CITY OF
ANDERSON
CITY OF ANDERSON
GENERAL PLAN
MAY 1, 2007
City of Anderson
1887 Howard Street
Anderson, CA 96007
530- 378- 6636 City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
6/ 26/ 2007
Summary of Anderson General Plan 2007
The City of Anderson General Plan 2007 is a Plan for the City and for the adjacent Planning Area. The Plan will allow needed growth while protecting the “ small town” characteristics of Anderson. The Plan emphasizes planning for the health and safety of all residents— now and in the future. Extending the various general plan diagrams to cover the entire planning area is a new feature of the General Plan.
The Land Use Element includes new land use designations such as “ Rural Holding”, “ Low- Density Residential Hillside”, “ Mixed Use”, and “ Special Planning Area” to accommodate various types of development and to protect resource areas. The “ Rural Holding” designation will protect agricultural uses on larger parcels. The “ Low- Density Residential Hillside” designation will limit development in hilly areas. The “ Mixed Use” designation will allow a combination of residential, commercial and office uses in a compact area. The “ Special Planning Area” designation will be developed with a unique Planned Development Zoning Ordinance especially suited to the area with this designation. Extending the land use designations to the Planning Area will allow the pre- zoning necessary for annexation.
The Circulation Element emphasizes the creation of a multi- modal transportation system to benefit healthy lifestyles and connectivity at all levels. This Element classifies existing roadways and shows where new arterial and collector roads may be built. The Element b
also allows the creation of various special roadway standards to facilitate environmental protection in new developments. Pedestrian and bicycle traffic are promoted and protected by policies in the Circulation Element.
The Open Space and Conservation Element highlights the many resources Anderson has and the best ways to protect and enjoy them. Biological, open space, scenic, and agricultural resources are all important to Anderson residents. The conservation of various types of habitat and open space are emphasized along with the need to maintain these areas and to make them accessible to the general public for education, appreciation and enjoyment.
The Health and Safety Element provides guidance on public health issues and safety in all areas. The importance of developing a community that will foster healthy lifestyles is emphasized. These policies are coordinated with policies in the Land Use, Circulation and Recreation elements. The Noise Element shows the noise corridors and standards for development to minimize impacts from noise.
The Recreation Element expands the framework for increasing recreation facilities and opportunities in Anderson. A diversity of park types is encouraged including small privately- maintained parks, trails and neighborhood parks. Recreation is important to all ages and groups within the City. The previously adopted Housing Element and Air Quality Element will remain part of the General Plan. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
6/ 26/ 2007 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.1 General Plan Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 General Plan Format and Consistency. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1- 2
1.3 City of Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2- 3
1.4 Environmental Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.5 Subsequent Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4- 5
1.6 General Plan Goals and Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.6.1 Definitions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5- 6
1.6.2 City of Anderson Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6- 7
1.6.3 City of Anderson Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8- 9
1.7 Intergovernmental Coordination and Cooperation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9- 10
2. LAND USE ELEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1 Land Use Element Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11- 12
2.2 Future Development within the Present City Limits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12- 13
2.3 City Expansion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13- 14
2.4 Land Use Designations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14- 15
2.4.1 Rural Holding ( Agriculture) Land Use Designation ( RH) . . . . . . . . .. 16
2.4.2 Rural Estate ( Limited Agriculture) Land Use Designation ( RE) . . . 16- 17
2.4.3 Low Density Residential- Hill Side Land Use Designation ( LDR- HS). 17
2.4.4 Low Density Residential Land Use Designation ( LDR) . . . . . . 18
2.4.5 Medium Density Residential Land Use Designation ( MDR) . . . . . .18- 19
2.4.6 High Density Residential Land Use Designation ( HDR) . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.4.7 Special Planning Area Land Use Designation ( SPA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19 City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
6/ 26/ 2007 ii
2.4.8 Mixed Use Land Use Designation ( MU) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
2.4.9 Commercial Land Use Designation ( C) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.4.10 Industrial ( Manufacturing) Land Use Designation ( I) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
2.4.11 Public and Semi- Public Land and Open Space Land Use
Designation ( SPS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
2.5 Land Use Element Objectives, Policies and Implementation Programs . . . . . . 21
2.5.1 General Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
A. Land Use Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21- 22
B. General Land Use Policies ( GP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22- 23
C. General Land Use Implementation Programs ( GI) . . . . . . .23- 24
2.5.2 Residential Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25
A. Residential Land Use Policies ( RP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25- 26
B. Residential Land Use Implementation Program ( RI) . . . . . .26- 27
C. Typical Residential Density Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
2.5.3 Mixed- Use Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
A. Mixed- Use Land Use Policies ( MUP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
B. Mixed- Use Land Use Implementation Measures ( MUI) . . . . . 29
2.5.4 Commercial Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
A. Commercial Land Use Policies ( CP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29- 31
B. Commercial Land Use Implementation Program ( CI) . . . . . . . 31
2.5.5 Industrial Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
A. Industrial Land Use Policies ( IP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31- 32
B. Industrial Land Use Implementation Program ( II) . . . . . . . . . . . 32
2.5.6 Open Space Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
A. Open Space Land Use Policies ( OP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32- 33 City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
6/ 26/ 2007 iii
B. Open Space Land Use Implementation Program ( OI) . . . . . 33- 34
2.6 Land Use Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
2.6.1 Land Use Diagram for City of Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
2.6.2 Designation of Old Town Core. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
2.7 Land Use Designation Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38- 40
3. CIRCULATION ELEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1 Circulation Element Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
3.2 Transportation in Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41- 43
3.3 Street Classifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
3.3.1 Freeway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
3.3.2 Expressway. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
3.3.3 Arterial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
3.3.4 Collector. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
3.3.5 Local Street. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44- 45
3.3.6 Truck Routes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
3.4 Objectives, Policies and Implementation Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
3.4.1 Streets and Roadways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
A. Streets and Roadways Policies ( SP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48- 50
B. Streets and Roadways Implementation Programs ( SI) . . . . .51- 53
3.4.2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
A. Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation Policies ( BP) . . . . . . . . .53- 54
B. Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation Implementation
Programs ( BI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54- 55
3.4.3 Parking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
A. Parking Policies ( PP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
6/ 26/ 2007 iv
B. Parking Implementation Measures ( PI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
3.4.4 Public Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
A. Public Transportation Policies ( TP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
B. Public Transportation Implementation Programs ( TI) . . . . 57- 58
3.4.5 Railroad Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
A. Railroad Policy ( RRP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
B. Railroad Implementation Program ( RRI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
3.4.6 Utilities— Gas Lines, Power Lines, Fiber Optic Cable . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
A. Utility Policy ( UP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
B. Utility Implementation ( UI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
3.5 Circulation Plan Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
3.5.1 Circulation Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
3.5.2 Truck Routes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
3.5.3 Bicycle Routes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
3.6 Right- of- Way Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
4. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.1 Open Space and Conservation Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65- 67
4.2 Environmental Protection and Enhancement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
4.3 Objectives, Policies and Implementation Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
4.3.1 Biological Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68- 71
A. Biological Resources Conservation Policies ( BRP) . . . . . . 71- 72
B. Biological Resource Conservation Implementation ( BRI) . 72- 73
4.3.2 Open Space Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
A. Open Space Resources Policies ( OSP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74- 75
B. Open Space Resources Implementation and Action Plan ( OSI) 75 City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
6/ 26/ 2007 v
4.3.3 Scenic Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
A. Scenic Resources Policies ( SRP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
B. Scenic Resources Implementation Measures ( SRI) . . . . . . . . . . 76
4.3.4 Agricultural Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
A. Agricultural Resource Policies ( AP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77- 78
B. Agricultural Resource Implementation ( AI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
4.3.5 Cultural Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
A. Cultural Resources Policy ( CRP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
B. Cultural Resources Implementation ( CRI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80- 81
4.3.6 Historic Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .82- 84
A. Historic Resources Policies ( HP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
B. Historic Resources Implementation Programs ( HI) . . . . . . . . . 86
4.3.7 Energy Conservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
A. Energy Conservation Policy ( ECP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87- 88
B. Energy Conservation Implementation Program ( ECI) . . . . . . . . 88
4.3.8 Air Quality Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
A. Air Quality Policies ( AQP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
B. Air Quality Implementation ( AQI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89- 90
4.4 Creeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
5. HEALTH AND SAFETY ELEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1 Health and Safety Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .92- 93
5.2 Objectives, Policies, and Implementation Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
5.2.1 Public Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .93- 95
A. Public Health Policies ( PHP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
B. Public Health Implementation Program ( PHI) . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
6/ 26/ 2007 vi
5.2.2 Public Safety and Police Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97- 98
A. Public Safety and Police Protection Policies ( PPP) . . . . . . . . . .98
B. Public Safety and Police Protection Implementation ( PPI) . . . . 99
5.2.3 Fire Protection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
A. Fire Protection Policies ( FP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 100- 101
B. Fire Protection Implementation ( FI) . . . . . . . . . . . . 101- 102
5.2.4 Geology and Seismic Hazards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103- 104
A. Seismic Safety Policies ( SSP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
B. Seismic Safety Implementation ( SSI) . . . . . . . . . . 104- 105
5.2.5 Flood Hazards and Drainage System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
A. Flood Hazard and Drainage System Policies ( FHP) . 106- 107
B. Flood Hazard Implementation ( FHI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
5.2.6 Airport- Related Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
A. Airport Hazard Policy ( AHP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
B. Airport Hazard Implementation ( AHI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
5.2.7 Hazardous Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
A. Hazardous Materials Policies ( HMP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
B. Hazardous Materials Implementation Program ( HMI) . . . . .109
5.2.8 Public Protection and Emergency Planning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
A. Emergency Planning Policy ( EP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .110- 111
B. Emergency Planning Implementation ( EI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .112
5.2.9 Water System and Water Supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
A. Water System Policies ( WSP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
B. Water System Implementation ( WSI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113- 114
5.2.10 Wastewater Collection and Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .114 City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
6/ 26/ 2007 vii
A. Waste Water Collection and Treatment Policies ( WWP) . . . .114
B. Waste Water Collection and Treatment
Implementation ( WWI) 114
5.3 Hazard Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .115- 116
6. NOISE ELEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1 Noise Element Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .117- 118
6.2 Noise Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
6.2.1 Roadway Noise. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
6.2.2 Railroads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
6.2.3 Fixed Noise Sources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .119- 120
6.2.4 Nuisance Noise. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
6.2.5 Community Noise Survey. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .121
6.3 Objectives, Policies, and Implementation Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
A. Noise Policies ( NP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
B. Noise Mitigation Implementation ( NI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .122- 123
6.4 Noise Contour Maps and Tables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124- 125
7. RECREATION ELEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.1 Recreation Element Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
7.1.1 City of Anderson Parks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .129- 131
7.1.2 Park Classification and Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
A. Community Parks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
B. Neighborhood Parks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
C. Regional Parks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
D. Specialized Areas and Special Purpose Parks . . . . . . . . . . . . .132 City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
6/ 26/ 2007 viii
7.2 Recreation Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.2.1 Park and Recreation Organization and Administration . . . . . . . . . . .133
7.2.2 Expanding Scope of the Park and Recreation Function . . . . . . . . 133
7.2.3 Inter- agency Coordination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .133- 134
7.2.4 Additional Park Needs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .134
7.3 Recreation Trails Network. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.3.1 Recreation Trails Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
7.3.2 Recreation Trails Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136- 137
7.4 Recreation Goals, Objectives, Policies and Implementation Programs . . .
7.4.1 Recreation Policies ( RPP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138- 140
7.4.2 Recreation Implementation Actions and Strategies ( RPI) . . . . . . 141- 142
7.5 Recreation Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCES ……………………………………………………. 144- 145
LIST OF GENERAL PLAN CODES…………………………………………………… 146- 147
GENERAL PLAN ABBREVIATIONS……………………………………………………… 148
GENERAL PLAN DEFINITIONS……………………………………………………… 149- 165 APPENDIX A NOISE CONTOUR MAPS. 166- 174
HOUSING ELEMENT
AIR QUALITY ELEMENT
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Introduction
6/ 26/ 2007 1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 General Plan Requirements
California State Law ( Government Code Section 65300) requires the City of Anderson to adopt a general plan “ for the physical development of the city, and any land outside its boundaries which . . . bears relation to its planning.” The general plan serves as a “ constitution” for development, the foundation upon which all land use decisions are to be based. It expresses community development goals and embodies public policy relative to the distribution of future land use, both public and private. In summary, it is a statement of the City’s vision of its physical growth over the next 20 years to the year 2027.
