|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
|
|
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION
OFFICE OF MATERIALS AND INFRASTRUCTURE
SEISMIC, CREEP, AND TENSILE TESTING OF VARIOUS EPOXY BONDED REBAR PRODUCTS IN HARDENED CONCRETE
Supervised by Tom Hoover, P. E.
Principal Investigator Robert Meline, P. E.
Report Prepared by Jacob Duane, P. E. & Malinda Gallaher
Research Performed by Jacob Duane, P. E. & Malinda Gallaher
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
TR0003 ( REV. 10/ 98)
1. REPORT NUMBER
FHWA/ CA/ IR/ 2004/ 01
2. GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION NUMBER
3. RECIPIENT’S CATALOG NUMBER
5. REPORT DATE
February 2006
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Seismic, Creep, and Tensile Testing of Various Epoxy Bonded Rebar Products in Hardened Concrete
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR( S)
Robert J. Meline, Malinda Gallaher, Jacob Duane
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
65- 680321
10. WORK UNIT NUMBER
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
California Department of Transportation
Division of Research and Innovation, MS- 83
1227 O Street
Sacramento CA 95814
11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER
F 01 IR 25
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
FINAL
12. SPONSORING AGENCY AND ADDRESS
California Department of Transportation
Sacramento, CA 95819
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES
This project was performed in cooperation with the US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, under the research project titled “ Seismic, Creep, and Tensile Testing of Various Epoxy Bonded Rebar Products in Hardened Concrete”
16. ABSTRACT
The objective of this project was to evaluate the performance of currently specified epoxy adhesive anchor systems on various epoxy- coated rebar under seismic, creep and tensile loading. Previous testing of dowel bonding materials for use in hardened concrete was performed on plain rebar, raising the question of their performance on epoxy coated rebar.
The epoxy- coated rebar was found to meet the requirements of ICBO- AC58, Section 5.3.7.2.4, “ Conditions of Acceptance” for tension and seismic loading when bonded into hardened concrete using an epoxy adhesive. However, the epoxy- coated rebar did not meet the requirements of the Caltrans Augmentation/ Revisions to ICBO- AC58, Section 5.3.3.2, “ Conditions of Acceptance” for creep loading when bonded into hardened concrete. The rebar bonded with Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000 was found to meet the creep requirements, whereas the rebar bonded with Simpson SET22 and Red Head Epcon C6 did not meet the conditions of acceptance for creep loading.
It was also noticed that, when compared to the manufacturer test data, the epoxy- coated rebar outperformed uncoated rebar in allowable tensile loads for two of the three epoxies tested. Simpson SET22 adhesive under performed the manufacturer test data.
17. KEY WORDS
Epoxy- Coated Rebar, Rebar Testing, Creep, Seismic, Tensile, Dowel Testing, Concrete.
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
No restrictions. This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161
19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION ( of this report)
Unclassified
20. NUMBER OF PAGES
21. PRICE
Reproduction of completed page authorized i
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Special appreciation is due to Malinda Gallaher for her enthusiastic and competent help on this project. Ronald Reese also contributed to the project with guidance and knowledge of this testing.
Other persons who made important contributions are Bill Poroshin, Martin Zanotti, and Mike Said with excellent machine shop services, and Fred McWhorter with instrumentation support. Student assistants John Means, Steve Kiyama, Natane Clarke, and John Black also lent aid in completing this project.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................... 1
1.1 Problem Statement................................................................................... 1
1.2 Objective.................................................................................................. 1
1.3 Background.............................................................................................. 1
1.4 Scope........................................................................................................ 2
2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS........................................................................... 2
3. PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS........................................................................... 3
3.1 Simpson Strong- Tie SET22..................................................................... 3
3.2 Red Head Epcon Ceramic 6..................................................................... 3
3.3 Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000............................................................ 4
4. TEST MATERIALS....................................................................................... 5
4.1 Epoxy- Coated Rebar................................................................................ 5
4.2 Concrete................................................................................................... 5
5. TEST EQUIPMENT....................................................................................... 5
5.1 Tension and Seismic Loading.................................................................. 5
5.2 Creep Loading.......................................................................................... 7
5.3 Environmental Chamber.......................................................................... 9
5.4 Other Equipment...................................................................................... 9
6. INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS............................................................ 11
7. TEST PROCEDURE...................................................................................... 11
7.1 Tension and Seismic Tests....................................................................... 11
7.2 Creep Tests............................................................................................... 12
8. TEST RESULTS............................................................................................. 13
8.1 Tension and Seismic Tests....................................................................... 16
8.1.1 Simpson Strong- Tie SET22............................................................ 17
8.1.2 Red Head Epcon Ceramic 6............................................................ 18
8.1.3 Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000................................................... 18
8.2 Creep Tests............................................................................................... 18
8.2.1 Simpson Strong- Tie SET22............................................................ 18
8.2.2 Red Head Epcon Ceramic 6............................................................ 19
8.2.3 Convert Operations CIA- Gel 7000................................................. 19
9. CONCLUSION............................................................................................... 20
10. RECOMMENDATION.................................................................................. 20
11. IMPLEMENTATION.................................................................................... 21
12. REFERENCES................................................................................................ 21
APPENDIX............................................................................................................... 22
iii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 5- 1 267 kN ( 60 Kip) Load Frame............................................................. 6
Figure 5- 2 Cart with Controller and Hydraulic Pump......................................... 6
Figure 5- 3 LVDT Bracket................................................................................... 7
Figure 5- 4 Creep Loading Setup.......................................................................... 8
Figure 5- 5 LVDT Bracket for Creep Testing...................................................... 8
Figure 5- 6 Air Powered Pump............................................................................. 8
Figure 5- 7 Concrete Cylinder Mover.................................................................. 10
Figure 5- 8 Campbell Scientific CR10X Data logger........................................... 10
Figure 5- 9 Rebar Gripper..................................................................................... 10
Figure 5- 10 LVDT Multiplexer............................................................................. 10
Figure 7- 1 Seismic Loading Criteria................................................................... 12
Figure A- 1 Typical Concrete– Concrete/ Adhesive Interface Failure.................... 29
Figure A- 2 Typical Concrete/ Adhesive Interface Failure.................................... 29
Figure A- 3 Typical Concrete/ Adhesive – Adhesive/ Rebar Interface Failure....... 30
Figure A- 4 Typical Adhesive/ Rebar Interface Failure......................................... 30
Figure A- 5 Typical Rebar Failure........................................................................ 31
Figure A- 6 SET22 12d Tensile Test # 1................................................................ 32
Figure A- 7 SET22 12d Tensile Test # 2................................................................ 32
Figure A- 8 SET22 12d Tensile Test # 3................................................................ 33
Figure A- 9 SET22 12d Tensile Test # 4................................................................ 33
Figure A- 10 SET22 12d Tensile Test # 5................................................................ 33
Figure A- 11 SET22 12d Seismic Test # 1............................................................... 34
Figure A- 12 SET22 12d Seismic Test # 2............................................................... 34
Figure A- 13 SET22 12d Seismic Test # 3............................................................... 34
Figure A- 14 SET22 12d Seismic Test # 4............................................................... 35
Figure A- 15 SET22 12d Seismic Test # 5............................................................... 35
Figure A- 16 SET22 9d Tensile Test # 1.................................................................. 35
Figure A- 17 SET22 9d Tensile Test # 2.................................................................. 36
Figure A- 18 SET22 9d Tensile Test # 3.................................................................. 36
Figure A- 19 SET22 9d Tensile Test # 4.................................................................. 36
Figure A- 20 SET22 9d Tensile Test # 5.................................................................. 37
Figure A- 21 SET22 9d Seismic Test # 1................................................................. 37
Figure A- 22 SET22 9d Seismic Test # 2................................................................. 37
Figure A- 23 SET22 9d Seismic Test # 3................................................................. 38
Figure A- 24 SET22 9d Seismic Test # 4................................................................. 38
Figure A- 25 SET22 9d Seismic Test # 5................................................................. 38
Figure A- 26 SET22 Creep Displacements Over First 6 Hours.............................. 39
Figure A- 27 SET22 Creep Displacement 600- Day Log Regression Analysis....... 39
Figure A- 28 SET22 42- Day Creep Displacements................................................ 40
Figure A- 29 SET22 Chamber and Concrete Temperatures.................................... 40
Figure A- 30 SET22 Creep Load............................................................................. 40
Figure A- 31 SET22 Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests...................................... 41
Figure A- 32 SET22 Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile Tests........................... 41
Figure A- 33 Ceramic 6 12d Tensile Test # 1.......................................................... 42
iv
Figure A- 34 Ceramic 6 12d Tensile Test # 2.......................................................... 42
Figure A- 35 Ceramic 6 12d Tensile Test # 3.......................................................... 43
Figure A- 36 Ceramic 6 12d Tensile Test # 4.......................................................... 43
Figure A- 37 Ceramic 6 12d Tensile Test # 5.......................................................... 43
Figure A- 38 Ceramic 6 12d Seismic Test # 1......................................................... 44
Figure A- 39 Ceramic 6 12d Seismic Test # 2......................................................... 44
Figure A- 40 Ceramic 6 12d Seismic Test # 3......................................................... 44
Figure A- 41 Ceramic 6 12d Seismic Test # 4......................................................... 45
Figure A- 42 Ceramic 6 12d Seismic Test # 5......................................................... 45
Figure A- 43 Ceramic 6 9d Tensile Test # 1............................................................ 45
Figure A- 44 Ceramic 6 9d Tensile Test # 2............................................................ 46
Figure A- 45 Ceramic 6 9d Tensile Test # 3............................................................ 46
Figure A- 46 Ceramic 6 9d Tensile Test # 4............................................................ 46
Figure A- 47 Ceramic 6 9d Tensile Test # 5............................................................ 47
Figure A- 48 Ceramic 6 9d Seismic Test # 1........................................................... 47
Figure A- 49 Ceramic 6 9d Seismic Test # 2........................................................... 47
Figure A- 50 Ceramic 6 9d Seismic Test # 3........................................................... 48
Figure A- 51 Ceramic 6 9d Seismic Test # 4........................................................... 48
Figure A- 52 Ceramic 6 9d Seismic Test # 5........................................................... 48
Figure A- 53 Ceramic 6 Creep Displacements Over First 6 Hours......................... 49
Figure A- 54 Ceramic 6 Creep Displacement 600- Day Log Regression Analysis. 49
Figure A- 55 Ceramic 6 42- Day Creep Displacements........................................... 50
Figure A- 56 Ceramic 6 Chamber and Concrete Temperatures.............................. 50
Figure A- 57 Ceramic 6 Creep Load....................................................................... 50
Figure A- 58 Ceramic 6 Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests................................ 51
Figure A- 59 Ceramic 6 Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile Tests...................... 51
Figure A- 60 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Tensile Test # 1.................................................... 52
Figure A- 61 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Tensile Test # 2.................................................... 52
Figure A- 62 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Tensile Test # 3.................................................... 53
Figure A- 63 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Tensile Test # 4.................................................... 53
Figure A- 64 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Tensile Test # 5.................................................... 53
Figure A- 65 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Seismic Test # 1................................................... 54
Figure A- 66 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Seismic Test # 2................................................... 54
Figure A- 67 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Seismic Test # 3................................................... 54
Figure A- 68 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Seismic Test # 4................................................... 55
Figure A- 69 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Seismic Test # 5................................................... 55
Figure A- 70 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Tensile Test # 1...................................................... 55
Figure A- 71 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Tensile Test # 2...................................................... 56
Figure A- 72 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Tensile Test # 3...................................................... 56
Figure A- 73 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Tensile Test # 4...................................................... 56
Figure A- 74 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Tensile Test # 5...................................................... 57
Figure A- 75 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Seismic Test # 1..................................................... 57
Figure A- 76 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Seismic Test # 2..................................................... 57
Figure A- 77 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Seismic Test # 3..................................................... 58
Figure A- 78 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Seismic Test # 4..................................................... 58
Figure A- 79 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Seismic Test # 5..................................................... 58
v
Figure A- 80 CIA- Gel 7000 Creep Displacements Over First 6 Hours.................. 59
Figure A- 81 CIA- Gel 7000 Creep Displacement 600- Day Analysis..................... 59
Figure A- 82 CIA- Gel 7000 42- Day Creep Displacements.................................... 60
Figure A- 83 CIA- Gel 7000 Chamber and Concrete Temperatures........................ 60
Figure A- 84 CIA- Gel 7000 Creep Load................................................................. 60
Figure A- 85 CIA- Gel 7000 Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests.......................... 61
Figure A- 86 CIA- Gel 7000 Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile Tests............... 61
Figure C- 1 Rebar Puller....................................................................................... 98
Figure C- 2 Rebar Gripper – Collar....................................................................... 99
Figure C- 3 Rebar Gripper – Jaw.......................................................................... 100
Figure C- 4 LVDT Bracket for Pullout and Seismic Testing – Front View......... 101
Figure C- 5 LVDT Bracket for Pullout and Seismic Testing – Side View........... 101
Figure C- 6 LVDT Bracket for Pullout and Seismic Testing – Top View............ 102
Figure C- 7 LVDT Bracket for Pullout and Seismic Testing – 3D View............. 102
Figure C- 8 LVDT Bracket for Creep Testing – Front View................................ 103
Figure C- 9 LVDT Bracket for Creep Testing – Side View................................. 103
Figure C- 10 LVDT Bracket for Creep Testing – Top View.................................. 104
Figure C- 11 LVDT Bracket for Creep Testing – 3D View.................................... 104
Figure C- 12 Creep Load Frame.............................................................................. 105
Figure C- 13 Cart – 3D View.................................................................................. 105
Figure C- 14 Cart – Side View................................................................................ 106
Figure C- 15 LVDT Breakout Box Schematic........................................................ 107
vi
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1- 1 Testing Quantities.............................................................................. 2
Table 1- 2 Testing Specifications........................................................................ 2
Table 3- 1 Simpson SET22 Cure Times.............................................................. 3
Table 3- 2 Red Head Epcon Ceramic 6 Cure times............................................ 4
Table 3- 3 Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000 Cure times.................................... 4
Table 8- 1 Summary of Results for SET22 Epoxy Testing................................. 13
Table 8- 2 Summary of Results for Ceramic 6 Epoxy Testing........................... 14
Table 8- 3 Summary of Results for CIA- Gel 7000 Epoxy Testing..................... 15
Table 8- 4 Preliminary Test Results and Seismic Parameters............................. 16
Table 8- 5 Seismic Test Conditions of Acceptance............................................ 16
Table A- 1 Concrete Pour Information................................................................ 21
Table A- 2 Epoxy Adhesive Information............................................................. 21
Table A- 3 SET22 Concrete Compressive Strengths........................................... 22
Table A- 4 Ceramic 6 Concrete Compressive Strengths...................................... 23
Table A- 5 CIA- GEL 7000 Concrete Compressive Strengths............................. 24
Table A- 6 SET22 Testing Failure Modes........................................................... 22
Table A- 7 Ceramic 6 Testing Failure Modes...................................................... 23
Table A- 8 CIA- Gel 7000 Testing Failure Modes............................................... 24
vii
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Problem Statement
For certain applications, the California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans) uses epoxy cartridge adhesives for bonding rebar into holes that are drilled in hardened concrete. Caltrans started using these adhesives on plain rebar since previous research and testing was completed on them. At some point, Caltrans used a large quantity of epoxy- coated rebar for earthquake retrofitted bridge structure rehabilitation projects. Concern was expressed about using epoxy- coated rebar with epoxy cartridge adhesives. Problems that could occur are long- term creep under sustained tensile loading and slip or strength loss during cyclic loading that takes place during a seismic event. The International Conference of Building Officials ( ICBO) had suggested that bars with any coatings should be treated as a new, different bar and would require a new set of tests. These tests have yet to be completed.
Caltrans’ Division of Materials Engineering and Testing Services recommended to Structures Design that a separate set of ICBO seismic tests be performed on epoxy- coated bars with epoxy cartridge adhesives. These tests would have to pass Caltrans’ Augmentation to ICBO- AC58 [ 1] to be permitted for use in concrete structures. They also recommended that a considerable reduction in allowable loads be imposed on untested coated bars until the effects of coatings could be determined.
1.2 Objective
The objective of this project is to evaluate the performance of currently specified epoxy adhesive anchor systems on various epoxy- coated rebar under seismic, creep and tensile loading.
1.3 Background
Epoxy- coated reinforcing bars are used in concrete structures where corrosion protection is important. The epoxy- coated bars have a lower bond strength to concrete than the uncoated bars. An improved understanding of bond behavior is needed with the increasing application of epoxy- coated reinforcement, the conservative design guides, and the limited data on which those provisions are based. The goal is to improve economy and constructability, while maintaining an adequate margin of safety.
A large scale study, “ Bond of Epoxy- Coated Reinforcement: Bar Parameters” [ 2], was carried out by Oan Chul Choi, Hossain Hadje- Ghaffari, David Darwin, and Steven L. McCabe to determine the effects of coating thickness, deformation pattern, and bar size on the reduction in bond strength between reinforcing bars and concrete caused by epoxy coating. In general, their conclusion was that the reduction in bond strength caused by epoxy coating increases with bar size.
Adhesive- bonded anchors are increasingly used as structural fasteners for connections to hardened concrete. Due to their reliance on chemical and mechanical bond, adhesive anchors are uniquely susceptible to a number of potentially adverse
1
factors. Conditions that cause these factors can occur during installation and throughout the service life of the anchor.
Twenty different epoxy products ( for a total of 765 tests) were evaluated by Ronald A. Cook and Robert C. Konz in their report entitled, “ Factors influencing the Bond Strength of Adhesive Anchors” [ 3]. From their conclusions, the two substantial concerns were the temperature and condition of the drilled hole. Subjecting adhesive anchors to an elevated temperature of 43.3° C ( 110° F) can substantially influence bond strength along with increased product variation. Also, the condition of the drilled hole during installation can have a substantial influence on bond strength. Products installed into holes that were damp, wet, or not cleaned out generally showed reductions in bond strength with increased variation.
1.4 Scope
A total of 90 tests were performed according to the ICBO- AC58. The testing quantities and specifications established for this project are shown in Tables 1- 1 and 1- 2.
Epoxy Brand
Simpson
Red Head
Covert Operations
Model
SET22
Ceramic 6
CIA- Gel 7000
Embedment Depth
12d
9d
12d
9d
12d
9d
Tensile Test
5
5
5
5
5
5
Seismic Test
5
5
5
5
5
5
Aged Seismic Test
5
0
0
0
0
0
High Temp Tensile Test
0
5
0
5
0
5
Creep Test
0
5
0
5
0
5
Table 1- 1: Testing Quantities
Rebar Size
M19 [ 19.1mm dia] (# 6 [ 3/ 4" dia])
Drill Diameter
22.2mm ( 7/ 8")
Rebar Material
Grade A706
Coating Thickness
0.178- 0.305 mm ( 7- 12 mils)
Deformation Pattern
S ( diagonal)
Concrete Dimensions
813mm ( 32") dia, 279mm ( 11") and 356mm ( 14") depth
Table 1- 2: Testing Specifications
2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS
The epoxy- coated rebar tested with all three epoxy adhesive brands in tension and seismic loading met or exceeded the requirements of ICBO- AC58, Section 5.3.7.2.4, “ Conditions of Acceptance”.
The epoxy- coated rebar tested with the Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000 epoxy adhesive in creep loading met or exceeded the requirements of the Caltrans Augmentation/ Revisions to ICBO- AC58, Section 5.3.3.2, “ Conditions of Acceptance”. However, the Simpson Strong – Tie SET22 and Red Head Epcon Ceramic 6 epoxy adhesives did not meet the requirements for creep loading.
2
3. PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS
3.1 Simpson Strong- Tie SET22
Simpson Strong- Tie SET22 epoxy is a two- component, low odor, 1: 1 ratio, 100% solids epoxy- based adhesive for use as a high strength, non- shrink anchor grouting material. Resin and hardener are dispensed and mixed simultaneously through the mixing nozzle. SET22 meets the ASTM C- 881 specification for Type I, II, IV and V, Grade 3, Class B and C.
Surfaces to receive epoxy must be clean. The base material temperature must be 4.44° C ( 40° F) or above at the time of installation. For best results, material should be 21.1° C - 26.7° C ( 70° - 80° F) at the time of application. The shelf life of an unopened side- by- side cartridge is two years from the date of manufacture. The batch number and expiration date is found on each cartridge. For best results cartridges should be stored between 7.22° C ( 45° F) and 32.2° C ( 90° F). The recommended cure times for different base material temperatures are shown in Table 3- 1.
Base Material Temperature
° F
° C
Cure Time
40
4
72 hrs.
65
18
24 hrs.
85
29
20 hrs.
90
32
16 hrs.
Table 3- 1: Simpson SET22 Cure Times
SET22 samples were randomly chosen via purchase from White Cap Industries in Rancho Cordova, CA.
3.2 Red Head Epcon Ceramic 6
Red Head Epcon Ceramic 6 ( or C6) is a two- component, 100% solids, non- sag paste adhesive formulated for use in concrete, stone, and hollow masonry. Epoxy components are dispensed through a static mixing nozzle that thoroughly mixes the material. It meets NSF Standard 61 for use in conjunction with drinking water systems, and meets ASTM C881- 90, Type IV Grade 3, Class A, B, and C with the exception of gel time.
Surfaces to receive epoxy must be clean. At temperatures between - 17.8° C - 10° C ( 0° F - 50° F), C6 should be heated to room temperature or up to 65.6° C ( 150° F) maximum to improve product flow and assure proper curing. The minimum shelf life for C6 is 3 years. Two codes, a four- letter batch code and five- number cartridge code, are printed on a single sticker affixed to each epoxy cartridge. Expiration dates were not found on the cartridges, but are available on the boxes. The expiration dates for each cartridge were obtained by calling the manufacturer. The recommended cure times for different base temperatures are shown in Table 3- 2.
3
Base Material Temperature
° F
° C
WorkingTime
Full Cure Time
40
4
45 min.
32 hrs.
50
10
20 min.
24 hrs.
60
16
10 min.
2 hrs.
70
20
7 min.
1 hr.
90
32
5 min.
1 hr.
120
49
4 min.
1 hr.
Table 3- 2: Red Head Epcon C6 Cure times
C6 samples were randomly chosen via purchase from White Cap Industries in Rancho Cordova, CA and Rainbow Fasteners Inc. in Sacramento, CA.
3.3 Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000
Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000 epoxy is a 100% solids, two- component, non- sag structural adhesive designed to be used on a wide range of applications. It is a low odor, low toxicity, and non- shrink epoxy. CIA- Gel 7000 meets ASTM C881. Resin and hardener are simultaneously dispensed and mixed through a mixing nozzle.
Surfaces to receive epoxy must be clean. Application at a substrate temperature below 4.44° C ( 40° F) is not recommended. Exposure to temperature exceeding 43.3° C ( 110° F) for prolonged periods is not recommended. The shelf life for unopened containers is a minimum of one year. CIA- Gel 7000 is not sensitive to heat or UV light, but should be prevented from freezing. The epoxy should be stored in temperatures above 4.44° C ( 40° F). The lot number and expiration date are printed on a label affixed to each cartridge. The recommended cure times for different base temperatures are shown in Table 3- 3.
Base Material Temperature
° F
° C
Initial Set Time
Bolt- Up Time
Cure Time
40- 50
4.44- 10
5 hrs.
12 hrs.
96 hrs.
50- 60
10- 15.6
4 hrs.
8 hrs.
72 hrs.
60- 70
15.6- 21.1
3 hrs.
6 hrs.
48 hrs.
70- 80
21.1- 26.7
2 hrs.
4 hrs.
36 hrs.
80- 90
26.7- 32.2
1 hrs.
4 hrs.
24 hrs.
Table 3- 3: Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000 Cure times
CIA- Gel 7000 samples were randomly chosen via purchase from White Cap Industries in Rancho Cordova, CA.
4
4. TEST MATERIALS
4.1 Epoxy- Coated Rebar
The epoxy- coated rebar samples were specified to be M19 (# 6), grade A706 rebar with an “ S”, or diagonal, deformation pattern. The coating thickness was specified as 0.178- 0.305 mm ( 7- 12 mils) with a gray ( rigid) coating. The rebar was from the same heat and the cut ends were coated. The epoxy- coated rebar was obtained from FBC Systems, Inc. in Vallejo, CA.
4.2 Concrete
All testing was performed in unreinforced and uncracked concrete. The Caltrans concrete mix design T0A6342A, which has a compressive strength of 31 ± 3.45 MPa ( 4500 ± 500 psi), was used instead of the 20.7 ± 3.45 MPa ( 3000 ± 500 psi) strength requirement of ICBO- AC58. This mix design was tested because it is more representative of the mix used in the construction of Caltrans structures, and it allowed the epoxy- coated rebar to be more accurately tested. Concrete was supplied by Teichert in Sacramento, CA.
The concrete structural samples were cylinders of 813 mm ( 32”) in diameter and either 279 mm ( 11”) or 356 mm ( 14”) in depth ( depending on embedment depth). The test surface was rough, “ screed” finished to replicate field applications.
Concrete compressive test cylinders were prepared and tested in accordance with CTM 521 and ASTM C39. The actual compressive strength of the concrete when tested ranged from 30.8 MPa ( 4470 psi) to 43.8 MPa ( 6350 psi). Additional concrete data is located in Appendix A. 1.
5. TEST EQUIPMENT
5.1 Tension and Seismic Loading
Tension and seismic testing was conducted using equipment designed in compliance with ASTM E488. The equipment used for the tension and seismic loading of the epoxy- coated rebar was a custom made system designed in by Caltrans in conjunction with SATEC. The system includes a load frame, a Labtronic 8800 Digital Controller, and a hydraulic pump.
The load frame uses a 267 kN ( 60 kip), 254 mm ( 10”) stroke hydraulic actuator to apply tension force to the rebar samples. ( See Figure 5- 1) Attached in- line to the end of the actuator is a load cell, a linear alignment coupler, and a bolt holder. The linear alignment coupler is a ball- in- socket type coupler that allows small x- y movement of the bolt holder via rotation about a fixed point. It is used to prevent a moment from being applied to the rebar sample during testing. The bolt holder is a high- strength part that holds the rebar gripping device. The entire frame is supported by a ring that is 12.7 mm ( ½ ”) thick by 25.4 mm ( 1”) tall and has an internal diameter of 635 mm ( 25”). This ring allows the rebar sample to experience an unconstrained failure. Therefore, the rebar
5
sample can fail in a number of ways which best simulates actual failures in the field. The load frame was moved onto and off of the samples with a gantry crane due to its weight.
The Labtronic 8800 Digital Controller is a sophisticated device that allows a multitude of testing capabilities. The controller manages the hydraulics to perform the necessary tension and seismic loading conditions. The controller is connected to a laptop computer, which collects all of the pertinent test data. The controller is housed in a watertight cabinet and mounted to a cart along side the hydraulic pump. ( See Figure 5- 2)
The load measurements were obtained from the 267 kN ( 60 kip) load cell on the load frame. The displacement measurements were obtained by a pair of ± 25.4 mm (± 1”) stroke AC LVDT’s. The LVDT’s were attached to the rebar by a custom made bracket that holds them 381 mm ( 15”) away from the rebar in opposite directions. Using two LVDT’s in this configuration and taking their average helps to minimize errors that can occur from misaligned samples. The displacements were measured relative to the concrete test surface. The LVDTs’ were calibrated with the Labtronic controller at the beginning of each test day. ( See Figure 5- 3)
Figure 5- 1: 267 kN ( 60 kip) Load Frame Figure 5- 2: Cart with Controller and Hydraulic Pump
6
Figure 5- 3: LVDT Bracket 5.2 Creep Loading In order to perform the testing in a timely manner, a method of applying a creep load to five samples simultaneously was developed. For each sample this method uses a hydraulic actuator, a spherical washer set, a barlock rebar clamp, a pair of LVDT’s, anLVDT bracket, and a hydraulic actuator support frame. The barlock screws into the reba
r
n the
pport the actuator load and they sit on the concrete test surface allowing a clearance of
about 229 mm ( 9”) around the rebar. This clearance creates an unconstrained condition
on the rebar and allows any type of failure mode. The LVDT’s are mounted in the same
manner as for the tension testing, however; they only allow 229 mm ( 9”) of clearance
around the rebar and have a full stroke of ± 12.7 mm (± 0.5”). ( See Figures 5- 4 and 5- 5)
An air- powered pump simultaneously pressurizes all five actuators. This pump is
driven by a static compressed air supply, which converts air pressure to hydraulic
pressure through a mechanical piston ratio. Once pressurized, the pump holds a constant
pressure, which in turn applies a constant load on the rebar samples. ( See Figure 5- 6)
to create a shoulder for the actuator to push against. The spherical washer is placed between the actuator piston and the barlock, and is used to minimize any moment isystem. The actuator support frame is made of two steel C- channels and two I- beams welded together, and holds the actuator above the concrete test surface. The I- beams
su
7
Figure 5- 4: Creep Loading Setup Figure 5- 5: LVDT Bracket for Creep Testing
Figure 5- 6: Air Powered Pump
8
5.3 Environmental Chamber
An environmental chamber was used to bring the samples to the appropriate temperatures for testing. The chamber that was used is a wooden shed that is fully insulated. It is equipped with an HVAC unit with enough capacity to bring the chamber to the necessary temperatures regardless of outside temperature. A programmable thermostat was used to maintain the necessary temperature tolerance.
5.4 Other Equipment
Testing could not be performed inside of the environmental chamber because it was too small. Therefore, a method of moving the heavy concrete test cylinders was necessary. A small steel cart was designed that would allow the cylinders to be moved in and out of the chamber one at a time as needed ( see Figure 5- 7).
The load frame was equipped with a bolt holder that is used to grip threaded rod outfitted with a nut and washer. Since there was not an easy method of attaching a nut and washer to the rebar, a gripping device was designed specially to grip the rebar and fit into the bolt holder. This rebar grip consists of three tapered conical jaws in a tapered cylindrical housing ( see Figure 5- 9). As the gripper is pulled up with a piece of rebar in the jaws, the jaws will grip into the rebar at a ratio of approximately 6: 1 of the pulling load. This gives a firm grip on the rebar to minimize the possibility of rebar slippage during testing.
During the creep testing of the rebar, data must be collected at anywhere from minutely to daily during the span of testing. For this, a Campbell Scientific CR23X datalogger was used ( see Figure 5- 8). For the first 6 hours of testing, the datalogger was programmed to collect all data every three seconds. This gave more than enough data to accurately record the initial elastic deformation and the critical first six hours of rebar displacement. After the first six hours, the datalogger was programmed to collect all data on an hourly basis. This gave enough data to satisfy all requirements. The datalogger program is located in Appendix B.
To minimize the clutter of wiring from the 10 LVDT’s, a multiplexer with integrated power supply was designed and fabricated ( see Figure 5- 10). This LVDT multiplexer allowed the 10 LVDT’s to be plugged into it, gave the appropriate power to each LVDT, and output a clean set of 10 twisted wire pairs to be connected to the datalogger. This multiplexer greatly facilitated connecting and disconnecting the LVDT’s between tests.
