, whether it is homes ( residential), shops and
restaurants ( commercial), manufacturing businesses ( business park), a
park, or a school or college. To describe the intensity of use — how much
development exists on a property or could be built ( and presumably,
what the associated activity level is) — land use planners have developed
quantitative measures called density and intensity.
The term density typically applies to residential uses and refers to the
population and development capacity of residential land. Density is
described in terms of dwelling units per acre of land ( du/ ac) and
population per acre of land ( pop/ ac).
Sumner House
The Sumner House is a fine example of one of
Claremont’s Victorian structures that has great
historical significance.
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 2 - 8
For commercial, industrial, and other nonresidential uses, intensity
describes the degree to which a property is or can be developed. The
measure of intensity Claremont has adopted is the floor- area ratio. The
floor- area ratio, or FAR, describes the relationship between the total
square footage of development on a lot and the area of that lot. The
FAR is determined by dividing the gross floor area of all buildings on a
lot by the land area of that lot ( Figure 2- 2).
FAR and factors such as building square footage,
building height, and the percent of lot coverage
are all interrelated. For example, a 20,000 square-foot
building on a 40,000 square- foot lot yields a
FAR of 0.50: 1. This 0.50: 1 FAR can
accommodate a single- story building that covers
half the lot or a two- story building with reduced lot
coverage. Figure 2- 2 illustrates different FAR
calculations.
Land Use Classifications
The Land Use Plan Map ( Figure 2- 3) graphically
represents the planned distribution and intensity
of land use citywide. The colors shown on the
map correspond to land use designations that
describe the types of uses existing and planned in
Claremont. Given the built- out character of the
community, only minor land use changes from
baseline year 2005 conditions will occur over the
long term. Table 2- 2 indicates planned land use
distribution.
Residential Land Use Designations
Four residential land use categories describe the
general character of housing development in
Claremont: Residential 2, Residential 6, Residential 15, and Residential
22. Figure 2- 4 illustrates the various residential densities located in
Claremont.
Residential 2
The Residential 2 category provides for the development of very
low- density, single- family residences within a density range of 0.1 to
2.0 dwelling units per acre. Development is characterized generally
by detached homes on large individual lots, with a custom character
of development.
Figure 2- 2
Floor Area Ratio
"
" " "
" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "
" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "
Cable Airport
Thompson Creek
Live Oak Wash
San
Antonio
Dam
Thompson
Creek
Dam
Upland
Montclair
Pomona
La
Verne
Thompson Creek
Angeles National Forest
Los Angeles County
San Bernardino County
Burbank Canyon
Gail Canyon
Cobal Canyon
Williams Canyon
Chicken Canyon
Metrolink ( San Bernardino Line) Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
San Antonio Creek Channel