1.2 General Plan Format and Consistency
State Law is specific on the topics that must be addressed within the General Plan. The chapters, or Elements, of the Plan must address various State- mandated topics, but the organization of the Elements is at the discretion of each jurisdiction. Additionally, the State recognizes that each jurisdiction may face unique issues and authorizes the adoption of optional Elements that address issues of local concern.
The General Plan must fully integrate its separate parts and relate them to each other without conflict. Internal consistency applies as much to figures and tables as to the General Plan text. It also applies to the data, analysis, and policies. All adopted portions of the General Plan, whether required by State Law or not, have equal legal weight. No Element may supersede another. Where policies or implementation measures in one element relate to other elements in the General Plan they will be noted in parentheses at the end of the statement. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Introduction
6/ 26/ 2007 2
The 2007 Anderson General Plan addresses the State- mandated requirements through the following Elements:
1. Land Use Element
2. Circulation Element
3. Open Space and Conservation Element
4. Health and Safety Element
5. Noise Element
6. Recreation Element ( optional element)
7. Housing Element ( adopted 2003)
8. Air Quality Element ( optional element, adopted 1998)
The organization of material within each general plan element is at the discretion of the local jurisdiction. Each element of this General Plan has been organized as follows:
a) a brief Introduction that describes the element’s content and mandatory components; and
b) a Goals, Policies Objectives and Programs section that establishes the policies and regulations that will govern land uses and activities within the City.
This Plan is intended to be concise and easily understood.
1.3 City of Anderson
Anderson is located in south Shasta County along the Sacramento River. It is characterized by the River Valley landscape that rises in the west into rolling foothills. The land is former agricultural City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Introduction
6/ 26/ 2007 3
land that has been changed to residential, commercial and industrial uses since the coming of the railroad in 1872.
The area is sprinkled with large oak trees, including Valley Oaks, Blue Oaks, and Live Oaks. The Sacramento River, Anderson Creek, other streams and man- made canals and waterways traverse the area. These waterways have created delightful riparian corridors that support a wide variety of plants and animal communities.
The gently sloping land transitions from the Sacramento River on the north and east to hillside slopes to the south and west. The gentle slopes allow residents of the community to enjoy the sweeping vistas of Mt. Shasta, the northern Sierra Nevada Mountains, Mt. Lassen and the southern Cascade Range.
Quality of life factors have been given consideration along with quantitative measures of success and progress. Through the General Plan process, the City has identified priorities and planned strategies based upon quality of life factors.
Anderson residents value the City’s “ small town” characteristics, which are not indicative of size but, instead, represent a sense of community. Anderson’s friendliness and community consciousness stand in sharp contrast to the perceived alienation often associated with impersonal large cities and modern suburbs. Closely associated with “ small town” character is convenience ( nothing is far from anything else) and proximity to open space.
The 2007 Anderson General Plan strives to maintain Anderson’s “ small town” character and sense of community in a number of ways, including an emphasis on infill development, neighborhood integrity, community design and creation of community and neighborhood gathering places. Promotion of Mixed Use Development for the Old Town Core is a key element of this Plan. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Introduction
6/ 26/ 2007 4
The City works together with other public agencies to provide the community with a safe environment, affordable housing, quality education and ever increasing opportunities for business and industry. The community offers a variety of recreational, cultural, multicultural and educational opportunities for preschoolers to seniors, with excellent schools, a Teen Center, the Frontier Senior Center, Library, and concert stage in beautiful Anderson River Park. Anderson is also the home of the Shasta District Fair.
1.4 Environmental Review
Adoption of a General Plan is considered a “ project” under the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA). As such, the potential impacts of adoption of the General Plan must be identified and analyzed. For the Anderson 2007 General Plan, an Environmental Impact Report ( EIR) will be prepared.
It has been the City’s intention to create a self- mitigating Plan. This strategy required the City to consider potential impacts and incorporate policies, objectives and programs within the General Plan that would reduce potential adverse environmental impacts to a level of “ less than significant”. It is also recognized that future development projects will be subject to project- specific and site- specific review pursuant to CEQA.
1.5 Subsequent Actions
While adoption of the General Plan represents a major milestone for the City of Anderson, additional concurrent and future planning efforts will be required. The City is engaged in numerous planning efforts that are anticipated for adoption following the General Plan. Additionally, the City shall amend the Zoning Map to achieve consistency with this General Plan.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Introduction
6/ 26/ 2007 5
The General Plan anticipates the development of a large planned community governed by a Specific Plan. The Vineyards at Anderson project will consist of housing that would approximately double the population of Anderson and provide housing options and open space amenities not currently available in the community. This project will focus on a mixed- use Village Center and include parks and open space, commercial uses and the necessary public services and infrastructure.
1.6 General Plan Goals and Objectives
1.6.1 Definitions
The general plan defines key terms that are used repeatedly throughout the text. The following terms are defined as used within the context of a general plan:
Goal: A goal is a broad, generalized expression of commonly held community values. Since a goal is broadly stated, disagreement regarding a goal tends to be uncommon.
Objectives: Objectives are similar to goals and frequently the two terms are used interchangeably. As used in the general plan, however, an objective is a more narrowly drawn expression of community intent. One goal may imply two or more objectives, each responsive to a particular aspect of a more broadly stated goal.
Policy: A policy is a precise statement of public regulatory powers and fiscal resources that will be exercised and allocated to achieve a specific objective. Policies may be expressed in text, maps, diagrams, or some combination thereof. Since policies are tangible, they can be quantitatively measured. It is important to note that some policies are more specific than others.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Introduction
6/ 26/ 2007 6
The policies contained in the general plan are expressed in terms of “ shall” or “ should”. There is an important distinction between these two terms. As used in the general plan, “ shall” indicates an unequivocal commitment, while “ should” indicates a guide toward accomplishing a long- range goal.
Implementation: The final link in the hierarchy running from an objective to its physical realization is provided by implementation. Although implementation is commonly spoken of in terms of programs implying a long- term effort, it may have a much shorter duration and simply be referred to as a measure. In any event, implementation programs and measures are concerned with the specific actions necessary for accomplishment.
1.6.2 City of Anderson Goals
The 2007 General Plan is Anderson’s second General Plan in its 50- year history. The various elements that make up the current General Plan were prepared between 1968 and 1986. The
elements were consolidated into a comprehensive document in 1986. The goals and priorities established then are still important today. Goals may be followed by a reference to a specific element of the General Plan to show consistency between the various elements and other parts of the Plan.
The following are the general goals ( GG) for the 2007- 2027 General Plan:
GG- 1. Enhance the physical, social, economic and environmental stability of the City of Anderson by maintaining orderly growth and physical development while ensuring the continuity of the City’s “ small town” atmosphere. ( Housing Element)
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Introduction
6/ 26/ 2007 7
GG- 2. Enhance the City’s natural resources by managing their use, protection, and maintenance consistent with community goals. ( Open Space and Conservation Element)
GG- 3. Provide a safe and healthy living environment for all Anderson residents by constructing and maintaining high quality municipal facilities and recreation programs. ( Health and Safety Element) ( Recreation Element)
GG- 4. Improve circulation patterns within the City to ensure a safe and efficient circulation system that provides a variety of options; including walking, bicycles, public transit, rail, as well as, the automobile. ( Circulation Element)( Air Quality Element)
GG- 5. Protect and improve the Old Town Core to encourage improvement of the City’s historic structures and enhance the Old Town Core commercial base.
GG- 6. Diversify the economy to provide a variety of job opportunities. ( Housing Element)
GG- 7 Locate industry to avoid undue traffic impacts. ( Circulation Element)
GG- 8. Preserve and enhance the quality of life by providing a variety of living environments and accommodating growth. ( Housing Element)
GG- 9. Geographic distribution and the timing of growth shall be directly related to the provision and/ or improvement of public facilities, services and utilities.
GG- 10. Recognition that the general plan is a decision- making tool which will be reviewed and revised periodically.
GG- 11. Apply an inter- jurisdictional approach to planning issues.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Introduction
6/ 26/ 2007 8
1.6.3 City of Anderson Objectives
1. Land Use: To maintain the orderly growth and stable physical development of the City of Anderson while enhancing the physical, social, economic and environmental characteristics of the community; and ensure the continuance of the City’s “ small town” atmosphere.
2. Circulation: To maximize the development of a multimodal circulation system that will be both safe and efficient.
3. Conservation: To ensure the planned management of the community’s natural resources consistent with community goals and prevention of their misuse.
4. Open Space: To establish open space areas for the following:
a) the preservation of natural resources,
b) the managed production of resources,
c) outdoor recreation, public health and safety,
d) mitigation areas,
e) wetland banking, and
f) to ensure the preservation and maintenance of these spaces consistent with community need.
5. Health and Safety: To provide all City residents with public services for a safe and healthy community.
6. Noise: To mitigate noise, maintaining a livable environment in the City of Anderson.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Introduction
6/ 26/ 2007 9
7. Housing: To ensure that the City of Anderson offers the opportunity for adequate and safe housing in a suitable environment for all economic groups. This consists of the conservation and rehabilitation of existing and older neighborhoods as well as planning of new and innovative residential developments. ( Housing Element)
1.7 Intergovernmental Coordination and Cooperation
Coordination with Shasta County will increase as implementation of specific recommendations and concepts start to take shape. Likewise, the City of Anderson must coordinate with the City of Redding, Anderson- Cottonwood Irrigation District, Anderson Fire Protection District, Cottonwood Fire Protection District, school districts, air and water quality regional agencies, Caltrans and other public service providers and enforcement agencies.
Coordination with the Shasta Local Agency Formation Commission ( Shasta LAFCO) will be especially important to process annexations to the City. Anderson will continue to participate in the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area, the SHASTEC Redevelopment Project Area ( Riverside
Avenue and North Street area) and the Enterprise Zone. A new Enterprise Zone application was submitted in August 2006 for the Shasta Metro Enterprise Zone including Shasta County, City of Shasta Lake, City of Redding, and City of Anderson.
The SHASTEC Redevelopment Plan was amended in 2006 to include an additional 870 acres. A 678- acre portion of this area is the chosen location for the development of a medium- to large- parcel business park, to be known as the Stillwater Business Park. The 2006 Amendment also includes construction of the “ backbone” infrastructure necessary for the development of the
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Introduction
6/ 26/ 2007 10
Stillwater Business Park, environmental mitigation, and the improvement of primary access routes to the Business Park.
The City will also work closely with the Anderson Redevelopment Agency to improve the business facades in the Old Town Core. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 11
2. LAND USE ELEMENT
2.1 Land Use Element Introduction
California Government Code Section 65302( a) requires that a land use element be included in a General Plan and more specifically mandates that the element address the following:
“... the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of the land for housing, business, industry, open space, including agriculture, natural resources, recreation, and enjoyment of scenic beauty, education, public building and grounds, solid and liquid waste disposal facilities and other categories of public and private uses of land. The land use element shall include a statement of the standards of population density and building intensity recommended for the various districts and other territory covered by the plan...”