9
Figure 5- 7: Concrete Cylinder Mover Figure 5- 8: Campbell Scientific Datalogger
Figure 5- 9: Rebar Gripper Figure 5- 10: LVDT Multiplexer
More detailed information for most of the equipment described in this section
may be found in Appendix C in the form of data sheets and/ or drawings.
1 0
6. INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
For each epoxy adhesive, the epoxy- coated rebar was installed into concrete cylinders measuring 813 mm ( 32”) in diameter by 279 mm ( 11”) deep for the 9d [ 171.5mm ( 6 ¾ ”)] embedment depth, and 813 mm ( 32”) in diameter by 356 mm ( 14”) deep for the 12d [ 228.6mm ( 9”)] embedment depth. Holes were drilled into the hardened concrete using a rotary hammer to depths of 171.5 mm ( 6 ¾ ”) or 228.6 mm ( 9”) depending on the test. The freshly drilled holes were blown out with compressed air, thoroughly brushed, and blown out again until no particles blew out. Tape was immediately put over each cleaned hole until the rebar was installed to prevent debris infiltration. The holes were drilled to a size of 22.2 mm ( 7/ 8”) in diameter at less than 6° from vertical.
The concrete cylinders were brought to a temperature of 21.1° C ± 2.8° C ( 70° F ± 5° F) in an environmental chamber. The epoxy adhesive was dispensed into each hole from the bottom up, filling each hole approximately half way. The epoxy- coated rebar was then inserted into each adhesive filled hole with a twisting motion to help eliminate air pockets from forming. The epoxy adhesive was allowed to cure for 48 hours at 21.1° C ± 2.8° C ( 70° F ± 5° F) prior to testing.
7. TEST PROCEDURE
Testing was conducted in accordance with ICBO- AC58, ASTM E488- 96, ASTM E1512- 01, CTM 681, and Caltrans Augmentation/ Revisions to ICBO- AC58, except for concrete compressive strength in which a higher strength than required was used.
7.1 Tension and Seismic Tests
Tension and seismic tests were first performed on the 12d embedment depth epoxy- coated rebar samples, and then the 9d. Ten samples were tested at a time; five samples for each tension and seismic loadings. One at a time, the cured samples were brought outside from an environmental chamber at 21.1° C ± 2.8° C ( 70° F ± 5° F) and quickly tested. The samples were unconstrained to allow any possible failure mode.
Five samples ( controls) were tested in tension until failure and an average ultimate load was determined, Tref. Loading criteria, Ns, Ni, and Nm, for the seismic tests were then calculated using the average ultimate load ( see Figure 7- 1). The remaining five samples were then tested in seismic loading at a frequency of 0.5 Hz and according to the calculated loading criteria. Immediately after the seismic loading was complete, the samples were pulled in tension until failure. An average ultimate tension load after seismic loading was calculated.
1 1
Nm = ¼ Tref
Ni = ( Ns + Nm)/ 2
Ns = maximum tension test load
= ( 1.5)( 1.3333)( ¼ Tref)
Ns Ni Nm Cycles Load 10 30 100
Figure 7- 1: Seismic Loading Criteria
7.2 Creep Tests
High temperature creep tests were performed on samples with the 9d embedment depth only. Ten cured samples were brought up to 43.3 ° C ± 1.65° C ( 110° F ± 3° F) in an environmental chamber in approximately 24 hours. Elevated temperature tension tests were first performed on five of the samples. One at a time, the heated samples were taken out of the heated environmental chamber and quickly tested. A maximum displacement at ultimate load was calculated from the five high temperature tests.
A sustained creep load of 40% of the average ultimate load, Tref, was applied to the remaining five samples by the use of an air- powered hydraulic pump and five hydraulic actuators. Each sample was fitted with a hydraulic actuator, one set of spherical washers, a barlock clamping device, an actuator support fixture, and a bracket which held two LVDT’s 228.6mm ( 9”) away from the rebar in opposite directions. One of the five samples was also equipped with a load cell.
With the samples already up to temperature, a preload of approximately 4% of the sustained creep load was applied to the samples. The displacements were then zeroed, and the remaining sustained creep load was applied. The displacements were recorded every three seconds for the first six hours, and hourly until the end of the test cycle. Other data that was recorded hourly until the end of the test cycle includes: internal chamber temperature and humidity, tension force applied to the rebar, air pump pressure, sample concrete temperature, and outside temperature. The samples were left in the environmental chamber that was programmed to warm up to 43.3 ° C ± 1.65° C ( 110° F ± 3° F) and maintain that temperature within ± 1.65° C (± 3° F) for at least 42 days. The sample concrete temperature was recorded by a thermocouple cast into two of the five samples 114 mm ( 4 ½ ”) down from the test surface.
After the 42- day test cycle, the samples were unloaded and the fixtures were removed. The rebar was then cut to a length of approximately 203 mm ( 8”) to both remove the marred section of rebar created by the barlocks, and to allow the sample to fit into the testing machine. One at a time, each sample was then taken out of the heated chamber and quickly tested in tension until failure.
Data and specific details for the above test procedure may be found in the Appendix, and are summarized in Section 8, Test Results.
1 2
8. TEST RESULTS
The testing revealed that epoxy- coated rebar bonded into hardened concrete generally outperforms uncoated rebar in tensile loading, however; it under performs uncoated rebar in creep loading. One interesting discovery was that failures occurred via the adhesive debonding from the epoxy coating on the rebar. For uncoated rebar, the adhesive rarely debonds from the rebar interface. The seismic testing revealed that the epoxy- coated rebar satisfied the ICBO- AC58 conditions of acceptance for each adhesive. A summary of all tests performed is displayed in Tables 8- 1 through 8- 3.
After performing the tests and having the concrete test cylinders compression tested, the concrete strength was found to be slightly higher than initially intended. The concrete strength was found to be in the range of 30.8 MPa ( 4470 psi) to 43.8 MPa ( 6350 psi). Even with the higher strength concrete, the epoxy- coated rebar still failed the creep tests for two adhesives.
1 3
Test Type
Sample #
Date
Time
OutsideTemp
Max Load
Max Displacement
Method of Failure
AverageLoad
AverageDisp
F
C
lbf
N
in
mm
N ( lbf)
mm ( in)
1
10/ 01/ 03
9: 35
63.8
35.4
38570
171637
0.1926
4.892
Adhesive
2
10/ 01/ 03
10: 24
69.0
38.3
41320
183874
0.4361
11.077
Adhesive
178436
6.962
3
10/ 01/ 03
11: 16
74.6
41.4
40550
180448
-
-
Rebar Gripper
( 40098)
( 0.2741)
4
10/ 01/ 03
11: 44
76.4
42.4
40590
180626
0.2702
6.863
Rebar
SET22 12d Tensile
5
10/ 01/ 03
12: 14
76.0
42.2
39460
175597
0.1975
5.017
Rebar
1
10/ 01/ 03
13: 25
81.8
45.4
40160
178712
0.1802
4.576
Rebar
2
10/ 01/ 03
13: 52
81.4
45.2
40910
182050
0.1610
4.090
Rebar
182121
5.453
3
10/ 01/ 03
14: 21
82.2
45.7
40980
182361
0.2926
7.432
Rebar
( 40926)
( 0.2147)
4
10/ 01/ 03
14: 57
82.0
45.6
41090
182851
0.2420
6.148
Rebar
SET22 12d Seismic
5
10/ 01/ 03
15: 37
81.0
45.0
41490
184631
0.1977
5.021
Rebar
1
10/ 08/ 03
11: 25
76.2
42.3
33960
151122
0.0982
2.495
Conc/ Adhesive
2
10/ 08/ 03
11: 51
77.8
43.2
32610
145115
0.0716
1.819
Conc/ Adhesive
149983
2.654
3
10/ 08/ 03
12: 28
80.0
44.4
33290
148141
0.0998
2.535
Adhesive
( 33704)
( 0.1045)
4
10/ 08/ 03
12: 50
81.6
45.3
33520
149164
0.1068
2.712
Adhesive
SET22 9d Tensile
5
10/ 08/ 03
13: 12
78.8
43.8
35140
156373
0.1461
3.711
Adhesive
1
10/ 08/ 03
14: 20
82.2
45.7
33140
147473
0.0924
2.346
Adhesive
2
10/ 08/ 03
14: 46
83.6
46.4
35110
156240
0.1229
3.122
Adhesive
148354
2.474
3
10/ 08/ 03
15: 10
83.6
46.4
32040
142578
0.0800
2.032
Adhesive
( 33338)
( 0.0974)
4
10/ 08/ 03
15: 34
84.2
46.8
33580
149431
0.0942
2.392
Adhesive
SET22 9d Seismic
5
10/ 08/ 03
15: 55
83.4
46.3
32820
146049
0.0976
2.480
Adhesive
1
10/ 17/ 03
14: 54
82.2
45.7
31500
140175
0.0717
1.822
Conc/ Adhesive
2
10/ 17/ 03
15: 16
82.2
45.7
29840
132788
0.1079
2.741
Conc/ Adhesive
139107
6.312
3
10/ 17/ 03
15: 35
82.2
45.7
30880
137416
0.2774
7.045
Adhesive
( 31260)
( 0.2485)
4
10/ 17/ 03
15: 51
82.0
45.6
32340
143913
0.3552
9.021
Adhesive
SET22 9d Elevated Temperature Tensile
5
10/ 17/ 03
16: 09
82.2
45.7
31740
141243
0.4304
10.931
Conc/ Adhesive
5
12/ 01/ 03
11: 20
63.4
35.2
25790
114766
0.0578
1.467
Adhesive
1
12/ 01/ 03
11: 47
63.8
35.4
29500
131275
0.0507
1.289
Adhesive
117142
1.359
2
12/ 01/ 03
12: 10
60.8
33.8
26290
116991
0.0440
1.117
Conc/ Adhesive
( 26324)
( 0.0535)
4
12/ 01/ 03
12: 31
59.4
33.0
25660
114187
0.0439
1.116
Conc/ Adhesive
SET22 9d Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile
3
12/ 01/ 03
12: 51
60.0
33.3
24380
108491
0.0711
1.807
Conc/ Adhesive
Table 8- 1: Summary of Results for SET22 Epoxy Testing
1 4
Test Type
Sample #
Date
Time
OutsideTemp
Max Load
Max Displacement
Method of Failure
AverageLoad
AverageDisp
F
C
lbf
N
in
mm
N ( lbf)
mm ( in)
1
12/ 05/ 03
9: 39
56.4
31.3
37850
168433
0.2681
6.811
Adhesive
2
12/ 05/ 03
10: 09
57.8
32.1
35790
159266
0.2041
5.185
Adhesive
155323
4.767
3
12/ 05/ 03
10: 32
58.6
32.6
38620
171859
0.2744
6.970
Adhesive
( 34904)
( 0.1877)
4
12/ 05/ 03
10: 55
60.6
33.7
32520
144714
0.1255
3.188
Adhesive
Ceramic 6 12d Tensile
5
12/ 05/ 03
11: 18
60.0
33.3
29740
132343
0.0662
1.681
Adhesive
1
12/ 05/ 03
12: 27
61.6
34.2
33560
149342
0.0668
1.696
Adhesive
2
12/ 05/ 03
12: 54
62.0
34.4
36950
164428
0.2387
6.062
Adhesive
148924
4.807
3
12/ 05/ 03
13: 18
62.6
34.8
39900
177555
0.3157
8.020
Adhesive
( 37123)
( 0.1893)
4
12/ 05/ 03
13: 46
63.0
35.0
38080
169456
0.2271
5.768
Adhesive
Ceramic 6 12d Seismic
5
12/ 05/ 03
14: 13
64.4
35.8
18840
83838
0.0980
2.489
Adhesive
1
12/ 10/ 03
9: 06
58.6
32.6
29880
132966
0.1040
2.641
Adhesive
2
12/ 10/ 03
9: 26
58.8
32.7
31380
139641
0.0798
2.028
Adhesive
142178
2.987
3
12/ 10/ 03
9: 44
57.4
31.9
32660
145337
0.1157
2.940
Adhesive
( 31950)
( 0.1176)
4
12/ 10/ 03
10: 00
58.2
32.3
33470
148942
0.1515
3.847
Adhesive
Ceramic 6 9d Tensile
5
12/ 10/ 03
10: 17
58.8
32.7
32360
144002
0.1369
3.478
Adhesive
1
12/ 10/ 03
10: 37
59.0
32.8
32430
144314
0.1298
3.298
Adhesive
2
12/ 10/ 03
10: 57
60.2
33.4
31990
142356
0.0866
2.200
Adhesive
140967
2.761
3
12/ 10/ 03
11: 15
61.2
34.0
31440
139908
0.1292
3.281
Adhesive
( 31678)
( 0.1087)
4
12/ 10/ 03
11: 34
60.2
33.4
31670
140932
0.1267
3.217
Adhesive
Ceramic 6 9d Seismic
5
12/ 10/ 03
11: 55
61.2
34.0
30860
137327
0.0711
1.807
Adhesive
1
12/ 18/ 03
14: 09
60.0
33.3
29420
130919
0.1032
2.622
Adhesive
2
12/ 18/ 03
14: 25
60.6
33.7
27630
122954
0.1292
3.282
Adhesive
131435
3.336
3
12/ 18/ 03
14: 40
60.2
33.4
29430
130964
0.1398
3.551
Adhesive
( 29536)
( 0.1313)
4
12/ 18/ 03
14: 58
61.4
34.1
30550
135948
0.1063
2.700
Adhesive
Ceramic 6 9d Elevated Temperature Tensile
5
12/ 18/ 03
15: 13
61.2
34.0
30650
136393
0.1782
4.526
Adhesive
5
01/ 30/ 04
11: 09
50.6
28.1
31110
138440
0.2159
5.483
Adhesive
3
01/ 30/ 04
11: 49
52.2
29.0
27850
123933
0.1125
2.858
Adhesive
130897
3.778
2
01/ 30/ 04
12: 10
54.2
30.1
27590
122776
0.0564
1.432
Adhesive
( 29415)
( 0.1487)
1
01/ 30/ 04
12: 30
54.0
30.0
31110
138440
0.2101
5.337
Adhesive
Ceramic 6 9d Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile
4
01/ 30/ 04
-
-
-
FAILED
-
-
-
-
Table 8- 2: Summary of Results for Red Head Epcon C6 Epoxy Testing
1 5
Test Type
Sample #
Date
Time
OutsideTemp
Max Load
Max Displacement
Method of Failure
AverageLoad
AverageDisp
( F)
( C)
( lbf)
( N)
( in)
( mm)
N ( lbf)
mm ( in)
1
02/ 04/ 04
9: 13
50.0
27.8
41060
182717
0.4179
10.615
Rebar
2
02/ 04/ 04
9: 36
50.6
28.1
38770
172527
0.6421
16.310
Adhesive
168148
12.066
3
02/ 04/ 04
9: 57
47.6
26.4
32210
143335
0.3222
8.183
Adhesive
( 37786)
( 0.475)
4
02/ 04/ 04
10: 25
49.6
27.6
38710
172260
0.4926
12.512
Adhesive
CIA- Gel 7000 12d Tensile
5
02/ 04/ 04
10: 42
50.4
28.0
38180
169901
0.5003
12.708
Adhesive
1
02/ 04/ 04
11: 12
52.6
29.2
40460
180047
0.6411
16.283
Adhesive
2
02/ 04/ 04
11: 42
55.8
31.0
40040
178178
0.5258
13.355
Adhesive
179415
15.522
3
02/ 04/ 04
12: 06
56.8
31.6
41610
185165
0.6961
17.681
Rebar
( 40318)
( 0.6111)
4
02/ 04/ 04
12: 29
58.4
32.4
40260
179157
0.6216
15.789
Adhesive
CIA- Gel 7000 12d Seismic
5
02/ 04/ 04
12: 52
59.6
33.1
39220
174529
0.5710
14.503
Adhesive
1
02/ 11/ 04
9: 32
54.0
30.0
29460
131097
0.0699
1.776
Adhesive
2
02/ 11/ 04
9: 52
55.6
30.9
32210
143335
0.1772
4.500
Adhesive
139890
3.795
3
02/ 11/ 04
10: 09
57.0
31.7
28000
124600
0.1612
4.094
Adhesive
( 31436)
( 0.1494)
4
02/ 11/ 04
10: 25
57.2
31.8
32230
143424
0.0838
2.129
Adhesive
CIA- Gel 7000 9d Tensile
5
02/ 11/ 04
10: 37
56.8
31.6
35280
156996
0.2550
6.476
Adhesive
1
02/ 11/ 04
10: 55
60.4
33.6
32640
145248
0.1060
2.693
Conc/ Adhesive
2
02/ 11/ 04
11: 12
58.4
32.4
28910
128650
0.0661
1.680
Adhesive
133865
2.014
3
02/ 11/ 04
12: 30
68.0
37.8
28910
128650
0.0302
0.768
Conc/ Adhesive
( 30082)
( 0.0793)
4
02/ 11/ 04
12: 50
61.0
33.9
29490
131231
0.0904
2.295
Adhesive
CIA- Gel 7000 9d Seismic
5
02/ 11/ 04
13: 08
61.4
34.1
30460
135547
0.1036
2.632
Adhesive
1
02/ 20/ 04
9: 19
54.4
30.2
28800
128160
0.0452
1.149
Adhesive
2
02/ 20/ 04
9: 34
55.4
30.8
28430
126514
0.0473
1.201
Adhesive
136437
1.719
3
02/ 20/ 04
9: 47
56.2
31.2
32330
143869
0.0866
2.200
Conc/ Adhesive
( 30660)
( 0.0677)
4
02/ 20/ 04
10: 05
56.4
31.3
31230
138974
0.0663
1.683
Adhesive
CIA- Gel 7000 9d Elevated Temperature Tensile
5
02/ 20/ 04
10: 23
58.4
32.4
32510
144670
0.0929
2.360
Conc/ Adhesive
1
04/ 05/ 04
10: 55
69.8
38.8
34330
152769
0.1285
3.263
Adhesive
2
04/ 06/ 04
11: 17
66.4
36.9
33050
147073
0.0525
1.333
Adhesive
139401
2.025
3
04/ 07/ 04
11: 35
68.0
37.8
33200
147740
0.1296
3.292
Adhesive
( 31326)
( 0.0797)
4
04/ 08/ 04
11: 50
62.6
34.8
29780
132521
0.0541
1.375
Adhesive
CIA- Gel 7000 9d Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile
5
04/ 09/ 04
12: 03
68.2
37.9
26270
116902
0.0340
0.864
Conc/ Adhesive
Table 8- 3: Summary of Results for CIA- Gel 7000 7000 Epoxy Testing
8.1 Tension and Seismic Tests
For the CIA- Gel 7000 and Ceramic 6 adhesives, the average ultimate strength from tensile loading of the bonded epoxy- coated rebar was found to be slightly higher than the manufacturers specifications for uncoated rebar. However, the SET22 adhesive under performed the manufacturer specifications for uncoated rebar. This shows that epoxy- coated rebar bonded in hardened concrete generally performs comparable to uncoated rebar. Tables 8- 4 and 8- 5 summarize the tension and seismic test results and give the conditions of acceptance.
1 6
Preliminary Test Results and Seismic Parameters Tension and Seismic Test ICBO- AC58 4000 to 5000 psi Concrete ( Caltrans Mix T0A6342A)
Tension Seismic - M19 ( 19.1 mm) [# 6 ( 0.75 in)] Rebar
Average Ultimate Tension - Controls ( Tref)
Seismic Load Levels ( N) @ 0.5 Hz
Embedment
Epoxy Type
Avg. Load
Preload
Failure
Ns
Ni
Nm
N ( lb)
N ( lb)
(%)
Mode
10 cycles
30 cycles
100 cycles
SET22
178436 ( 40098)
4450 ( 1000)
2.49
2- epoxy1- grip 2- rebar
89215 ( 20048)
66912 ( 15036)
44609 ( 10024)
Red Head
155323 ( 34904)
4450 ( 1000)
2.86
5- epoxy
77659 ( 17451)
58245 ( 13089)
38831 ( 8726)
228.6 mm ( 9") [ 12d]
CIA- GEL 7000
168148 ( 37786)
4450 ( 1000)
2.65
4- epoxy1- rebar
84072 ( 18893)
63054 ( 14169)
42037 ( 9447)
SET22
149983 ( 33704)
4450 ( 1000)
2.97
3- epoxy2- cnc/ epy
74989 ( 16851)
56242 ( 12639)
37495 ( 8426)
Red Head
142178 ( 31950)
4450 ( 1000)
3.13
5- epoxy
71087 ( 15975)
53316 ( 11981)
35544 ( 7987)
171.5 mm ( 6- 3/ 4") [ 9d]
CIA- GEL 7000
139890 ( 31436)
4450 ( 1000)
3.18
5- epoxy
69943 ( 15718)
52458 ( 11788)
34973 ( 7859)
Table 8- 4: Preliminary Test Results and Seismic Parameters
Conditions of Acceptance Per Caltrans Augmentation to AC58 Section 5.3.7.2.2 Tension and Seismic Test ICBO- AC58 4000 to 5000 psi Concrete ( Caltrans Mix T0A6342A)
Tension Seismic - M19 ( 19.1 mm) [# 6 ( 0.75 in)] Rebar
Average Ultimate Tension - After Seismic
Maximum Peak Displacement, mm ( in) ( Δns ≤ ( Ns/ Tref)* Δult)
Embedment
Epoxy Type
Avg. Load
Preload
Failure
Pass/
Ns
Ni
Nm
N ( lb)
N ( lb)
(%)
Mode
Fail
10 cycles
30 cycles
100 cycles
SET22
182121 ( 40926)
4450( 1000)
2.44
5- rebar
Pass
0.684 ≤ 3.481( 0.026 ≤ 0.137)
0.734 ≤ 3.481 ( 0.029 ≤ 0.137)
0.504 ≤ 3.481( 0.020 ≤ 0.137)
Red Head
148924 ( 33466)
4450( 1000)
2.99
5- epoxy
Pass
1.563 ≤ 2.383( 0.062 ≤ 0.0938)
1.459 ≤ 2.383 ( 0.057 ≤ 0.0938)
1.291 ≤ 2.383( 0.051 ≤ 0.0938)
228.6 mm ( 9") [ 12d]
CIA- GEL 7000
179415 ( 40318)
4450( 1000)
2.48
4- epoxy1- rebar
Pass
0.664 ≤ 6.033( 0.026 ≤ 0.238)
0.604 ≤ 6.033 ( 0.024 ≤ 0.238)
0.537 ≤ 6.033( 0.021 ≤ 0.238)
SET22
148354 ( 33338)
4450( 1000)
3.00
5- epoxy
Pass
0.224 ≤ 1.327( 0.009 ≤ 0.0522)
0.177 ≤ 1.327 ( 0.007 ≤ 0.0522)
0.123 ≤ 1.327( 0.005 ≤ 0.0522)
Red Head
140967 ( 31678)
4450( 1000)
3.16
5- epoxy
Pass
0.337 ≤ 1.493( 0.013 ≤ 0.0588)
0.286 ≤ 1.493 ( 0.011 ≤ 0.0588)
0.236 ≤ 1.493( 0.009 ≤ 0.0588)
171.5 mm ( 6- 3/ 4") [ 9d]
CIA- GEL 7000
133865 ( 30082)
4450( 1000)
3.32
3- epoxy2- epy/ cnc
Pass
0.373 ≤ 1.897( 0.015 ≤ 0.0747)
0.326≤ 1.897 ( 0.013 ≤ 0.0747)
0.274 ≤ 1.897( 0.011 ≤ 0.0747)
Table 8- 5: Seismic Test Conditions of Acceptance
8.1.1 Simpson SET22
This was the first epoxy tested and therefore, was the test with the most errors. The first two tension tests on the 12d embedment depth were performed without oversight. However, on the third test the rebar gripper slipped off of the rebar just before failure of the rebar due to the gripper being inadvertently placed over the lettering on the
1 7
rebar. The lettering created an area where the gripper could not fully engage the rebar, and therefore caused slippage. On tests 4 and 5, the LVDT bracket came loose from the rebar causing it to slip down the rebar just before failure, and thus creating inaccurate displacement data. This occurred because the LVDT bracket was unable to maintain a tight grip once the rebar began to neck. Figures A- 6 through A- 10 in the appendix show the load vs. displacement curves for the five 12d tension tests.
After the tension tests, the seismic tests for the 12d embedment depth were performed. For these tests, every failure was a rebar failure. This caused excessive necking in the rebar just before failure, which allowed the LVDT bracket to slip down on every test. This, again, created erroneous displacement data. The load vs. displacement plots for the 12d seismic tests can be seen in Figures A- 11 through A- 15.
The 9d embedment depth tests were performed next and done so without fault. Figures A- 16 through A- 25 show the results for the tension and seismic tests in graphical form. See Table 8- 1 for all results from SET22 epoxy testing summarized in tabular form.
8.1.2 Red Head Epcon C6
For the testing of the Red Head Epoxy, the LVDT bracket was improved to accommodate for necking of the rebar. During its installation into the concrete, the epoxy adhesive began to harden before all ten 12d cylinders could be filled. This caused the need to use another epoxy cartridge to fill the last two samples. These two samples were numbers 1 and 3 of the tensile test group. During the tensile testing it was found that the two samples with the epoxy from the second cartridge had slightly higher strengths than the other three, however the values were within reasonable tolerances ( see Table 8- 2).
In addition to the premature hardening of the epoxy, sample # 5 in the 12d seismic test group did not receive enough epoxy. After testing this sample, it was noticed that the strength was much lower than the other four samples, and therefore the data for this sample was neglected. Figures A- 33 through A- 42 show the results for the 12d tensile and seismic tests.
The 9d testing was performed without fault and the results can be found in Figures A- 43 through A- 52.
8.1.3 Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000
All tensile and seismic tests for CIA- Gel 7000 were performed without errors and the results can be found in Figures A- 60 through A- 79. The results are also summarized in Table 8- 3.
8.2 Creep Tests
8.2.1 Simpson SET22
During the elevated temperature creep tests for the SET22 epoxy, one of the hydraulic rams leaked out all of the hydraulic fluid from the pump on day 41 of testing.
1 8
This caused a complete loss of pressure, and therefore a complete loss of loading on the samples. Although the creep testing did not go for the minimum 42- day period, testing continued. The creep testing data and results are shown in Figures A- 26 through A- 30. In Figure A- 29 some very large spikes can be seen in the temperature graph. These spikes are not actual temperature fluctuations, however they are due to electronic interference with the datalogging device and should therefore be ignored. The tension tests after creep were performed and the results can be found in Figure A- 32.
The average displacement at ultimate load from the elevated temperature tensile tests was compared to the 1.52mm ( 0.06”) requirement from the Caltrans Augmentation to ICBO- AC58, and was found to be a higher value ( 6.31 mm, [ 0.248”]). Therefore, the 1.52mm ( 0.06”) displacement value is the requirement to be met. The average displacement at 600 days was found to be 1.50 mm ( 0.0591”), however this is the average of all five samples. One sample ( sample # 3) strayed from the other four, and those four samples all failed to meet the displacement limit, with an average of 1.59 mm ( 0.0626”). This leads to the conclusion that sample # 3 should be neglected and that the epoxy- coated rebar bonded with SET22 did not meet the required displacement criteria.
8.2.2 Red Head Epcon C6
The displacement criteria for the Red Head epoxy testing was determined to be 1.52 mm ( 0.06”), because the average displacement at ultimate load of the elevated temperature tensile tests was found to be 3.34 mm ( 0.131”). The elevated temperature tensile tests results can be seen on Figure A- 58.
During the elevated temperature creep testing with the Red Head epoxy, all five of the samples failed the Caltrans Augmentation to ICBO- AC58 displacement criteria ( Section 5.3.3.2) before the 42- day creep cycle was over. Two of the samples displaced farther than the stroke of the LVDT’s, with one of them pulling completely out of the concrete. This event can be seen on Figure A- 55. Without a doubt, the epoxy- coated rebar bonded with Red Head Epcon C6 did not meet the required displacement criteria. The average displacement at 600 days was found to be 2.75 mm ( 0.108”). The results for this creep testing can be found on Figures A- 53 through A- 57, and the results for the tensile testing after creep can be found on Figure A- 59. As in the SET22 testing, the spikes on Figure A- 56 are not actual temperature fluctuations, but are due to electronic interference with the datalogger.
8.2.3 Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000
The CIA- Gel 7000 average displacement at ultimate load for the elevated temperature tensile tests was found to be 1.72 mm ( 0.0676”). Since this value is higher than that set by the Caltrans Augmentation to ICBO- AC58, the displacement limit was set as 1.52 mm ( 0.06”). The elevated temperature tensile test results can be seen on Figure A- 85.
The average displacement at 600 days for the epoxy- coated rebar bonded with CIA- Gel 7000 was found to be 0.538 mm ( 0.0212”). This shows that the epoxy- coated rebar bonded with CIA- Gel 7000 did meet the displacement criteria. The creep testing results are shown in Figures A- 80 through A- 84. Once again, the temperature spikes
1 9
during the first 11 days in Figure A- 83 are not actual temperature fluctuations, but are due to electronic interference with the datalogger. The small jump and rebound in displacement near day 37 was due to a jump in pressure from pump inaccuracies. The pressure jump occurred over a weekend and was compensated for as soon as it was discovered. The results for the elevated temperature tensile tests after creep are shown in Figure A- 86.
9. CONCLUSION
The epoxy- coated rebar was found to meet the conditions of acceptance for seismic loading when bonded into hardened concrete using an epoxy adhesive. However, the epoxy- coated rebar did not meet the conditions of acceptance for creep loading when bonded into hardened concrete. The rebar bonded with CIA- Gel 7000 was found to meet the creep requirements, whereas the rebar bonded with SET22 and Red Head Epcon C6 did not meet the conditions of acceptance for creep loading. It was also noticed that, when compared to the manufacturer test data, the epoxy- coated rebar outperformed uncoated rebar in allowable tensile loads for two of the three epoxies tested. SET22 adhesive under performed the manufacturer test data.
Although the testing procedures and instrumentation were burdened with error, the testing revealed enough accurate data to be valuable. The displacement data on the 12d testing with the SET22 epoxy was accurate until the last few seconds of each test, where the LVDT brackets slipped creating inaccurate data. Even though the displacement data was not complete, the loading data was complete and accurate. Beneficially, the incomplete portions of data did not affect the calculation of the conditions of acceptance. The interference in the instrumentation that created undesirable spikes in the temperature data was not found to be detrimental to the testing. The temperature was often checked manually to ensure that it was within the allowable tolerances.
The target concrete compressive strength was 31 ± 3.45 MPa ( 4500 ± 500 psi), however the actual strength ranged from 30.8 MPa ( 4470 psi) to 43.8 MPa ( 6350 psi). The concrete mix design used in this testing is representative of the mix used in the construction of Caltrans structures. Since this testing is designed to evaluate epoxy- coated rebar in actual use applications, the data obtained from the testing is in direct correlation.
Overall, this testing has proved to be valuable and has provided a better understanding of how epoxy- coated rebar reacts when bonded into hardened concrete with different epoxy adhesives.
10. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that a higher factor of safety be applied to epoxy- coated rebar than is to uncoated rebar when bonding it into hardened concrete. This can be done in the form of a deeper embedment depth or other method. The Reinforced Concrete Committee should determine whether a change in the general notes of the pre- qualified products list for cartridge epoxies / chemical adhesives is necessary to address the factor of safety modification. Also, the Reinforced Concrete Committee should review the
2 0
creep displacement acceptance criteria to determine if the value should be changed to accommodate epoxy- coated rebar, or if a separate set of specifications should be made for epoxy- coated rebar. The Red Head Epcon C6 epoxy is currently not on the Caltrans pre- qualified products list, and from the results in this testing, it is recommended that it stay off of the list.
11. IMPLEMENTATION
The Office of Structure Design will be responsible for the modification of the pre- qualified products list for cartridge epoxies / chemical adhesives and the bridge design aids for the use of epoxy- coated rebar bonded into hardened concrete.
12. REFERENCES
[ 1] California Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Services,
“ Caltrans Augmentation/ Revisions to ICBO- AC58, Acceptance Criteria for
Adhesive Anchors in Concrete and Masonry Elements”, November 2001.
[ 2] Choi, O. C., Hadje- Ghaffari, H., Darwin, D. and McCabe, S. L., “ Bond of Epoxy- Coated Reinforcement: Bar Parameters”, ACI Materials Journal, No. 88- M26, March- April 1991.
[ 3] Cook, R. A. and Konz, R. C., “ Factors Influencing Bond Strength of Adhesive
Anchors,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 98, N. 1, January- February 2001, pp. 76-
86.
2 1
APPENDIX
Appendix A General Test Data
A. 1 Kelly Ball and Slump Test Results
Epoxy
Time Date
Air Temp
ConcreteTemp
Kelly Ball
Slump
Mix Design
12: 00
26.9° C
28.6° C
54 mm
63.5 mm
SET22
9/ 2/ 2003
( 80.4° F)
( 83.4° F)
( 2- 1/ 8”)
( 2- 1/ 2”)
T0A6342A
14: 30
17.8° C
22.7° C
50.8 mm
63.5 mm
Ceramic 6
11/ 5/ 2003
( 64.0° F)
( 72.8° F)
( 2”)
( 2- 1/ 2”)
T0A6342A
14: 00
10° C
63.5 mm
82.5mm
CIA- GEL 7000
1/ 5/ 2004
( 50° F)
−
( 2- 1/ 2”)
( 3- 1/ 4”)
T0A6342A
Table A- 1: Concrete Pour Information
A. 2 Epoxy Information
Epoxy
Lot Number
Expiration Date
SET22
M219N010
Jan- 05
Ceramic 6
12d Tests
EONS 47029
Jan- 06
12d Tests ( tensile test samples 1 & 3)
EONR 79212
Sep- 05
9d Tests
EONT 51816
Nov- 05
9d Creep Tests
EONT 51817
Nov- 05
CIA- Gel 7000
745
Nov- 04
Table A- 2: Epoxy Adhesive Information
2 2
A. 3 Concrete Test Results
TL No.: 134606
Contract No.: 65- 680321
Cast Date: 9/ 2/ 2003
Break Date
Concrete Lab Sample No.
CylinderNo.
CylinderAge
Peak Load
Compressive Strength
Test Result( Average)
1/ 2
588 kN ( 132300 lbf)
32.3 MPa ( 4679 psi)
9/ 29/ 03
CL031730
2/ 2
27 days
597 kN ( 134200 lbf)
32.7 MPa ( 4746 psi)
32.5 MPa( 4710 psi)
1/ 2
604 kN ( 135700 lbf)
33.1 MPa ( 4799 psi)
10/ 1/ 03
CL031731
2/ 2
29 days
607 kN ( 136500 lbf)
33.3 MPa ( 4828 psi)
33.2 MPa( 4810 psi)
1/ 2
620 kN ( 139400 lbf)
34 MPa ( 4930 psi)
10/ 8/ 03
CL031732
2/ 2
36 days
629 kN ( 141500 lbf)
34.5 MPa ( 5005 psi)
34.3 MPa( 4970 psi)
1/ 2
631 kN ( 141900 lbf)
34.6 MPa ( 5019 psi)
10/ 17/ 03
CL031733
2/ 2
45 days
618 kN ( 138900 lbf)
33.9 MPa ( 4913 psi)
34.3 MPa( 4970 psi)
1/ 2
677 kN ( 152100 lbf)
37.1 MPa ( 5379 psi)
12/ 1/ 03
CL031734
2/ 2
90 days
673 kN ( 151400 lbf)
36.9 MPa ( 5355 psi)
37 MPa ( 5370 psi)
Table A- 3: Simpson SET22 Concrete Compressive Strengths
2 3
TL No.: 134607
Contract No.: 65- 680321
Cast Date: 11/ 5/ 2003
Break Date
Concrete Lab Sample No.
CylinderNo.
CylinderAge
Peak Load
Compressive Strength
Test Result( Average)
1/ 2
641 kN ( 144200 lbf)
35.2 MPa ( 5100 psi)
34.3 MPa( 4980 psi)
12/ 3/ 03
CL032361
2/ 2
28 days
612 kN ( 137500 lbf)
33.5 MPa ( 4863 psi)
1/ 2
628 kN ( 141100 lbf)
34.4 MPa ( 4990 psi)
12/ 4/ 03
CL032360
2/ 2
29 days
610 kN ( 137100 lbf)
33.4 MPa ( 4849 psi)
33.9 MPa( 4920 psi)
1/ 2
658 kN ( 148000 lbf)
36.1 MPa ( 5234 psi)
12/ 10/ 03
CL032359
2/ 2
35 days
650 kN ( 146100 lbf)
35.6 MPa ( 5167 psi)
35.9 MPa( 5200 psi)
1/ 2
694 kN ( 156000 lbf)
38 MPa ( 5517 psi)
12/ 18/ 03
CL032358
2/ 2
43 days
701 kN ( 157500 lbf)
38.4 MPa ( 5570 psi)
38.2 MPa( 5540 psi)
1/ 2
790 kN ( 177700 lbf)
43.3 MPa ( 6285 psi)
1/ 30/ 04
CL032357
2/ 2
86 days
797 kN ( 179200 lbf)
43.7 MPa ( 6338 psi)
43.5 MPa( 6310 psi)
Table A- 4: Red Head C6 Concrete Compressive Strengths
2 4
TL No.: 134608
Contract No.: 65- 680321
Cast Date: 1/ 5/ 2004
Break Date
Concrete Lab Sample No.
CylinderNo.
CylinderAge
Peak Load
Compressive Strength
Test Result( Average)
1/ 2
520 kN ( 116900 lbf)
28.5 MPa ( 4134 psi)
2/ 2/ 04
CL040169
2/ 2
28 days
516 kN ( 116000 lbf)
28.3 MPa ( 4103 psi)
28.4 MPa( 4120 psi)
1/ 2
557 kN ( 125200 lbf)
30.5 MPa ( 4428 psi)
2/ 4/ 04
CL040168
2/ 2
30 days
568 kN ( 127600 lbf)
31.1 MPa ( 4513 psi)
30.8 MPa( 4470 psi)
1/ 2
604 kN ( 135800 lbf)
33.1 MPa ( 4803 psi)
2/ 11/ 04
CL040166
2/ 2
37 days
606 kN ( 136200 lbf)
33.2 MPa ( 4817 psi)
33.2 MPa( 4810 psi)
1/ 2
664 kN ( 149300 lbf)
36.4 MPa ( 5280 psi)
2/ 20/ 04
CL040167
2/ 2
46 days
672 kN ( 151000 lbf)
36.8 MPa ( 5341 psi)
36.6 MPa( 5310 psi)
1/ 2
813 kN ( 182800 lbf)
44.6 MPa ( 6465 psi)
4/ 5/ 04
CL040170
2/ 2
91 days
785 kN ( 176400 lbf)
43 MPa ( 6239 psi)
43.8 MPa( 6350 psi)
Table A- 5: Covert Operations CIA- GEL 7000 Concrete Compressive Strengths
2 5
A. 4 Failure Modes
Failure Mode
Test
Sample #
Sample ID
Concrete
Concrete- Adhesive Interface
Adhesive- Rebar Interface
Rebar
Other
1
S1
X
2
S2
X
3
S3
Rebar Gripper Slipped
4
S4
X
SET22 12d Tensile
5
S5
X
1
S1S
X
2
S2S
X
3
S3S
X
4
S4S
X
SET22 12d Seismic
5
S5S
X
1
S6
X
X
X
2
S7
X
X
Some adhesive removed
3
S8
X
4
S9
X
X
SET22 9d Tensile
5
S10
X
1
S6S
X
2
S7S
X
3
S8S
X
4
S9S
X
SET22 9d Seismic
5
S10S
X
1
S1HT
X
X
2
S2HT
X
X
3
S3HT
X
4
S4HT
X
Significant concrete breakage
SET22 9d Elevated Temperature Tensile
5
S5HT
X
X
1
E1/ S1C
X
2
E1/ S2C
X
X
3
E1/ S3C
X
X
4
E1/ S4C
X
X
SET22 9d Creep Tensile
5
E1/ S5C
X
Table A- 6: Testing Failure Modes for Epoxy- Coated Rebar Bonded with SET22 Adhesive
2 6
Failure Mode
Test
Sample #
Sample ID
Concrete
Concrete- Adhesive Interface
Adhesive- Rebar Interface
Rebar
Other
1
E2/ S1T/ 12d
X
X
2
E2/ S2T/ 12d
X
3
E2/ S3T/ 12d
X
X
4
E2/ S4T/ 12d
X
Red Head 12d Tensile
5
E2/ S5T/ 12d
X
1
E2/ S1S/ 12d
X
Some adhesive removed
2
E2/ S2S/ 12d
X
3
E2/ S3S/ 12d
X
X
4
E2/ S4S/ 12d
X
Red Head 12d Seismic
5
E2/ S5S/ 12d
X
1
E2/ S1T/ 9d
X
2
E2/ S2T/ 9d
X
3
E2/ S3T/ 9d
X
X
4
E2/ S4T/ 9d
X
X
Red Head 9d Tensile
5
E2/ S5T/ 9d
X
X
1
E2/ S1S/ 9d
X
2
E2/ S2S/ 9d
X
3
E2/ S3S/ 9d
X
X
4
E2/ S4S/ 9d
X
X
Red Head 9d Seismic
5
E2/ S5S/ 9d
X
1
E2/ S1HT
X
Adhesive removed at bottom
2
E2/ S2HT
X
Adhesive removed at bottom
3
E2/ S3HT
X
Adhesive removed at bottom
4
E2/ S4HT
X
Adhesive removed at bottom
Red Head 9d Elevated Temperature Tensile
5
E2/ S5HT
X
Adhesive removed at bottom
1
E2/ S1C
X
X
2
E2/ S2C
X
X
3
E2/ S3C
X
X
4
E2/ S4C
Failed during creep
Red Head 9d Creep Tensile
5
E2/ S5C
X
X
Table A- 7: Testing Failure Modes for Epoxy- Coated Rebar Bonded with Ceramic 6 Adhesive
2 7
Failure Mode
Test
Sample #
Sample ID
Concrete
Concrete- Adhesive Interface
Adhesive- Rebar Interface
Rebar
Other
1
CG/ S1T/ 12d
X
2
CG/ S2T/ 12d
X
Some adhesive removed
3
CG/ S3T/ 12d
X
4
CG/ S4T/ 12d
X
CIA- Gel 7000 12d Tensile
5
CG/ S5T/ 12d
X
Some adhesive removed
1
CG/ S1S/ 12d
X
X
2
CG/ S2S/ 12d
X
3
CG/ S3S/ 12d
X
4
CG/ S4S/ 12d
X
CIA- Gel 7000 12d Seismic
5
CG/ S5S/ 12d
X
1
CG/ S1T/ 9d
X
2
CG/ S2T/ 9d
X
3
CG/ S3T/ 9d
X
Some adhesive removed
4
CG/ S4T/ 9d
X
CIA- Gel 7000 9d Tensile
5
CG/ S5T/ 9d
X
X
1
CG/ S1S/ 9d
X
X
2
CG/ S2S/ 9d
X
3
CG/ S3S/ 9d
X
X
4
CG/ S4S/ 9d
X
CIA- Gel 7000 9d Seismic
5
CG/ S5S/ 9d
X
1
CG/ S1HT
X
2
CG/ S2HT
X
3
CG/ S3HT
X
X
4
CG/ S4HT
X
CIA- Gel 7000 9d Elevated Temperature Tensile
5
CG/ S5HT
X
X
1
CG/ S1C
X
2
CG/ S2C
X
3
CG/ S3C
X
4
CG/ S4C
X
CIA- Gel 7000 9d Creep Tensile
5
CG/ S5C
X
X
X
Table A- 8: Testing Failure Modes for Epoxy- Coated Rebar Bonded with CIA- Gel 7000 Adhesive
2 8
A. 5 Sample Failure Mode Photos
Figure A- 1: Typical Concrete– Concrete/ Adhesive Interface Failure
Figure A- 2: Typical Concrete/ Adhesive Interface Failure
2 9
Figure A- 3: T rface Failure
ypical Concrete/ Adhesive Interface– Adhesive/ Rebar Inte
Figure A- 4: Typical Adhesive/ Rebar Interface Failure
3 0
Figure A- 5: Typical Rebar Failure
Figure A- 6: Red Head C6 Creep Failure
3 1
A. 6 SET22 Test Data:
Simpson 12d Tensile Test # 1020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000180000012345678Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 6
Simpson 12d Tensile Test # 2020000400006000080000100000120000
140000160000
180000
200000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Displacement ( mm)
Load ( N)
Figure A- 7
3 2
Simpson 12d Tensile Test # 302000040000600008000010000012000014000016000018000020000001234567Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Fi
gure A- 8
Simpso
n 12d Tensile Test # 4
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
0 2 4 6 8 10
Displacement ( mm)
Load ( N)
Figure A- 9
Si
mpson 12d Tensile Test # 5
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Displacement ( mm) Load ( N)
Figure A- 10
3 3
Simpson 12d Seismic Test # 102000040000600008000010000012000014000016000018000001234567Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 11
Simpson 12d Seismic Test # 2020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000180000
200000
0 2 4 6 8 10
Displacement ( mm)
Load ( N)
Figure A- 12
Sim
pson 12d Seismic Test # 3
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
0 2 4 6 8 10
Displacement ( mm) Load ( N)
Figure A- 13
3 4
Simpson 12d Seismic Test # 402000040000600008000010000012000014000016000018000020000002468101Displacement ( mm) Load ( N
2
)
Figure A- 14
Simpson 12d Seismic Test # 50200004000060000800001000001200001400001600001800002000000246810Displacement ( mm) Load ( N
12
) Figure A- 15
Simpson 9d Tensile Test # 102000040000600008000010000012000014000016000001234Displacement ( mm) Load ( N
5
) Figure A- 16
3 5
Simpson 9d Tensile Test # 202000040000600008000010000012000014000016000000.511.522.53Displacement ( mm) Load ( N)
Figure A- 17
Simpson 9d Tensile
Test # 3
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Displacement ( mm)
Load ( N)
Figure A- 18
Si
mpson 9d Tensile Test # 4
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Displacement ( mm) Load ( N)
Figure A- 19
3 6
Simpson 9d Tensile Test # 502000040000600008000010000012000014000016000018000001234567Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 20
Simpson 9d Seismic Test # 10200004000060000
80000Load
100000
120000
160000
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Displacement ( mm)
( N
140000
)
Figure A- 21
Simpson 9d Seismic Test # 2020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000180000012345Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 22
3 7
Simpson 9d Seismic Test # 302000040000600008000010000012000014000016000001234Displacement ( mm) Load ( N
5
) Figure A- 23
Simpson 9d Seismic Test # 40200004000060000
80000ad (
100000
120000
160000
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Displacement ( mm)
Lo N
140000
)
Figure A- 24
Simpson 9d Seismic Test # 5020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000012345Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 25
3 8
Simpson Creep Displacements Over First 6 hours00.050.10.150.20.250.30: 001: 122: 243: 364: 486: 00Time ( hr) Displacement ( mm) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5 Figure A- 26
Simpson Elevated Temperature Creep Logarithmic Regression Analysis1.574 mm1.556 mm1.151 mm1.633 mm1.599 mm00.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.81101001000DaysDisplacement ( mm) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5y = 0.2394Ln( x) + 0.0421R2 = 0.9361y = 0.239Ln( x) + 0.0272R2 = 0.9237y = 0.1656Ln( x) + 0.153R2 = 0.9478y = 0.2491Ln( x) + 0.0398R2 = 0.927y = 0.2387Ln( x) + 0.0716R2 = 0.9443 Figure A- 27: SET22 Creep Displacement 600- Day Logarithmic Regression Analysis
3 9
Simpson 42- Day Creep Displacements00.20.40.60.811.207142128354249DaysDisplacement ( mm) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5 Figure A- 28
Simpson Chamber and Concrete Temperatures40414243444507142128354249DaysTemperature ( C) ConcreteChamber
Figure A- 29
Simpson Creep Load
48000
50000
52000
54000
56000
58000
60000
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49
Days
Load ( N)
Figure A- 30
4 0
Simpson Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests02000040000600008000010000012000014000016000002
4 6 8 10 12 14
Displacement ( mm)
Load ( N)
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Sample 4
Sample 5
1.82 mm
2.74 mm
7.04 mm
9.02 mm 10.93 mm
Figure A- 31: Displacements at Maximum Load for SET22 Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests
Simpson Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile Tests02000040000600008000010000012000014000000.511.522.533.544.5Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5 Figure A- 32: SET22 Tensile Tests After 42- Day Creep Cycle
4 1
A. 7 Red Head Epcon C6 Test Data:
Red Head 12d Tensile Test # 102000040000600008000010000012000014000016000018000002468Displacement ( mm) Load ( N
10
) Figure A- 33
Red Head 12d Tensile Test # 2020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000180000012345678Displacement (
mm)
Load ( N)
Figure A- 34
4 2
Red Head 12d Tensile Test # 302000040000600008000010000012000014000016000018000020000002468Displacement ( mm) Load ( N
10
) Figure A- 35
Red Head 12d Tensile Test # 4020000400006000080000100000120000140000
160000
0 1 2 3 4 5
Displacement ( mm)
Load ( N)
Figure A- 36
Red Head 12d Tensile Test # 50200004000
0
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Displacement ( mm) Load ( N)
Figure A- 37
4 3
Red Head 12d Seismic Test # 102000040000600008000010000012000014000016000000.511.522.533.54Displacement ( mm) Load ( N)
Figure A- 38
Red Hea
d 12d Seismic Test # 2
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Displacement ( mm)
Load ( N)
Figure A- 39
Red
Head 12d Seismic Test # 3
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
200000
0 2 4 6 8 10
Displacement ( mm) Load ( N
160000180000
)
Figure A- 40
4 4
Red Head 12d Seismic Test # 402000040000600008000010000012000014000016000018000002468Displacement ( mm) Load ( N
10
) Figure A- 41
Red Head 12d Seismic Test # 50
1000020000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
90000
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Displacement ( mm)
Load ( N
80000
)
Figure A- 42
Red Head 9d Tensile Test # 1020000400006000080000100000120000140000012345Displacement ( mm) Load ( N)
Figure A- 43
4 5
Red Head 9d Tensile Test # 202000040000600008000010000012000014000016000000.511.522.5Displacement ( mm) Load ( N
3
) Figure A- 44
Red Head 9d Tensile Test # 3020000400006000080000
100000N
120000
140000
160000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Displacement ( mm)
Load ( )
Figure A- 45
Red Head 9d Tensile Test # 4020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000012345Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 46
4 6
Red Head 9d Tensile Test # 502000040000600008000010000012000014000016000001234567Displacement ( mm) Load ( N)
Figure A- 47
Red Head 9d Seismic Test # 1020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000012345Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 48
Red Head 9d Seismic Test # 202000040000600008000010000012000014000016000000.511.522.533. Displacement ( mm) Load ( N
5
) Figure A- 49
4 7
Red Head 9d Seismic Test # 3020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000012345Displacement ( mm) Load ( N
6
)
Figure A- 50
Red Head 9d Seismic Test # 4020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000012345Displacement ( mm) Load ( N
6
) Figure A- 51
Red Head 9d Seismic Test # 502000040000600008000010000012000014000016000000.511.522.533.54Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 52
4 8
Red Head Creep Displacements Over First 6 Hours00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80: 00: 001: 12: 002: 24: 003: 36: 004: 48: 006: 00: 00Time ( Hr) Displacement ( mm) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5 Figure A- 53
Red Head Elevated Temperature Creep Logarithmic Regression Analysis3.670 mm2.123 mm2.465 mm00.511.522.533.541101001000DaysDisplacement ( mm) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 5y = 0.5577Ln( x) + 0.1025R2 = 0.8168y = 0.301Ln( x) + 0.1979R2 = 0.8608y = 0.3222Ln( x) + 0.4048R2 = 0.88 Figure A- 54: Red Head Creep Displacement 600- Day Logarithmic Regression Analysis
4 9
Red Head 42- Day Creep Displacements02468101207142128354249DaysDisplacement ( mm) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5
Figure A- 55 Re
d Head Chamber and Concrete Temperatures
37
38
39
44
45
46
47
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49
Days
Temperat e ( C)
4243
ur
4041
Concrete
Chamber
Figure A- 56
Red Head Creep Load5100052000530005400055000560
00
57000
58000
59000
60000
61000
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49
Days Load ( N)
Figure A- 57
5 0
Red Head Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests02000040000600008000010000012000014000016000001234567Displacement ( mm) Load ( N
8
) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 52.62 mm3.28 mm3.55 MM2.70 mm4.53 mm Figure A- 58: Displaceme Load for Red Head Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests
nts at MaximumRed Head Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile Tests
00123456789
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
Displacement ( mm)
Load ( N)
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Sample 5
Figure A- 59: Red Head Tensile Tests After 42- Day Creep Cycle
5 1
A. 8 CIA- Gel 7000 Test Data:
CIA GEL 12d Tensile Test # 1
180000200000
160000
140000
100000d ( N) 120000
Loa
6000080000
40000
0
20000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Displacement ( mm)
Figure A- 60
CIA GEL 12d Tensile Test # 20
200000
20000
40000
80000
160000
180000
0 5 10 15 20
Displacement ( mm)
140000
100000120000Load ( N)
60000
Figure A- 61
5 2
CIA GE160000
L 12d Tensile Test # 3
20000
4 6 8 10 12
Displacement ( mm)
140000
120000
100000
002
40000
60000
80000Loa
d ( N)
Figure A- 62
CIA GEL 12d Tensile Test # 4
200000
180000
00
20000
40000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
8 10 12 14
Displacement ( mm)
Load ( N
60000
246
)
Figure A- 63
CIA GEL 12d Tensile Test # 5
60000
10 12 14 16
Displacement ( mm) a
180000
160000
140000
120000
100000d ( N)
80000Lo
40000
20000
0468
02
Figure A- 64
5 3
CIA GEL 12d Seismic Test # 1
200000
180000
160000
140000
0
20000
40000
60000
10 15 20
ment ( mm)
a
100000120000d ( N
)
80000Lo
05Displace
Figure A- 65
CIA GEL 12d Seismic Test # 2020000
40000
6000080000Lo
100000
00
140000
160000
180000
200000
5 10 15 20
Displacement ( mm)
ad (
1200N)
0
Figure A- 66
CIA GEL 12d Seismic Test # 3
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Displacement ( mm)
180000200000
160000
140000
100000120000ad ( N)
Lo
80000
60000
40000
020000
Figure A- 67
5 4
CIA GEL 12d Seismic Test # 4
60000
5 10 15 20
Displacement ( mm)
(
200000
180000
160000
140000
120000N)
80000Lo
100000ad
40000
20000
0
0
Figure A- 68
CIA GEL 12d Seismic Test # 5020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000180000200000051015Displacement ( mm) Load ( N
20
) Figure A- 69
CIA- GEL 9d Tensile Test # 1
20000
40000
100000
1 1.5 2 2.5 3
ent ( mm)
140000
120000
80000d (
N)
Loa
60000
00
0.5D
isplacem
Figure A- 70
5 5
CIA- GEL 9d Tensile Test # 2
160000
140000
120000
80000d ( N
00
20000
40000
60000
100000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Displacement ( mm)
Loa )
Figure A- 71
CIA- GEL 9d Tensile Test # 3
0
20000
40000
60000
100000
120000
140000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Displacement ( mm)
Lo
80000ad ( N)
Figure A- 72
CIA- GEL 9d Tensile Test # 4
0
120000
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Displacement ( mm)
160000
140000
100000 ( N
)
60000Lo
80000ad
40000
20000
Figure A- 73
5 6
CIA- GEL 9d Tensile Test # 5
40000
6 7
ent ( mm)
180000
160000
120000140000
N)
80000Loa
100000d (
60000
20000
00
12345Displac
em
A- 74
Figure
CIA- GEL 9d Seismic Test # 10
20000
60000
80000
100000
160000
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Displacement ( mm)
Load ( N
1400
0000
1200
40000
)
Figure A- 75
CIA- GEL 9d Seismic Test # 2
3 4 5
Displacement ( mm) a
140000
120000
100000
80000d ( N
)
60000Lo
40000
20000
0012
Figure A- 76
5 7
CIA- GEL 9d Seismic Test # 3
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Displacement ( mm)
140000
120000
100000
N)
80000d (
Loa
60000
40000
20000
0
Figure A- 77
CIA- GEL 9d Seismic Test # 40
140000
120000
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Displacement ( mm)
Load (
N)
0
Figure A- 78
CIA- GEL 9d Seismic Test # 5
160000
140000
0
20000
40000
60000Loa
80000d
100000 ( N
120000
2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
ent ( mm)
)
00.511.52Displacem
Figure A- 79
5 8
CIA- GEL Creep Displacements Over First 6 Hours
0: 00: 00 1: 12: 00 2: 24: 00 3: 36: 00 4: 48: 00 6: 00: 00
Time ( Hr)
t
0.25
0.2
m)
0.15 ( m
men
0.1la
ce
Disp
0.05
0
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Sample 4
Sample 5
Figure A- 80
CIA- GEL Elev
ated Temperature Creep Logarithmic Regression Analysis
0.465 mm
0.483 mm
0.596 mm
0.619 mm
0.527 mm
0
10 100 1000
0.7
0.1
0.2Di
0.3ace
0.4ment
0.5)
0.6
1
Days
spl
( m
m
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Sample 4
Sample 5
y = 0.0509Ln( x) + 0.1392
9
y = 0.0772Ln( x) + 0.1252
R2 = 0.9839
y = 0.0534Ln( x) + 0.141R2 = 0.9758y = 0.0778Ln( x) + 0.0984R2 = 0.972
R2 = 0.9719
x) + 0.1114
- 81: CIA- GEL 7000 Creep Displacement 600- Day Logarithmic Regression Analysis
y = 0.0649Ln( R2 = 0.921
Figure A
5 9
CIA- GE0.5
L 42- Day Creep Displacements
0.15
0.35
42 49
)
0.45
0.4
00714212835
0.05D
0.1isp
0.2lacem
0.25en
0.3t (
mm
Days
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Sample 4
Sample 5
2
Figure A- 8
CIA- GEL Chamber and Concrete Temperatures3839404142
43ure (
44
45
46
47
35 42 49
Days
emperat C)
T
07142128
Concrete
Chamber
Figure A- 83
CIA- GEL Creep Load
63000
61000
59000
51000
53000
55000
57000
28 35 42 49
071421Days
Lo
ad
( N)
84
Figure A-
6 0
CIA- GEL Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests
100000
2 3 4 5 6
Displacement ( mm)
160000
0
20000
40000
60000
80000ad
120000
140000
01
Lo
( N)
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Sample 4
Sample 5
1.15 mm
1.20 mm
2.20 mm
1.68 mm
2.36 mm
m Load for CIA- GEL 7000 Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests
Figure A- 85: Displacements at Maximu
CIA- GEL Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile Tests
0
140000
1 2 3 4 5 6
Displacement ( mm)
180000
160000
120000
)
100000d ( N
a
80000Lo
60000
40000
20000
0
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Sample 4
Sample 5
7000 Tensile Tests After 42- Day Creep Cycle
Figure A- 86: CIA- GEL
6 1
Appendix B Data Logger Programs
B. 1 Initial Creep Program ( First 8 hours)
;{ CR23X- TD}
; Epoxy Bonded Dowel Project
a from thermocouples, temp/ humidity
probe, load cell, & pump digital gauge. Two tables have been
y hour, while Table 2 collects
very 3 seconds for 8 hours.
concrete thermocouple.**
*********************************
Collects data every hour and stores into final storage
able 1 Program
tion Interval ( seconds)
RE SECTION
--------
rature
ature ( P17)
C ]
temp from C to F
: Z= X+ F ( P34)
Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ]
[ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ]
----------
ETE 1
Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range
: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan)
( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
;
; This program collects dat
;
; set- up. Table 1 collects ever
; e
;
; ** This version is for 2
; ********************************** TABLE 1 *
;
;
;
* T
01: 3600 Execu
; --------------------------------------------------------
; TEMPERATU
; ------------------------------------------------
; Reference tempe
; : Panel Temper
1
1: 1 Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_
; Convert reference
;
2: Z= X* F ( P37) _ TEMP_ C ]
1: 1 X Loc [ PANEL
2: 1.8 F [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ]
3: 2 Z Loc
3
1: 2 X : 32 F
2
3: 2 Z Loc
;
; CONCR
; Thermocouple 1 temp in F
;
4: Thermocouple
1: 1 Reps
2: 21 10
3: 1 DIFF Channel
4
5: 1 Ref Temp
6: 9 Loc [ C1_ TEMP_ F ] lt
7: 1.8 Mu
8: 32 Offset
6 2
; CONCRETE 2
; Thermocouple 2 temp in F
;
5: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
: 1 Reps
V, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range
: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan)
]
: 10 Loc [ C2_ TEMP_ F ]
OUTSIDE
Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range
: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan)
NEL_ TEMP_ C ]
_ TEMP_ F ]
ENCLOSURE
Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range
: 4 DIFF Channel
er- Constantan)
( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
------------------------------
HMP45C TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY PROBE SECTION
------------------------------------------
emp/ humidity probe on
: Do ( P86)
rt 1 High
e stabilization
: Delay w/ Opt Excitation ( P22)
x Channel
its)
: 15 Delay After Ex ( 0.01 sec units)
: 0 mV Excitation
emp from probe
1
2: 21 10 m
3: 2 DIFF Channel
4
5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C
6
7: 1.8 Mult
8: 32 Offset
;
; Thermocouple 3 temp in F
;
6: Thermocouple
1: 1 Reps
2
3: 3 DIFF Channel ;
4
5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PA
6: 11 Loc [ OUTSIDE
7: 1.8 Mult
8: 32 Offset
;
; Thermocouple 4 temp in F
;
7:
1: 1 Reps
2: 21 10
3
4: 1 Type T ( Copp
5: 1 Ref Temp
6: 12 Loc [ BOX_ TEMP_ F ]
7: 1.8 Mult
8: 32 Offset
; --------------------------
;
; --------------
; T
;
8
1: 41 Set Po
; Delay for prob
;
9
1: 1 E
2: 0 Delay W/ Ex ( 0.01 sec un
3
4
; T
6 3
;
10: Volt ( Diff) ( P2)
Range
: 7 DIFF Channel
c [ PROBE_ TEMP_ C ]
: .1 Mult
e
1: Volt ( Diff) ( P2)
ps
: 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range
l
DITY ]
Port 1 Low
Convert probe temp from C to F
: Z= X* F ( P37)
E_ TEMP_ C ]
MP_ F ]
4: Z= X+ F ( P34)
Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ F ]
: 32 F
E_ TEMP_ F ]
------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
r on - power
Port 3 High
easurements)
ing of Loop ( P87)
: 0 Delay
n ports LVDT's
17: Do ( P86)
Pulse Port 4
1: 1 Reps
2: 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow
3
4: 3 Lo
5
6: - 40 Offset
; Relative humidity from prob
;
1
1: 1 Re
2
3: 8 DIFF Channe
4: 5 Loc [ REL_ HUMI
5: .1 Mult
6: 0.0 Offset
; Probe off
;
12: Do ( P86)
1: 51 Set
; ---------
;
;
13
1: 3 X Loc [ PROB
2: 1.8 F
3: 4 Z Loc [ PROBE_ TE
1
1: 4 X
2
3: 4 Z Loc [ PROB
; --------------------------------------
; LVDT SECTION ( MUX)
;
; Multiplexe
;
15: Do ( P86)
1: 43 Set
; Begin LVDT measurement loop ( 10 m
;
16: Beginn
1
2: 10 Loop Count
; Clock pulse - switch betwee
;
1: 74
6 4
; Delay between pulses for LVDT stablization
n ( P22)
2: 0 Delay W/ Ex ( 0.01 sec units)
Delay After Ex ( 0.01 sec units)
4: 0 mV Excitation
nt voltage reading
NOTE: F4 is used to add "--" ( location incrementor)
1: 1 Reps
2: 45 5000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Fast Range
DIFF Channel
4: 24 -- Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ V ]
95)
VDT Factory Calibration ( V/ in)
2: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
F
: 0 n, Exponent of 10
ALIBRATION_ 1 ]
3: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
F
: 00 n, Exponent of 10
ALIBRATION_ 2 ]
4: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
F
: 00 n, Exponent of 10
ALIBRATION_ 3 ]
;
18: Delay w/ Opt Excitatio
1: 2 Ex Channel
3: 1
; LVDT displaceme
; w/ mV to V conversion
;
;
; in step 4.