Los Angeles Water and Power
High- Tension Powerlines
Bernard
Field Station
Claremont
Golf Course
Rancho Santa Ana
Botanic Garden
College Park
Marshall Canyon
Regional Park
Blaisdell
Preserve
Live Oak
Debris Basin
Lower Live
Oak Canyon
Reserve
Live Oak
Reservoir
Mills Av
Mt Baldy Rd
Mountain Av
Towne Av
Padua Av
Indian Hill Blvd
Harrison Av
Baseline Rd
Sunset Peak Mtwy
Claremont Blvd
Cobal Canyon Mtwy
Sumner Av
Pomello Dr
Scripps Dr
Garey Av
8th St
Grand Av
6th St
Miramar Av
Foothill Blvd
Miller Ranch Rd
Arrow Hwy
10th St
Williams Av
College Av
Gail Mtwy
Via Padova
Harvard Av
Indian Hill Blvd
Butte St
Lynoak Dr
Miller Lateral
Yale Av
Oxford Av
Bonita Av
Radcliffe Dr
1st St
Monte Vista Av
San Jose Av
Bonita Av
Palmer- Evey Mtwy
7th St
Webb Canyon Rd
Hollins Av
12th St
11th St
Tulane Rd
College Wy
Kent Dr
Bonnie Brae Av
9th St
Forbes Av
Vista Dr
Reed Dr
Mills Av
Doane Av
Palmer Canyon Rd
Woodbend Dr
Sycamore Av
Blaisdell Dr
Colby Cir
Glen Wy
Wharton Dr
La Junta Dr
Stephens Pasture Rd
Live Oak Canyon Rd
Charleston Dr
Green St
W Occidental Dr
Brooks Av
Andrew Dr
Olive St
Hood Dr
Northwestern Dr
Oxford Av
Ottawa Dr
Mills Av
Meredith St
Silver Tree Rd
Syracuse Dr
Peninsula Av
Cinderella Dr
Denver Av
Kemper Av
Base Line Rd
Mountain
10th St
Foothill Blvd
Sweetbriar Dr
Mural Dr
Santa Clara Av
Edinboro Av
Cambridge Av
Monticello Rd
Amarillo Dr
Independence Dr
Springfield St
Lamonette St
Elmira Av
Piedmont Av
Oak Ln
Sage St
Lassen Av
Geneva Av
Carleton Av
Colgate Pl
Bowdoin St
Clarion Pl
Longwood Av
Mills Av
Scottsbluff Dr
Andover Dr
Monterey Dr
Rockmont Av
Mountain Av
Sebastapol St
Padua Av
Grand Av
Belmont Abbey Ln
Mt Baldy Rd
Johnson Pasture Mtwy
Burbank Mtwy
Pomello Dr
San Antonio Av
Orange Grove Av
San Bernardino St
Palo Verde St
Moreno St 7th St
Arrow Route
Foothill Blvd
Benson Av Baseline Rd
Arrow Hwy
Monte Vista Av
Central Av
Grinnell Dr
Yuba Ln
Rosemount Av
Mary Pl
Taylor Dr
Butler Ct
Lansbury Av
Idaho Ct
Brigham Young Dr
Miami Ct
Alamosa Dr
Alamosa Dr
Indian Hill
Oak Park Dr
Yale Av
Berkeley Av
Baughman Av
Oxford Av
Danbury Rd
Wells Av
Niagara Av
Hillsdale Dr
Purdue Dr
Delaware Dr
Santa Barbara Dr
Garey Av
Towne Av
Occidental Dr
Tenango Dr
Lamar Dr
Towne Av
Arrow Hwy
Campus Av
Briarcroft Rd
Ridgefield Dr
Cobal Canyon Mtwy
Harvey Mudd College
Claremont
High School
Claremont
School of
Theology
Oak Park
Cemetery
Mountain
View Elementary
El Roble
Middle
School
Webb
Schools
Sumner
Elementary
La Puerta
Sports Park
Cahuilla
Community
Park
Oakmont
Elementary
School
San
Antonio
High
School
Pooch Park
Three Valleys
Water Treatment Plant
Sycamore
Canyon Park
Montclair
Plaza
Wheeler
Park
Vista Del
Valle
Elem.
School
Blaisdell
Park
Pitzer College
Scripps College
Claremont Mc Kenna
College
Pomona
College
Sycamore
Elem.
Memorial
Park
Larkin
Park
Griffith
Park
Alexander
Hughes
Comm Cntr
Condit
Elem.
Lewis
Park
Jaeger
Park
June
Vail Park
Padua
Hills
Theatre
Claremont Hills
Wilderness
Park
Claremont Hills
Wilderness
Park
Claremont Hills
Wilderness
Park
Claremont Hills
Wilderness
Park
Claremont Hills
Wilderness Park
Spillway Elev
PVPA
Spreading Grounds
Chaparral
Elementary
School
Chaparral
Park
El Barrio
Park
Higginbotham
Park
Shelton
Park
Mallows
Park
Rancho
San Jose
Park
Padua Park
Western
Christian
School
Pilgrim Place
Claremont
Manor
Mt.