The Land Use Element describes the pattern of land development within the City of Anderson and the proposed expansion area and provides direction for the future development envisioned for the City. Also included in this Element are descriptions of geographic areas that are anticipated to be developed over the term of this General Plan and Goals and Policies to guide the City’s decision makers in their review of development proposals. This Element also defines land use categories and provides supporting detail for the uses depicted upon the Anderson General Plan Land Use Diagram.
The Land Use Element is viewed as the core of the General Plan and is frequently the most referenced element. The General Plan Land Use Diagram designates land uses for all lands within the City and visually depicts the community’s intended physical form and areas for growth.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 12
The Land Use Diagram is supported by text in this Element that describes bu
ilding intensity, population density and expectations of the citizens of Anderson. The framework of Goals and Policies will guide the City’s decision- making throughout the term of the General Plan.
2.2 Future Development within the Present City Limits
The population of Anderson and its Planning Area ( estimated at 12,000), is projected to grow to 19,575 by the year 2025. There are 3,372 households out of which 39.3% have children under the age of 18 living with them, 42.6% are married couples living together, 20.2% have a female householder with no husband present, and 31.2% are non- families. Households made up of individuals are 26.5% of all households and 12.0% of all households have someone living alone who is 65 years of age or older. The average household size is 2.64 and the average family size is 3.14.
Infill development on undeveloped land within Anderson is an important facet of the 2007 General Plan. Infill and a compact development pattern will facilitate efficient use of land with a minimum of public service extensions. About one- quarter of the City remains undeveloped. Some of this land is constrained by natural features so that development may be limited without innovative building, lot, and street designs and planning techniques.
The Old Town Core recognizes the 1892 town site as the area bounded by North Street from Interstate- 5 to State Highway 273, north along State Highway 273 to Briggs Street, west along Briggs Street and First Street to the ACID Canal, South along the ACID Canal to South Street and east along South Street to Emily Street, South along Emily Street to Anderson Creek, along the Creek to a line extending from Balls Ferry Road, to Balls Ferry Road and along Balls Ferry Road to Interstate- 5. The Mixed Use area within the Old Town Core will be bounded by Ventura, North, Douglas and South/ Balls Ferry Streets.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 13
The vision for the Old Town Core includes using the Mixed Use Land Use Designation, the preservation of the historical area with smaller lots and homes and the addition of compatible commercial and professional businesses.
Areas designated for residential uses within the current City Limits will accommodate the short- term housing needs as outlined in the Housing Element. Long- term housing needs will depend on annexation of additional land. Depending on market factors, infill may be able to accommodate non- residential development. The City will meet the total commercial and industrial land demand through the annexation of additional lands.
Although the basic development patterns within the City Limits are already established, much can and should be done over the 20- year life of the 2007 General Plan. Many outstanding, though subtle, land use concepts can enhance the City incrementally. The Old Town Core will in- fill and build “ up rather than out” and will develop for Mixed Use.
Renovation of individual homes and conservation of neighborhoods must keep up with further aging of an older housing stock. Existing commercial areas must renovate and intensify. Housing code enforcement and effective use of re- development programs are essential “ implementers” of the 2007 General Plan.
2.3 City Expansion
Since its early days as an unincorporated settlement growing around a railroad station, Anderson has often expanded its boundaries to embrace and facilitate new development. From an original 12 square block Town site in 1872; Anderson has grown to its current, irregularly shaped, 6.7 square miles.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 14
The Sphere of Influence comprises about 12.9 square miles, nearly twice the current area of the Incorporated City. A substantial portion of the region’s commercial and industrial development is presently outside of the City but within the unincorporated Planning Area. The City proposes to add
2,000 acres southwest of the City to the Sphere of Influence which may then be annexed to the City. This area is proposed to be a special planning area which will develop according to an approved Specific Plan.
Areas to the northwest of the City will also be added to the Sphere of Influence and annexed for special uses, especially water storage, to serve future needs. The Rural Holding ( RH) Land Use Designation will be used for this area. Commercial development along State Highway 273 and the Verde Vale and Spring Gulch may eventually be annexed to the City.
One of the central themes of the Shasta County General Plan is to direct urban growth into community regions that can effectively and economically provide urban types of services. Anderson supports a centralized growth concept. The City is the logical service provider of the urban services required by future development within the Region.
Urban densities require urban services, and Anderson requires annexation prior to service extension. The 2007 General Plan provides direction for future annexation without dictating a rigid schedule for annexation.
2.4 Land Use Designations
The Land Use Element describes various land use designations for the land uses throughout the City of Anderson with consideration for the comments from the residents of Anderson. These Land Use Designations have been designed to maintain Anderson’s small- town characteristics as the community evolves.
By defining residential, commercial and industrial uses, along with the public and open- space lands, this Element of the General Plan provides clear direction for the various types of development that City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 15
will occur in Anderson. The Land Use Diagram guides future development in Anderson in conjunction with plan goals and policies. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 16
2.4.1 Rural Holding ( Agriculture) Land Use Designation ( RH)
The Rural Holding Land Use Designation will allow various agricultural uses and a residential density of one dwelling unit per five acres. Based on an average of 2.64 persons per unit this would allow a maximum population density of 0.5 people per acre. This land use designation will be used for lands outside the present City Limits which may be annexed in the future.
Agriculture will be a part of the City and of the surrounding area for the foreseeable future. The Rural Holding Land Use Designation will be compatible with various agricultural uses such as crop cultivation and grazing. This designation will be compatible with the County land use designation for these areas.
Appropriate zoning would be “ AG, Agriculture”.
2.4.2 Rural Estate ( Limited Agriculture)
Land Use Designation ( RE)
The Rural Estate ( Agricultural) Land Use Designation allows various types of “ Rural Estate” type of development including densities of two dwelling units per acre, one dwelling unit per acre, or one dwelling unit per two acres. The minimum net parcel size area is one half acre. In the Special Emphasis area, a Planned Development Zoning Designation, the minimum net parcel size area is 12,300 square feet maintaining the maximum density of two dwelling units per acre.. Based on an average of 2.64 persons per unit, this would allow a maximum population density of 6 people per acre.
The intent of the Rural Estate Designation is to preserve the rural nature of those areas which have historically developed with large lots and agricultural uses and to provide for large estate type development in less accessible or predominantly agricultural areas. Lots in this designation may be developed with individual water supplies and on- site sewage disposal if the requirements of the City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 17
Shasta County Environmental Health Department are met. ( This usually requires two acres or more.)
The Rural Estate ( Agricultural) Land Use Designation will promote such desired characteristics as open space, less traffic and a quiet setting. This designation also provides a medium to higher market range property where the lower density can contribute to good development and provide for a broadened housing choice in the community. The use of these sites for high- value agricultural crops such as herbs, fruits, nuts, vegetables, wine grapes and a limited number of farm animals ( appropriately located on larger parcels) is encouraged as is the processing and sale of products grown on the property.
This category will not be considered as a transitional land use once sites are developed to the maximum density allowed but may buffer other rural areas from more dense urban development. Future conversion to higher residential densities will; therefore, be discouraged if land is in the minimum parcel sizes allowed.
The zoning districts appropriate for this category are “ R- E, Rural Estate”, “ R- E- 2 ( 1/ 2 acre minimum) Rural Estate”, and “ PD, Planned Development”.
2.4.3 Low Density Residential- Hill Side Land Use Designation ( LDR- HS)
The Low Density Residential- Hill Side Land Use Designation will allow limited residential development on hills depending on the land formation. The degree of slope may have an effect on density. Generally, the greater the slope, the lower the density will be in units per acre.
The appropriate zoning will be “ R- 1- HS, Low Density Residential with Hill Side Combining District”.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 18
2.4.4 Low Density Residential Land Use Designation ( LDR)
The Low Density Residential Land Use Designation will allow up to 6 residential units per gross acre. Based on an average of 2.64 persons per unit this would allow a maximum population density of 16 people per acre. This category allocates lands for detached single family housing. Any density up to the maximum may be permitted as long as environmental constraints are respected and urban services can be reasonably provided. Second dwelling units will be allowed in accordance with the State Law.
The zoning districts consistent with this designation are “ R- 1, Single Family Residential” or “ PD, Planned Development” of the proper density. Some areas of the City may be appropriate for large- lot development.
2.4.5 Medium Density Residential Land Use Designation ( MDR)
The Medium Density Residential Land Use Designation allows from 10 to 20 dwelling units per gross acre. Based on an average of 2.64 persons per unit this would allow a maximum population density of 53 people per acre. The housing types planned for this density are duplexes, triplexes, four- plexes, townhouses and similar multiple- unit residential development. Apartment, condominium or cooperative units with Planned Development Zoning are permitted within this density category.
Urban services required for this increased density make location more selective than for lower density. Concerns regarding access, proximity to commercial services, impacts from adjoining uses and meeting housing needs should be addressed when applying this density to the plan. Mobilehome parks would be placed in this category. This designation may be used for small areas to promote integration of a variety of housing types.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 19
The zoning districts which implement this density are “ R- 2, Medium- Density Residential” or “ PD, Planned Development” of a density up to 20 dwelling units per acre.
2.4.6 High Density Residential Land Use Designation ( HDR)
The High Density Residential Land Use Designation allows from 20 to 40 dwelling units per gross acre. Based on an average of 2.64 persons per unit this would allow a maximum population density of 107 people per acre. Areas receiving this designation are planned for the greatest density of residential development in the City. The types of units intended for this category are apartments, townhouses or other multiple- unit structures. The use of the buildings and land shall be primarily residential with accessory uses permitted, such as recreational facilities. Flexibility and innovation and Mixed Use should be encouraged for projects of this type.
The zoning district used to implement this category is “ R- 3, Multiple- Family Residential” or other zoning districts and the Planned Development Combining District.
2.4.7 Special Planning Area Land Use Designation ( SPA)
The Special Planning Area Land Use Designation is used for areas in the City which are relatively undeveloped but planned for a combination of uses. These areas have few existing public services and most parcels are fairly large. The placement and timing of services requires the coordination provided by a Specific Plan as described in Government Code Section 65450. Zoning would be a “ PD, Planned Development District”. The Specific Plans adopted will govern the development as allowed by California Government Code Sections 65450 to 65457. A Specific Plan is a tool for implementing the General Plan but it is not part of the General Plan. The Specific Plan must be consistent with all facets of the General Plan.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 20
2.4.8 Mixed- Use Land Use Designation ( MU)
The Mixed- Use Land Use Designation would allow in- fill development and General Commercial uses such as stores and offices on the ground floor with high- density residential uses on second floors. On interior blocks and on street frontages off the main commercial frontage, residential uses may occupy the ground floor. The Mixed- Use Land Use Designation allows up to 40 dwelling units per gross acre. Based on 2.64 persons per unit this would allow a population density of 79 people per acre. This land use designation will be appropriate for a portion of the Old Town Core and may be considered for appropriate service nodes throughout the City. The purpose of this land use designation is to create functional, safe and attractive multi- use neighborhoods supported by all necessary public facilities and services.
A zoning designation of “ MU, Mixed- Use” or Planned Development is appropriate for this Designation.