;
19: Volt ( Diff) ( P2)
3: 10
5: .001 Mult
6: 0.0 Offset
; End loop
;
20: End ( P
; Multiplexer off
;
21: Do ( P86)
1: 53 Set Port 3 Low
;------------
; L
;
; LVDT # 1
;
2
1: 9.932
2
3: 14 Z Loc [ C
; LVDT # 2
;
2
1: 9.959
2
3: 15 Z Loc [ C
; LVDT # 3
;
2
1: 9.926
2
3: 16 Z Loc [ C
6 5
; LVDT # 4
;
25: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
F
: 00 n, Exponent of 10
ALIBRATION_ 4 ]
6: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
F
: 00 n, Exponent of 10
ALIBRATION_ 5 ]
7: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
F
: 00 n, Exponent of 10
ALIBRATION_ 6 ]
8: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
: 00 n, Exponent of 10
ALIBRATION_ 7 ]
9: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
F
ent of 10
: 21 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 8 ]
: 22 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 9 ]
: 9.926 F
0
ALIBRATION_ 10 ]
r ( V/ in)
= Linear Displacement ( in)
1: 9.914
2
3: 17 Z Loc [ C
; LVDT # 5
;
2
1: 9.875
2
3: 18 Z Loc [ C
; LVDT # 6
;
2
1: 9.938
2
3: 19 Z Loc [ C
; LVDT # 7
;
2
1: 9.885 F
2
3: 20 Z Loc [ C
; LVDT # 8
;
2
1: 9.980
2: 00 n, Expon
3
; LVDT # 9
;
30: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
1: 9.918 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3
; LVDT # 10
;
31: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
1
2: 00 n, Exponent of 1
3: 23 Z Loc [ C
; ------------
; LVDT Reading ( V) / Calibration Facto
;
;
; LVDT # 1
;
6 6
32: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
V ]
ALIBRATION_ 1 ]
[ CALIBRATION_ 2 ]
: 36 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ IN ]
: 27 X Loc [ LVDT_ 4_ V ]
TION_ 4 ]
VDT_ 4_ IN ]
6: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
VDT_ 5_ V ]
Loc [ LVDT_ 5_ IN ]
LVDT # 6
LIBRATION_ 6 ]
: 39 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ IN ]
TION_ 7 ]
VDT_ 8_ IN ]
1: 24 X Loc [ LVDT_ 1_
2: 14 Y Loc [ C
3: 34 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ]
; LVDT # 2
;
33: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 25 X Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ V ]
2: 15 Y Loc
3: 35 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ IN ]
; LVDT # 3
;
34: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 26 X Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ V ]
2: 16 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 3 ]
3
; LVDT # 4
;
35: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1
2: 17 Y Loc [ CALIBRA
3: 37 Z Loc [ L
; LVDT # 5
;
3
1: 28 X Loc [ L
2: 18 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 5 ]
3: 38 Z
;
;
37: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 29 X Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ V ]
2: 19 Y Loc [ CA
3
; LVDT # 7
;
38: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 30 X Loc [ LVDT_ 7_ V ]
2: 20 Y Loc [ CALIBRA
3: 40 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 7_ IN ]
; LVDT # 8
;
39: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 31 X Loc [ LVDT_ 8_ V ]
2: 21 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 8 ]
3: 41 Z Loc [ L
; LVDT # 9
;
6 7
40: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
DT_ 9_ V ]
[ CALIBRATION_ 9 ]
]
: 33 X Loc [ LVDT_ 10_ V ]
Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 10 ]
--------
2: Z= X+ Y ( P33)
: Z= X* F ( P37)
1_ AVG_ IN ]
: 44 Z Loc [ SMP_ 1_ AVG_ IN ]
MP_ 2_ AVG_ IN ]
5: Z= X* F ( P37)
_ 2_ AVG_ IN ]
Loc [ SMP_ 2_ AVG_ IN ]
ple 3
6: Z= X+ Y ( P33)
]
]
SMP_ 3_ AVG_ IN ]
: 46 X Loc [ SMP_ 3_ AVG_ IN ]
: 46 Z Loc [ SMP_ 3_ AVG_ IN ]
8: Z= X+ Y ( P33)
DT_ 7_ IN ]
: 41 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 8_ IN ]
VG_ IN ]
1: 32 X Loc [ LV
2: 22 Y Loc
3: 42 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 9_ IN
; LVDT # 10
;
41: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1
2: 23 Y
3: 43 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 10_ IN ]
; -
; Average reading
;
; LVDT 1 & 2 = Sample 1
4
1: 34 X Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ]
2: 35 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ IN ]
3: 44 Z Loc [ SMP_ 1_ AVG_ IN ]
43
1: 44 X Loc [ SMP_
2: .5 F
3
; LVDT 3 & 4 = Sample 2
44: Z= X+ Y ( P33)
1: 36 X Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ IN ]
2: 37 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 4_ IN ]
3: 45 Z Loc [ S
4
1: 45 X Loc [ SMP
2: .5 F
3: 45 Z
; LVDT 5 & 6 = Sam
4
1: 38 X Loc [ LVDT_ 5_ IN
2: 39 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ IN
3: 46 Z Loc [
47: Z= X* F ( P37)
1
2: .5 F
3
; LVDT 7 & 8 = Sample 4
4
1: 40 X Loc [ LV
2
3: 47 Z Loc [ SMP_ 4_ A
49: Z= X* F ( P37)
6 8
1: 47 X Loc [ SMP_ 4_ AVG_ IN ]
: 47 Z Loc [ SMP_ 4_ AVG_ IN ]
Sample 5
: 42 X Loc [ LVDT_ 9_ IN ]
0_ IN ]
: 48 Z Loc [ SMP_ 5_ AVG_ IN ]
: 48 X Loc [ SMP_ 5_ AVG_ IN ]
: 48 Z Loc [ SMP_ 5_ AVG_ IN ]
--------------------------------------------------------
AD CELL SECTION
--------------------------------------------------------
; Load cell reading
;
52: Full Bridge ( P6)
1: 1 Reps
2: 11 10 mV, Fast Range
3: 12 DIFF Channel
4: 1 Excite all reps w/ Exchan 1
5: 5000 mV Excitation
6: 6 Loc [ LOAD_ CELL_ 1_ LB ]
7: - 26444 Mult
8: - 153.49 Offset
; --------------------------------------------------------
; PRESSURE SECTION ( PUMP & RAMS)
; --------------------------------------------------------
; Pressure output
; ( 3000 psi / 2 V) * ( 1 V / 1000 mV) = 1.5 psi/ mV
;
53: Volt ( Diff) ( P2)
1: 1 Reps
2: 15 5000 mV, Fast Range
3: 6 DIFF Channel
4: 7 Loc [ PRESSURE_ PSIG ]
5: 1.5 Mult
6: 0.0 Offset
; ---------
; Convert pressure into force using ram's effective area
; = 7.22 in^ 2
;
54: Z= X* F ( P37)
1: 7 X Loc [ PRESSURE_ PSIG ]
2: 7.22 F
3: 8 Z Loc [ RAM_ FORCE1_ LB ]
; --------------------------------------------------------
; BATTERY MONITOR SECTION
2: .5 F
3
; LVDT 9 & 10 =
50: Z= X+ Y ( P33)
1
2: 43 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 1
3
51: Z= X* F ( P37)
1
2: .5 F
3
;
; LO
; 6 9
; --------------------------------------------------------
; Monitor battery voltage
ollect data and put into table format
6: Data Table ( P84)^ 27244
: 0.0 _____
: EpoxyRebarData1 Table Name
********************************** TABLE 2 **********************************
res into limited storage.
inue to display results w/ o storing.
Execution Interval ( seconds)
------------------
------
o F
P_ F ]
;
55: Batt Voltage ( P10) : 13 Loc [ BAT_ VOLTAGE_ V ]
1
; --------------------------------------------------------
; DATA COLLECTION SECTION
;---------------------------------------------------------
; C
;
5
1: 0 Seconds into Interval
2
3: 0.0 ( 0 = auto allocate, - x = redirect to inloc x)
4
; High resolution enabled ( 5 character)
;
57: Resolution ( P78)
1: 1 High Resolution
; Store average into table
;
58: Average ( P71)^ 25775
1: 13 Reps : 1 Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
2
: Average ( P71)^ 1908
59
1: 15 Reps
2: 34 Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ]
;
;
; Collects data every 3 seconds and stoata collected, but will cont
; 8 hours of d
; able 2 Program
* T
01: 3
; -------------------------------------- TEMPERATURE SECTION
;
; -------------------------------------------------- perature
; Reference tem
; 17)
1: Panel Temperature ( P
1: 1 Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
; Convert reference temp from C t
;
2: Z= X* F ( P37) : 1 X Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
1
2: 1.8 F
3: 2 Z Loc [ PANEL_ TEM
7 0
3: Z= X+ F ( P34)
1: 2 X Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ]
2: 32 F
3: 2 Z Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ]
1 temp in F
: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
ps
ct, Slow Range
: 1 DIFF Channel
mp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
2 temp in F
: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
ct, Slow Range
: 2 DIFF Channel
mp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
3 temp in F
: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
onstantan)
: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
[ OUTSIDE_ TEMP_ F ]
: 32 Offset
NCLOSURE
Reject, Slow Range
: 4 DIFF Channel
pper- Constantan)
: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
_ TEMP_ F ]
; ----------
; CONCRETE 1
; Thermocouple
;
4
1: 1 Re
2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reje
3
4: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan)
5: 1 Ref Te
6: 9 Loc [ C1_ TEMP_ F ]
7: 1.8 Mult
8: 32 Offset
; CONCRETE 2
; Thermocouple
;
5
1: 1 Reps
2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reje
3
4: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan)
5: 1 Ref Te
6: 10 Loc [ C2_ TEMP_ F ]
7: 1.8 Mult
8: 32 Offset
; OUTSIDE
; Thermocouple
;
6
1: 1 Reps
2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range
3: 3 DIFF Channel ;
4: 1 Type T ( Copper- C
5
6: 11 Loc
7: 1.8 Mult
8
; E
; Thermocouple 4 temp in F
;
7: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
1: 1 Reps
2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz
3
4: 1 Type T ( Co
5
6: 12 Loc [ BOX
7: 1.8 Mult
7 1
8: 32 Offset
; --------------------------------------------------------
PERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY PROBE SECTION
----------------------------------
Temp/ humidity probe on
Do ( P86)
High
annel
/ Ex ( 0.01 sec units)
: 15 Delay After Ex ( 0.01 sec units)
Excitation
obe
0: Volt ( Diff) ( P2)
Slow Range
: 7 DIFF Channel
BE_ TEMP_ C ]
fset
Relative humidity from probe
s
Range
: 8 DIFF Channel
robe off
: 51 Set Port 1 Low
--------
o F
: 3 X Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ C ]
: 4 Z Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ F ]
: 4 X Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ F ]
: 4 Z Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ F ]
; HMP45C TEM
; ----------------------
;
;
8:
1: 41 Set Port 1
; Delay for probe stabilization
;
9: Delay w/ Opt Excitation ( P22)
1: 1 Ex Ch
2: 0 Delay W
3
4: 0 mV
; Temp from pr
;
1
1: 1 Reps
2: 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz Reject,
3
4: 3 Loc [ PRO
5: .1 Mult
6: - 40 Of
;
;
11: Volt ( Diff) ( P2)
1: 1 Rep
2: 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow
3
4: 5 Loc [ REL_ HUMIDITY ]
5: .1 Mult
6: 0.0 Offset
; P
;
12: Do ( P86)
1
; -
; Convert probe temp from C t
;
13: Z= X* F ( P37)
1
2: 1.8 F
3
14: Z= X+ F ( P34)
1
2: 32 F
3
7 2
; --------------------------------------------------------
: Beginning of Loop ( P87)
nt
n ports LVDT's
ort 4
een pulses for LVDT stablization
Opt Excitation ( P22)
1: 2 Ex Channel
y W/ Ex ( 0.01 sec units)
3: 1 Delay After Ex ( 0.01 sec units)
Excitation
LVDT displacement voltage reading
V conversion
OTE: F4 is used to add "--" ( location incrementor)
in step 4.
19: Volt ( Diff) ( P2)
Hz Reject, Fast Range
5: .001 Mult
Offset
Multiplexer off
: Do ( P86)
w
VDT # 1
; LVDT SECTION ( MUX)
; --------------------------------------------------------
; Multiplexer on - power
;
15: Do ( P86)
1: 43 Set Port 3 High
; Begin LVDT measurement loop ( 10 measurements)
;
16
1: 0 Delay
2: 10 Loop Cou
; Clock pulse - switch betwee
;
17: Do ( P86)
1: 74 Pulse P
; Delay betw
;
18: Delay w/
2: 0 Dela
4: 0 mV
;
; w/ mV to
;
; N
;
;
1: 1 Reps
2: 45 5000 mV, 60
3: 10 DIFF Channel
4: 24 -- Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ V ]
6: 0.0
; End loop
;
20: End ( P95)
;
;
21
1: 53 Set Port 3 Lo
;------------
; LVDT Factory Calibration ( V/ in)
;
; L
;
7 3
22: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
: 14 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 1 ]
VDT # 2
n ( P30)
: 15 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 2 ]
VDT # 3
n ( P30)
: 16 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 3 ]
VDT # 4
n ( P30)
: 17 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 4 ]
VDT # 5
n ( P30)
: 18 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 5 ]
VDT # 6
n ( P30)
: 19 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 6 ]
VDT # 7
n ( P30)
: 20 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 7 ]
: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
: 9.980 F
, Exponent of 10
: 21 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 8 ]
1: 9.932 F
2: 0 n, Exponent of 10
3
; L
;
23: Z= F x 10^
1: 9.959 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3
; L
;
24: Z= F x 10^
1: 9.926 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3
; L
;
25: Z= F x 10^
1: 9.914 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3
; L
;
26: Z= F x 10^
1: 9.875 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3
; L
;
27: Z= F x 10^
1: 9.938 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3
; L
;
28: Z= F x 10^
1: 9.885 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3
; LVDT # 8
;
29
1
2: 00 n
3
; LVDT # 9
;
7 4
30: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
1: 9.918 F
, Exponent of 10
: 22 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 9 ]
: 9.926 F
, Exponent of 10
: 23 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 10 ]
r ( V/ in)
VDT # 1
]
: 34 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ]
VDT # 2
]
: 35 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ IN ]
VDT # 3
]
: 36 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ IN ]
VDT # 4
]
: 37 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 4_ IN ]
VDT # 5
]
: 38 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 5_ IN ]
VDT # 6
2: 00 n
3
; LVDT # 10
;
31: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
1
2: 00 n
3
; ------------
; LVDT Reading ( V) / Calibration Facto
; = Linear Displacement ( in)
;
; L
;
32: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 24 X Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ V ]
2: 14 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 1
3
; L
;
33: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 25 X Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ V ]
2: 15 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 2
3
; L
;
34: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 26 X Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ V ]
2: 16 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 3
3
; L
;
35: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 27 X Loc [ LVDT_ 4_ V ]
2: 17 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 4
3
; L
;
36: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 28 X Loc [ LVDT_ 5_ V ]
2: 18 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 5
3
; L
;
37: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 29 X Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ V ]
7 5
2: 19 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 6 ]
: 39 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ IN ]
VDT # 7
]
: 40 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 7_ IN ]
9: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
V ]
ALIBRATION_ 8 ]
[ CALIBRATION_ 9 ]
0 ]
: 43 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 10_ IN ]
ading
]
]
]
]
]
]
3
; L
;
38: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 30 X Loc [ LVDT_ 7_ V ]
2: 20 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 7
3
; LVDT # 8
;
3
1: 31 X Loc [ LVDT_ 8_
2: 21 Y Loc [ C
3: 41 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 8_ IN ]
; LVDT # 9
;
40: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 32 X Loc [ LVDT_ 9_ V ]
2: 22 Y Loc
3: 42 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 9_ IN ]
; LVDT # 10
;
41: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 33 X Loc [ LVDT_ 10_ V ]
2: 23 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 1
3
; ---------
; Average re
;
; LVDT 1 & 2 = Sample 1
42: Z= X+ Y ( P33)
1: 34 X Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ]
2: 35 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ IN ]
3: 44 Z Loc [ SMP_ 1_ AVG_ IN
43: Z= X* F ( P37)
1: 44 X Loc [ SMP_ 1_ AVG_ IN
2: .5 F
3: 44 Z Loc [ SMP_ 1_ AVG_ IN
; LVDT 3 & 4 = Sample 2
44: Z= X+ Y ( P33)
1: 36 X Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ IN ]
2: 37 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 4_ IN ]
3: 45 Z Loc [ SMP_ 2_ AVG_ IN
45: Z= X* F ( P37)
1: 45 X Loc [ SMP_ 2_ AVG_ IN
2: .5 F
3: 45 Z Loc [ SMP_ 2_ AVG_ IN 7 6
; LVDT 5 & 6 = Sample 3
46: Z= X+ Y ( P33)
1: 38 X Loc [ LVDT_ 5_ IN ]
2: 39 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ IN ]
3: 46 Z Loc [ SMP_ 3_ AVG_ IN ]
]
]
& 8 = Sample 4
: 40 X Loc [ LVDT_ 7_ IN ]
[ LVDT_ 8_ IN ]
: 47 Z Loc [ SMP_ 4_ AVG_ IN ]
[ SMP_ 4_ AVG_ IN ]
: 47 Z Loc [ SMP_ 4_ AVG_ IN ]
mple 5
[ LVDT_ 9_ IN ]
: 48 Z Loc [ SMP_ 5_ AVG_ IN ]
]
------------------------------------------
CELL SECTION
----------
ing
2: Full Bridge ( P6)
ps
ast Range
all reps w/ Exchan 1
: 6 Loc [ LOAD_ CELL_ 1_ LB ]
------------------------------
PRESSURE SECTION ( PUMP & RAMS)
----------------------------
t
0 - 3000 psi,
1.5 psi/ mV
47: Z= X* F ( P37)
1: 46 X Loc [ SMP_ 3_ AVG_ IN
2: .5 F
3: 46 Z Loc [ SMP_ 3_ AVG_ IN
; LVDT 7
48: Z= X+ Y ( P33)
1
2: 41 Y Loc
3
49: Z= X* F ( P37)
1: 47 X Loc
2: .5 F
3
; LVDT 9 & 10 = Sa
50: Z= X+ Y ( P33)
1: 42 X Loc
2: 43 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 10_ IN ]
3
51: Z= X* F ( P37)
1: 48 X Loc [ SMP_ 5_ AVG_ IN
2: .5 F
3: 48 Z Loc [ SMP_ 5_ AVG_ IN ]
; --------------
; LOAD
; ----------------------------------------------
; Load cell read
;
5
1: 1 Re
2: 11 10 mV, F
3: 12 DIFF Channel
4: 1 Excite
5: 5000 mV Excitation
6
7: - 26444 Mult
8: - 153.49 Offset
; --------------------------
;
; ----------------------------
; Pressure outpu
; When digital indicator is set to
; the output is 1500 PSI/ V
; ( 3000 psi / 2 V) * ( 1 V / 1000 mV) = 7 7
;
53: Volt ( Diff) ( P2)
1: 1 Reps
2: 15 5000 mV, Fast Range
: 6 DIFF Channel
onvert pressure into force using ram's effective area
URE_ PSIG ]
--------------------------------------------------------
BATTERY MONITOR SECTION
ry voltage
P10)
----
DATA COLLECTION SECTION
o conserve
: 49 X Loc [ COUNTER ]
: Data Table ( P84)^ 27244
l
allocate, - x = redirect to inloc x)
High resolution enabled ( 5 character)
: Resolution ( P78)
ion
Store InLoc 1- 13
: Average ( P71)^ 25775
ANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
3
4: 7 Loc [ PRESSURE_ PSIG ]
5: 1.5 Mult
6: 0.0 Offset
; ---------
; C
; = 7.22 in^ 2
;
54: Z= X* F ( P37)
1: 7 X Loc [ PRESS
2: 7.22 F
3: 8 Z Loc [ RAM_ FORCE1_ LB ]
;
;
; --------------------------------------------------------
; Monitor batte
;
55: Batt Voltage (
1: 13 Loc [ BAT_ VOLTAGE_ V ]
; ----------------------------------------------------
;
;---------------------------------------------------------
; Collect data and put into table format.
; Only 9600 records ( 8 hours) will be stored t
; memory space.
;
56: If ( X<=> F) ( P89)
1
2: 4 <
3: 9600 F
4: 30 Then Do
57
1: 0 Seconds into Interva
2: 0.0 _____
3: 0 ( 0 = auto
4: EpoxyRebarData2 Table Name
;
;
58
1: 1 High Resolut
;
;
59
1: 13 Reps
2: 1 Loc [ P
7 8
; Store LVDT displacement
1)^ 25355
: 34 Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ]
able 3 Subroutines
;
60: Average ( P7
1: 15 Reps
2
; Increment counter by 1
;
61: Z= Z+ 1 ( P32)
1: 49 Z Loc [ COUNTER ]
62: End ( P95)
* T
End Program
7 9
B. 2 Creep Program After Initial 8 Hours
Dowel Project
This program collects data from thermocouples, temp/ humidity
e. Two tables have been
stores data every hour, while
out storing data.
s.**
************************
cution Interval ( seconds)
------------------------------------
SECTION
-------------------------------------------------------
EMP_ C ]
PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
: 1.8 F
EMP_ F ]
c [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ]
----------
hermocouple 1 temp in F
p ( DIFF) ( P14)
ge
: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan)
( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
: 9 Loc [ C1_ TEMP_ F ]
;{ CR23X- TD}
; Epoxy Bonded
;
;
; probe, load
cell, & pump digital gaug; set- up. Table 1 collects and
; T
able 2 collects every 3 seconds with;
; ** This version
is for 2 concrete thermocouple
; ****************************
****** TABLE 1 ********** ;
; Collects data every hour and stores into final storage
;
* Table 1 Progra
m 01: 3600 Exe
; --------------------
; TEMPERATURE
; -
; Reference temperature
;
1: Panel Temperature ( P17)
1: 1 Loc [ PANEL_ T
; Convert reference temp from C to F
;
2: Z= X* F ( P37)
1: 1 X Loc [
2
3: 2 Z Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ]
3: Z= X+ F ( P34)
1: 2 X Loc [ PANEL_ T
2
: 32 F 3: 2 Z Lo
;
; CONCRETE 1
; T
;
4: Thermocouple Tem
1: 1 Reps
2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Ran
3: 1 DIFF Channel
4
5: 1 Ref Temp
6
7: 1.8 Mult
8: 32 Offset
; CONCRETE 2
; Thermocouple 2 temp in F
;
8 0
5: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
: 1 Reps
Slow Range
: 2 DIFF Channel
pper- Constantan)
mp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
Thermocouple 3 temp in F
Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
eject, Slow Range
: 3 DIFF Channel ;
e T ( Copper- Constantan)
PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
: 11 Loc [ OUTSIDE_ TEMP_ F ]
Thermocouple 4 temp in F
s
ange
: 4 DIFF Channel
ANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
: 32 Offset
----------------------
HMP45C TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY PROBE SECTION
emp/ humidity probe on
gh
citation ( P22)
: 0 Delay W/ Ex ( 0.01 sec units)
: 0 mV Excitation
1
2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject,
3
4: 1 Type T ( Co
5: 1 Ref Te
6: 10 Loc [ C2_ TEMP_ F ]
7: 1.8 Mult
8: 32 Offset
; OUTSIDE
;
;
6:
1: 1 Reps
2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz R
3
4: 1 Typ
5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [
6
7: 1.8 Mult
8: 32 Offset
; ENCLOSURE
;
;
7: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
1: 1 Rep
2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow R
3
4: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan)
5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ P
6: 12 Loc [ BOX_ TEMP_ F ]
7: 1.8 Mult
8
; ----------------------------------
;
; --------------------------------------------------------
; T
;
8: Do ( P86)
1: 41 Set Port 1 Hi
; Delay for probe stabilization
;
9: Delay w/ Opt Ex
1: 1 Ex Channel
2
3: 15 Delay After Ex ( 0.01 sec units)
4
; Temp from probe
;
10: Volt ( Diff) ( P2)
1: 1 Reps 8 1
2: 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range
EMP_ C ]
: .1 Mult
elative humidity from probe
eject, Slow Range
_ HUMIDITY ]
: 0.0 Offset
robe off
2: Do ( P86)
rt 1 Low
C to F
( P37)
C ]
: 1.8 F
: 4 Z Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ F ]
: Z= X+ F ( P34)
E_ TEMP_ F ]
MP_ F ]
--------------------------------------------------------
LVDT SECTION ( MUX)
-------------------------------------------------------
T measurement loop ( 10 measurements)
( P87)
y
Clock pulse - switch between ports LVDT's
17: Do ( P86)
t 4
DT stablization
18: Delay w/ Opt Excitation ( P22)
3: 7 DIFF Channel
4: 3 Loc [ PROBE_ T
5
6: - 40 Offset
; R
;
11: Volt ( Diff) ( P2)
1: 1 Reps
2: 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz R
3: 8 DIFF Channel
4: 5 Loc [ REL
5: .1 Mult
6
; P
;
1
1: 51 Set Po
; ---------
; Convert probe temp from
;
13: Z= X* F
1: 3 X Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_
2
3
14
1: 4 X Loc [ PROB
2: 32 F
3: 4 Z Loc [ PROBE_ TE
;
;
; -
; Multiplexer on - power
;
15: Do ( P86)
1: 43 Set Port 3 High
; Begin LVD
;
16: Beginning of Loop
1: 0 Dela
2: 10 Loop Count
;
;
1: 74 Pulse Por
; Delay between pulses for LV
;
8 2
1: 2 Ex Channel
2: 0 Delay W/ Ex ( 0.01 sec units)
r Ex ( 0.01 sec units)
V Excitation
w/ mV to V conversion
OTE: F4 is used to add "--" ( location incrementor)
2: 45 5000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Fast Range
DIFF Channel
4: 24 -- Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ V ]
et
95)
VDT Factory Calibration ( V/ in)
2: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
: 0 n, Exponent of 10
RATION_ 1 ]
3: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
ON_ 2 ]
LVDT # 3
: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
LVDT # 4
: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
3: 1 Delay Afte
4: 0 m
; LVDT displacement voltage reading
;
;
; N
; in step 4.