San
Antonio
Foothill
Country
Day
City Yard
Keck
Graduate
Institute
La Puerta
School Site
( not in use)
Rosa
Torrez Park ! 2
! 5
! 4
! 4 ! 3
! 2
! 1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Kilometers
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
Miles
Land Use Designation Categories
Commercial Recreation
Business Park
Institutional
Commercial Public
Claremont Village
Freeway Commercial
Residential 2
Mixed Use
Wilderness Park
City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
Specific Plan Overlay
Hillside Residential Overlay
Residential 6
Residential 15
Residential 22
Mixture of Commercial and
Business Park
Mixed Use Areas
1 Peppertree Square Mixed Use
2 Transportation Oriented Development
3 Old School House/ Hotel/ Office Mixed Use
4 Foothill Boulevard Corridor Mixed Use
Hillside 5 Base Line Road/ Towne Avenue Mixed Use
Last Updated: February 7, 2007
Office/ Professional
Land Use Plan
Figure 2- 3
C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
Park and Resource
Conservation
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 2 - 10
This page left blank intentionally.
L A N D U S E , C O M M U N I T Y C H A R A C T E R , A N D H E R I T A G E
P R E S E R V A T I O N E L E M E N T
P A G E 2 - 11
Figure 2- 4
Residential Densities in Claremont
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 2 - 12
Non- residential uses permitted or conditionally permitted, as regulated
by the City’s Land Use and Development Code, include parks and
recreation facilities, public and private schools, public safety facilities,
and facilities for religious assembly.
Unit Density: 0.1- 2.0 dwelling units per acre
Typical Population Density: 0- 5 persons per acre
Residential 6
The Residential 6 category provides for the development of
single- family residences within a density range of 2.1 to 6.0
dwelling units per acre. Development is characterized
generally by single- family detached homes on individual lots,
forming a cohesive neighborhood.
Non- residential uses permitted or conditionally permitted, as
regulated by the City’s Land Use and Development Code,
include parks and recreation facilities, public and private
schools, public safety facilities, and facilities for religious
assembly.
Unit Density: 2.1- 6.0 dwelling units per acre
Typical Population Density: 6- 16 persons per acre
Residential 15
The Residential 15 category allows detached and attached units,
townhouses, apartments, and condominiums. Development densities
may range from 6.1 to 15.0 units per acre.
Non- residential uses permitted, as regulated by the City’s Land Use and
Development Code, include parks and recreation facilities, public and
private schools, public safety facilities, and facilities for religious
assembly.
Unit Density: 6.1- 15.0 dwelling units per acre
Typical Population Density: 16- 40 persons per acre
Residential 22
The Residential 22 category accommodates all types of
multi- family housing, and specifically housing
development of a more intensive form, including
apartments, condominiums, and senior housing.
Residential projects may be constructed at a density of
between 15.1 and 22.0 units per acre.
Non- residential uses permitted, as regulated by the
City’s Land Use and Development Codes, include parks
and recreation facilities, public and private schools,
public safety facilities, and facilities for religious
assembly.
L A N D U S E , C O M M U N I T Y C H A R A C T E R , A N D H E R I T A G E
P R E S E R V A T I O N E L E M E N T
P A G E 2 - 13
Unit Density: 15.1- 22.0 dwelling units per acre
Typical Population Density: 40- 59 persons per acre
Commercial Land Use Designations
The Commercial Land Use designations include five categories
representing the spectrum of commercial uses in Claremont:
Commercial, Freeway Commercial, Office/ Professional, Commercial
Recreation, and Claremont Village.
Commercial
The Commercial category provides opportunities for a
broad range of retail, professional office, and service-oriented
businesses, including supermarkets, theaters,
restaurants, and specialty retail stores. Drive- through
businesses are prohibited. The Commercial category
accommodates uses that typically attract vehicular traffic.
This designation applies to properties along Foothill
Boulevard, Indian Hill Boulevard, and the east end of
Base Line Road.