2.4.9 Commercial Land Use Designation ( C)
The Commercial Land Use Designation includes high activity land uses. These include retail, service, repair and storage uses. Additional uses would include warehouses, building material yards, contractors’ storage yards, outside storage, repair establishments, caretaker residences and other uses. The intensity factor would be eighty percent land coverage. These land uses cause increased traffic, noise, visual effects from signs and architecture, service demands and related concerns. This Plan strives to provide the necessary functions of commercial development without resulting in unacceptable consequences for adjoining areas and the City’s circulation and public facilities.
The various types of commercial land use will by separated by the zoning districts within this land use designation. Zoning districts appropriate for this category are “ C- 1, General Commercial District”, “ C- 2, Highway Commercial District” and “ C- 3, Heavy Commercial District.”
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 21
2.4.10 Industrial ( Manufacturing) Land Use Designation ( I)
The Industrial ( Manufacturing) Land Use Designation includes all types of manufacturing and industrial uses and caretaker residences. Two zoning districts are compatible with this land use designation: “ M- 1, Light Industrial” and “ M- 2, Heavy Industrial”. Light industrial uses do not have smoke, fumes, risk of explosion or other noxious effects. Heavy industrial uses may have such effects if they cannot be fully avoided.
2.4.11 Public and Semi- Public Land and Open Space Land Use Designation ( PSP)
The Public Land and Open Space Land Use Designation includes a variety of uses such as cemeteries, fairgrounds, parks, recreation centers, public buildings, open space, and schools. These uses do not usually have adverse effects on other land uses. Public and non- profit agencies usually own and operate these facilities.
Zoning districts consistent with this land use designation include “ P- SP, Public/ Semipublic” and “ NR- Natural Resource District”.
2.5 Land Use Element Objectives, Policies and Implementation Program
2.5.1 General Land Use
A. Land Use Objectives
1. To make Anderson a “ complete” city by offering a full range of goods, services, housing, employment and recreation to diminish the need for residents to go elsewhere.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 22
2. To maintain the orderly growth and stable physical development of the City of Anderson while enhancing the physical, social, economic and environmental characteristics of the community; and ensure the continuance of the City’s “ small town” atmosphere.
B. General Land Use Policies ( GP)
GP- 1 Sufficient areas will provide for each type of land use to permit full development needed to meet the demands of population growth and economic advancement. ( Housing Element)
GP- 2 Promote a combination of employment and residential uses that provide both jobs and housing for Anderson’s residents.
GP- 3 Ensure an adequate supply and variety of commercial and industrial sites.
GP- 4 Approve suitable projects which extend an orderly pattern of growth and do not cause “ leap- frog” type development. ( Circulation Element) ( Air Quality Element)
GP- 5 Consider the fiscal impacts of development in order to ensure that the City has adequate financial resources to fund community projects and programs.
GP- 6 Assure that all development in the City pays for its fair share of the cost of necessary public service and facilities.
GP- 7 Ensure a strong physical connection to the Sacramento River waterfront, including convenient public access and recreational opportunities.
GP- 8 Infill development of the vacant areas within the City Limits shall be encouraged in order for the City to provide services to its residents more efficiently. ( Housing Element)
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 23
GP- 9 The City will promote the character and value of existing neighborhoods and historical structures.
GP- 10 Discourage development that results in land use incompatibility.
GP- 11 When considering large scale development projects, the City may, at its discretion, require a Specific Plan or Planned Unit Development approach that allows flexibility within a project area. ( Housing Element)
GP- 12 Environmental Justice concepts which encourage public participation from all segments of the community will be followed. Undesirable land uses which cause environmental and health burdens will not be located exclusively near low- income residents.
C. General Land Use Implementation Programs ( GI)
GI- 1 Develop City guidelines for the fiscal analysis of development proposals and bonding for specific improvements.
GI- 2 Prepare and adopt fee and other programs that assure that the need of residents for services and facilities will be adequately served. ( Housing Element)
GI- 3 Support rehabilitation of existing housing and commercial building and preservation of historic structures within the City.
GI- 4 Carry out General Plan policies through the Capital Improvement Program.
GI- 5 Require buffers ( such as landscaping or open space) between uses where appropriate and discourage locating sensitive uses ( residential) adjacent to existing potentially objectionable uses or locating potentially objectionable uses adjacent to sensitive uses. ( Noise Element)
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 24
GI- 6 Allow density averaging throughout a development to encourage creative development design and open space preservation.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 25
2.5.2 Residential Land Use
A. Residential Land Use Policies ( RP)
RP- 1 The City’s single family residential areas are the backbone of its land use pattern. These areas must be protected from decline by maintaining streets, infrastructure and services.
RP- 2 Require that new development within the Old Town Core be generally consistent with the historic scale, appearance, and “ small town” character of Anderson.
RP- 3. Protect existing residential areas from intrusion of incompatible land uses and excessive traffic.
RP- 4. In areas where different land uses abut one another, promote land use compatibility by using buffering techniques, landscaping, setbacks, screening and sound walls.
RP- 5. The community should encourage compact, well- defined living areas and discourage residential sprawl.
RP- 6 Encourage clustering higher density residential development at locations within convenient walking distance of the Old Town Core, shopping centers, and bus routes. ( Circulation Element, Air Quality Element)
RP- 7 Preserve the areas planned for multi- family residential development and discourage General Plan amendments and rezoning of such areas for other uses. ( Housing Element)
RP- 8 Consider the cumulative effects of development on community facilities and services, such as transportation and schools, throughout the planning process.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 26
RP- 9 Require the establishment of lighting and landscaping districts or community facilities districts, as appropriate, for new residential developments.
RP- 10 All residential development shall offer to dedicate required improvements to the City.
RP- 11 Development shall pay impact and other fees to ensure that necessary public services and facilities are funded.
RP- 12 Further develop design review standards and criteria that encourage exceptional design and amenities for all housing including mobilehome parks. ( Housing Element)
RP- 13 Encourage naming of subdivisions and streets to reflect Anderson’s geography and history and its relationship to the Sacramento River.
RP- 14 Encourage connectivity within and between subdivisions. ( Circulation Element) ( Health and Safety Element)
RP- 15 Implement ADA ( Americans with Disabilities Act) Standards for sidewalks within residential development. ( Housing Element)
RP- 16 The area lying east of Stingy Lane shown as Rural Estate - Special Emphasis ( RE- SE) on the Land Use Map shall provide a new multimodal parkway road entrance from Stingy Lane to the Anderson River Park. No parcel shall be smaller that a net 12,300 square feet in area while maintaining an over maximum gross density of two dwelling units per acre.
B. Residential Land Use Implementation Program ( RI)
RI- 1 Codify Design Review Guidelines for reviewing development applications.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 27
RI- 2 Continue implementation of ADA Standards. ( Housing Element)
RI- 3 Require proposed development to demonstrate compliance with policies, programs and standards for public services and facilities prior to project approval. ( Housing Element)
RI- 4 Create a design review manual for residential development.
RI- 5 The RE- SE area shown on the Land Use Map shall be developed only with a Planned Development ( PD). Said PD shall require construction of a parkway road from the Stingy Lane / Balls Ferry intersection connecting to the main park road in Anderson River Park Further the PD shall also require that said road be tree lined, with a center planter, separated sidewalks a minimum of 5 feet wide, shared driveways, Class II bicycle lanes in both directions, with roundabouts at the internal road intersections; and a bypass for Tormey Drain to control flooding with a 12 foot wide bicycle/ pedestrian path from Stingy Lane to the Anderson River Park. Houses along the parkway shall feature upgraded facades incorporating features such as porches: minimal view of the garages from the street with the over half of the frontage devoted to the façade of the house; and garages shall not project in front of the house façade. Other houses in the development should feature similar features. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 28
C. Typical Residential Density Table*
TABLE 2.5.2 TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL DENSITY
Land Use Designation Zoning Districts Units per Acre Population
Density Range
Rural Holding “ AG” 0.20 0.50/ acre
Low- Density Residential-
Hill Side “ R- 1- HS” depends on slope depends on slope
Rural Estate “ R- E”
Rural Estate 0.5- 2 3- 6/ acre
Low Density “ R- 1” Single
Residential Family Residential 4- 6 11- 16/ acre
Medium Density “ R- 2, Medium- Density 10- 20 26- 53/ acre
Residential Residential”
“ PD, Planned Development”
High Density “ R- 3, Multiple- Family
Residential Residential” 20- 40 53- 107/ acre
“ PD, Planned Development”
Mixed- Use “ MU”, Mixed- Use 20- 40 53- 107/ acre
“ PD, Planned Development”
* Second dwelling units could increase density.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 29
2.5.3 Mixed- Use
A. Mixed- Use Land Use Policies ( MUP)
MUP- 1 Encourage the reuse of vacant and/ or underutilized commercial buildings for more productive purposes, including new businesses, housing, and mixed- use development. ( Housing Element)
MUP- 2 Create design review standards and criteria for individual commercial areas; including business parks, the Old Town Core or other employment centers.
MUP- 3 Evaluate other areas for Mixed Use designation and development.
MUP- 4 All uses which will benefit the Old Town Core; including apartments, lofts, and home offices, shall be encouraged within that area. ( Housing Element)
B. Mixed- Use Land Use Implementation Measures ( MUI)
MUI- 1 Develop Standards for Mixed Use Development.
MUI- 2 Designate the Old Town Core, special planning areas and other suitable locations for Mixed Use Development.
2.5.4 Commercial Land Use
A. Commercial Land Use Policies ( CP)
CP- 1 Anderson’s Old Town Core shall feature a mixed use core of retail stores, offices and services ( with residential use on the second floor) and will be a center of retail, commercial and professional activity in the community. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 30
CP- 2 Additional retail locations will be provided including those suitable for large- scale and neighborhood retail development.
CP- 3 Commercial development should require high landscaping standards and be integrated with adjacent neighborhood development.
CP- 4 Encourage businesses that support and contribute to the economic vitality and diversity of the Anderson community.
CP- 5 Promote the location of commercial centers to allow for easy access to streets that serve the City and minimize negative impacts on residential neighborhoods. ( Circulation Element)
CP- 6 Promote the location of regional commercial uses on major roads or at major intersections. ( Circulation Element)
CP- 7 Promote the location of highway commercial uses, such as gas stations, convenience stores, and restaurants, to provide necessary services for traveling motorists.
CP- 8 Neighborhood commercial centers shall be designed to fit into the neighborhood area they serve; with walkable access, compatibility with surrounding uses, and consistent design with a community theme.
CP- 9 Ensure that adequate pedestrian, bicycle, and parking facilities are located in business and commercial areas.
CP- 10 Require the use of shared circulation and parking facilities for new and existing businesses unless physically impossible.
CP- 11 Anderson will participate in cooperative efforts to promote business growth such as the Shasta Metro Enterprise Zone. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 31
B. Commercial Land Use Implementation Program ( CI)
CI- 1 Continue to pursue State and Federal funds for activities and infrastructure improvements that will promote economic growth.
CI- 2 Update the zoning code to expedite the permit process for commercial and industrial development.
CI- 3 Develop design standards and criteria ( including landscaping requirements) for commercial development.
CI- 4 Require that all commercial developments construct, and dedicate land to the City, and pay impact and other fees that represent their respective fair shares of necessary public services and facilities.
CI- 5 Cooperate with the Anderson Chamber of Commerce for the promotion of commercial and industrial development.
CI- 6 Anderson will implement the provisions of the MOU for the Shasta Metro Enterprise Zone.
2.5.5 Industrial Land Use
A. Industrial Land Use Policies ( IP)
IP- 1. Encourage new, diversified industries to locate in the area.
IP- 2. Buffer industrial areas from residential and commercial areas and other uses which might be adversely affected.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 32
IP- 3. Provide adequate transportation facilities and public services to further development of an industrial economic base.