;
19: Volt ( Diff) ( P2)
1: 1 Reps
3: 10
5: .001 Mult
6: 0.0 Offs
; End loop
;
20: End ( P
; Multiplexer off
;
21: Do ( P86)
1: 53 Set Port 3 Low
;------------
; L
;
; LVDT # 1
;
2
1: 9.932 F
2
3: 14 Z Loc [ CALIB
; LVDT # 2
;
2
1: 9.959 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3: 15 Z Loc [ CALIBRATI
;
;
24
1: 9.926 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3: 16 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 3 ]
;
;
25
8 3
1: 9.914 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3: 17 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 4 ]
; LVDT # 5
: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
LVDT # 6
: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
LVDT # 7
: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
LVDT # 8
: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
LVDT # 9
: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
LVDT # 10
: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30)
------------
ding ( V) / Calibration Factor ( V/ in)
Linear Displacement ( in)
2: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
oc [ LVDT_ 1_ V ]
: 14 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 1 ]
;
26
1: 9.875 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3: 18 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 5 ]
;
;
27
1: 9.938 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3: 19 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 6 ]
;
;
28
1: 9.885 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3: 20 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 7 ]
;
;
29
1: 9.980 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3: 21 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 8 ]
;
;
30
1: 9.918 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3: 22 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 9 ]
;
;
31
1: 9.926 F
2: 00 n, Exponent of 10
3: 23 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 10 ]
;
; LVDT Rea
; =
;
; LVDT # 1
;
3
1: 24 X L
2
8 4
3: 34 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ]
3: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ V ]
ALIBRATION_ 2 ]
: 35 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ IN ]
]
: 36 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ IN ]
: 27 X Loc [ LVDT_ 4_ V ]
TION_ 4 ]
VDT_ 4_ IN ]
6: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
VDT_ 5_ V ]
]
Loc [ LVDT_ 5_ IN ]
LVDT # 6
]
P38)
: 20 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 7 ]
IN ]
: 31 X Loc [ LVDT_ 8_ V ]
ALIBRATION_ 8 ]
VDT_ 9_ V ]
]
; LVDT # 2
;
3
1: 25 X
2: 15 Y Loc [ C
3
; LVDT # 3
;
34: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 26 X Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ V ]
2: 16 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 3
3
; LVDT # 4
;
35: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1
2: 17 Y Loc [ CALIBRA
3: 37 Z Loc [ L
; LVDT # 5
;
3
1: 28 X Loc [ L
2: 18 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 5
3: 38 Z
;
;
37: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 29 X Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ V ]
2: 19 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 6
3: 39 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ IN ]
; LVDT # 7
;
38: Z= X/ Y (
1: 30 X Loc [ LVDT_ 7_ V ]
2
3: 40 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 7_
; LVDT # 8
;
39: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1
2: 21 Y Loc [ C
3: 41 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 8_ IN ]
; LVDT # 9
;
40: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 32 X Loc [ L
2: 22 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 9
8 5
3: 42 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 9_ IN ]
LVDT # 10
[ LVDT_ 10_ V ]
0 ]
: 43 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 10_ IN ]
Average reading
ple 1
[ LVDT_ 1_ IN ]
: 44 Z Loc [ S1_ AVG_ IN ]
= Sample 2
[ LVDT_ 4_ IN ]
P37)
2_ AVG_ IN ]
[ S2_ AVG_ IN ]
LVDT 5 & 6 = Sample 3
( P33)
VDT_ 5_ IN ]
c [ S3_ AVG_ IN ]
7: Z= X* F ( P37)
VDT 7 & 8 = Sample 4
[ LVDT_ 7_ IN ]
]
_ IN ]
4_ AVG_ IN ]
;
;
41: Z= X/ Y ( P38)
1: 33 X Loc
2: 23 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 1
3
; ---------
;
;
; LVDT 1 & 2 = Sam
42: Z= X+ Y ( P33)
1: 34 X Loc
2: 35 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ IN ]
3
43: Z= X* F ( P37)
1: 44 X Loc [ S1_ AVG_ IN ]
2: .5 F
3: 44 Z Loc [ S1_ AVG_ IN ]
; LVDT 3 & 4
44: Z= X+ Y ( P33)
1: 36 X Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ IN ]
2: 37 Y Loc
3: 45 Z Loc [ S2_ AVG_ IN ]
45: Z= X* F (
1: 45 X Loc [ S
2: .5 F
3: 45 Z Loc
;
46: Z= X+ Y
1: 38 X Loc [ L
2: 39 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ IN ]
3: 46 Z Lo
4
1: 46 X Loc [ S3_ AVG_ IN ]
2: .5 F
3: 46 Z Loc [ S3_ AVG_ IN ]
; L
48: Z= X+ Y ( P33)
1: 40 X Loc
2: 41 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 8_ IN
3: 47 Z Loc [ S4_ AVG
49: Z= X* F ( P37)
1: 47 X Loc [ S4_ AVG_ IN ]
2: .5 F
3: 47 Z Loc [ S
8 6
; LVDT 9 & 10 = Sample 5
50: Z= X+ Y ( P33)
1: 42 X Loc [ LVDT_ 9_ IN ]
2: 43 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 10_ IN ]
: 48 X Loc [ S5_ AVG_ IN ]
[ S5_ AVG_ IN ]
F ( P34)
: 49 Z Loc [ S1_ TOT_ DISP ]
34)
: -. 011948 F
: 46 X Loc [ S3_ AVG_ IN ]
5: Z= X+ F ( P34)
c [ S4_ AVG_ IN ]
2: -. 025067 F
3: 52 Z Loc [ S4_ TOT_ DISP ]
; Sample 5
56: Z= X+ F ( P34)
1: 48 X Loc [ S5_ AVG_ IN ]
2: -. 12509 F
3: 53 Z Loc [ S5_ TOT_ DISP ]
; --------------------------------------------------------
; LOAD CELL SECTION
; --------------------------------------------------------
; Load cell reading
;
57: Full Bridge ( P6)
1: 1 Reps
2: 11 10 mV, Fast Range
3: 12 DIFF Channel
4: 1 Excite all reps w/ Exchan 1
3: 48 Z Loc [ S5_ AVG_ IN ]
51: Z= X* F ( P37)
1
2: .5 F
3: 48 Z Loc
; ---------
; Total displacement
; Sample 1
52: Z= X+
1: 44 X Loc [ S1_ AVG_ IN ]
2: -. 026186 F
3
; Sample 2
53: Z= X+ F ( P
1: 45 X Loc [ S2_ AVG_ IN ]
2
3: 50 Z Loc [ S2_ TOT_ DISP ]
; Sample 3
54: Z= X+ F ( P34)
1
2: -. 022722 F
3: 51 Z Loc [ S3_ TOT_ DISP ]
; Sample 4
5
1: 47 X Lo
8 7
5: 5000 mV Excitation
6: 6 Loc [ LOAD_ CELL_ 1_ LB ]
53
; --------------------------------------------------------
; PRESSURE SECTION ( PUMP & RAMS)
; --------------------------------------------------------
; Pressure output
; ( 3000 psi / 2 V) * ( 1 V / 1000 mV) = 1.5 psi/ mV
;
58: Volt ( Diff) ( P2)
1: 1 Reps
2: 15 5000 mV, Fast Range
3: 6 DIFF Channel
4: 7 Loc [ PRESSURE_ PSIG ]
5: 1.5 Mult
6: 0.0 Offset
; ---------
; Convert pressure into force using ram's effective area
; = 7.22 in^ 2
;
59: Z= X* F ( P37)
1: 7 X Loc [ PRESSURE_ PSIG ]
2: 7.22 F
3: 8 Z Loc [ RAM_ FORCE1_ LB ]
; --------------------------------------------------------
; BATTERY MONITOR SECTION
; --------------------------------------------------------
; Monitor battery voltage
;
60: Batt Voltage ( P10)
1: 13 Loc [ BAT_ VOLTAGE_ V ]
; --------------------------------------------------------
; DATA COLLECTION SECTION
;---------------------------------------------------------
; Collect data and put into table format
;
61: Data Table ( P84)^ 27244
1: 0 Seconds into Interval
2: 0.0 _____
3: 0.0 ( 0 = auto allocate, - x = redirect to inloc x)
4: EpoxyRebarData1 Table Name
; High resolution enabled ( 5 character)
;
62: Resolution ( P78)
1: 1 High Resolution
; Store average into table
;
63: Average ( P71)^ 25775
1: 13 Reps
7: - 26444 Mult : - 1.49 Offset
8 8 8
2: 1 Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
64: Average ( P71)^ 2342
1: 20 Reps
2: 34 Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ]
; ********************************** TABLE 2 **********************************
;
; Collects data every 3 seconds and stores into limited storage.
; 8 hours of data collected, but will continue to update w/ o storing.
;
* Table 2 Program
01: 3 Execution Interval ( seconds)
; --------------------------------------------------------
; TEMPERATURE SECTION
; --------------------------------------------------------
; Reference temperature
;
1: Panel Temperature ( P17)
1: 1 Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
; Convert reference temp from C to F
;
2: Z= X* F ( P37)
1: 1 X Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
2: 1.8 F
3: 2 Z Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ]
3: Z= X+ F ( P34)
1: 2 X Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ]
2: 32 F
3: 2 Z Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ]
; ----------
; CONCRETE 1
; Thermocouple 1 temp in F
;
4: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
1: 1 Reps
2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range
3: 1 DIFF Channel
4: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan)
5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
6: 9 Loc [ C1_ TEMP_ F ]
7: 1.8 Mult
8: 32 Offset
; CONCRETE 2
; Thermocouple 2 temp in F
;
5: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
1: 1 Reps
2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range
3: 2 DIFF Channel
8 9
4: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan)
5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
6: 10 Loc [ C2_ TEMP_ F ]
7: 1.8 Mult
8: 32 Offset
; OUTSIDE
; Thermocouple 3 temp in F
;
6: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
1: 1 Reps
2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range
3: 3 DIFF Channel ;
4: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan)
5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
6: 11 Loc [ OUTSIDE_ TEMP_ F ]
7: 1.8 Mult
8: 32 Offset
; ENCLOSURE
; Thermocouple 4 temp in F
;
7: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14)
1: 1 Reps
2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range
3: 4 DIFF Channel
4: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan)
5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ]
6: 12 Loc [ BOX_ TEMP_ F ]
7: 1.8 Mult
8: 32 Offset
; --------------------------------------------------------
; HMP45C TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY PROBE SECTION
; --------------------------------------------------------
; Temp/ humidity probe on
;
8: Do ( P86)
1: 41 Set Port 1 High
; Delay for probe stabilization
;
9: Delay w/ Opt Excitation ( P22)
1: 1 Ex Channel
2: 0 Delay W/ Ex ( 0.01 sec units)
3: 15 Delay After Ex ( 0.01 sec units)
4: 0 mV Excitation
; Temp from probe
;
10: Volt ( Diff) ( P2)
1: 1 Reps
2: 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz Reje
DIFF Channel
: 3 Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ C ]
5: .1 Mult
ct, Slow Range
3: 7 4
9 0
6: - 40 Offset
e humidity from probe
; ;
Relativ
11: Volt ( Diff) ( P2)
Reps
: 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range
3: 8 DIFF Channel
4: 5 Loc [ REL_ HUMIDITY ]
5: .1 Mult
6: 0.0 Offset
; Probe off
;
12: Do ( P86)
1: 51 Set Port 1 Low
; ---------
; Convert probe temp from C to F
Click tabs to swap between content that is broken into logical sections.
| Rating | |
| Title | Seismic, creep, and tensile testing of various epoxy bonded rebar products in hardened concrete |
| Subject | Reinforcing bars--Testing.; Reinforced concrete--Testing.; Epoxy coatings--Testing. |
| Description | Text document in PDF format.; Title from PDF title page (viewed on January 29, 2008).; "February 2006."; Includes bibliographical references.; Performed by California Dept. of Transportation Division of Research and Innovation for U.S. Federal Highway Administration under contract no.; Harvested from the web on 1/29/08 |
| Creator | Meline, Robert J. |
| Publisher | California Department of Transportation; Available through the National Technical Information Service |
| Contributors | Gallaher, Malinda.; Duane, Jacob.; California. Dept. of Transportation. |
| Type | Text |
| Language | eng |
| Relation | http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/research/researchreports/reports/2006/epoxy%5Fbonded%5Fdowel-final%5Freport.pdf |
| Date-Issued | 2006] |
| Format-Extent | 115 p. : digital, PDF file with col. ill., col. charts. |
| Relation-Requires | Mode of access: World Wide Web. |
| Transcript | STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION OFFICE OF MATERIALS AND INFRASTRUCTURE SEISMIC, CREEP, AND TENSILE TESTING OF VARIOUS EPOXY BONDED REBAR PRODUCTS IN HARDENED CONCRETE Supervised by Tom Hoover, P. E. Principal Investigator Robert Meline, P. E. Report Prepared by Jacob Duane, P. E. & Malinda Gallaher Research Performed by Jacob Duane, P. E. & Malinda Gallaher STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE TR0003 ( REV. 10/ 98) 1. REPORT NUMBER FHWA/ CA/ IR/ 2004/ 01 2. GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION NUMBER 3. RECIPIENT’S CATALOG NUMBER 5. REPORT DATE February 2006 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Seismic, Creep, and Tensile Testing of Various Epoxy Bonded Rebar Products in Hardened Concrete 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR( S) Robert J. Meline, Malinda Gallaher, Jacob Duane 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. 65- 680321 10. WORK UNIT NUMBER 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS California Department of Transportation Division of Research and Innovation, MS- 83 1227 O Street Sacramento CA 95814 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER F 01 IR 25 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED FINAL 12. SPONSORING AGENCY AND ADDRESS California Department of Transportation Sacramento, CA 95819 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE 15. SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES This project was performed in cooperation with the US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, under the research project titled “ Seismic, Creep, and Tensile Testing of Various Epoxy Bonded Rebar Products in Hardened Concrete” 16. ABSTRACT The objective of this project was to evaluate the performance of currently specified epoxy adhesive anchor systems on various epoxy- coated rebar under seismic, creep and tensile loading. Previous testing of dowel bonding materials for use in hardened concrete was performed on plain rebar, raising the question of their performance on epoxy coated rebar. The epoxy- coated rebar was found to meet the requirements of ICBO- AC58, Section 5.3.7.2.4, “ Conditions of Acceptance” for tension and seismic loading when bonded into hardened concrete using an epoxy adhesive. However, the epoxy- coated rebar did not meet the requirements of the Caltrans Augmentation/ Revisions to ICBO- AC58, Section 5.3.3.2, “ Conditions of Acceptance” for creep loading when bonded into hardened concrete. The rebar bonded with Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000 was found to meet the creep requirements, whereas the rebar bonded with Simpson SET22 and Red Head Epcon C6 did not meet the conditions of acceptance for creep loading. It was also noticed that, when compared to the manufacturer test data, the epoxy- coated rebar outperformed uncoated rebar in allowable tensile loads for two of the three epoxies tested. Simpson SET22 adhesive under performed the manufacturer test data. 17. KEY WORDS Epoxy- Coated Rebar, Rebar Testing, Creep, Seismic, Tensile, Dowel Testing, Concrete. 18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT No restrictions. This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION ( of this report) Unclassified 20. NUMBER OF PAGES 21. PRICE Reproduction of completed page authorized i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Special appreciation is due to Malinda Gallaher for her enthusiastic and competent help on this project. Ronald Reese also contributed to the project with guidance and knowledge of this testing. Other persons who made important contributions are Bill Poroshin, Martin Zanotti, and Mike Said with excellent machine shop services, and Fred McWhorter with instrumentation support. Student assistants John Means, Steve Kiyama, Natane Clarke, and John Black also lent aid in completing this project. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Problem Statement................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective.................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Background.............................................................................................. 1 1.4 Scope........................................................................................................ 2 2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS........................................................................... 2 3. PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS........................................................................... 3 3.1 Simpson Strong- Tie SET22..................................................................... 3 3.2 Red Head Epcon Ceramic 6..................................................................... 3 3.3 Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000............................................................ 4 4. TEST MATERIALS....................................................................................... 5 4.1 Epoxy- Coated Rebar................................................................................ 5 4.2 Concrete................................................................................................... 5 5. TEST EQUIPMENT....................................................................................... 5 5.1 Tension and Seismic Loading.................................................................. 5 5.2 Creep Loading.......................................................................................... 7 5.3 Environmental Chamber.......................................................................... 9 5.4 Other Equipment...................................................................................... 9 6. INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS............................................................ 11 7. TEST PROCEDURE...................................................................................... 11 7.1 Tension and Seismic Tests....................................................................... 11 7.2 Creep Tests............................................................................................... 12 8. TEST RESULTS............................................................................................. 13 8.1 Tension and Seismic Tests....................................................................... 16 8.1.1 Simpson Strong- Tie SET22............................................................ 17 8.1.2 Red Head Epcon Ceramic 6............................................................ 18 8.1.3 Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000................................................... 18 8.2 Creep Tests............................................................................................... 18 8.2.1 Simpson Strong- Tie SET22............................................................ 18 8.2.2 Red Head Epcon Ceramic 6............................................................ 19 8.2.3 Convert Operations CIA- Gel 7000................................................. 19 9. CONCLUSION............................................................................................... 20 10. RECOMMENDATION.................................................................................. 20 11. IMPLEMENTATION.................................................................................... 21 12. REFERENCES................................................................................................ 21 APPENDIX............................................................................................................... 22 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 5- 1 267 kN ( 60 Kip) Load Frame............................................................. 6 Figure 5- 2 Cart with Controller and Hydraulic Pump......................................... 6 Figure 5- 3 LVDT Bracket................................................................................... 7 Figure 5- 4 Creep Loading Setup.......................................................................... 8 Figure 5- 5 LVDT Bracket for Creep Testing...................................................... 8 Figure 5- 6 Air Powered Pump............................................................................. 8 Figure 5- 7 Concrete Cylinder Mover.................................................................. 10 Figure 5- 8 Campbell Scientific CR10X Data logger........................................... 10 Figure 5- 9 Rebar Gripper..................................................................................... 10 Figure 5- 10 LVDT Multiplexer............................................................................. 10 Figure 7- 1 Seismic Loading Criteria................................................................... 12 Figure A- 1 Typical Concrete– Concrete/ Adhesive Interface Failure.................... 29 Figure A- 2 Typical Concrete/ Adhesive Interface Failure.................................... 29 Figure A- 3 Typical Concrete/ Adhesive – Adhesive/ Rebar Interface Failure....... 30 Figure A- 4 Typical Adhesive/ Rebar Interface Failure......................................... 30 Figure A- 5 Typical Rebar Failure........................................................................ 31 Figure A- 6 SET22 12d Tensile Test # 1................................................................ 32 Figure A- 7 SET22 12d Tensile Test # 2................................................................ 32 Figure A- 8 SET22 12d Tensile Test # 3................................................................ 33 Figure A- 9 SET22 12d Tensile Test # 4................................................................ 33 Figure A- 10 SET22 12d Tensile Test # 5................................................................ 33 Figure A- 11 SET22 12d Seismic Test # 1............................................................... 34 Figure A- 12 SET22 12d Seismic Test # 2............................................................... 34 Figure A- 13 SET22 12d Seismic Test # 3............................................................... 34 Figure A- 14 SET22 12d Seismic Test # 4............................................................... 35 Figure A- 15 SET22 12d Seismic Test # 5............................................................... 35 Figure A- 16 SET22 9d Tensile Test # 1.................................................................. 35 Figure A- 17 SET22 9d Tensile Test # 2.................................................................. 36 Figure A- 18 SET22 9d Tensile Test # 3.................................................................. 36 Figure A- 19 SET22 9d Tensile Test # 4.................................................................. 36 Figure A- 20 SET22 9d Tensile Test # 5.................................................................. 37 Figure A- 21 SET22 9d Seismic Test # 1................................................................. 37 Figure A- 22 SET22 9d Seismic Test # 2................................................................. 37 Figure A- 23 SET22 9d Seismic Test # 3................................................................. 38 Figure A- 24 SET22 9d Seismic Test # 4................................................................. 38 Figure A- 25 SET22 9d Seismic Test # 5................................................................. 38 Figure A- 26 SET22 Creep Displacements Over First 6 Hours.............................. 39 Figure A- 27 SET22 Creep Displacement 600- Day Log Regression Analysis....... 39 Figure A- 28 SET22 42- Day Creep Displacements................................................ 40 Figure A- 29 SET22 Chamber and Concrete Temperatures.................................... 40 Figure A- 30 SET22 Creep Load............................................................................. 40 Figure A- 31 SET22 Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests...................................... 41 Figure A- 32 SET22 Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile Tests........................... 41 Figure A- 33 Ceramic 6 12d Tensile Test # 1.......................................................... 42 iv Figure A- 34 Ceramic 6 12d Tensile Test # 2.......................................................... 42 Figure A- 35 Ceramic 6 12d Tensile Test # 3.......................................................... 43 Figure A- 36 Ceramic 6 12d Tensile Test # 4.......................................................... 43 Figure A- 37 Ceramic 6 12d Tensile Test # 5.......................................................... 43 Figure A- 38 Ceramic 6 12d Seismic Test # 1......................................................... 44 Figure A- 39 Ceramic 6 12d Seismic Test # 2......................................................... 44 Figure A- 40 Ceramic 6 12d Seismic Test # 3......................................................... 44 Figure A- 41 Ceramic 6 12d Seismic Test # 4......................................................... 45 Figure A- 42 Ceramic 6 12d Seismic Test # 5......................................................... 45 Figure A- 43 Ceramic 6 9d Tensile Test # 1............................................................ 45 Figure A- 44 Ceramic 6 9d Tensile Test # 2............................................................ 46 Figure A- 45 Ceramic 6 9d Tensile Test # 3............................................................ 46 Figure A- 46 Ceramic 6 9d Tensile Test # 4............................................................ 46 Figure A- 47 Ceramic 6 9d Tensile Test # 5............................................................ 47 Figure A- 48 Ceramic 6 9d Seismic Test # 1........................................................... 47 Figure A- 49 Ceramic 6 9d Seismic Test # 2........................................................... 47 Figure A- 50 Ceramic 6 9d Seismic Test # 3........................................................... 48 Figure A- 51 Ceramic 6 9d Seismic Test # 4........................................................... 48 Figure A- 52 Ceramic 6 9d Seismic Test # 5........................................................... 48 Figure A- 53 Ceramic 6 Creep Displacements Over First 6 Hours......................... 49 Figure A- 54 Ceramic 6 Creep Displacement 600- Day Log Regression Analysis. 49 Figure A- 55 Ceramic 6 42- Day Creep Displacements........................................... 50 Figure A- 56 Ceramic 6 Chamber and Concrete Temperatures.............................. 50 Figure A- 57 Ceramic 6 Creep Load....................................................................... 50 Figure A- 58 Ceramic 6 Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests................................ 51 Figure A- 59 Ceramic 6 Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile Tests...................... 51 Figure A- 60 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Tensile Test # 1.................................................... 52 Figure A- 61 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Tensile Test # 2.................................................... 52 Figure A- 62 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Tensile Test # 3.................................................... 53 Figure A- 63 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Tensile Test # 4.................................................... 53 Figure A- 64 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Tensile Test # 5.................................................... 53 Figure A- 65 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Seismic Test # 1................................................... 54 Figure A- 66 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Seismic Test # 2................................................... 54 Figure A- 67 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Seismic Test # 3................................................... 54 Figure A- 68 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Seismic Test # 4................................................... 55 Figure A- 69 CIA- Gel 7000 12d Seismic Test # 5................................................... 55 Figure A- 70 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Tensile Test # 1...................................................... 55 Figure A- 71 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Tensile Test # 2...................................................... 56 Figure A- 72 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Tensile Test # 3...................................................... 56 Figure A- 73 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Tensile Test # 4...................................................... 56 Figure A- 74 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Tensile Test # 5...................................................... 57 Figure A- 75 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Seismic Test # 1..................................................... 57 Figure A- 76 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Seismic Test # 2..................................................... 57 Figure A- 77 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Seismic Test # 3..................................................... 58 Figure A- 78 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Seismic Test # 4..................................................... 58 Figure A- 79 CIA- Gel 7000 9d Seismic Test # 5..................................................... 58 v Figure A- 80 CIA- Gel 7000 Creep Displacements Over First 6 Hours.................. 59 Figure A- 81 CIA- Gel 7000 Creep Displacement 600- Day Analysis..................... 59 Figure A- 82 CIA- Gel 7000 42- Day Creep Displacements.................................... 60 Figure A- 83 CIA- Gel 7000 Chamber and Concrete Temperatures........................ 60 Figure A- 84 CIA- Gel 7000 Creep Load................................................................. 60 Figure A- 85 CIA- Gel 7000 Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests.......................... 61 Figure A- 86 CIA- Gel 7000 Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile Tests............... 61 Figure C- 1 Rebar Puller....................................................................................... 98 Figure C- 2 Rebar Gripper – Collar....................................................................... 99 Figure C- 3 Rebar Gripper – Jaw.......................................................................... 100 Figure C- 4 LVDT Bracket for Pullout and Seismic Testing – Front View......... 101 Figure C- 5 LVDT Bracket for Pullout and Seismic Testing – Side View........... 101 Figure C- 6 LVDT Bracket for Pullout and Seismic Testing – Top View............ 102 Figure C- 7 LVDT Bracket for Pullout and Seismic Testing – 3D View............. 102 Figure C- 8 LVDT Bracket for Creep Testing – Front View................................ 103 Figure C- 9 LVDT Bracket for Creep Testing – Side View................................. 103 Figure C- 10 LVDT Bracket for Creep Testing – Top View.................................. 104 Figure C- 11 LVDT Bracket for Creep Testing – 3D View.................................... 104 Figure C- 12 Creep Load Frame.............................................................................. 