Floor- Area Ratio: 0.20- 0.60 ( FAR)
Freeway Commercial
The Freeway Commercial category applies to properties adjacent to
the 10 Freeway that are highly visible from the freeway and benefit
from this regional exposure. Permitted uses are those oriented toward
the regional market and benefiting from high visibility, including
automobile sales and ancillary uses, supermarkets, hotels, larger
retailers, restaurants, and drive- through restaurants.
Floor- Area Ratio: 0.25- 1.0 ( FAR)
Office/ Professional
The Office/ Professional category allows for single- and multi- tenant
offices, including legal, design, engineering, medical, corporate,
government, and community facilities. Supporting convenience retail
and personal service commercial uses may be permitted to serve the
needs of local residents, employees, and visitors.
Floor- Area Ratio: 0.25- 1.0 ( FAR)
Commercial Recreation
The Commercial Recreation category refers to uses that are
destinations of regional interest to visitors, including large- scale
commercial recreation centers, conference centers, clubhouses and golf
courses, resorts, restaurants, parks, open spaces, and community
facilities.
Floor- Area Ratio: 0.10- 1.0 ( FAR)
C I T Y O F C L A R E M O N T G E N E R A L P L A N
P A G E 2 - 14
The Claremont Village
The Claremont Village category applies to the Claremont Village area,
including the area west of Indian Hill Boulevard. The land use
designation is intended to encourage a complementary mix of small-scale
retail stores, commercial services, restaurants, offices, and civic
uses within a small- town, pedestrian- oriented district. Residential use is
permitted where consistent in character with
the commercial uses. Retail and service
commercial shall remain the predominant
uses. Pedestrian connections to The
Claremont Colleges, Claremont Transit
Center, and adjacent residential
neighborhoods are essential.
Floor Area Ratio: 0.3- 2.0 ( FAR)
Maximum Residential Density: 22.0 dwelling
units per acre
Projected Maximum Population Density: 59
persons per acre
Mixed- Use Land Use Designations
The Mixed- Use designation applies to five distinct sites, each with
individual development objectives and standards: Indian Hill/ Arrow
Highway, College Avenue/ South Village, Indian Hill/ Foothill, West
Foothill Boulevard, and Base Line Road Corridor. This designation
allows for a mix of residential and compatible office and retail/ service
uses integrated as a cohesive development, or such uses developed
side- by- side in a manner that encourages interaction between uses.
Density and intensity vary by area.
Indian Hill/ Arrow Highway Mixed- Use
The Indian Hill/ Arrow Highway Mixed- Use area allows vertically or
horizontally mixed commercial, office, and residential uses, with an
emphasis on retail uses along the ground floor, Indian Hill Boulevard
and Arrow Highway frontages, and residential/ offices on the upper
floors. Residential uses adjacent to the adjoining single- family
neighborhood are encouraged and need not include commercial retail
uses. Pedestrian connections among the uses, and as appropriate to
surrounding neighborhoods, should be provided.
Maximum Floor- Area Ratio: 1.3 ( FAR)
Maximum Residential Density: 22.0 dwelling units per acre
Projected Population Density: 59 persons per acre
L A N D U S E , C O M M U N I T Y C H A R A C T E R , A N D H E R I T A G E
P R E S E R V A T I O N E L E M E N T
P A G E 2 - 15
College Avenue/ South Village Transit- Oriented Mixed- Use
This area includes two sites: one located south of the Claremont
Transit Center and The Village, and the other located east of the
Claremont Transit Center and south of The Claremont Colleges. The
mixed- use area provides for a mix of uses and higher- density residential
development. Uses may be vertically or horizontally integrated, with an
emphasis on residential and limited office/ commercial along College
Avenue and First Street and other ground floors. Development on
individual lots need not include both commercial and residential but is
encouraged. Pedestrian connections to the Claremont Transit Center,
The Claremont Colleges, The Village, and surrounding neighborhoods
are important.
Maximum Floor Area Ratio: 1.5 ( FAR)
Maximum Unit Density: 22.0 dwelling units per acre
Projected Population Density: 59 persons per acre
Indian Hill/ Foothill Mixed- Use
In this area uses ma