IP- 4 Coordinate economic development efforts with other public agencies and organization promoting economic development in the region such as SHASTEC.
B. Industrial Land Use Implementation Program ( II)
II- 1 Continue to pursue State and Federal funds for activities and infrastructure improvements that will promote economic growth such as the Ox Yoke project.
II- 2 Establish industrial zoning designations that provide an adequate mix of parcel sizes, zoning and infrastructure to accommodate a variety of industrial uses.
II- 3 Minimize negative impacts on adjacent areas through the use of buffers, landscaping, walls, and sound barriers.
II- 4 Recognize Environmental Justice principles and protect low- income areas from adverse environmental impacts of industrial development.
2.5.6 Open Space Land Use
A. Open Space Land Use Policies ( OP)
OP- 1 Public facilities, such as fire stations, libraries, parks ( including open space), and recreation centers shall be located in those areas of the City where they will provide maximum benefit. ( Recreation Element)
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 33
OP- 2 Agricultural uses will be carried on within the planning area for the life of this General Plan, design new residential areas to work with adjacent agricultural uses.
OP- 3 Encourage low- impact, high- value agricultural crops such as herbs, fruits and vegetables to be grown on small parcels and in public gardens.
OP- 4 Preserve open space areas, of varying scales and uses, both within development projects and at the City’s boundary. ( Open Space and Conservation Element) ( Recreation Element)
OP- 5 Work to preserve, enhance and/ or restore existing natural habitat areas ( including those along the Sacramento River, Tormey Drain and Anderson Creek), as feasible. ( Recreation Element)
OP- 6 Create new wildlife habitat areas in appropriate locations, which may serve multiple purposes of natural resource preservation and passive recreation, as feasible. ( Recreation Element)
OP- 7 All public recreational areas and facilities shall be accessible by a publicly maintained access. ( Recreation Element)
OP- 8 Entitlements and ministerial permits shall conform to the requirements of the Floodplain Management Ordinance which are incorporated into this General Plan by reference. ( Health and Safety Element)
OP- 9 Protect F- 1 floodway areas, riparian corridors, environmentally sensitive areas, environmental mitigation areas. ( Open Space and Conservation Element)
B. Open Space Land Use Implementation Program ( OI)
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 34
OI- 1 Pursue opportunities, including grants to purchase rights of way, easements or other instruments to provide public access to the Sacramento River, parkland, open space, waterfront, or waterways.
OI- 2. Work with the school districts when they are selecting future school sites.
OI- 3 Work with school districts to plan land uses adjacent to existing and proposed school sites.
OI- 4 Give due consideration to school district input on developments, especially when overcrowding of schools is a concern of the district.
OI- 5 Update the “ NR” ( Natural Resource) and “ P- SP” ( Public/ Semipublic) zoning districts.
OI- 6 Zone floodway areas, riparian corridors, environmentally sensitive areas, environmental mitigation areas “ NR” ( Natural Resource). City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 35
2.6 Land Use Diagrams City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 36
2.6.1 Land Use Diagram for City of Anderson City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 37
2.6.2 Designation of Old Town Core City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 38
Table 2.7.1 General Plan Densities and Intensities
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
2007 City
of Anderson
General Plan
Rural
Holding
RH
Rural Estate
RE
Low- Density
Residential/
Hillside
LDR/ HS
Low- Density
Residential
LDR
Medium-
Density
Residential
MDR
High
Density
Residential
HDR
Specific
Planning
Area
SPA
Mixed
Use
MU
1989 City
General Plan
RE
AG1
N/ A
LDR
MDR
HDR
LDR
N/ A
Shasta
County
General Plan
Acg/ RB
SR
Acg
RA
NA2
NA2
NA2
RA/ RB
MU
DENSITY
City
Limit
2du/ ac
1du/ ac
1du/ 2ac3
4.6 du/ ac
12du/ ac
20du/ ac
4.6 du/ ac
1989 City
General Plan
County4
1du/ 5ac
3du/ ac
1du/ 5ac
1du/ 2ac
1du/ 2- 5ac
1du/ ac
1 The Agricultural designation is being phased out in the updated General Plan recognizing that conventional agriculture should be conducted outside of the City.
2 No land within the Anderson planning area is designated by the Shasta County General Plan for land use densities higher than SR.
3 Average density, the actual density depends on slope and ranges from 2 du/ ac to 1 du/ 4 ac.
4 The 1989 Anderson General plan did not place land use designations outside of the City Limits. The County land use designations are used for this area.
5 Assumed Density is based on historic land use patterns within the City and anticipated development based on topography and biological constraints.
The following County General Plan designations are used in the unincorporated area within the planning area ( Sphere of Influence):
Acg- Agriculture, cropland grazing
RB- Rural Residential B
RA- Rural Residential A
SR- Suburban Residential
du = dwelling unit, ac = acre
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 39
2007 Plan
Plan Area
1du/ 5ac
0.5- 2du/ ac
1du/ 2ac3
6du/ ac
10- 20du/ ac
20- 40du/ ac
2.5du/ ac
40du/ ac
Assumed
Density5
Plan Area
0.2
1.0
0.5
4.0
15.0
25.0
2.5
20.0
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Land Use Element
6/ 26/ 2007 40
Table 2.7.2 Potential Buildout of Planning Area
Land Use Designation
Planning
Area
Total5
Existing City
Developed
Planning
Area
Vacant
Maximum
Density6
Units/ Acre
Assumed
Density7
Units/ Acre
Assumed
Units At
Buildout
Assumed
Population
At Buildout8
Rural Holding RH
2131
461
1670
1du/ 5ac
0.2
334
898
Rural Estate RE
1253
805
448
0.5- 2du/ ac
1.0
448
1204
Low Density Residential/ Hill Side
LDR/ HS
410
223
187
1du/ 2ac
0.5
94
251
Low Density Residential LDR
876
559
317
6du/ ac
4.0
1268
3408
Medium- Density Residential MDR
234
178
56
10- 20 du/ ac
15.0
840
2258
High Density Residential HDR
73
51
22
20- 40 du/ ac
25.0
550
1478
Specific Planning Area SPA
2406
2406
2.5 du/ ac
2.5
6015
16,168
Mixed Use MU
59
51
8
30 du/ ac
20.0
160
430
PSP, Public & Quasi- Public
913
842
71
C Commercial
807
324
483
I Industrial
1768
702
1066
TOTALS
10,930
4196
6734
9709
26,095
Existing Population
10,677
Total at Build- out
36,772
5 As measured by City’s GIS
6 Densities from Table 2.7.1.
7 Assumed Density is based on historic development within the City and understanding of topographical and biological constraints.
8 Population figures are based on 2.688 persons per unit as estimated by the California Department of Finance, E- 5 Report, January 2006. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
41
3. CIRCULATION ELEMENT
3.1 Circulation Element Introduction
The Circulation Element is one of the seven mandated general plan elements identified in the State Planning and Zoning Law. Section 65302( b) of the California Government Code specifies that each general plan must include “ a circulation element consisting of the general location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, and other local public utilities and facilities, all correlated with the land use element of the plan.” The sewer and water public utilities are covered in the Health and Safety Element.
According to State Planning Law, the Circulation Element must be consistent with the other General Plan elements, which are all interrelated. Certain goals and policies of one element may address issues that are primary subjects of other elements. This integration of issues throughout the General Plan creates a strong basis for the implementation of plans and programs and achievement of community goals.
3.2 Transportation in Anderson
The community desires transportation alternatives to the automobile. At the same time, they expect solutions to present- day congestion. Citizens want traffic in residential neighborhoods to be slower, less disruptive and less dangerous to pedestrians.
The City of Anderson can reduce traffic and congestion by improving internal circulation within the City and by becoming a full service City which provides a complete range of retail experiences, services, housing types, and employment opportunities. When citizens are required to travel to other communities the use of parallel routes such as State Route 273 will be encouraged. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
42
Alternatives to the automobile most desired are bicycle and pedestrian ways, including trails, paths, sidewalks, bike lanes and similar facilities.
Additionally the City is served by the regional transit system operated by the Redding Area Bus Authority ( RABA). Transit service is available on a commuter route from a transfer site within the City to the Inter- modal Transit Center in Redding. A loop service is also provided on the Anderson end of the route providing limited service within the town. Alternative transportation systems need to connect identified nodes forming real networks. The system needs to be well marked and publicized to the general public.
The Redding Area Bus Authority also provides “ Demand Response” service within ¾ mile of the fixed service route. Eligible riders may call for service. The Far Northern Regional Center provides transportation for persons with developmental disabilities, the Redding Rancheria Indian Tribe
provides transportation to descendants of the indigenous tribes of Shasta County, and the Shasta County Opportunity Center serves individuals with disabilities.
In a city where over 90% of all trips are made by automobile and other alternatives including bicycling and walking represent 1.5% or less of all work trips, alternative transportation is not expected to render vehicular transportation obsolete. However, Anderson has the potential to be a healthy walkable, bikeable City due to the grid street pattern and generous rights- of- way in the Old Town Core. Although alternative transportation modes are supplemental to the street and road system, a choice of circulation alternatives is increasingly important to the quality of life and public health in Anderson.
Because recreational use of alternative transportation modes leads to familiarity and acceptance, implementation of a comprehensive Trails- Sidewalks Network is a high priority. Previous General Plans have included versions of a trail system. Certainly, planning and developing a comprehensive City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
43
pedestrian/ bicycle system will be difficult and expensive. For that reason, multi- purpose pathways/ trails/ sidewalks designed to meet the needs of ( and to be funded jointly by) both transportation and recreation interests are planned.
3.3 Street Classifications
The following street classifications are used in this General Plan: freeway, expressway, arterial, collector and local street. These classifications are explained below. The specifications for these
routes are detailed in the City Code and in the Public Works Standards. Freeways and State Highways are maintained by the California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans).
3.3.1 Freeway
Interstate 5 ( I- 5), a limited access freeway, is the only route of this category in the Anderson Planning Area. This route divides the City, separating the residential areas along the Sacramento River from the older portions of the community near the railroad.
3.3.2 Expressway
An Expressway is a divided multi- lane major arterial street for through traffic with partial control of access and with grade separations at major intersections. State Route 273 ( old Highway 99) is an expressway facility paralleling the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. The expressway continues to be a major connection between the cities of Redding and Anderson. This route is four lanes with a median separation and controlled access. All crossings are at grade.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
44
3.3.3 Arterial
These streets provide the major routes for traffic flow within the City. They connect the areas of high traffic generation; therefore, their function is to move large volumes of traffic and should be designed to perform that function. Typical rights- of- way for arterials are 80 to 108 feet wide.
Pavement width and lane width of arterials may vary. Access from adjoining property should be avoided or consolidated if at all possible to prevent interference with traffic flow. Parking, if provided, may be converted to travel lanes if traffic warrants.
3.3.4 Collector
Collectors are minimum two lane streets with a minimum 60 foot right- of- way. They provide circulation within and between neighborhoods and commercial and industrial areas. Collectors usually serve short trips and are intended for collecting trips from local streets and distributing them to the arterial network. Direct driveway connections to the collector streets are discouraged. Usually access is consolidated and driveways have joint access.