105 Figure C- 13 Cart – 3D View.................................................................................. 105 Figure C- 14 Cart – Side View................................................................................ 106 Figure C- 15 LVDT Breakout Box Schematic........................................................ 107 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 1- 1 Testing Quantities.............................................................................. 2 Table 1- 2 Testing Specifications........................................................................ 2 Table 3- 1 Simpson SET22 Cure Times.............................................................. 3 Table 3- 2 Red Head Epcon Ceramic 6 Cure times............................................ 4 Table 3- 3 Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000 Cure times.................................... 4 Table 8- 1 Summary of Results for SET22 Epoxy Testing................................. 13 Table 8- 2 Summary of Results for Ceramic 6 Epoxy Testing........................... 14 Table 8- 3 Summary of Results for CIA- Gel 7000 Epoxy Testing..................... 15 Table 8- 4 Preliminary Test Results and Seismic Parameters............................. 16 Table 8- 5 Seismic Test Conditions of Acceptance............................................ 16 Table A- 1 Concrete Pour Information................................................................ 21 Table A- 2 Epoxy Adhesive Information............................................................. 21 Table A- 3 SET22 Concrete Compressive Strengths........................................... 22 Table A- 4 Ceramic 6 Concrete Compressive Strengths...................................... 23 Table A- 5 CIA- GEL 7000 Concrete Compressive Strengths............................. 24 Table A- 6 SET22 Testing Failure Modes........................................................... 22 Table A- 7 Ceramic 6 Testing Failure Modes...................................................... 23 Table A- 8 CIA- Gel 7000 Testing Failure Modes............................................... 24 vii 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Problem Statement For certain applications, the California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans) uses epoxy cartridge adhesives for bonding rebar into holes that are drilled in hardened concrete. Caltrans started using these adhesives on plain rebar since previous research and testing was completed on them. At some point, Caltrans used a large quantity of epoxy- coated rebar for earthquake retrofitted bridge structure rehabilitation projects. Concern was expressed about using epoxy- coated rebar with epoxy cartridge adhesives. Problems that could occur are long- term creep under sustained tensile loading and slip or strength loss during cyclic loading that takes place during a seismic event. The International Conference of Building Officials ( ICBO) had suggested that bars with any coatings should be treated as a new, different bar and would require a new set of tests. These tests have yet to be completed. Caltrans’ Division of Materials Engineering and Testing Services recommended to Structures Design that a separate set of ICBO seismic tests be performed on epoxy- coated bars with epoxy cartridge adhesives. These tests would have to pass Caltrans’ Augmentation to ICBO- AC58 [ 1] to be permitted for use in concrete structures. They also recommended that a considerable reduction in allowable loads be imposed on untested coated bars until the effects of coatings could be determined. 1.2 Objective The objective of this project is to evaluate the performance of currently specified epoxy adhesive anchor systems on various epoxy- coated rebar under seismic, creep and tensile loading. 1.3 Background Epoxy- coated reinforcing bars are used in concrete structures where corrosion protection is important. The epoxy- coated bars have a lower bond strength to concrete than the uncoated bars. An improved understanding of bond behavior is needed with the increasing application of epoxy- coated reinforcement, the conservative design guides, and the limited data on which those provisions are based. The goal is to improve economy and constructability, while maintaining an adequate margin of safety. A large scale study, “ Bond of Epoxy- Coated Reinforcement: Bar Parameters” [ 2], was carried out by Oan Chul Choi, Hossain Hadje- Ghaffari, David Darwin, and Steven L. McCabe to determine the effects of coating thickness, deformation pattern, and bar size on the reduction in bond strength between reinforcing bars and concrete caused by epoxy coating. In general, their conclusion was that the reduction in bond strength caused by epoxy coating increases with bar size. Adhesive- bonded anchors are increasingly used as structural fasteners for connections to hardened concrete. Due to their reliance on chemical and mechanical bond, adhesive anchors are uniquely susceptible to a number of potentially adverse 1 factors. Conditions that cause these factors can occur during installation and throughout the service life of the anchor. Twenty different epoxy products ( for a total of 765 tests) were evaluated by Ronald A. Cook and Robert C. Konz in their report entitled, “ Factors influencing the Bond Strength of Adhesive Anchors” [ 3]. From their conclusions, the two substantial concerns were the temperature and condition of the drilled hole. Subjecting adhesive anchors to an elevated temperature of 43.3° C ( 110° F) can substantially influence bond strength along with increased product variation. Also, the condition of the drilled hole during installation can have a substantial influence on bond strength. Products installed into holes that were damp, wet, or not cleaned out generally showed reductions in bond strength with increased variation. 1.4 Scope A total of 90 tests were performed according to the ICBO- AC58. The testing quantities and specifications established for this project are shown in Tables 1- 1 and 1- 2. Epoxy Brand Simpson Red Head Covert Operations Model SET22 Ceramic 6 CIA- Gel 7000 Embedment Depth 12d 9d 12d 9d 12d 9d Tensile Test 5 5 5 5 5 5 Seismic Test 5 5 5 5 5 5 Aged Seismic Test 5 0 0 0 0 0 High Temp Tensile Test 0 5 0 5 0 5 Creep Test 0 5 0 5 0 5 Table 1- 1: Testing Quantities Rebar Size M19 [ 19.1mm dia] (# 6 [ 3/ 4" dia]) Drill Diameter 22.2mm ( 7/ 8") Rebar Material Grade A706 Coating Thickness 0.178- 0.305 mm ( 7- 12 mils) Deformation Pattern S ( diagonal) Concrete Dimensions 813mm ( 32") dia, 279mm ( 11") and 356mm ( 14") depth Table 1- 2: Testing Specifications 2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS The epoxy- coated rebar tested with all three epoxy adhesive brands in tension and seismic loading met or exceeded the requirements of ICBO- AC58, Section 5.3.7.2.4, “ Conditions of Acceptance”. The epoxy- coated rebar tested with the Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000 epoxy adhesive in creep loading met or exceeded the requirements of the Caltrans Augmentation/ Revisions to ICBO- AC58, Section 5.3.3.2, “ Conditions of Acceptance”. However, the Simpson Strong – Tie SET22 and Red Head Epcon Ceramic 6 epoxy adhesives did not meet the requirements for creep loading. 2 3. PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS 3.1 Simpson Strong- Tie SET22 Simpson Strong- Tie SET22 epoxy is a two- component, low odor, 1: 1 ratio, 100% solids epoxy- based adhesive for use as a high strength, non- shrink anchor grouting material. Resin and hardener are dispensed and mixed simultaneously through the mixing nozzle. SET22 meets the ASTM C- 881 specification for Type I, II, IV and V, Grade 3, Class B and C. Surfaces to receive epoxy must be clean. The base material temperature must be 4.44° C ( 40° F) or above at the time of installation. For best results, material should be 21.1° C - 26.7° C ( 70° - 80° F) at the time of application. The shelf life of an unopened side- by- side cartridge is two years from the date of manufacture. The batch number and expiration date is found on each cartridge. For best results cartridges should be stored between 7.22° C ( 45° F) and 32.2° C ( 90° F). The recommended cure times for different base material temperatures are shown in Table 3- 1. Base Material Temperature ° F ° C Cure Time 40 4 72 hrs. 65 18 24 hrs. 85 29 20 hrs. 90 32 16 hrs. Table 3- 1: Simpson SET22 Cure Times SET22 samples were randomly chosen via purchase from White Cap Industries in Rancho Cordova, CA. 3.2 Red Head Epcon Ceramic 6 Red Head Epcon Ceramic 6 ( or C6) is a two- component, 100% solids, non- sag paste adhesive formulated for use in concrete, stone, and hollow masonry. Epoxy components are dispensed through a static mixing nozzle that thoroughly mixes the material. It meets NSF Standard 61 for use in conjunction with drinking water systems, and meets ASTM C881- 90, Type IV Grade 3, Class A, B, and C with the exception of gel time. Surfaces to receive epoxy must be clean. At temperatures between - 17.8° C - 10° C ( 0° F - 50° F), C6 should be heated to room temperature or up to 65.6° C ( 150° F) maximum to improve product flow and assure proper curing. The minimum shelf life for C6 is 3 years. Two codes, a four- letter batch code and five- number cartridge code, are printed on a single sticker affixed to each epoxy cartridge. Expiration dates were not found on the cartridges, but are available on the boxes. The expiration dates for each cartridge were obtained by calling the manufacturer. The recommended cure times for different base temperatures are shown in Table 3- 2. 3 Base Material Temperature ° F ° C WorkingTime Full Cure Time 40 4 45 min. 32 hrs. 50 10 20 min. 24 hrs. 60 16 10 min. 2 hrs. 70 20 7 min. 1 hr. 90 32 5 min. 1 hr. 120 49 4 min. 1 hr. Table 3- 2: Red Head Epcon C6 Cure times C6 samples were randomly chosen via purchase from White Cap Industries in Rancho Cordova, CA and Rainbow Fasteners Inc. in Sacramento, CA. 3.3 Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000 Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000 epoxy is a 100% solids, two- component, non- sag structural adhesive designed to be used on a wide range of applications. It is a low odor, low toxicity, and non- shrink epoxy. CIA- Gel 7000 meets ASTM C881. Resin and hardener are simultaneously dispensed and mixed through a mixing nozzle. Surfaces to receive epoxy must be clean. Application at a substrate temperature below 4.44° C ( 40° F) is not recommended. Exposure to temperature exceeding 43.3° C ( 110° F) for prolonged periods is not recommended. The shelf life for unopened containers is a minimum of one year. CIA- Gel 7000 is not sensitive to heat or UV light, but should be prevented from freezing. The epoxy should be stored in temperatures above 4.44° C ( 40° F). The lot number and expiration date are printed on a label affixed to each cartridge. The recommended cure times for different base temperatures are shown in Table 3- 3. Base Material Temperature ° F ° C Initial Set Time Bolt- Up Time Cure Time 40- 50 4.44- 10 5 hrs. 12 hrs. 96 hrs. 50- 60 10- 15.6 4 hrs. 8 hrs. 72 hrs. 60- 70 15.6- 21.1 3 hrs. 6 hrs. 48 hrs. 70- 80 21.1- 26.7 2 hrs. 4 hrs. 36 hrs. 80- 90 26.7- 32.2 1 hrs. 4 hrs. 24 hrs. Table 3- 3: Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000 Cure times CIA- Gel 7000 samples were randomly chosen via purchase from White Cap Industries in Rancho Cordova, CA. 4 4. TEST MATERIALS 4.1 Epoxy- Coated Rebar The epoxy- coated rebar samples were specified to be M19 (# 6), grade A706 rebar with an “ S”, or diagonal, deformation pattern. The coating thickness was specified as 0.178- 0.305 mm ( 7- 12 mils) with a gray ( rigid) coating. The rebar was from the same heat and the cut ends were coated. The epoxy- coated rebar was obtained from FBC Systems, Inc. in Vallejo, CA. 4.2 Concrete All testing was performed in unreinforced and uncracked concrete. The Caltrans concrete mix design T0A6342A, which has a compressive strength of 31 ± 3.45 MPa ( 4500 ± 500 psi), was used instead of the 20.7 ± 3.45 MPa ( 3000 ± 500 psi) strength requirement of ICBO- AC58. This mix design was tested because it is more representative of the mix used in the construction of Caltrans structures, and it allowed the epoxy- coated rebar to be more accurately tested. Concrete was supplied by Teichert in Sacramento, CA. The concrete structural samples were cylinders of 813 mm ( 32”) in diameter and either 279 mm ( 11”) or 356 mm ( 14”) in depth ( depending on embedment depth). The test surface was rough, “ screed” finished to replicate field applications. Concrete compressive test cylinders were prepared and tested in accordance with CTM 521 and ASTM C39. The actual compressive strength of the concrete when tested ranged from 30.8 MPa ( 4470 psi) to 43.8 MPa ( 6350 psi). Additional concrete data is located in Appendix A. 1. 5. TEST EQUIPMENT 5.1 Tension and Seismic Loading Tension and seismic testing was conducted using equipment designed in compliance with ASTM E488. The equipment used for the tension and seismic loading of the epoxy- coated rebar was a custom made system designed in by Caltrans in conjunction with SATEC. The system includes a load frame, a Labtronic 8800 Digital Controller, and a hydraulic pump. The load frame uses a 267 kN ( 60 kip), 254 mm ( 10”) stroke hydraulic actuator to apply tension force to the rebar samples. ( See Figure 5- 1) Attached in- line to the end of the actuator is a load cell, a linear alignment coupler, and a bolt holder. The linear alignment coupler is a ball- in- socket type coupler that allows small x- y movement of the bolt holder via rotation about a fixed point. It is used to prevent a moment from being applied to the rebar sample during testing. The bolt holder is a high- strength part that holds the rebar gripping device. The entire frame is supported by a ring that is 12.7 mm ( ½ ”) thick by 25.4 mm ( 1”) tall and has an internal diameter of 635 mm ( 25”). This ring allows the rebar sample to experience an unconstrained failure. Therefore, the rebar 5 sample can fail in a number of ways which best simulates actual failures in the field. The load frame was moved onto and off of the samples with a gantry crane due to its weight. The Labtronic 8800 Digital Controller is a sophisticated device that allows a multitude of testing capabilities. The controller manages the hydraulics to perform the necessary tension and seismic loading conditions. The controller is connected to a laptop computer, which collects all of the pertinent test data. The controller is housed in a watertight cabinet and mounted to a cart along side the hydraulic pump. ( See Figure 5- 2) The load measurements were obtained from the 267 kN ( 60 kip) load cell on the load frame. The displacement measurements were obtained by a pair of ± 25.4 mm (± 1”) stroke AC LVDT’s. The LVDT’s were attached to the rebar by a custom made bracket that holds them 381 mm ( 15”) away from the rebar in opposite directions. Using two LVDT’s in this configuration and taking their average helps to minimize errors that can occur from misaligned samples. The displacements were measured relative to the concrete test surface. The LVDTs’ were calibrated with the Labtronic controller at the beginning of each test day. ( See Figure 5- 3) Figure 5- 1: 267 kN ( 60 kip) Load Frame Figure 5- 2: Cart with Controller and Hydraulic Pump 6 Figure 5- 3: LVDT Bracket 5.2 Creep Loading In order to perform the testing in a timely manner, a method of applying a creep load to five samples simultaneously was developed. For each sample this method uses a hydraulic actuator, a spherical washer set, a barlock rebar clamp, a pair of LVDT’s, anLVDT bracket, and a hydraulic actuator support frame. The barlock screws into the reba r n the pport the actuator load and they sit on the concrete test surface allowing a clearance of about 229 mm ( 9”) around the rebar. This clearance creates an unconstrained condition on the rebar and allows any type of failure mode. The LVDT’s are mounted in the same manner as for the tension testing, however; they only allow 229 mm ( 9”) of clearance around the rebar and have a full stroke of ± 12.7 mm (± 0.5”). ( See Figures 5- 4 and 5- 5) An air- powered pump simultaneously pressurizes all five actuators. This pump is driven by a static compressed air supply, which converts air pressure to hydraulic pressure through a mechanical piston ratio. Once pressurized, the pump holds a constant pressure, which in turn applies a constant load on the rebar samples. ( See Figure 5- 6) to create a shoulder for the actuator to push against. The spherical washer is placed between the actuator piston and the barlock, and is used to minimize any moment isystem. The actuator support frame is made of two steel C- channels and two I- beams welded together, and holds the actuator above the concrete test surface. The I- beams su 7 Figure 5- 4: Creep Loading Setup Figure 5- 5: LVDT Bracket for Creep Testing Figure 5- 6: Air Powered Pump 8 5.3 Environmental Chamber An environmental chamber was used to bring the samples to the appropriate temperatures for testing. The chamber that was used is a wooden shed that is fully insulated. It is equipped with an HVAC unit with enough capacity to bring the chamber to the necessary temperatures regardless of outside temperature. A programmable thermostat was used to maintain the necessary temperature tolerance. 5.4 Other Equipment Testing could not be performed inside of the environmental chamber because it was too small. Therefore, a method of moving the heavy concrete test cylinders was necessary. A small steel cart was designed that would allow the cylinders to be moved in and out of the chamber one at a time as needed ( see Figure 5- 7). The load frame was equipped with a bolt holder that is used to grip threaded rod outfitted with a nut and washer. Since there was not an easy method of attaching a nut and washer to the rebar, a gripping device was designed specially to grip the rebar and fit into the bolt holder. This rebar grip consists of three tapered conical jaws in a tapered cylindrical housing ( see Figure 5- 9). As the gripper is pulled up with a piece of rebar in the jaws, the jaws will grip into the rebar at a ratio of approximately 6: 1 of the pulling load. This gives a firm grip on the rebar to minimize the possibility of rebar slippage during testing. During the creep testing of the rebar, data must be collected at anywhere from minutely to daily during the span of testing. For this, a Campbell Scientific CR23X datalogger was used ( see Figure 5- 8). For the first 6 hours of testing, the datalogger was programmed to collect all data every three seconds. This gave more than enough data to accurately record the initial elastic deformation and the critical first six hours of rebar displacement. After the first six hours, the datalogger was programmed to collect all data on an hourly basis. This gave enough data to satisfy all requirements. The datalogger program is located in Appendix B. To minimize the clutter of wiring from the 10 LVDT’s, a multiplexer with integrated power supply was designed and fabricated ( see Figure 5- 10). This LVDT multiplexer allowed the 10 LVDT’s to be plugged into it, gave the appropriate power to each LVDT, and output a clean set of 10 twisted wire pairs to be connected to the datalogger. This multiplexer greatly facilitated connecting and disconnecting the LVDT’s between tests. 9 Figure 5- 7: Concrete Cylinder Mover Figure 5- 8: Campbell Scientific Datalogger Figure 5- 9: Rebar Gripper Figure 5- 10: LVDT Multiplexer More detailed information for most of the equipment described in this section may be found in Appendix C in the form of data sheets and/ or drawings. 1 0 6. INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS For each epoxy adhesive, the epoxy- coated rebar was installed into concrete cylinders measuring 813 mm ( 32”) in diameter by 279 mm ( 11”) deep for the 9d [ 171.5mm ( 6 ¾ ”)] embedment depth, and 813 mm ( 32”) in diameter by 356 mm ( 14”) deep for the 12d [ 228.6mm ( 9”)] embedment depth. Holes were drilled into the hardened concrete using a rotary hammer to depths of 171.5 mm ( 6 ¾ ”) or 228.6 mm ( 9”) depending on the test. The freshly drilled holes were blown out with compressed air, thoroughly brushed, and blown out again until no particles blew out. Tape was immediately put over each cleaned hole until the rebar was installed to prevent debris infiltration. The holes were drilled to a size of 22.2 mm ( 7/ 8”) in diameter at less than 6° from vertical. The concrete cylinders were brought to a temperature of 21.1° C ± 2.8° C ( 70° F ± 5° F) in an environmental chamber. The epoxy adhesive was dispensed into each hole from the bottom up, filling each hole approximately half way. The epoxy- coated rebar was then inserted into each adhesive filled hole with a twisting motion to help eliminate air pockets from forming. The epoxy adhesive was allowed to cure for 48 hours at 21.1° C ± 2.8° C ( 70° F ± 5° F) prior to testing. 7. TEST PROCEDURE Testing was conducted in accordance with ICBO- AC58, ASTM E488- 96, ASTM E1512- 01, CTM 681, and Caltrans Augmentation/ Revisions to ICBO- AC58, except for concrete compressive strength in which a higher strength than required was used. 7.1 Tension and Seismic Tests Tension and seismic tests were first performed on the 12d embedment depth epoxy- coated rebar samples, and then the 9d. Ten samples were tested at a time; five samples for each tension and seismic loadings. One at a time, the cured samples were brought outside from an environmental chamber at 21.1° C ± 2.8° C ( 70° F ± 5° F) and quickly tested. The samples were unconstrained to allow any possible failure mode. Five samples ( controls) were tested in tension until failure and an average ultimate load was determined, Tref. Loading criteria, Ns, Ni, and Nm, for the seismic tests were then calculated using the average ultimate load ( see Figure 7- 1). The remaining five samples were then tested in seismic loading at a frequency of 0.5 Hz and according to the calculated loading criteria. Immediately after the seismic loading was complete, the samples were pulled in tension until failure. An average ultimate tension load after seismic loading was calculated. 1 1 Nm = ¼ Tref Ni = ( Ns + Nm)/ 2 Ns = maximum tension test load = ( 1.5)( 1.3333)( ¼ Tref) Ns Ni Nm Cycles Load 10 30 100 Figure 7- 1: Seismic Loading Criteria 7.2 Creep Tests High temperature creep tests were performed on samples with the 9d embedment depth only. Ten cured samples were brought up to 43.3 ° C ± 1.65° C ( 110° F ± 3° F) in an environmental chamber in approximately 24 hours. Elevated temperature tension tests were first performed on five of the samples. One at a time, the heated samples were taken out of the heated environmental chamber and quickly tested. A maximum displacement at ultimate load was calculated from the five high temperature tests. A sustained creep load of 40% of the average ultimate load, Tref, was applied to the remaining five samples by the use of an air- powered hydraulic pump and five hydraulic actuators. Each sample was fitted with a hydraulic actuator, one set of spherical washers, a barlock clamping device, an actuator support fixture, and a bracket which held two LVDT’s 228.6mm ( 9”) away from the rebar in opposite directions. One of the five samples was also equipped with a load cell. With the samples already up to temperature, a preload of approximately 4% of the sustained creep load was applied to the samples. The displacements were then zeroed, and the remaining sustained creep load was applied. The displacements were recorded every three seconds for the first six hours, and hourly until the end of the test cycle. Other data that was recorded hourly until the end of the test cycle includes: internal chamber temperature and humidity, tension force applied to the rebar, air pump pressure, sample concrete temperature, and outside temperature. The samples were left in the environmental chamber that was programmed to warm up to 43.3 ° C ± 1.65° C ( 110° F ± 3° F) and maintain that temperature within ± 1.65° C (± 3° F) for at least 42 days. The sample concrete temperature was recorded by a thermocouple cast into two of the five samples 114 mm ( 4 ½ ”) down from the test surface. After the 42- day test cycle, the samples were unloaded and the fixtures were removed. The rebar was then cut to a length of approximately 203 mm ( 8”) to both remove the marred section of rebar created by the barlocks, and to allow the sample to fit into the testing machine. One at a time, each sample was then taken out of the heated chamber and quickly tested in tension until failure. Data and specific details for the above test procedure may be found in the Appendix, and are summarized in Section 8, Test Results. 1 2 8. TEST RESULTS The testing revealed that epoxy- coated rebar bonded into hardened concrete generally outperforms uncoated rebar in tensile loading, however; it under performs uncoated rebar in creep loading. One interesting discovery was that failures occurred via the adhesive debonding from the epoxy coating on the rebar. For uncoated rebar, the adhesive rarely debonds from the rebar interface. The seismic testing revealed that the epoxy- coated rebar satisfied the ICBO- AC58 conditions of acceptance for each adhesive. A summary of all tests performed is displayed in Tables 8- 1 through 8- 3. After performing the tests and having the concrete test cylinders compression tested, the concrete strength was found to be slightly higher than initially intended. The concrete strength was found to be in the range of 30.8 MPa ( 4470 psi) to 43.8 MPa ( 6350 psi). Even with the higher strength concrete, the epoxy- coated rebar still failed the creep tests for two adhesives. 1 3 Test Type Sample # Date Time OutsideTemp Max Load Max Displacement Method of Failure AverageLoad AverageDisp F C lbf N in mm N ( lbf) mm ( in) 1 10/ 01/ 03 9: 35 63.8 35.4 38570 171637 0.1926 4.892 Adhesive 2 10/ 01/ 03 10: 24 69.0 38.3 41320 183874 0.4361 11.077 Adhesive 178436 6.962 3 10/ 01/ 03 11: 16 74.6 41.4 40550 180448 - - Rebar Gripper ( 40098) ( 0.2741) 4 10/ 01/ 03 11: 44 76.4 42.4 40590 180626 0.2702 6.863 Rebar SET22 12d Tensile 5 10/ 01/ 03 12: 14 76.0 42.2 39460 175597 0.1975 5.017 Rebar 1 10/ 01/ 03 13: 25 81.8 45.4 40160 178712 0.1802 4.576 Rebar 2 10/ 01/ 03 13: 52 81.4 45.2 40910 182050 0.1610 4.090 Rebar 182121 5.453 3 10/ 01/ 03 14: 21 82.2 45.7 40980 182361 0.2926 7.432 Rebar ( 40926) ( 0.2147) 4 10/ 01/ 03 14: 57 82.0 45.6 41090 182851 0.2420 6.148 Rebar SET22 12d Seismic 5 10/ 01/ 03 15: 37 81.0 45.0 41490 184631 0.1977 5.021 Rebar 1 10/ 08/ 03 11: 25 76.2 42.3 33960 151122 0.0982 2.495 Conc/ Adhesive 2 10/ 08/ 03 11: 51 77.8 43.2 32610 145115 0.0716 1.819 Conc/ Adhesive 149983 2.654 3 10/ 08/ 03 12: 28 80.0 44.4 33290 148141 0.0998 2.535 Adhesive ( 33704) ( 0.1045) 4 10/ 08/ 03 12: 50 81.6 45.3 33520 149164 0.1068 2.712 Adhesive SET22 9d Tensile 5 10/ 08/ 03 13: 12 78.8 43.8 35140 156373 0.1461 3.711 Adhesive 1 10/ 08/ 03 14: 20 82.2 45.7 33140 147473 0.0924 2.346 Adhesive 2 10/ 08/ 03 14: 46 83.6 46.4 35110 156240 0.1229 3.122 Adhesive 148354 2.474 3 10/ 08/ 03 15: 10 83.6 46.4 32040 142578 0.0800 2.032 Adhesive ( 33338) ( 0.0974) 4 10/ 08/ 03 15: 34 84.2 46.8 33580 149431 0.0942 2.392 Adhesive SET22 9d Seismic 5 10/ 08/ 03 15: 55 83.4 46.3 32820 146049 0.0976 2.480 Adhesive 1 10/ 17/ 03 14: 54 82.2 45.7 31500 140175 0.0717 1.822 Conc/ Adhesive 2 10/ 17/ 03 15: 16 82.2 45.7 29840 132788 0.1079 2.741 Conc/ Adhesive 139107 6.312 3 10/ 17/ 03 15: 35 82.2 45.7 30880 137416 0.2774 7.045 Adhesive ( 31260) ( 0.2485) 4 10/ 17/ 03 15: 51 82.0 45.6 32340 143913 0.3552 9.021 Adhesive SET22 9d Elevated Temperature Tensile 5 10/ 17/ 03 16: 09 82.2 45.7 31740 141243 0.4304 10.931 Conc/ Adhesive 5 12/ 01/ 03 11: 20 63.4 35.2 25790 114766 0.0578 1.467 Adhesive 1 12/ 01/ 03 11: 47 63.8 35.4 29500 131275 0.0507 1.289 Adhesive 117142 1.359 2 12/ 01/ 03 12: 10 60.8 33.8 26290 116991 0.0440 1.117 Conc/ Adhesive ( 26324) ( 0.0535) 4 12/ 01/ 03 12: 31 59.4 33.0 25660 114187 0.0439 1.116 Conc/ Adhesive SET22 9d Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile 3 12/ 01/ 03 12: 51 60.0 33.3 24380 108491 0.0711 1.807 Conc/ Adhesive Table 8- 1: Summary of Results for SET22 Epoxy Testing 1 4 Test Type Sample # Date Time OutsideTemp Max Load Max Displacement Method of Failure AverageLoad AverageDisp F C lbf N in mm N ( lbf) mm ( in) 1 12/ 05/ 03 9: 39 56.4 31.3 37850 168433 0.2681 6.811 Adhesive 2 12/ 05/ 03 10: 09 57.8 32.1 35790 159266 0.2041 5.185 Adhesive 155323 4.767 3 12/ 05/ 03 10: 32 58.6 32.6 38620 171859 0.2744 6.970 Adhesive ( 34904) ( 0.1877) 4 12/ 05/ 03 10: 55 60.6 33.7 32520 144714 0.1255 3.188 Adhesive Ceramic 6 12d Tensile 5 12/ 05/ 03 11: 18 60.0 33.3 29740 132343 0.0662 1.681 Adhesive 1 12/ 05/ 03 12: 27 61.6 34.2 33560 149342 0.0668 1.696 Adhesive 2 12/ 05/ 03 12: 54 62.0 34.4 36950 164428 0.2387 6.062 Adhesive 148924 4.807 3 12/ 05/ 03 13: 18 62.6 34.8 39900 177555 0.3157 8.020 Adhesive ( 37123) ( 0.1893) 4 12/ 05/ 03 13: 46 63.0 35.0 38080 169456 0.2271 5.768 Adhesive Ceramic 6 12d Seismic 5 12/ 05/ 03 14: 13 64.4 35.8 18840 83838 0.0980 2.489 Adhesive 1 12/ 10/ 03 9: 06 58.6 32.6 29880 132966 0.1040 2.641 Adhesive 2 12/ 10/ 03 9: 26 58.8 32.7 31380 139641 0.0798 2.028 Adhesive 142178 2.987 3 12/ 10/ 03 9: 44 57.4 31.9 32660 145337 0.1157 2.940 Adhesive ( 31950) ( 0.1176) 4 12/ 10/ 03 10: 00 58.2 32.3 33470 148942 0.1515 3.847 Adhesive Ceramic 6 9d Tensile 5 12/ 10/ 03 10: 17 58.8 32.7 32360 144002 0.1369 3.478 Adhesive 1 12/ 10/ 03 10: 37 59.0 32.8 32430 144314 0.1298 3.298 Adhesive 2 12/ 10/ 03 10: 57 60.2 33.4 31990 142356 0.0866 2.200 Adhesive 140967 2.761 3 12/ 10/ 03 11: 15 61.2 34.0 31440 139908 0.1292 3.281 Adhesive ( 31678) ( 0.1087) 4 12/ 10/ 03 11: 34 60.2 33.4 31670 140932 0.1267 3.217 Adhesive Ceramic 6 9d Seismic 5 12/ 10/ 03 11: 55 61.2 34.0 30860 137327 0.0711 1.807 Adhesive 1 12/ 18/ 03 14: 09 60.0 33.3 29420 130919 0.1032 2.622 Adhesive 2 12/ 18/ 03 14: 25 60.6 33.7 27630 122954 0.1292 3.282 Adhesive 131435 3.336 3 12/ 18/ 03 14: 40 60.2 33.4 29430 130964 0.1398 3.551 Adhesive ( 29536) ( 0.1313) 4 12/ 18/ 03 14: 58 61.4 34.1 30550 135948 0.1063 2.700 Adhesive Ceramic 6 9d Elevated Temperature Tensile 5 12/ 18/ 03 15: 13 61.2 34.0 30650 136393 0.1782 4.526 Adhesive 5 01/ 30/ 04 11: 09 50.6 28.1 31110 138440 0.2159 5.483 Adhesive 3 01/ 30/ 04 11: 49 52.2 29.0 27850 123933 0.1125 2.858 Adhesive 130897 3.778 2 01/ 30/ 04 12: 10 54.2 30.1 27590 122776 0.0564 1.432 Adhesive ( 29415) ( 0.1487) 1 01/ 30/ 04 12: 30 54.0 30.0 31110 138440 0.2101 5.337 Adhesive Ceramic 6 9d Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile 4 01/ 30/ 04 - - - FAILED - - - - Table 8- 2: Summary of Results for Red Head Epcon C6 Epoxy Testing 1 5 Test Type Sample # Date Time OutsideTemp Max Load Max Displacement Method of Failure AverageLoad AverageDisp ( F) ( C) ( lbf) ( N) ( in) ( mm) N ( lbf) mm ( in) 1 02/ 04/ 04 9: 13 50.0 27.8 41060 182717 0.4179 10.615 Rebar 2 02/ 04/ 04 9: 36 50.6 28.1 38770 172527 0.6421 16.310 Adhesive 168148 12.066 3 02/ 04/ 04 9: 57 47.6 26.4 32210 143335 0.3222 8.183 Adhesive ( 37786) ( 0.475) 4 02/ 04/ 04 10: 25 49.6 27.6 38710 172260 0.4926 12.512 Adhesive CIA- Gel 7000 12d Tensile 5 02/ 04/ 04 10: 42 50.4 28.0 38180 169901 0.5003 12.708 Adhesive 1 02/ 04/ 04 11: 12 52.6 29.2 40460 180047 0.6411 16.283 Adhesive 2 02/ 04/ 04 11: 42 55.8 31.0 40040 178178 0.5258 13.355 Adhesive 179415 15.522 3 02/ 04/ 04 12: 06 56.8 31.6 41610 185165 0.6961 17.681 Rebar ( 40318) ( 0.6111) 4 02/ 04/ 04 12: 29 58.4 32.4 40260 179157 0.6216 15.789 Adhesive CIA- Gel 7000 12d Seismic 5 02/ 04/ 04 12: 52 59.6 33.1 39220 174529 0.5710 14.503 Adhesive 1 02/ 11/ 04 9: 32 54.0 30.0 29460 131097 0.0699 1.776 Adhesive 2 02/ 11/ 04 9: 52 55.6 30.9 32210 143335 0.1772 4.500 Adhesive 139890 3.795 3 02/ 11/ 04 10: 09 57.0 31.7 28000 124600 0.1612 4.094 Adhesive ( 31436) ( 0.1494) 4 02/ 11/ 04 10: 25 57.2 31.8 32230 143424 0.0838 2.129 Adhesive CIA- Gel 7000 9d Tensile 5 02/ 11/ 04 10: 37 56.8 31.6 35280 156996 0.2550 6.476 Adhesive 1 02/ 11/ 04 10: 55 60.4 33.6 32640 145248 0.1060 2.693 Conc/ Adhesive 2 02/ 11/ 04 11: 12 58.4 32.4 28910 128650 0.0661 1.680 Adhesive 133865 2.014 3 02/ 11/ 04 12: 30 68.0 37.8 28910 128650 0.0302 0.768 Conc/ Adhesive ( 30082) ( 0.0793) 4 02/ 11/ 04 12: 50 61.0 33.9 29490 131231 0.0904 2.295 Adhesive CIA- Gel 7000 9d Seismic 5 02/ 11/ 04 13: 08 61.4 34.1 30460 135547 0.1036 2.632 Adhesive 1 02/ 20/ 04 9: 19 54.4 30.2 28800 128160 0.0452 1.149 Adhesive 2 02/ 20/ 04 9: 34 55.4 30.8 28430 126514 0.0473 1.201 Adhesive 136437 1.719 3 02/ 20/ 04 9: 47 56.2 31.2 32330 143869 0.0866 2.200 Conc/ Adhesive ( 30660) ( 0.0677) 4 02/ 20/ 04 10: 05 56.4 31.3 31230 138974 0.0663 1.683 Adhesive CIA- Gel 7000 9d Elevated Temperature Tensile 5 02/ 20/ 04 10: 23 58.4 32.4 32510 144670 0.0929 2.360 Conc/ Adhesive 1 04/ 05/ 04 10: 55 69.8 38.8 34330 152769 0.1285 3.263 Adhesive 2 04/ 06/ 04 11: 17 66.4 36.9 33050 147073 0.0525 1.333 Adhesive 139401 2.025 3 04/ 07/ 04 11: 35 68.0 37.8 33200 147740 0.1296 3.292 Adhesive ( 31326) ( 0.0797) 4 04/ 08/ 04 11: 50 62.6 34.8 29780 132521 0.0541 1.375 Adhesive CIA- Gel 7000 9d Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile 5 04/ 09/ 04 12: 03 68.2 37.9 26270 116902 0.0340 0.864 Conc/ Adhesive Table 8- 3: Summary of Results for CIA- Gel 7000 7000 Epoxy Testing 8.1 Tension and Seismic Tests For the CIA- Gel 7000 and Ceramic 6 adhesives, the average ultimate strength from tensile loading of the bonded epoxy- coated rebar was found to be slightly higher than the manufacturers specifications for uncoated rebar. However, the SET22 adhesive under performed the manufacturer specifications for uncoated rebar. This shows that epoxy- coated rebar bonded in hardened concrete generally performs comparable to uncoated rebar. Tables 8- 4 and 8- 5 summarize the tension and seismic test results and give the conditions of acceptance. 