3.3.5 Local Street
These are used to provide access to abutting property, locations for utilities, and fire breaks between buildings. Carrying through traffic is a secondary function of local streets and they should be designed to disperse traffic and incorporate traffic calming measures. The use of curvi- linear streets may be needed in hillside areas but the grid street pattern should be used where possible to provide for connectivity and walkability. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
45
Local streets may use a variety of street designs including the following:
a) Traditional Local Street
The Traditional Local Street includes two twelve- foot wide traffic lanes, with parking, curb, gutter and sidewalk areas in addition to the traffic lanes within a sixty- foot wide right- of- way.
b) Special Local Street
The Special Local Street will be used in areas designated for planned development. These streets may be narrow and have rights- of- way as small as forty- eight feet wide. The travel ways ( including parking) may be twenty- four to twenty- eight feet wide. Typically trees or landscaping will separate the vehicle travel- way from the pedestrian sidewalk.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
46
3.3.6 Truck Routes
Truck Routes are designated in Chapter 10.36 of the City of Anderson Code. The following streets and parts of streets are designated as truck routes for the movement of vehicles exceeding a maximum gross weight of five tons:
1. State Highway 273
2. Interstate 5
3. Deschutes Road
4. North Street between State Highway 273 and the Sacramento River
5. Ventura Street
6. South Street between the westerly City Limits and State Highway 273
7. Balls Ferry Road
8. Riverside Avenue from I- 5 to Latona Street
9. McMurry Street
10. Ox Yoke Road
11. South Street from State Highway 273 to Balls Ferry Road
12. Childress Street
13. Ganyon Street from McMurray to Childress Street
14. Briggs Street from State Highway 273 to Fairgrounds Drive
15. Fairgrounds Drive
16. Third Street from State Highway 273 to Missouri Street
17. Silver Street
18. Stingy Lane
19. Missouri Lane
20. Spring Gulch Road from Missouri Street to State Highway 273
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
47
3.4 Objectives, Policies and Implementation Program
Circulation Objective:
To ensure the development of a multimodal circulation system which will be both safe and efficient. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
48
3.4.1 Streets and Roadways
A. Streets and Roadways Policies ( SP)
SP- 1 Provide a street system which will adequately serve homes, business, industry, recreation and other uses as they develop in accordance with the Land Use Plan. ( Land Use Element)
SP- 2 Continue to work with the Shasta County Regional Transportation Planning Agency ( RTPA) to implement those programs appropriate for the City of Anderson.
SP- 3 The City may develop standards for the provision of private streets.
Street Design Policies
SP- 4 Provide an overall street pattern that has a functional relationship to land uses, accommodates future traffic volumes, and includes a wide variety of street types and designs to foster connectivity and walkability. ( Land Use Element) ( Health and Safety Element)
SP- 5 Provide bicycle and pedestrian trails and facilities within and between residential areas. ( Health and Safety Element)
SP- 6 Promote modification of the Standards in Old Town Core, Special Planning areas and other suitable areas to allow special designs which promote smart growth and walkability. ( Health and Safety Element)
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
49
SP- 7 Coordinate design standards with area- wide construction standards to promote regional planning and efficiency.
Street System Policies
SP- 8 Strive to maintain Level of Service ( LOS) D as the minimum acceptable service standard for intersections during peak periods.
SP- 9 Provide easy access for trucks and employees from employment centers to major through routes. Provide signage to direct trucks to appropriate truck routes. Direct non- local traffic onto collector streets and arterials. ( Noise Element)
SP- 10 Monitor, improve and enhance traffic safety and reduce the potential for traffic accidents.
SP- 11 Maintain traffic speeds and volumes on neighborhood streets consistent with residential land uses through design and use of traffic calming measures.
SP- 12 Provide adequate capacity ( such as bike lanes and bus turn- outs) on collector and arterial streets to accommodate multi- modal travel within the City. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
50
New Street Facilities Policies
SP- 13 Address future roadway needs through both new road construction and management of existing and planned roadway capacity.
SP- 14 Maintain an infrastructure fees and other funding programs adequate to assure sufficient financing and land to maintain and achieve prescribed Levels of Service.
SP- 15 The City supports the concept of a new Interstate 5 interchange at the south end of the City to improve local traffic circulation if the findings of project- specific feasibility studies and environmental impact analysis conclude that a new interchange will be in the best interest of the City of Anderson.
SP- 16 Review all new development proposals with public safety personnel to ensure adequate emergency access during construction and operation of the development.
B. Streets and Roadways Implementation Programs ( SI)
Street Design Implementation
SI- 1 Incorporate provisions for bicycle, pedestrian, and public transit modes during the planning and development review processes for new development and new roadways. ( Health and Safety Element)
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
51
SI- 2 Encourage and promote car pools, vanpools, park and ride facilities, alternative work hours, employee shuttles, and other incentives to reduce single- occupant vehicle trips. ( Air Quality Element)
SI- 3 Coordinate with local fire protection and law enforcement agencies on emergency response routes and plans. ( Health and Safety Element)
SI- 4 Design residential streets to balance bicyclist and pedestrian safety with vehicular movement and safety to avoid creating hazards.
SI- 5 Various street designs, including traditional grid street designs, may be used and may include such traffic- calming features such as narrow streets, round- abouts and bulb- outs to encourage pedestrian- friendly development.
SI- 6 Adopt standards to allow narrow street sections in areas featuring grid systems and redundant parallel streets when combined with group parking and other safety features.
Street System Implementation
SI- 7 Maintain and develop a network of arterial and collector streets with proper consideration for existing and proposed circulation and land use patterns.
SI- 8 Monitor intersection Levels of Service at key reporting intersections.
SI- 9 Maintain a pavement management program, and identify and prioritize projects in the City’s Capital Improvement Program to maintain the quality, safety and integrity of the City’s roadway system for all types of traffic.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
52
SI- 10 Street maintenance shall include regular cleaning and upkeep of bicycle routes to remove debris and alleviate poor pavement conditions that discourage bicycle riding.
SI- 11 Install and maintain truck route signing and marking to direct truck traffic onto designated truck routes.
SI- 12 Select safe traffic standards and provide consistent and comprehensive traffic safety law enforcement throughout Anderson. ( Health and Safety Element)
New Street Facilities Implementation
SI- 13 Pursue improvements at I- 5 Interchanges by coordinating with Caltrans and seeking funding from State and Federal sources.
SI- 14 Ensure that developers fund traffic impact studies that identify on- site and off- site effects and mitigations, and that they contribute appropriate funding to ensure that on- site and off- site improvements are constructed.
SI- 15 If it cannot be demonstrated prior to project approval that levels of service will be met, the City may consider the development based on payment of traffic impact fees targeted for the specific impacts.
SI- 16 In the event that a signalized intersection exceeds the applicable level of service standard, the City may approve projects if the City can establish appropriate conditions of approval and/ or mitigation measures to address the service standard. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
53
SI- 17 Continue to work in partnership to address capacity and access issues along Interstate- 5.
3.4.2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation
A. Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation Policies ( BP)
BP- 1 Provide bicycle and pedestrian transportation areas on all arterial and collector streets. ( Air Quality Element)
BP- 2 Bicycle and pedestrian routes shall lead to schools, shopping centers, recreational areas and connect with regional bikeway systems. ( Air Quality Element) ( Health and Safety Element)
BP- 3 Provide maximum opportunities for bicycle and pedestrian circulation on existing and new roadway facilities. ( Air Quality Element) ( Health and Safety Element)
BP- 4 Enhance opportunities for bicycle and pedestrian activity in new public and private development projects. ( Air Quality Element) ( Health and Safety Element)
BP- 5 Create a bicycle and pedestrian system that provides connections throughout Anderson and with neighboring areas, and serves both recreational and commuter users. ( Air Quality Element) ( Open Space and Conservation Element) ( Recreation Element)
BP- 6 Design new roadway facilities to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Include Class I, II or III bicycle facilities as appropriate. Through the Design Review process, provide sidewalks to all roads, except in cases where very low pedestrian volumes and/ or safety considerations preclude sidewalks. ( Air Quality Element)
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
54
BP- 7 Promote the provision of bike lockers and bike racks at park and ride lots, shopping areas and office buildings within the City. ( Air Quality Element) ( Health and Safety Element)
B. Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation Implementation Programs ( BI)
BI- 1 Plan bicycle and pedestrian routes to form a continuous system to connect as many parts of the City as possible. Avoid dead- end trails. ( Health and Safety Element)
BI- 2 Coordinate City bicycle routes with Shasta County and State bicycle routes.
BI- 3 Encourage greater support and use of bikeways and trails.
BI- 4 During the site plan review process, require new development to incorporate design features that support bicycling and walking, particularly in those areas that could provide access to and between major destinations. This could include bicycle racks, lockers, showers and other support facilities; continuous sidewalks; an internal pedestrian circulation plan;
walkways for pedestrians and bicyclist between cul- de- sacs; and at least one major entrance adjacent to a sidewalk, wherever possible.
BI- 5 Develop a comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, including design standards for bicycle and pedestrian facilities, evaluation of current bicycle promotion programs, analysis of bicycle and pedestrian accidents, and a capital improvement program to ensure adequate maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. ( Recreation Element)
BI- 6 Design trails to avoid unnecessary impacts to wetlands, drainages and sensitive species. ( Open Space and Conservation Element) City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
55
BI- 7 Develop a strategic approach to pursuing State and Federal funding for bicycle and pedestrian improvement projects, working closely with neighboring jurisdictions.
BI- 8 Coordinate with local public and private schools to create well- designed Safe Routes to Schools, maps for bicyclists and pedestrians, and to provide adequate facilities to park bicycles.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
56
3.4.3 Parking
Parking facilities are a necessary part of any circulation plan. Parking facilities should be landscaped and shared by multiple users.
A. Parking Policies ( PP)
PP- 1 Parking requirements shall ensure attractive, safe and adequate parking for each type of land use.
PP- 2 Parking facilities should be used to encourage car- pools.
PP- 3 Designs for shaded pedestrian connections should be included in all parking facilities.
B. Parking Implementation Measures ( PI)
PI- 1 Develop parking standards for each zoning district.
PI- 2 Shared parking solutions between retail, office, residential and community uses shall be encouraged.
PI- 3 Develop landscaping and lighting standards for parking areas.
PI- 4 Parking access shall be adequately signed. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
57
3.4.4 Public Transportation
Anderson’s main public transportation is provided by the Redding Area Bus Authority ( RABA). RABA provides the “ Anderson Express” bus service between Redding and Anderson and also transportation within Anderson. RABA provides bike racks on all buses.
A. Public Transportation Policies ( TP)
TP- 1 Ensure that new roadways and facilities can accommodate public transit. ( Air Quality Element)
TP- 2 Ensure that new public and private development supports public transit. ( Air Quality Element, Land Use Element)
TP- 3 Encourage transit providers to improve transit routes, frequency, and level of service to adequately serve the mobility needs of Anderson residents, including those dependent on public transit in a cost- effective manner. ( Air Quality Element)
B. Public Transportation Implementation Programs ( TI)
TI- 1 When reviewing development proposals, coordinate with public transit on appropriate standards for bus bays, bus turnouts, bus shelters, and other public transit amenities.
TI- 2 Coordinate with public schools to promote access and roadway designs that support school bus requirements.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
58
TI- 3 During the development review process, require provisions in site plans for public transit vehicle stops and turning maneuvers, where appropriate.
TI- 4 Explore potential locations for Park- and- Ride facilities within Anderson.
TI- 5 Use routing and transit programs to maintain the highest level of public transit service possible.
3.4.5 Railroad Service
The City of Anderson is served by the Union Pacific Railroad. The Railroad is an integral part of the City since it became a distinct community in 1872 with the successful negotiation with the Southern Pacific Railroad for the railroad right- of- way. Many changes in the railroad industry have occurred since then. Now the railroad provides only long- haul freight service to heavy industry.
A. Railroad Policy ( RRP)
RRP- 1 Maintain the highest level of rail service for economic development.
B. Railroad Implementation Program ( RRI)
RRI- 1 Assist businesses to work with Union Pacific Railroad to maintain sidings for freight service. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
59
3.4.6 Utilities— Gas Lines, Power Lines, Fiber Optic Cable
According to the General Plan Guidelines “ The circulation element is not simply a transportation plan. It is an infrastructure plan addressing the circulation of people, goods, energy, water, sewage, storm drainage, and communications.” In this Plan the water and waste water treatment systems are addressed in the Health and Safety Element. The storm drainage issues are addressed in the Open Space and Conservation Element.
In Anderson, gas and electrical power are supplied by the Pacific Gas and Electric Company ( PG& E). New development must be coordinated with PG& E to insure that the required infrastructure can be made available in a timely and efficient manner.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Circulation Element
60
Communication lines are supplied by AT& T ( telephone) and Charter Communication ( cable television) and wireless communication systems are also available.
A. Utility Policy ( UP)
UP- 1. Ensure that utilities are available for new development.
UP- 2. Encourage state- of- the- art electronic communication connections for all new development.
UP- 3. Encourage co- location of wireless communication facilities.
B. Utility Implementation ( UI)
UI- 1. Coordinate development planning with utility providers.
UI- 2. Review utility plans for large projects to ensure connectivity to gas, electricity and electronic communication.
UI- 3. Allow co- location of wireless communication facilities where sites are available.
61
3.5 Circulation Plan Diagrams 3.5.1 Circulation Plan 62
63
64
3.6 Right- of- Way Requirements
Design Item
Express- way
Major Arterial
Major* Arterial Option
Collec- tor
Subcollec- tor ( Local)
Local Streets
Cul- de- sac
Indust./ Busi- ness Park
Frontage Road
ROW width
110- 120
96
84
84
64 or 60
56- 60
56- 60
64
45- 60
Pavement width ( curb to curb)
72
76
72
64
44 or 40
32- 40
36- 40
44
32- 40
Median
width 3
18
12
10
10
--
--
--
--
--
Curb type
Vertical
Vertical
Vertical
Vertical
Vertical
Vertical or rolled4
Vertical or rolled4
Vertical
Vertical
Sidewalk width
--
5- 101
5- 101
5
5
5
5
5
5
Maximum grade
7%
7%
7%
8%
12%
12%
12%
8%
8%
Minimum centerline radius of curves
1000
1000
1000
800
500
200
200
300
300
Minimum tangent between adjacent curves
100
100
100
100
2
2
2
2
2
Minimum cul- de- sac radius
--
--
--
--
--
--
50
50
--
Maximum weekday traffic
50,000
28,000
28,000
12,000
8,000
3,000
1,000
4,000
--
Property line radii at intersections
40
40
40
30
30
20
20
30
30
Design speed
55- 65
45- 55
45
35
30
25
25
25
25
* Certain major arterials may be reduced to eighty- four- foot rights- of- way with special provisions for public service easements and special intersection turn lanes, bus stops, and bike lanes. 1 Varies with type/ density of development. 2 Tangent to be determined by the City Public Works Director. 3 Medians may be established in any street subject to approval by the planning commission, depending on whether it is also used for turning purposes. 4 Rolled curb only in single- family or duplex areas.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 65
4. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT
4.1 Open Space and Conservation Introduction
Valuable resources in the City of Anderson include biological resources, open space resources, scenic resources, agricultural resources, cultural and historic resources, and air quality. The Open Space and Conservation Element focuses on the protection and enhancement of such resources to ensure a high quality living environment for years to come.
The Open Space and Conservation Element expresses community goals to protect environmental resources, open space, and scenic resources. Specifically, resources addressed in this element include the following:
a) Biological resources, including significant habitat areas and special status plant and animal species.
b) Open space resources, including natural and improved open space areas that are physical, functional, and visual.
c) Scenic resources as predominant physical characteristics of the community.
d) Agricultural resources, including quantity and quality of agricultural lands within the Planning Area.
e) Cultural resources in terms of known and potential archaeological and paleontological resources.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 66
f) Historic resources that are nationally designated, recognized by the State of California or locally significant.
g) Energy conservation
h) Air quality in terms of local and regional compliance with air pollutant standards.
This combined Open Space and Conservation Element meets the State requirements for Open Space and Conservation Elements as defined in Sections 65301, 65302( d), 65302( e), and 65560 of the California Government Code, respectively. According to these requirements, the Open Space Element must contain goals and policies to manage open space areas, including undeveloped lands and outdoor recreation areas.
Specifically the Open Space Element must address several open space categories such as those used for the preservation of natural resources and managed production of resources, as well as open space maintained for public health and safety reasons. Open Space for outdoor recreation is addressed within the Recreation Element.
The Conservation Element must contain goals and policies to protect and maintain natural resources such as water, soils, wildlife and minerals, and prevent wasteful resource exploitation, degradation and destruction.
In adopting the requirement that all jurisdictions must prepare an Open Space Element, the Legislature found that the preservation of open space land is necessary not only for the maintenance of the economy of the State, but also for the continued availability of land for the production of food and fiber, for the enjoyment of scenic beauty, for recreation, and for the use of natural resources.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 67
The Legislature further found that discouraging premature and unnecessary conversion of open space land to urban uses is in the public interest because it discourages non- contiguous development patterns that tend to increase the costs of community services to community residents. Finally, the Legislature found that the anticipated increase in the population of the State demands that cities, counties, and the State make plans at the earliest possible date for the preservation of valuable open space land and take positive action to carry out such plans by the adoption and strict administration of laws, ordinances, rules and regulations.
4.2 Environmental Protection and Enhancement
Anderson’s environmental setting is both the object of affection and concern for the citizens of Anderson. The area’s valley setting, the Sacramento River, streams, trees, and wetlands draw and captivate residents. But these same natural features are sensitive to alteration, and may be destroyed or seriously impaired in the course of land development.
Environmental challenges and opportunities are many; setting aside environmentally sensitive areas; preserving open space; park and nature trail development; and restoring or reclaiming abused areas. All are addressed effectively in the 2007 General Plan.
Rare botanical species and their supporting environs in and near Anderson have been identified and described by the California Native Plant Society.
Anderson’s existing park system consists of land donated or purchased by the City over the years. While attractive and pleasant, City parks are unevenly distributed, resulting in some areas being well served while others are underserved. The 2007 General Plan contains a framework for a park and recreation system, designed to meet current and future needs throughout the City and expanded in scope to include natural areas, open space and passive parks as well as active parks and play fields.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 68
4.3 Objectives, Policies and Implementation Program
Open Space Objective:
To establish open space areas for the following:
a) the preservation of natural resources,
b) the managed production of resources,
c) outdoor recreation, public health and safety, and
d) to ensure the preservation and maintenance of these spaces consistent with community need.
Conservation Objective:
To ensure the planned management of the community’s natural resources, their permanency consistent with community goals and prevention of their misuse.
4.3.1 Biological Resources
The City’s Plan Area supports a diverse assemblage of plant and wildlife species throughout several habitat types. It is characterized by the river valley landscape that rises to the west into rolling foothills. The area is
sprinkled with large oak trees, including Valley Oaks, Blue Oaks, and Live Oaks. The Sacramento River, Anderson Creek, other streams and man- made canals and waterways traverse the area. These waterways have created delightful riparian corridors that support a wide variety of plants and animal communities.
Sensitive habitat areas in Anderson contain valuable biological resources. Efforts to identify and preserve these valuable resources will improve the quality of the environment for Anderson residents. Protection of biological resources requires design with sensitivity to existing landforms and vegetation and includes protection of soil and water quality.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 69
The following habitat types exist within the Anderson Planning area:
Seasonal Wetlands
Seasonal wetlands allow water to pond for a long enough period of time to support hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils and include both vernal and non- vernal wetlands. Seasonal wetlands tend to lack standing water during the late summer months, or during prolonged dry periods. They support hydrophytic species, such as spike- rush ( Elocharis sp.) that require longer and typically deeper inundation periods than those of vernal species. Accordingly, seasonal wetland lack underlying hardpan common with vernal pools and swales.
Vernal pools form where there is a soil layer below or at the surface that is impermeable or nearly impermeable. Vernal pools gradually dry during the spring, often forming a unique “ bathtub ring” of flowers from endemic vernal pool plants blooming successively at the pool margins. Vernal swales differ from vernal pools in their function as shallow conveyance channels.
Fresh Emergent Wetland
This wetland type is a mixture of erect, rooted herbaceous hydrophytes that prosper in anaerobic, frequently flooded areas. Fresh emergent wetlands often occur around lake edges and areas with standing water for most of the year. Edge vegetation includes sedges, rushes, and nut grasses. Areas that are slightly deeper and wet for longer periods of time consist of cattail, bulrush and arrowhead. Birds, reptiles, and amphibians rely on fresh emergent wetlands for protection, breeding and nesting, and foraging.
Pond
Palustrine or pond habitats are inland depressions or dammed riverine channels containing standing water, which is removed only by percolation, evaporation, or transpiration.
Blue Oak Woodland
Blue Oak Woodlands generally have an overstory of scattered trees, but the canopy can be nearly closed on better quality sites. Blue Oak is the dominant tree species. Common associates in the City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 70
canopy include Coast Live Oak and Valley Oak. Associated shrub species include poison oak, California coffeeberry, buckbrush, redberry, California buckeye and manzanita species. The ground cover usually consists of annual grasses.
Hardwood habitats, including Blue Oak Woodlands, are documented to provide breeding habitat for more wildlife species than any other habitat in California, supporting important breeding habitat for numerous amphibian and reptile, bird and mammal species. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 71
Annual Grassland
Introduced annual grasses are the dominant plants species in this habitat. These include wild oats, soft chess, ripgut brome, red brome, wild barley and foxtail fescue. Many wildlife species; including reptiles, mammals, and birds, use annual grasslands as foraging or breeding habitat.
Valley- foothill Riparian
Riparian habitats provide food, water, migration and dispersal corridors and escape, nesting and thermal cover for California’s wildlife. Dominant vegetation in the canopy includes Cottonwood, California Sycamore, and Valley Oak.
Riverine
Intermittent or continually flowing water distinguishes rivers and streams. The majority of fast stream inhabitants ( typically insects) live in the riffles, on the underside of rubble and gravel, sheltered from the current. Riverine habitats include the watercourse and associated wetland edge.
Many laws are involved in the protection of biological resources. These laws include the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA), the National Environmental Policy Act ( NEPA) and the Clean Water Act ( CWA). Two laws related to the protection of Endangered Species are the Federal Endangered Species Act and the California Endangered Species Act.
A. Biological Resources Conservation Policies ( BRP)
BRP- 1 Retain the riparian vegetation along the main water- ways in the City.
BRP- 2 Protect areas that have significant wildlife habitat resources or, if impacts cannot be avoided, require appropriate mitigation.
BRP- 3 Avoid soil erosion from flooding. ( Health and Safety Element) City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 72
BRP- 4 Address development of sloping land with the Planned Development Combining District and the Hillside Slopes Combining District.
BRP- 5 Maintain high levels of water quality and quantity in rivers, streams and groundwater basins. ( Health and Safety Element)
BRP- 6 Preserve water rights of all sources; rivers, streams, groundwater and ACID water for the benefit of the City.
BRP- 7 Preserve trees where possible and mitigate for the loss of trees to be removed.
BRP- 8 Minimize impacts to special- status species and sensitive habitats to the maximum extent feasible.
B. Biological Resource Conservation Implementation ( BRI)
BRI- 1 Treat areas adjoining Anderson Creek, Spring Gulch, Tormey Drain, Sacramento Gulch, Olinda Creek and the Sacramento River as high value resource areas providing an amenity to the City where feasible.
BRI- 2 Maintain the flood damage prevention requirements while retaining biological resource values.
BRI- 3 Continue application of the Hillside Slopes Combining Zone or the Planned Development Combining Zone where development is planned in areas with steep slopes.
BRI- 4 Develop and implement a grading ordinance to addresses the issues of site grading, mass grading, tree removal and storm water run- off.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 73
BRI- 5 Prohibit significant reduction of water quality or quantity through implementation of erosion prevention programs. ( Health and Safety Element)
BRI- 6 Develop storm drain facilities which enhance biological resources.
BRI- 7 Tree removal shall be compensated by the planting of street, parkland, recreational area or other urban area trees or other appropriate means of conservation.
BRI- 8 Provide an educational program including signs and maps to inform the public of biological resources within the City.
BRI- 9 Cooperate with Shasta County and State agencies on water related issues.
BRI- 10 If, during CEQA review of a proposed project, the Initial Study indicates that a project has the potential for significant impacts on biological resources, the City may require a biological resource assessment to evaluate the impacts and recommend appropriate mitigation measures to avoid or lessen impacts to those resources.
BRI- 11 The City will develop guidelines for protection of special- status species and sensitive habitats that exist in the vicinity. The guidelines will recommend species- specific and habitat- specific mitigation measures that can be used by project developers, and by the City in approving particular projects, to avoid or lessen the impacts to biological resources.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 74
4.3.2 Open Space Resources
Open space resources in Anderson consist of designated parkland, natural and recreational open space areas and waterways ( Sacramento River, Anderson Creek, Sacramento Gulch, and Tormey Drain). Generally, open space land is unimproved and used for habitat preservation, recreation, public safety, and/ or managed production of resources.
Many of the City’s open space resources are addressed in other sections of the Plan and this Element. For example, additional goals, policies and programs for parklands and recreational open space are discussed in the Recreation Element. Similarly, natural habitat areas are discussed in the Biological Resource section of this Element and agricultural lands are discussed in the Land Use Element and in the Agricultural Resources section of this Element.
Goals, policies and programs in this section address the City’s desire to preserve, enhance, and expand open space resources to maintain the natural physical and visual quality of Anderson. Permanent open space areas
may include active recreation areas, habitat protection areas, and scenic open spaces. Resources preserved within open space include creek corridors, steep slopes, oak woodlands, wetlands, grasslands, and viewsheds.
The Open Space Resources Implementation and Action Plan shown below shall meet the requirement for the Open- Space Action Program required by California Government Code Section 65564.
A. Open Space Resources Policies ( OSP)
OSP- 1 Encourage public access in multiple forms and improvements along the City’s water ways, particularly the Sacramento River. ( Circulation Element) City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 75
OSP- 2 Establish buffers from adjoining land uses to protect the natural open space resources in the City.
OSP- 3 Encourage preservation and enhancement of the watershed, natural waterways, and areas important for the maintenance of natural vegetation and wildlife populations.
OSP- 4 Where feasible and desirable, major open space components shall be combined and linked to form a visual and physical system in the City. ( Housing Element) ( Land Use Element)
B. Open Space Resources Implementation and Action Plan ( OSI)
OSI- 1 Adopt land use controls that prevent incompatible uses for parcels adjacent to existing open space resources. ( Land Use Element) ( Noise Element)
OSI- 2 Pursue opportunities for additional open space land in the form of parkland dedication, and public open space easements, leaseholds, land donations/ dedications, and gift annuities.
OSI- 3 Participate with regional, State and Federal entities and agencies to establish open space areas that include wildlife habitat and provide passive recreational opportunities.
OSI- 4 All Open Space Preserve areas that are specifically created to set lands aside for the continued protection of wetlands and seasonal drainages will be placed in a conservation easement that will restrict or prevent future development of these areas.
OSI- 5 The dedication of parkland for new development will be changed to 5 acres per 1,000 people. ( Health and Safety Element) ( Recreation Element)
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 76
4.3.3 Scenic Resources
Scenic resources in Anderson include predominant natural landscape features of the Sacramento River and views of surrounding mountains including Mount Shasta to the north and Mount Lassen to the east. Trees and landscaping are valuable scenic resources. The City supports the preservation of scenic resources and views.
A. Scenic Resources Policies ( SRP)
SRP- 1 Encourage preservation and enhancement of views of the Sacramento River and Mount Shasta and Mount Lassen to the extent possible.
SRP- 2 New development and redevelopment along the Sacramento River and throughout the City should take advantage of view opportunities.
SRP- 3 Encourage preservation of trees and landscaping as a scenic resource.
B. Scenic Resources Implementation Measures ( SRI)
SRI- 1 Develop guidelines, as funding becomes available, for development along scenic waterways to maintain the visual quality of these areas.
SRI- 2 Review development applications for discretionary actions to determine aesthetic impacts and visual compatibility with surrounding property.
SRI- 3 Develop a tree preservation mitigation plan with a priority for tree replacement areas.
SRI- 4 Work with applicants to implement heritage and scenic tree preservation mitigation plans for each development. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 77
4.3.4 Agricultural Resources
Anderson has historically been an agricultural community with a wide variety of agricultural crops. While much of the land used for agriculture has been developed into urban uses, there are remaining private parcels that continue in agricultural production, if only on a hobby basis. The City hopes to encourage low- impact, high- value agricultural crops such as herbs, fruits and vegetables, nuts and wine grapes on smaller parcels.
These agricultural areas help to preserve the traditional “ small town” character of the community, maintain open space, and reduce congestion within the City. While the City recognizes the historic role of agriculture within the Anderson community and supports continued agriculture, the transition from agriculture to urban uses limits the potential for large- scale commercial agriculture within the City Limits of Anderson. Outside the City Limits, agriculture will continue for the life of this Plan. The City will work to ensure that new development is compatible with adjacent agricultural uses.
A. Agricultural Resource Policies ( AP)
AP- 1 Agricultural land can best be preserved outside the City Limits by encouraging development within the City Limits so that viable agricultural operations in the unincorporated area can continue.
AP- 2 Allow keeping and raising of animals in undeveloped areas ( planned for future growth) which are suitable for such use and compatible with established neighborhoods.
AP- 3 Avoid conflicts between agriculture and urbanization within the City’s area of influence. Reduce the negative impacts resulting from urban uses and neighboring agricultural uses in close proximity. ( Land Use Element)
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 78
AP- 4 Protect and retain areas suitable for supplemental farming. The focus will be on high- value crops such as herbs, fruits, vegetables, nuts and wine grapes in the Rural Estate Land Use Designation. ( Land Use Element)
AP- 5 Promote community gardens, herb gardens, or tree nurseries on vacant lots in developed areas.
AP- 6 Encourage the promotion and marketing of locally grown agricultural products.
AP- 7 Incorporate parks, open space and trails between urban and agricultural uses to provide buffer and transition between uses. ( Recreation Element)
AP- 8 No agriculture shall be undertaken in areas of preserved wetlands.
B. Agricultural Resource Implementation ( AI)
AI- 1 Require landowners close to agricultural uses ( even those outside the City Limits) to sign and record a “ Right- to- Farm” statement at the time of development.
AI- 2 Use the California Department of Conservation Important Farmland Map in the review of development applications.
AI- 3 Provide land use buffers of parks, open space and trails, for proposed major subdivisions adjacent to prime agricultural lands.
AI- 4 Continue enforcement of animal density codes.
City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 79
4.3.5 Cultural Resources
The Anderson area was originally the home of the Wintu, the northern branch of the Wintun Tribe. The use of the area may have begun as early as 16,000 to 20,000 years ago according to archeological researchers. The Wintu represent the most northerly group of Penutian speakers in California. Main villages located along the Sacramento River and its tributaries were occupied year around. Seasonal food- gathering sites located in the foothills and grasslands were occupied temporarily. The territory of the Wintu encompassed western Shasta County and eastern Trinity County.
The basic unit of the Wintu was the family. Several families made up a village which was considered the social, political and economic unit. A village would have had from four to thirty bark houses and from twenty to 150 inhabitants. Leadership among the Wintu was, in theory, hereditary from father to eldest son— but only if the son was considered fit for the position. The men hunted deer, bear and smaller animals. The women gathered acorns, berries, plants and roots. Salmon was also a significant part of the Wintu diet.
In the early 1800s, there were approximately 12,000- 15,000 members of the Wintun Tribe. Spanish settlers arrived in Wintun territory by 1808, and the Hudson Bay Company trappers arrived sometime before 1832. Tribal unity was destroyed by the taking of land and the destruction of traditional food and material- gathering areas. Approximately 75 percent of the Wintu populations
living along the Sacramento River were lost to malaria and influenza epidemics brought about by the arrival of European and American trappers and settlers in the mid 1800’ s. Along with the introduction of cattle, hogs, and sheep, the construction of dams, and the Copper processing plants in the 1880s and early 1900s, the Wintun suffered a heavy toll on their health and survival. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 80
A. Cultural Resources Policy ( CRP)
CRP- 1 Preserve areas that have identifiable and important archaeological or paleontological significance.
CRP- 2 Consultation with the Native American Heritage Commission ( NAHC)
to determine religious, historical or cultural significance of site and notification of appropriate tribal group or descendants as identified by NAHC in accordance with the guidelines presented in Senate Bill ( SB) 18.
B. Cultural Resources Implementation ( CRI)
CRI- 1 Assess development proposals for potential impacts to significant archaeological resources pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. Require a study conducted by a professional archaeologist for projects located near creeks or identified archaeological sites to determine if significant archaeological resources are potentially present and if the project will significantly impact the resources. If significant impacts are identified, either require the project to be modified to avoid the impacts, or require measures to mitigate the impacts. Mitigation may involve archeological investigation or recovery in consultation with both the professional archaeologist and Tribal representatives.
CRI- 2 Consult with local Indian tribes to monitor all development projects during grading and excavation. If a cultural resource is identified or uncovered, construction will be redirected or stopped until the archaeologist monitor has evaluated the significance of the find and identified the appropriate mitigation measures.
CRI- 3 If human remains are encountered, work in the immediate vicinity of the remains will be halted until the Shasta County coroner, who must be contacted within 24 hours, has City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 81
evaluated the remains. If the coroner determines that the burial is Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted to determine the most likely descendant ( MLD). The MLD should be involved with the disposition of the remains following scientific analysis. City of Anderson General Plan May 2007
Open Space and Conservation Element
6/ 26/ 2007 82
4.3.6 Historic Resources
History continues to live in Anderson. Anderson exhibits the settlement and progression of western communities from the late 19th century through the early 20th century. The City of Anderson is located within the original Rancho Buenaventura, a land grant given to Major Pierson B. Reading in December 1844 by Mexican Governor Manuel Micheltorena.
Reading received a patent for this grant from the United States government in 1854. The rancho contained six square leagues of land on the west side of the Sacramento River, from Salt Creek ( at Redding) on the north, to the mouth of Cottonwood Creek on the south.
During his lifetime, Reading sold approximately 5000 acres of land and the remainder of the rancho was mortgaged when he died in 1868. The mortgage was foreclosed in 1871 and the majority of the land was bought by James Ben Ali Haggin, a San Francisco financier and land speculator.
Anderson began as a community in 1872 with the successful negotiation with the Southern Pacific Railroad for the railroad right- of- way. Haggin and his partner, Edward Frisbie, a local banker and real estate promoter, laid out the original town of Anderson.
A twelve square block plat was filed. Anderson was named after Eli