1 6 Preliminary Test Results and Seismic Parameters Tension and Seismic Test ICBO- AC58 4000 to 5000 psi Concrete ( Caltrans Mix T0A6342A) Tension Seismic - M19 ( 19.1 mm) [# 6 ( 0.75 in)] Rebar Average Ultimate Tension - Controls ( Tref) Seismic Load Levels ( N) @ 0.5 Hz Embedment Epoxy Type Avg. Load Preload Failure Ns Ni Nm N ( lb) N ( lb) (%) Mode 10 cycles 30 cycles 100 cycles SET22 178436 ( 40098) 4450 ( 1000) 2.49 2- epoxy1- grip 2- rebar 89215 ( 20048) 66912 ( 15036) 44609 ( 10024) Red Head 155323 ( 34904) 4450 ( 1000) 2.86 5- epoxy 77659 ( 17451) 58245 ( 13089) 38831 ( 8726) 228.6 mm ( 9") [ 12d] CIA- GEL 7000 168148 ( 37786) 4450 ( 1000) 2.65 4- epoxy1- rebar 84072 ( 18893) 63054 ( 14169) 42037 ( 9447) SET22 149983 ( 33704) 4450 ( 1000) 2.97 3- epoxy2- cnc/ epy 74989 ( 16851) 56242 ( 12639) 37495 ( 8426) Red Head 142178 ( 31950) 4450 ( 1000) 3.13 5- epoxy 71087 ( 15975) 53316 ( 11981) 35544 ( 7987) 171.5 mm ( 6- 3/ 4") [ 9d] CIA- GEL 7000 139890 ( 31436) 4450 ( 1000) 3.18 5- epoxy 69943 ( 15718) 52458 ( 11788) 34973 ( 7859) Table 8- 4: Preliminary Test Results and Seismic Parameters Conditions of Acceptance Per Caltrans Augmentation to AC58 Section 5.3.7.2.2 Tension and Seismic Test ICBO- AC58 4000 to 5000 psi Concrete ( Caltrans Mix T0A6342A) Tension Seismic - M19 ( 19.1 mm) [# 6 ( 0.75 in)] Rebar Average Ultimate Tension - After Seismic Maximum Peak Displacement, mm ( in) ( Δns ≤ ( Ns/ Tref)* Δult) Embedment Epoxy Type Avg. Load Preload Failure Pass/ Ns Ni Nm N ( lb) N ( lb) (%) Mode Fail 10 cycles 30 cycles 100 cycles SET22 182121 ( 40926) 4450( 1000) 2.44 5- rebar Pass 0.684 ≤ 3.481( 0.026 ≤ 0.137) 0.734 ≤ 3.481 ( 0.029 ≤ 0.137) 0.504 ≤ 3.481( 0.020 ≤ 0.137) Red Head 148924 ( 33466) 4450( 1000) 2.99 5- epoxy Pass 1.563 ≤ 2.383( 0.062 ≤ 0.0938) 1.459 ≤ 2.383 ( 0.057 ≤ 0.0938) 1.291 ≤ 2.383( 0.051 ≤ 0.0938) 228.6 mm ( 9") [ 12d] CIA- GEL 7000 179415 ( 40318) 4450( 1000) 2.48 4- epoxy1- rebar Pass 0.664 ≤ 6.033( 0.026 ≤ 0.238) 0.604 ≤ 6.033 ( 0.024 ≤ 0.238) 0.537 ≤ 6.033( 0.021 ≤ 0.238) SET22 148354 ( 33338) 4450( 1000) 3.00 5- epoxy Pass 0.224 ≤ 1.327( 0.009 ≤ 0.0522) 0.177 ≤ 1.327 ( 0.007 ≤ 0.0522) 0.123 ≤ 1.327( 0.005 ≤ 0.0522) Red Head 140967 ( 31678) 4450( 1000) 3.16 5- epoxy Pass 0.337 ≤ 1.493( 0.013 ≤ 0.0588) 0.286 ≤ 1.493 ( 0.011 ≤ 0.0588) 0.236 ≤ 1.493( 0.009 ≤ 0.0588) 171.5 mm ( 6- 3/ 4") [ 9d] CIA- GEL 7000 133865 ( 30082) 4450( 1000) 3.32 3- epoxy2- epy/ cnc Pass 0.373 ≤ 1.897( 0.015 ≤ 0.0747) 0.326≤ 1.897 ( 0.013 ≤ 0.0747) 0.274 ≤ 1.897( 0.011 ≤ 0.0747) Table 8- 5: Seismic Test Conditions of Acceptance 8.1.1 Simpson SET22 This was the first epoxy tested and therefore, was the test with the most errors. The first two tension tests on the 12d embedment depth were performed without oversight. However, on the third test the rebar gripper slipped off of the rebar just before failure of the rebar due to the gripper being inadvertently placed over the lettering on the 1 7 rebar. The lettering created an area where the gripper could not fully engage the rebar, and therefore caused slippage. On tests 4 and 5, the LVDT bracket came loose from the rebar causing it to slip down the rebar just before failure, and thus creating inaccurate displacement data. This occurred because the LVDT bracket was unable to maintain a tight grip once the rebar began to neck. Figures A- 6 through A- 10 in the appendix show the load vs. displacement curves for the five 12d tension tests. After the tension tests, the seismic tests for the 12d embedment depth were performed. For these tests, every failure was a rebar failure. This caused excessive necking in the rebar just before failure, which allowed the LVDT bracket to slip down on every test. This, again, created erroneous displacement data. The load vs. displacement plots for the 12d seismic tests can be seen in Figures A- 11 through A- 15. The 9d embedment depth tests were performed next and done so without fault. Figures A- 16 through A- 25 show the results for the tension and seismic tests in graphical form. See Table 8- 1 for all results from SET22 epoxy testing summarized in tabular form. 8.1.2 Red Head Epcon C6 For the testing of the Red Head Epoxy, the LVDT bracket was improved to accommodate for necking of the rebar. During its installation into the concrete, the epoxy adhesive began to harden before all ten 12d cylinders could be filled. This caused the need to use another epoxy cartridge to fill the last two samples. These two samples were numbers 1 and 3 of the tensile test group. During the tensile testing it was found that the two samples with the epoxy from the second cartridge had slightly higher strengths than the other three, however the values were within reasonable tolerances ( see Table 8- 2). In addition to the premature hardening of the epoxy, sample # 5 in the 12d seismic test group did not receive enough epoxy. After testing this sample, it was noticed that the strength was much lower than the other four samples, and therefore the data for this sample was neglected. Figures A- 33 through A- 42 show the results for the 12d tensile and seismic tests. The 9d testing was performed without fault and the results can be found in Figures A- 43 through A- 52. 8.1.3 Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000 All tensile and seismic tests for CIA- Gel 7000 were performed without errors and the results can be found in Figures A- 60 through A- 79. The results are also summarized in Table 8- 3. 8.2 Creep Tests 8.2.1 Simpson SET22 During the elevated temperature creep tests for the SET22 epoxy, one of the hydraulic rams leaked out all of the hydraulic fluid from the pump on day 41 of testing. 1 8 This caused a complete loss of pressure, and therefore a complete loss of loading on the samples. Although the creep testing did not go for the minimum 42- day period, testing continued. The creep testing data and results are shown in Figures A- 26 through A- 30. In Figure A- 29 some very large spikes can be seen in the temperature graph. These spikes are not actual temperature fluctuations, however they are due to electronic interference with the datalogging device and should therefore be ignored. The tension tests after creep were performed and the results can be found in Figure A- 32. The average displacement at ultimate load from the elevated temperature tensile tests was compared to the 1.52mm ( 0.06”) requirement from the Caltrans Augmentation to ICBO- AC58, and was found to be a higher value ( 6.31 mm, [ 0.248”]). Therefore, the 1.52mm ( 0.06”) displacement value is the requirement to be met. The average displacement at 600 days was found to be 1.50 mm ( 0.0591”), however this is the average of all five samples. One sample ( sample # 3) strayed from the other four, and those four samples all failed to meet the displacement limit, with an average of 1.59 mm ( 0.0626”). This leads to the conclusion that sample # 3 should be neglected and that the epoxy- coated rebar bonded with SET22 did not meet the required displacement criteria. 8.2.2 Red Head Epcon C6 The displacement criteria for the Red Head epoxy testing was determined to be 1.52 mm ( 0.06”), because the average displacement at ultimate load of the elevated temperature tensile tests was found to be 3.34 mm ( 0.131”). The elevated temperature tensile tests results can be seen on Figure A- 58. During the elevated temperature creep testing with the Red Head epoxy, all five of the samples failed the Caltrans Augmentation to ICBO- AC58 displacement criteria ( Section 5.3.3.2) before the 42- day creep cycle was over. Two of the samples displaced farther than the stroke of the LVDT’s, with one of them pulling completely out of the concrete. This event can be seen on Figure A- 55. Without a doubt, the epoxy- coated rebar bonded with Red Head Epcon C6 did not meet the required displacement criteria. The average displacement at 600 days was found to be 2.75 mm ( 0.108”). The results for this creep testing can be found on Figures A- 53 through A- 57, and the results for the tensile testing after creep can be found on Figure A- 59. As in the SET22 testing, the spikes on Figure A- 56 are not actual temperature fluctuations, but are due to electronic interference with the datalogger. 8.2.3 Covert Operations CIA- Gel 7000 The CIA- Gel 7000 average displacement at ultimate load for the elevated temperature tensile tests was found to be 1.72 mm ( 0.0676”). Since this value is higher than that set by the Caltrans Augmentation to ICBO- AC58, the displacement limit was set as 1.52 mm ( 0.06”). The elevated temperature tensile test results can be seen on Figure A- 85. The average displacement at 600 days for the epoxy- coated rebar bonded with CIA- Gel 7000 was found to be 0.538 mm ( 0.0212”). This shows that the epoxy- coated rebar bonded with CIA- Gel 7000 did meet the displacement criteria. The creep testing results are shown in Figures A- 80 through A- 84. Once again, the temperature spikes 1 9 during the first 11 days in Figure A- 83 are not actual temperature fluctuations, but are due to electronic interference with the datalogger. The small jump and rebound in displacement near day 37 was due to a jump in pressure from pump inaccuracies. The pressure jump occurred over a weekend and was compensated for as soon as it was discovered. The results for the elevated temperature tensile tests after creep are shown in Figure A- 86. 9. CONCLUSION The epoxy- coated rebar was found to meet the conditions of acceptance for seismic loading when bonded into hardened concrete using an epoxy adhesive. However, the epoxy- coated rebar did not meet the conditions of acceptance for creep loading when bonded into hardened concrete. The rebar bonded with CIA- Gel 7000 was found to meet the creep requirements, whereas the rebar bonded with SET22 and Red Head Epcon C6 did not meet the conditions of acceptance for creep loading. It was also noticed that, when compared to the manufacturer test data, the epoxy- coated rebar outperformed uncoated rebar in allowable tensile loads for two of the three epoxies tested. SET22 adhesive under performed the manufacturer test data. Although the testing procedures and instrumentation were burdened with error, the testing revealed enough accurate data to be valuable. The displacement data on the 12d testing with the SET22 epoxy was accurate until the last few seconds of each test, where the LVDT brackets slipped creating inaccurate data. Even though the displacement data was not complete, the loading data was complete and accurate. Beneficially, the incomplete portions of data did not affect the calculation of the conditions of acceptance. The interference in the instrumentation that created undesirable spikes in the temperature data was not found to be detrimental to the testing. The temperature was often checked manually to ensure that it was within the allowable tolerances. The target concrete compressive strength was 31 ± 3.45 MPa ( 4500 ± 500 psi), however the actual strength ranged from 30.8 MPa ( 4470 psi) to 43.8 MPa ( 6350 psi). The concrete mix design used in this testing is representative of the mix used in the construction of Caltrans structures. Since this testing is designed to evaluate epoxy- coated rebar in actual use applications, the data obtained from the testing is in direct correlation. Overall, this testing has proved to be valuable and has provided a better understanding of how epoxy- coated rebar reacts when bonded into hardened concrete with different epoxy adhesives. 10. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that a higher factor of safety be applied to epoxy- coated rebar than is to uncoated rebar when bonding it into hardened concrete. This can be done in the form of a deeper embedment depth or other method. The Reinforced Concrete Committee should determine whether a change in the general notes of the pre- qualified products list for cartridge epoxies / chemical adhesives is necessary to address the factor of safety modification. Also, the Reinforced Concrete Committee should review the 2 0 creep displacement acceptance criteria to determine if the value should be changed to accommodate epoxy- coated rebar, or if a separate set of specifications should be made for epoxy- coated rebar. The Red Head Epcon C6 epoxy is currently not on the Caltrans pre- qualified products list, and from the results in this testing, it is recommended that it stay off of the list. 11. IMPLEMENTATION The Office of Structure Design will be responsible for the modification of the pre- qualified products list for cartridge epoxies / chemical adhesives and the bridge design aids for the use of epoxy- coated rebar bonded into hardened concrete. 12. REFERENCES [ 1] California Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Services, “ Caltrans Augmentation/ Revisions to ICBO- AC58, Acceptance Criteria for Adhesive Anchors in Concrete and Masonry Elements”, November 2001. [ 2] Choi, O. C., Hadje- Ghaffari, H., Darwin, D. and McCabe, S. L., “ Bond of Epoxy- Coated Reinforcement: Bar Parameters”, ACI Materials Journal, No. 88- M26, March- April 1991. [ 3] Cook, R. A. and Konz, R. C., “ Factors Influencing Bond Strength of Adhesive Anchors,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 98, N. 1, January- February 2001, pp. 76- 86. 2 1 APPENDIX Appendix A General Test Data A. 1 Kelly Ball and Slump Test Results Epoxy Time Date Air Temp ConcreteTemp Kelly Ball Slump Mix Design 12: 00 26.9° C 28.6° C 54 mm 63.5 mm SET22 9/ 2/ 2003 ( 80.4° F) ( 83.4° F) ( 2- 1/ 8”) ( 2- 1/ 2”) T0A6342A 14: 30 17.8° C 22.7° C 50.8 mm 63.5 mm Ceramic 6 11/ 5/ 2003 ( 64.0° F) ( 72.8° F) ( 2”) ( 2- 1/ 2”) T0A6342A 14: 00 10° C 63.5 mm 82.5mm CIA- GEL 7000 1/ 5/ 2004 ( 50° F) − ( 2- 1/ 2”) ( 3- 1/ 4”) T0A6342A Table A- 1: Concrete Pour Information A. 2 Epoxy Information Epoxy Lot Number Expiration Date SET22 M219N010 Jan- 05 Ceramic 6 12d Tests EONS 47029 Jan- 06 12d Tests ( tensile test samples 1 & 3) EONR 79212 Sep- 05 9d Tests EONT 51816 Nov- 05 9d Creep Tests EONT 51817 Nov- 05 CIA- Gel 7000 745 Nov- 04 Table A- 2: Epoxy Adhesive Information 2 2 A. 3 Concrete Test Results TL No.: 134606 Contract No.: 65- 680321 Cast Date: 9/ 2/ 2003 Break Date Concrete Lab Sample No. CylinderNo. CylinderAge Peak Load Compressive Strength Test Result( Average) 1/ 2 588 kN ( 132300 lbf) 32.3 MPa ( 4679 psi) 9/ 29/ 03 CL031730 2/ 2 27 days 597 kN ( 134200 lbf) 32.7 MPa ( 4746 psi) 32.5 MPa( 4710 psi) 1/ 2 604 kN ( 135700 lbf) 33.1 MPa ( 4799 psi) 10/ 1/ 03 CL031731 2/ 2 29 days 607 kN ( 136500 lbf) 33.3 MPa ( 4828 psi) 33.2 MPa( 4810 psi) 1/ 2 620 kN ( 139400 lbf) 34 MPa ( 4930 psi) 10/ 8/ 03 CL031732 2/ 2 36 days 629 kN ( 141500 lbf) 34.5 MPa ( 5005 psi) 34.3 MPa( 4970 psi) 1/ 2 631 kN ( 141900 lbf) 34.6 MPa ( 5019 psi) 10/ 17/ 03 CL031733 2/ 2 45 days 618 kN ( 138900 lbf) 33.9 MPa ( 4913 psi) 34.3 MPa( 4970 psi) 1/ 2 677 kN ( 152100 lbf) 37.1 MPa ( 5379 psi) 12/ 1/ 03 CL031734 2/ 2 90 days 673 kN ( 151400 lbf) 36.9 MPa ( 5355 psi) 37 MPa ( 5370 psi) Table A- 3: Simpson SET22 Concrete Compressive Strengths 2 3 TL No.: 134607 Contract No.: 65- 680321 Cast Date: 11/ 5/ 2003 Break Date Concrete Lab Sample No. CylinderNo. CylinderAge Peak Load Compressive Strength Test Result( Average) 1/ 2 641 kN ( 144200 lbf) 35.2 MPa ( 5100 psi) 34.3 MPa( 4980 psi) 12/ 3/ 03 CL032361 2/ 2 28 days 612 kN ( 137500 lbf) 33.5 MPa ( 4863 psi) 1/ 2 628 kN ( 141100 lbf) 34.4 MPa ( 4990 psi) 12/ 4/ 03 CL032360 2/ 2 29 days 610 kN ( 137100 lbf) 33.4 MPa ( 4849 psi) 33.9 MPa( 4920 psi) 1/ 2 658 kN ( 148000 lbf) 36.1 MPa ( 5234 psi) 12/ 10/ 03 CL032359 2/ 2 35 days 650 kN ( 146100 lbf) 35.6 MPa ( 5167 psi) 35.9 MPa( 5200 psi) 1/ 2 694 kN ( 156000 lbf) 38 MPa ( 5517 psi) 12/ 18/ 03 CL032358 2/ 2 43 days 701 kN ( 157500 lbf) 38.4 MPa ( 5570 psi) 38.2 MPa( 5540 psi) 1/ 2 790 kN ( 177700 lbf) 43.3 MPa ( 6285 psi) 1/ 30/ 04 CL032357 2/ 2 86 days 797 kN ( 179200 lbf) 43.7 MPa ( 6338 psi) 43.5 MPa( 6310 psi) Table A- 4: Red Head C6 Concrete Compressive Strengths 2 4 TL No.: 134608 Contract No.: 65- 680321 Cast Date: 1/ 5/ 2004 Break Date Concrete Lab Sample No. CylinderNo. CylinderAge Peak Load Compressive Strength Test Result( Average) 1/ 2 520 kN ( 116900 lbf) 28.5 MPa ( 4134 psi) 2/ 2/ 04 CL040169 2/ 2 28 days 516 kN ( 116000 lbf) 28.3 MPa ( 4103 psi) 28.4 MPa( 4120 psi) 1/ 2 557 kN ( 125200 lbf) 30.5 MPa ( 4428 psi) 2/ 4/ 04 CL040168 2/ 2 30 days 568 kN ( 127600 lbf) 31.1 MPa ( 4513 psi) 30.8 MPa( 4470 psi) 1/ 2 604 kN ( 135800 lbf) 33.1 MPa ( 4803 psi) 2/ 11/ 04 CL040166 2/ 2 37 days 606 kN ( 136200 lbf) 33.2 MPa ( 4817 psi) 33.2 MPa( 4810 psi) 1/ 2 664 kN ( 149300 lbf) 36.4 MPa ( 5280 psi) 2/ 20/ 04 CL040167 2/ 2 46 days 672 kN ( 151000 lbf) 36.8 MPa ( 5341 psi) 36.6 MPa( 5310 psi) 1/ 2 813 kN ( 182800 lbf) 44.6 MPa ( 6465 psi) 4/ 5/ 04 CL040170 2/ 2 91 days 785 kN ( 176400 lbf) 43 MPa ( 6239 psi) 43.8 MPa( 6350 psi) Table A- 5: Covert Operations CIA- GEL 7000 Concrete Compressive Strengths 2 5 A. 4 Failure Modes Failure Mode Test Sample # Sample ID Concrete Concrete- Adhesive Interface Adhesive- Rebar Interface Rebar Other 1 S1 X 2 S2 X 3 S3 Rebar Gripper Slipped 4 S4 X SET22 12d Tensile 5 S5 X 1 S1S X 2 S2S X 3 S3S X 4 S4S X SET22 12d Seismic 5 S5S X 1 S6 X X X 2 S7 X X Some adhesive removed 3 S8 X 4 S9 X X SET22 9d Tensile 5 S10 X 1 S6S X 2 S7S X 3 S8S X 4 S9S X SET22 9d Seismic 5 S10S X 1 S1HT X X 2 S2HT X X 3 S3HT X 4 S4HT X Significant concrete breakage SET22 9d Elevated Temperature Tensile 5 S5HT X X 1 E1/ S1C X 2 E1/ S2C X X 3 E1/ S3C X X 4 E1/ S4C X X SET22 9d Creep Tensile 5 E1/ S5C X Table A- 6: Testing Failure Modes for Epoxy- Coated Rebar Bonded with SET22 Adhesive 2 6 Failure Mode Test Sample # Sample ID Concrete Concrete- Adhesive Interface Adhesive- Rebar Interface Rebar Other 1 E2/ S1T/ 12d X X 2 E2/ S2T/ 12d X 3 E2/ S3T/ 12d X X 4 E2/ S4T/ 12d X Red Head 12d Tensile 5 E2/ S5T/ 12d X 1 E2/ S1S/ 12d X Some adhesive removed 2 E2/ S2S/ 12d X 3 E2/ S3S/ 12d X X 4 E2/ S4S/ 12d X Red Head 12d Seismic 5 E2/ S5S/ 12d X 1 E2/ S1T/ 9d X 2 E2/ S2T/ 9d X 3 E2/ S3T/ 9d X X 4 E2/ S4T/ 9d X X Red Head 9d Tensile 5 E2/ S5T/ 9d X X 1 E2/ S1S/ 9d X 2 E2/ S2S/ 9d X 3 E2/ S3S/ 9d X X 4 E2/ S4S/ 9d X X Red Head 9d Seismic 5 E2/ S5S/ 9d X 1 E2/ S1HT X Adhesive removed at bottom 2 E2/ S2HT X Adhesive removed at bottom 3 E2/ S3HT X Adhesive removed at bottom 4 E2/ S4HT X Adhesive removed at bottom Red Head 9d Elevated Temperature Tensile 5 E2/ S5HT X Adhesive removed at bottom 1 E2/ S1C X X 2 E2/ S2C X X 3 E2/ S3C X X 4 E2/ S4C Failed during creep Red Head 9d Creep Tensile 5 E2/ S5C X X Table A- 7: Testing Failure Modes for Epoxy- Coated Rebar Bonded with Ceramic 6 Adhesive 2 7 Failure Mode Test Sample # Sample ID Concrete Concrete- Adhesive Interface Adhesive- Rebar Interface Rebar Other 1 CG/ S1T/ 12d X 2 CG/ S2T/ 12d X Some adhesive removed 3 CG/ S3T/ 12d X 4 CG/ S4T/ 12d X CIA- Gel 7000 12d Tensile 5 CG/ S5T/ 12d X Some adhesive removed 1 CG/ S1S/ 12d X X 2 CG/ S2S/ 12d X 3 CG/ S3S/ 12d X 4 CG/ S4S/ 12d X CIA- Gel 7000 12d Seismic 5 CG/ S5S/ 12d X 1 CG/ S1T/ 9d X 2 CG/ S2T/ 9d X 3 CG/ S3T/ 9d X Some adhesive removed 4 CG/ S4T/ 9d X CIA- Gel 7000 9d Tensile 5 CG/ S5T/ 9d X X 1 CG/ S1S/ 9d X X 2 CG/ S2S/ 9d X 3 CG/ S3S/ 9d X X 4 CG/ S4S/ 9d X CIA- Gel 7000 9d Seismic 5 CG/ S5S/ 9d X 1 CG/ S1HT X 2 CG/ S2HT X 3 CG/ S3HT X X 4 CG/ S4HT X CIA- Gel 7000 9d Elevated Temperature Tensile 5 CG/ S5HT X X 1 CG/ S1C X 2 CG/ S2C X 3 CG/ S3C X 4 CG/ S4C X CIA- Gel 7000 9d Creep Tensile 5 CG/ S5C X X X Table A- 8: Testing Failure Modes for Epoxy- Coated Rebar Bonded with CIA- Gel 7000 Adhesive 2 8 A. 5 Sample Failure Mode Photos Figure A- 1: Typical Concrete– Concrete/ Adhesive Interface Failure Figure A- 2: Typical Concrete/ Adhesive Interface Failure 2 9 Figure A- 3: T rface Failure ypical Concrete/ Adhesive Interface– Adhesive/ Rebar Inte Figure A- 4: Typical Adhesive/ Rebar Interface Failure 3 0 Figure A- 5: Typical Rebar Failure Figure A- 6: Red Head C6 Creep Failure 3 1 A. 6 SET22 Test Data: Simpson 12d Tensile Test # 1020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000180000012345678Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 6 Simpson 12d Tensile Test # 2020000400006000080000100000120000 140000160000 180000 200000 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 7 3 2 Simpson 12d Tensile Test # 302000040000600008000010000012000014000016000018000020000001234567Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Fi gure A- 8 Simpso n 12d Tensile Test # 4 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000 200000 0 2 4 6 8 10 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 9 Si mpson 12d Tensile Test # 5 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000 200000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 10 3 3 Simpson 12d Seismic Test # 102000040000600008000010000012000014000016000018000001234567Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 11 Simpson 12d Seismic Test # 2020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000180000 200000 0 2 4 6 8 10 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 12 Sim pson 12d Seismic Test # 3 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000 200000 0 2 4 6 8 10 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 13 3 4 Simpson 12d Seismic Test # 402000040000600008000010000012000014000016000018000020000002468101Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 2 ) Figure A- 14 Simpson 12d Seismic Test # 50200004000060000800001000001200001400001600001800002000000246810Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 12 ) Figure A- 15 Simpson 9d Tensile Test # 102000040000600008000010000012000014000016000001234Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 5 ) Figure A- 16 3 5 Simpson 9d Tensile Test # 202000040000600008000010000012000014000016000000.511.522.53Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 17 Simpson 9d Tensile Test # 3 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 18 Si mpson 9d Tensile Test # 4 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 19 3 6 Simpson 9d Tensile Test # 502000040000600008000010000012000014000016000018000001234567Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 20 Simpson 9d Seismic Test # 10200004000060000 80000Load 100000 120000 160000 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Displacement ( mm) ( N 140000 ) Figure A- 21 Simpson 9d Seismic Test # 2020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000180000012345Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 22 3 7 Simpson 9d Seismic Test # 302000040000600008000010000012000014000016000001234Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 5 ) Figure A- 23 Simpson 9d Seismic Test # 40200004000060000 80000ad ( 100000 120000 160000 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Displacement ( mm) Lo N 140000 ) Figure A- 24 Simpson 9d Seismic Test # 5020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000012345Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 25 3 8 Simpson Creep Displacements Over First 6 hours00.050.10.150.20.250.30: 001: 122: 243: 364: 486: 00Time ( hr) Displacement ( mm) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5 Figure A- 26 Simpson Elevated Temperature Creep Logarithmic Regression Analysis1.574 mm1.556 mm1.151 mm1.633 mm1.599 mm00.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.81101001000DaysDisplacement ( mm) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5y = 0.2394Ln( x) + 0.0421R2 = 0.9361y = 0.239Ln( x) + 0.0272R2 = 0.9237y = 0.1656Ln( x) + 0.153R2 = 0.9478y = 0.2491Ln( x) + 0.0398R2 = 0.927y = 0.2387Ln( x) + 0.0716R2 = 0.9443 Figure A- 27: SET22 Creep Displacement 600- Day Logarithmic Regression Analysis 3 9 Simpson 42- Day Creep Displacements00.20.40.60.811.207142128354249DaysDisplacement ( mm) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5 Figure A- 28 Simpson Chamber and Concrete Temperatures40414243444507142128354249DaysTemperature ( C) ConcreteChamber Figure A- 29 Simpson Creep Load 48000 50000 52000 54000 56000 58000 60000 0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 Days Load ( N) Figure A- 30 4 0 Simpson Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests02000040000600008000010000012000014000016000002 4 6 8 10 12 14 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 1.82 mm 2.74 mm 7.04 mm 9.02 mm 10.93 mm Figure A- 31: Displacements at Maximum Load for SET22 Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests Simpson Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile Tests02000040000600008000010000012000014000000.511.522.533.544.5Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5 Figure A- 32: SET22 Tensile Tests After 42- Day Creep Cycle 4 1 A. 7 Red Head Epcon C6 Test Data: Red Head 12d Tensile Test # 102000040000600008000010000012000014000016000018000002468Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 10 ) Figure A- 33 Red Head 12d Tensile Test # 2020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000180000012345678Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 34 4 2 Red Head 12d Tensile Test # 302000040000600008000010000012000014000016000018000020000002468Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 10 ) Figure A- 35 Red Head 12d Tensile Test # 4020000400006000080000100000120000140000 160000 0 1 2 3 4 5 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 36 Red Head 12d Tensile Test # 50200004000 0 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 37 4 3 Red Head 12d Seismic Test # 102000040000600008000010000012000014000016000000.511.522.533.54Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 38 Red Hea d 12d Seismic Test # 2 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 39 Red Head 12d Seismic Test # 3 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 200000 0 2 4 6 8 10 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 160000180000 ) Figure A- 40 4 4 Red Head 12d Seismic Test # 402000040000600008000010000012000014000016000018000002468Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 10 ) Figure A- 41 Red Head 12d Seismic Test # 50 1000020000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 90000 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 80000 ) Figure A- 42 Red Head 9d Tensile Test # 1020000400006000080000100000120000140000012345Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 43 4 5 Red Head 9d Tensile Test # 202000040000600008000010000012000014000016000000.511.522.5Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 3 ) Figure A- 44 Red Head 9d Tensile Test # 3020000400006000080000 100000N 120000 140000 160000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Displacement ( mm) Load ( ) Figure A- 45 Red Head 9d Tensile Test # 4020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000012345Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 46 4 6 Red Head 9d Tensile Test # 502000040000600008000010000012000014000016000001234567Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 47 Red Head 9d Seismic Test # 1020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000012345Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 48 Red Head 9d Seismic Test # 202000040000600008000010000012000014000016000000.511.522.533. Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 5 ) Figure A- 49 4 7 Red Head 9d Seismic Test # 3020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000012345Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 6 ) Figure A- 50 Red Head 9d Seismic Test # 4020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000012345Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 6 ) Figure A- 51 Red Head 9d Seismic Test # 502000040000600008000010000012000014000016000000.511.522.533.54Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Figure A- 52 4 8 Red Head Creep Displacements Over First 6 Hours00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80: 00: 001: 12: 002: 24: 003: 36: 004: 48: 006: 00: 00Time ( Hr) Displacement ( mm) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5 Figure A- 53 Red Head Elevated Temperature Creep Logarithmic Regression Analysis3.670 mm2.123 mm2.465 mm00.511.522.533.541101001000DaysDisplacement ( mm) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 5y = 0.5577Ln( x) + 0.1025R2 = 0.8168y = 0.301Ln( x) + 0.1979R2 = 0.8608y = 0.3222Ln( x) + 0.4048R2 = 0.88 Figure A- 54: Red Head Creep Displacement 600- Day Logarithmic Regression Analysis 4 9 Red Head 42- Day Creep Displacements02468101207142128354249DaysDisplacement ( mm) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5 Figure A- 55 Re d Head Chamber and Concrete Temperatures 37 38 39 44 45 46 47 0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 Days Temperat e ( C) 4243 ur 4041 Concrete Chamber Figure A- 56 Red Head Creep Load5100052000530005400055000560 00 57000 58000 59000 60000 61000 0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 Days Load ( N) Figure A- 57 5 0 Red Head Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests02000040000600008000010000012000014000016000001234567Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 8 ) Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 52.62 mm3.28 mm3.55 MM2.70 mm4.53 mm Figure A- 58: Displaceme Load for Red Head Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests nts at MaximumRed Head Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile Tests 00123456789 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 5 Figure A- 59: Red Head Tensile Tests After 42- Day Creep Cycle 5 1 A. 8 CIA- Gel 7000 Test Data: CIA GEL 12d Tensile Test # 1 180000200000 160000 140000 100000d ( N) 120000 Loa 6000080000 40000 0 20000 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Displacement ( mm) Figure A- 60 CIA GEL 12d Tensile Test # 20 200000 20000 40000 80000 160000 180000 0 5 10 15 20 Displacement ( mm) 140000 100000120000Load ( N) 60000 Figure A- 61 5 2 CIA GE160000 L 12d Tensile Test # 3 20000 4 6 8 10 12 Displacement ( mm) 140000 120000 100000 002 40000 60000 80000Loa d ( N) Figure A- 62 CIA GEL 12d Tensile Test # 4 200000 180000 00 20000 40000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 8 10 12 14 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 60000 246 ) Figure A- 63 CIA GEL 12d Tensile Test # 5 60000 10 12 14 16 Displacement ( mm) a 180000 160000 140000 120000 100000d ( N) 80000Lo 40000 20000 0468 02 Figure A- 64 5 3 CIA GEL 12d Seismic Test # 1 200000 180000 160000 140000 0 20000 40000 60000 10 15 20 ment ( mm) a 100000120000d ( N ) 80000Lo 05Displace Figure A- 65 CIA GEL 12d Seismic Test # 2020000 40000 6000080000Lo 100000 00 140000 160000 180000 200000 5 10 15 20 Displacement ( mm) ad ( 1200N) 0 Figure A- 66 CIA GEL 12d Seismic Test # 3 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Displacement ( mm) 180000200000 160000 140000 100000120000ad ( N) Lo 80000 60000 40000 020000 Figure A- 67 5 4 CIA GEL 12d Seismic Test # 4 60000 5 10 15 20 Displacement ( mm) ( 200000 180000 160000 140000 120000N) 80000Lo 100000ad 40000 20000 0 0 Figure A- 68 CIA GEL 12d Seismic Test # 5020000400006000080000100000120000140000160000180000200000051015Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 20 ) Figure A- 69 CIA- GEL 9d Tensile Test # 1 20000 40000 100000 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 ent ( mm) 140000 120000 80000d ( N) Loa 60000 00 0.5D isplacem Figure A- 70 5 5 CIA- GEL 9d Tensile Test # 2 160000 140000 120000 80000d ( N 00 20000 40000 60000 100000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Displacement ( mm) Loa ) Figure A- 71 CIA- GEL 9d Tensile Test # 3 0 20000 40000 60000 100000 120000 140000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Displacement ( mm) Lo 80000ad ( N) Figure A- 72 CIA- GEL 9d Tensile Test # 4 0 120000 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Displacement ( mm) 160000 140000 100000 ( N ) 60000Lo 80000ad 40000 20000 Figure A- 73 5 6 CIA- GEL 9d Tensile Test # 5 40000 6 7 ent ( mm) 180000 160000 120000140000 N) 80000Loa 100000d ( 60000 20000 00 12345Displac em A- 74 Figure CIA- GEL 9d Seismic Test # 10 20000 60000 80000 100000 160000 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N 1400 0000 1200 40000 ) Figure A- 75 CIA- GEL 9d Seismic Test # 2 3 4 5 Displacement ( mm) a 140000 120000 100000 80000d ( N ) 60000Lo 40000 20000 0012 Figure A- 76 5 7 CIA- GEL 9d Seismic Test # 3 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Displacement ( mm) 140000 120000 100000 N) 80000d ( Loa 60000 40000 20000 0 Figure A- 77 CIA- GEL 9d Seismic Test # 40 140000 120000 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Displacement ( mm) Load ( N) 0 Figure A- 78 CIA- GEL 9d Seismic Test # 5 160000 140000 0 20000 40000 60000Loa 80000d 100000 ( N 120000 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 ent ( mm) ) 00.511.52Displacem Figure A- 79 5 8 CIA- GEL Creep Displacements Over First 6 Hours 0: 00: 00 1: 12: 00 2: 24: 00 3: 36: 00 4: 48: 00 6: 00: 00 Time ( Hr) t 0.25 0.2 m) 0.15 ( m men 0.1la ce Disp 0.05 0 Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Figure A- 80 CIA- GEL Elev ated Temperature Creep Logarithmic Regression Analysis 0.465 mm 0.483 mm 0.596 mm 0.619 mm 0.527 mm 0 10 100 1000 0.7 0.1 0.2Di 0.3ace 0.4ment 0.5) 0.6 1 Days spl ( m m Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 y = 0.0509Ln( x) + 0.1392 9 y = 0.0772Ln( x) + 0.1252 R2 = 0.9839 y = 0.0534Ln( x) + 0.141R2 = 0.9758y = 0.0778Ln( x) + 0.0984R2 = 0.972 R2 = 0.9719 x) + 0.1114 - 81: CIA- GEL 7000 Creep Displacement 600- Day Logarithmic Regression Analysis y = 0.0649Ln( R2 = 0.921 Figure A 5 9 CIA- GE0.5 L 42- Day Creep Displacements 0.15 0.35 42 49 ) 0.45 0.4 00714212835 0.05D 0.1isp 0.2lacem 0.25en 0.3t ( mm Days Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 2 Figure A- 8 CIA- GEL Chamber and Concrete Temperatures3839404142 43ure ( 44 45 46 47 35 42 49 Days emperat C) T 07142128 Concrete Chamber Figure A- 83 CIA- GEL Creep Load 63000 61000 59000 51000 53000 55000 57000 28 35 42 49 071421Days Lo ad ( N) 84 Figure A- 6 0 CIA- GEL Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests 100000 2 3 4 5 6 Displacement ( mm) 160000 0 20000 40000 60000 80000ad 120000 140000 01 Lo ( N) Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 1.15 mm 1.20 mm 2.20 mm 1.68 mm 2.36 mm m Load for CIA- GEL 7000 Elevated Temperature Tensile Tests Figure A- 85: Displacements at Maximu CIA- GEL Elevated Temperature Creep Tensile Tests 0 140000 1 2 3 4 5 6 Displacement ( mm) 180000 160000 120000 ) 100000d ( N a 80000Lo 60000 40000 20000 0 Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 7000 Tensile Tests After 42- Day Creep Cycle Figure A- 86: CIA- GEL 6 1 Appendix B Data Logger Programs B. 1 Initial Creep Program ( First 8 hours) ;{ CR23X- TD} ; Epoxy Bonded Dowel Project a from thermocouples, temp/ humidity probe, load cell, & pump digital gauge. Two tables have been y hour, while Table 2 collects very 3 seconds for 8 hours. concrete thermocouple.** ********************************* Collects data every hour and stores into final storage able 1 Program tion Interval ( seconds) RE SECTION -------- rature ature ( P17) C ] temp from C to F : Z= X+ F ( P34) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ] [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ] ---------- ETE 1 Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range : 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan) ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] ; ; This program collects dat ; ; set- up. Table 1 collects ever ; e ; ; ** This version is for 2 ; ********************************** TABLE 1 * ; ; ; * T 01: 3600 Execu ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; TEMPERATU ; ------------------------------------------------ ; Reference tempe ; : Panel Temper 1 1: 1 Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ ; Convert reference ; 2: Z= X* F ( P37) _ TEMP_ C ] 1: 1 X Loc [ PANEL 2: 1.8 F [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ] 3: 2 Z Loc 3 1: 2 X : 32 F 2 3: 2 Z Loc ; ; CONCR ; Thermocouple 1 temp in F ; 4: Thermocouple 1: 1 Reps 2: 21 10 3: 1 DIFF Channel 4 5: 1 Ref Temp 6: 9 Loc [ C1_ TEMP_ F ] lt 7: 1.8 Mu 8: 32 Offset 6 2 ; CONCRETE 2 ; Thermocouple 2 temp in F ; 5: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) : 1 Reps V, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range : 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan) ] : 10 Loc [ C2_ TEMP_ F ] OUTSIDE Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) : 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range : 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan) NEL_ TEMP_ C ] _ TEMP_ F ] ENCLOSURE Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range : 4 DIFF Channel er- Constantan) ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] ------------------------------ HMP45C TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY PROBE SECTION ------------------------------------------ emp/ humidity probe on : Do ( P86) rt 1 High e stabilization : Delay w/ Opt Excitation ( P22) x Channel its) : 15 Delay After Ex ( 0.01 sec units) : 0 mV Excitation emp from probe 1 2: 21 10 m 3: 2 DIFF Channel 4 5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C 6 7: 1.8 Mult 8: 32 Offset ; ; Thermocouple 3 temp in F ; 6: Thermocouple 1: 1 Reps 2 3: 3 DIFF Channel ; 4 5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PA 6: 11 Loc [ OUTSIDE 7: 1.8 Mult 8: 32 Offset ; ; Thermocouple 4 temp in F ; 7: 1: 1 Reps 2: 21 10 3 4: 1 Type T ( Copp 5: 1 Ref Temp 6: 12 Loc [ BOX_ TEMP_ F ] 7: 1.8 Mult 8: 32 Offset ; -------------------------- ; ; -------------- ; T ; 8 1: 41 Set Po ; Delay for prob ; 9 1: 1 E 2: 0 Delay W/ Ex ( 0.01 sec un 3 4 ; T 6 3 ; 10: Volt ( Diff) ( P2) Range : 7 DIFF Channel c [ PROBE_ TEMP_ C ] : .1 Mult e 1: Volt ( Diff) ( P2) ps : 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range l DITY ] Port 1 Low Convert probe temp from C to F : Z= X* F ( P37) E_ TEMP_ C ] MP_ F ] 4: Z= X+ F ( P34) Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ F ] : 32 F E_ TEMP_ F ] ------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- r on - power Port 3 High easurements) ing of Loop ( P87) : 0 Delay n ports LVDT's 17: Do ( P86) Pulse Port 4 1: 1 Reps 2: 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow 3 4: 3 Lo 5 6: - 40 Offset ; Relative humidity from prob ; 1 1: 1 Re 2 3: 8 DIFF Channe 4: 5 Loc [ REL_ HUMI 5: .1 Mult 6: 0.0 Offset ; Probe off ; 12: Do ( P86) 1: 51 Set ; --------- ; ; 13 1: 3 X Loc [ PROB 2: 1.8 F 3: 4 Z Loc [ PROBE_ TE 1 1: 4 X 2 3: 4 Z Loc [ PROB ; -------------------------------------- ; LVDT SECTION ( MUX) ; ; Multiplexe ; 15: Do ( P86) 1: 43 Set ; Begin LVDT measurement loop ( 10 m ; 16: Beginn 1 2: 10 Loop Count ; Clock pulse - switch betwee ; 1: 74 6 4 ; Delay between pulses for LVDT stablization n ( P22) 2: 0 Delay W/ Ex ( 0.01 sec units) Delay After Ex ( 0.01 sec units) 4: 0 mV Excitation nt voltage reading NOTE: F4 is used to add "--" ( location incrementor) 1: 1 Reps 2: 45 5000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Fast Range DIFF Channel 4: 24 -- Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ V ] 95) VDT Factory Calibration ( V/ in) 2: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) F : 0 n, Exponent of 10 ALIBRATION_ 1 ] 3: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) F : 00 n, Exponent of 10 ALIBRATION_ 2 ] 4: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) F : 00 n, Exponent of 10 ALIBRATION_ 3 ] ; 18: Delay w/ Opt Excitatio 1: 2 Ex Channel 3: 1 ; LVDT displaceme ; w/ mV to V conversion ; ; ; in step 4. ; 19: Volt ( Diff) ( P2) 3: 10 5: .001 Mult 6: 0.0 Offset ; End loop ; 20: End ( P ; Multiplexer off ; 21: Do ( P86) 1: 53 Set Port 3 Low ;------------ ; L ; ; LVDT # 1 ; 2 1: 9.932 2 3: 14 Z Loc [ C ; LVDT # 2 ; 2 1: 9.959 2 3: 15 Z Loc [ C ; LVDT # 3 ; 2 1: 9.926 2 3: 16 Z Loc [ C 6 5 ; LVDT # 4 ; 25: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) F : 00 n, Exponent of 10 ALIBRATION_ 4 ] 6: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) F : 00 n, Exponent of 10 ALIBRATION_ 5 ] 7: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) F : 00 n, Exponent of 10 ALIBRATION_ 6 ] 8: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) : 00 n, Exponent of 10 ALIBRATION_ 7 ] 9: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) F ent of 10 : 21 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 8 ] : 22 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 9 ] : 9.926 F 0 ALIBRATION_ 10 ] r ( V/ in) = Linear Displacement ( in) 1: 9.914 2 3: 17 Z Loc [ C ; LVDT # 5 ; 2 1: 9.875 2 3: 18 Z Loc [ C ; LVDT # 6 ; 2 1: 9.938 2 3: 19 Z Loc [ C ; LVDT # 7 ; 2 1: 9.885 F 2 3: 20 Z Loc [ C ; LVDT # 8 ; 2 1: 9.980 2: 00 n, Expon 3 ; LVDT # 9 ; 30: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) 1: 9.918 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3 ; LVDT # 10 ; 31: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) 1 2: 00 n, Exponent of 1 3: 23 Z Loc [ C ; ------------ ; LVDT Reading ( V) / Calibration Facto ; ; ; LVDT # 1 ; 6 6 32: Z= X/ Y ( P38) V ] ALIBRATION_ 1 ] [ CALIBRATION_ 2 ] : 36 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ IN ] : 27 X Loc [ LVDT_ 4_ V ] TION_ 4 ] VDT_ 4_ IN ] 6: Z= X/ Y ( P38) VDT_ 5_ V ] Loc [ LVDT_ 5_ IN ] LVDT # 6 LIBRATION_ 6 ] : 39 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ IN ] TION_ 7 ] VDT_ 8_ IN ] 1: 24 X Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ 2: 14 Y Loc [ C 3: 34 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ] ; LVDT # 2 ; 33: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 25 X Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ V ] 2: 15 Y Loc 3: 35 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ IN ] ; LVDT # 3 ; 34: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 26 X Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ V ] 2: 16 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 3 ] 3 ; LVDT # 4 ; 35: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1 2: 17 Y Loc [ CALIBRA 3: 37 Z Loc [ L ; LVDT # 5 ; 3 1: 28 X Loc [ L 2: 18 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 5 ] 3: 38 Z ; ; 37: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 29 X Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ V ] 2: 19 Y Loc [ CA 3 ; LVDT # 7 ; 38: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 30 X Loc [ LVDT_ 7_ V ] 2: 20 Y Loc [ CALIBRA 3: 40 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 7_ IN ] ; LVDT # 8 ; 39: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 31 X Loc [ LVDT_ 8_ V ] 2: 21 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 8 ] 3: 41 Z Loc [ L ; LVDT # 9 ; 6 7 40: Z= X/ Y ( P38) DT_ 9_ V ] [ CALIBRATION_ 9 ] ] : 33 X Loc [ LVDT_ 10_ V ] Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 10 ] -------- 2: Z= X+ Y ( P33) : Z= X* F ( P37) 1_ AVG_ IN ] : 44 Z Loc [ SMP_ 1_ AVG_ IN ] MP_ 2_ AVG_ IN ] 5: Z= X* F ( P37) _ 2_ AVG_ IN ] Loc [ SMP_ 2_ AVG_ IN ] ple 3 6: Z= X+ Y ( P33) ] ] SMP_ 3_ AVG_ IN ] : 46 X Loc [ SMP_ 3_ AVG_ IN ] : 46 Z Loc [ SMP_ 3_ AVG_ IN ] 8: Z= X+ Y ( P33) DT_ 7_ IN ] : 41 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 8_ IN ] VG_ IN ] 1: 32 X Loc [ LV 2: 22 Y Loc 3: 42 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 9_ IN ; LVDT # 10 ; 41: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1 2: 23 Y 3: 43 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 10_ IN ] ; - ; Average reading ; ; LVDT 1 & 2 = Sample 1 4 1: 34 X Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ] 2: 35 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ IN ] 3: 44 Z Loc [ SMP_ 1_ AVG_ IN ] 43 1: 44 X Loc [ SMP_ 2: .5 F 3 ; LVDT 3 & 4 = Sample 2 44: Z= X+ Y ( P33) 1: 36 X Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ IN ] 2: 37 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 4_ IN ] 3: 45 Z Loc [ S 4 1: 45 X Loc [ SMP 2: .5 F 3: 45 Z ; LVDT 5 & 6 = Sam 4 1: 38 X Loc [ LVDT_ 5_ IN 2: 39 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ IN 3: 46 Z Loc [ 47: Z= X* F ( P37) 1 2: .5 F 3 ; LVDT 7 & 8 = Sample 4 4 1: 40 X Loc [ LV 2 3: 47 Z Loc [ SMP_ 4_ A 49: Z= X* F ( P37) 6 8 1: 47 X Loc [ SMP_ 4_ AVG_ IN ] : 47 Z Loc [ SMP_ 4_ AVG_ IN ] Sample 5 : 42 X Loc [ LVDT_ 9_ IN ] 0_ IN ] : 48 Z Loc [ SMP_ 5_ AVG_ IN ] : 48 X Loc [ SMP_ 5_ AVG_ IN ] : 48 Z Loc [ SMP_ 5_ AVG_ IN ] -------------------------------------------------------- AD CELL SECTION -------------------------------------------------------- ; Load cell reading ; 52: Full Bridge ( P6) 1: 1 Reps 2: 11 10 mV, Fast Range 3: 12 DIFF Channel 4: 1 Excite all reps w/ Exchan 1 5: 5000 mV Excitation 6: 6 Loc [ LOAD_ CELL_ 1_ LB ] 7: - 26444 Mult 8: - 153.49 Offset ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; PRESSURE SECTION ( PUMP & RAMS) ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; Pressure output ; ( 3000 psi / 2 V) * ( 1 V / 1000 mV) = 1.5 psi/ mV ; 53: Volt ( Diff) ( P2) 1: 1 Reps 2: 15 5000 mV, Fast Range 3: 6 DIFF Channel 4: 7 Loc [ PRESSURE_ PSIG ] 5: 1.5 Mult 6: 0.0 Offset ; --------- ; Convert pressure into force using ram's effective area ; = 7.22 in^ 2 ; 54: Z= X* F ( P37) 1: 7 X Loc [ PRESSURE_ PSIG ] 2: 7.22 F 3: 8 Z Loc [ RAM_ FORCE1_ LB ] ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; BATTERY MONITOR SECTION 2: .5 F 3 ; LVDT 9 & 10 = 50: Z= X+ Y ( P33) 1 2: 43 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 1 3 51: Z= X* F ( P37) 1 2: .5 F 3 ; ; LO ; 6 9 ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; Monitor battery voltage ollect data and put into table format 6: Data Table ( P84)^ 27244 : 0.0 _____ : EpoxyRebarData1 Table Name ********************************** TABLE 2 ********************************** res into limited storage. inue to display results w/ o storing. Execution Interval ( seconds) ------------------ ------ o F P_ F ] ; 55: Batt Voltage ( P10) : 13 Loc [ BAT_ VOLTAGE_ V ] 1 ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; DATA COLLECTION SECTION ;--------------------------------------------------------- ; C ; 5 1: 0 Seconds into Interval 2 3: 0.0 ( 0 = auto allocate, - x = redirect to inloc x) 4 ; High resolution enabled ( 5 character) ; 57: Resolution ( P78) 1: 1 High Resolution ; Store average into table ; 58: Average ( P71)^ 25775 1: 13 Reps : 1 Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] 2 : Average ( P71)^ 1908 59 1: 15 Reps 2: 34 Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ] ; ; ; Collects data every 3 seconds and stoata collected, but will cont ; 8 hours of d ; able 2 Program * T 01: 3 ; -------------------------------------- TEMPERATURE SECTION ; ; -------------------------------------------------- perature ; Reference tem ; 17) 1: Panel Temperature ( P 1: 1 Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] ; Convert reference temp from C t ; 2: Z= X* F ( P37) : 1 X Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] 1 2: 1.8 F 3: 2 Z Loc [ PANEL_ TEM 7 0 3: Z= X+ F ( P34) 1: 2 X Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ] 2: 32 F 3: 2 Z Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ] 1 temp in F : Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) ps ct, Slow Range : 1 DIFF Channel mp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] 2 temp in F : Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) ct, Slow Range : 2 DIFF Channel mp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] 3 temp in F : Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) onstantan) : 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] [ OUTSIDE_ TEMP_ F ] : 32 Offset NCLOSURE Reject, Slow Range : 4 DIFF Channel pper- Constantan) : 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] _ TEMP_ F ] ; ---------- ; CONCRETE 1 ; Thermocouple ; 4 1: 1 Re 2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reje 3 4: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan) 5: 1 Ref Te 6: 9 Loc [ C1_ TEMP_ F ] 7: 1.8 Mult 8: 32 Offset ; CONCRETE 2 ; Thermocouple ; 5 1: 1 Reps 2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reje 3 4: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan) 5: 1 Ref Te 6: 10 Loc [ C2_ TEMP_ F ] 7: 1.8 Mult 8: 32 Offset ; OUTSIDE ; Thermocouple ; 6 1: 1 Reps 2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range 3: 3 DIFF Channel ; 4: 1 Type T ( Copper- C 5 6: 11 Loc 7: 1.8 Mult 8 ; E ; Thermocouple 4 temp in F ; 7: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) 1: 1 Reps 2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz 3 4: 1 Type T ( Co 5 6: 12 Loc [ BOX 7: 1.8 Mult 7 1 8: 32 Offset ; -------------------------------------------------------- PERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY PROBE SECTION ---------------------------------- Temp/ humidity probe on Do ( P86) High annel / Ex ( 0.01 sec units) : 15 Delay After Ex ( 0.01 sec units) Excitation obe 0: Volt ( Diff) ( P2) Slow Range : 7 DIFF Channel BE_ TEMP_ C ] fset Relative humidity from probe s Range : 8 DIFF Channel robe off : 51 Set Port 1 Low -------- o F : 3 X Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ C ] : 4 Z Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ F ] : 4 X Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ F ] : 4 Z Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ F ] ; HMP45C TEM ; ---------------------- ; ; 8: 1: 41 Set Port 1 ; Delay for probe stabilization ; 9: Delay w/ Opt Excitation ( P22) 1: 1 Ex Ch 2: 0 Delay W 3 4: 0 mV ; Temp from pr ; 1 1: 1 Reps 2: 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, 3 4: 3 Loc [ PRO 5: .1 Mult 6: - 40 Of ; ; 11: Volt ( Diff) ( P2) 1: 1 Rep 2: 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow 3 4: 5 Loc [ REL_ HUMIDITY ] 5: .1 Mult 6: 0.0 Offset ; P ; 12: Do ( P86) 1 ; - ; Convert probe temp from C t ; 13: Z= X* F ( P37) 1 2: 1.8 F 3 14: Z= X+ F ( P34) 1 2: 32 F 3 7 2 ; -------------------------------------------------------- : Beginning of Loop ( P87) nt n ports LVDT's ort 4 een pulses for LVDT stablization Opt Excitation ( P22) 1: 2 Ex Channel y W/ Ex ( 0.01 sec units) 3: 1 Delay After Ex ( 0.01 sec units) Excitation LVDT displacement voltage reading V conversion OTE: F4 is used to add "--" ( location incrementor) in step 4. 19: Volt ( Diff) ( P2) Hz Reject, Fast Range 5: .001 Mult Offset Multiplexer off : Do ( P86) w VDT # 1 ; LVDT SECTION ( MUX) ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; Multiplexer on - power ; 15: Do ( P86) 1: 43 Set Port 3 High ; Begin LVDT measurement loop ( 10 measurements) ; 16 1: 0 Delay 2: 10 Loop Cou ; Clock pulse - switch betwee ; 17: Do ( P86) 1: 74 Pulse P ; Delay betw ; 18: Delay w/ 2: 0 Dela 4: 0 mV ; ; w/ mV to ; ; N ; ; 1: 1 Reps 2: 45 5000 mV, 60 3: 10 DIFF Channel 4: 24 -- Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ V ] 6: 0.0 ; End loop ; 20: End ( P95) ; ; 21 1: 53 Set Port 3 Lo ;------------ ; LVDT Factory Calibration ( V/ in) ; ; L ; 7 3 22: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) : 14 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 1 ] VDT # 2 n ( P30) : 15 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 2 ] VDT # 3 n ( P30) : 16 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 3 ] VDT # 4 n ( P30) : 17 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 4 ] VDT # 5 n ( P30) : 18 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 5 ] VDT # 6 n ( P30) : 19 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 6 ] VDT # 7 n ( P30) : 20 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 7 ] : Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) : 9.980 F , Exponent of 10 : 21 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 8 ] 1: 9.932 F 2: 0 n, Exponent of 10 3 ; L ; 23: Z= F x 10^ 1: 9.959 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3 ; L ; 24: Z= F x 10^ 1: 9.926 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3 ; L ; 25: Z= F x 10^ 1: 9.914 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3 ; L ; 26: Z= F x 10^ 1: 9.875 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3 ; L ; 27: Z= F x 10^ 1: 9.938 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3 ; L ; 28: Z= F x 10^ 1: 9.885 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3 ; LVDT # 8 ; 29 1 2: 00 n 3 ; LVDT # 9 ; 7 4 30: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) 1: 9.918 F , Exponent of 10 : 22 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 9 ] : 9.926 F , Exponent of 10 : 23 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 10 ] r ( V/ in) VDT # 1 ] : 34 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ] VDT # 2 ] : 35 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ IN ] VDT # 3 ] : 36 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ IN ] VDT # 4 ] : 37 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 4_ IN ] VDT # 5 ] : 38 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 5_ IN ] VDT # 6 2: 00 n 3 ; LVDT # 10 ; 31: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) 1 2: 00 n 3 ; ------------ ; LVDT Reading ( V) / Calibration Facto ; = Linear Displacement ( in) ; ; L ; 32: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 24 X Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ V ] 2: 14 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 1 3 ; L ; 33: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 25 X Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ V ] 2: 15 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 2 3 ; L ; 34: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 26 X Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ V ] 2: 16 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 3 3 ; L ; 35: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 27 X Loc [ LVDT_ 4_ V ] 2: 17 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 4 3 ; L ; 36: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 28 X Loc [ LVDT_ 5_ V ] 2: 18 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 5 3 ; L ; 37: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 29 X Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ V ] 7 5 2: 19 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 6 ] : 39 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ IN ] VDT # 7 ] : 40 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 7_ IN ] 9: Z= X/ Y ( P38) V ] ALIBRATION_ 8 ] [ CALIBRATION_ 9 ] 0 ] : 43 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 10_ IN ] ading ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 ; L ; 38: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 30 X Loc [ LVDT_ 7_ V ] 2: 20 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 7 3 ; LVDT # 8 ; 3 1: 31 X Loc [ LVDT_ 8_ 2: 21 Y Loc [ C 3: 41 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 8_ IN ] ; LVDT # 9 ; 40: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 32 X Loc [ LVDT_ 9_ V ] 2: 22 Y Loc 3: 42 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 9_ IN ] ; LVDT # 10 ; 41: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 33 X Loc [ LVDT_ 10_ V ] 2: 23 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 1 3 ; --------- ; Average re ; ; LVDT 1 & 2 = Sample 1 42: Z= X+ Y ( P33) 1: 34 X Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ] 2: 35 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ IN ] 3: 44 Z Loc [ SMP_ 1_ AVG_ IN 43: Z= X* F ( P37) 1: 44 X Loc [ SMP_ 1_ AVG_ IN 2: .5 F 3: 44 Z Loc [ SMP_ 1_ AVG_ IN ; LVDT 3 & 4 = Sample 2 44: Z= X+ Y ( P33) 1: 36 X Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ IN ] 2: 37 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 4_ IN ] 3: 45 Z Loc [ SMP_ 2_ AVG_ IN 45: Z= X* F ( P37) 1: 45 X Loc [ SMP_ 2_ AVG_ IN 2: .5 F 3: 45 Z Loc [ SMP_ 2_ AVG_ IN 7 6 ; LVDT 5 & 6 = Sample 3 46: Z= X+ Y ( P33) 1: 38 X Loc [ LVDT_ 5_ IN ] 2: 39 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ IN ] 3: 46 Z Loc [ SMP_ 3_ AVG_ IN ] ] ] & 8 = Sample 4 : 40 X Loc [ LVDT_ 7_ IN ] [ LVDT_ 8_ IN ] : 47 Z Loc [ SMP_ 4_ AVG_ IN ] [ SMP_ 4_ AVG_ IN ] : 47 Z Loc [ SMP_ 4_ AVG_ IN ] mple 5 [ LVDT_ 9_ IN ] : 48 Z Loc [ SMP_ 5_ AVG_ IN ] ] ------------------------------------------ CELL SECTION ---------- ing 2: Full Bridge ( P6) ps ast Range all reps w/ Exchan 1 : 6 Loc [ LOAD_ CELL_ 1_ LB ] ------------------------------ PRESSURE SECTION ( PUMP & RAMS) ---------------------------- t 0 - 3000 psi, 1.5 psi/ mV 47: Z= X* F ( P37) 1: 46 X Loc [ SMP_ 3_ AVG_ IN 2: .5 F 3: 46 Z Loc [ SMP_ 3_ AVG_ IN ; LVDT 7 48: Z= X+ Y ( P33) 1 2: 41 Y Loc 3 49: Z= X* F ( P37) 1: 47 X Loc 2: .5 F 3 ; LVDT 9 & 10 = Sa 50: Z= X+ Y ( P33) 1: 42 X Loc 2: 43 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 10_ IN ] 3 51: Z= X* F ( P37) 1: 48 X Loc [ SMP_ 5_ AVG_ IN 2: .5 F 3: 48 Z Loc [ SMP_ 5_ AVG_ IN ] ; -------------- ; LOAD ; ---------------------------------------------- ; Load cell read ; 5 1: 1 Re 2: 11 10 mV, F 3: 12 DIFF Channel 4: 1 Excite 5: 5000 mV Excitation 6 7: - 26444 Mult 8: - 153.49 Offset ; -------------------------- ; ; ---------------------------- ; Pressure outpu ; When digital indicator is set to ; the output is 1500 PSI/ V ; ( 3000 psi / 2 V) * ( 1 V / 1000 mV) = 7 7 ; 53: Volt ( Diff) ( P2) 1: 1 Reps 2: 15 5000 mV, Fast Range : 6 DIFF Channel onvert pressure into force using ram's effective area URE_ PSIG ] -------------------------------------------------------- BATTERY MONITOR SECTION ry voltage P10) ---- DATA COLLECTION SECTION o conserve : 49 X Loc [ COUNTER ] : Data Table ( P84)^ 27244 l allocate, - x = redirect to inloc x) High resolution enabled ( 5 character) : Resolution ( P78) ion Store InLoc 1- 13 : Average ( P71)^ 25775 ANEL_ TEMP_ C ] 3 4: 7 Loc [ PRESSURE_ PSIG ] 5: 1.5 Mult 6: 0.0 Offset ; --------- ; C ; = 7.22 in^ 2 ; 54: Z= X* F ( P37) 1: 7 X Loc [ PRESS 2: 7.22 F 3: 8 Z Loc [ RAM_ FORCE1_ LB ] ; ; ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; Monitor batte ; 55: Batt Voltage ( 1: 13 Loc [ BAT_ VOLTAGE_ V ] ; ---------------------------------------------------- ; ;--------------------------------------------------------- ; Collect data and put into table format. ; Only 9600 records ( 8 hours) will be stored t ; memory space. ; 56: If ( X<=> F) ( P89) 1 2: 4 < 3: 9600 F 4: 30 Then Do 57 1: 0 Seconds into Interva 2: 0.0 _____ 3: 0 ( 0 = auto 4: EpoxyRebarData2 Table Name ; ; 58 1: 1 High Resolut ; ; 59 1: 13 Reps 2: 1 Loc [ P 7 8 ; Store LVDT displacement 1)^ 25355 : 34 Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ] able 3 Subroutines ; 60: Average ( P7 1: 15 Reps 2 ; Increment counter by 1 ; 61: Z= Z+ 1 ( P32) 1: 49 Z Loc [ COUNTER ] 62: End ( P95) * T End Program 7 9 B. 2 Creep Program After Initial 8 Hours Dowel Project This program collects data from thermocouples, temp/ humidity e. Two tables have been stores data every hour, while out storing data. s.** ************************ cution Interval ( seconds) ------------------------------------ SECTION ------------------------------------------------------- EMP_ C ] PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] : 1.8 F EMP_ F ] c [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ] ---------- hermocouple 1 temp in F p ( DIFF) ( P14) ge : 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan) ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] : 9 Loc [ C1_ TEMP_ F ] ;{ CR23X- TD} ; Epoxy Bonded ; ; ; probe, load cell, & pump digital gaug; set- up. Table 1 collects and ; T able 2 collects every 3 seconds with; ; ** This version is for 2 concrete thermocouple ; **************************** ****** TABLE 1 ********** ; ; Collects data every hour and stores into final storage ; * Table 1 Progra m 01: 3600 Exe ; -------------------- ; TEMPERATURE ; - ; Reference temperature ; 1: Panel Temperature ( P17) 1: 1 Loc [ PANEL_ T ; Convert reference temp from C to F ; 2: Z= X* F ( P37) 1: 1 X Loc [ 2 3: 2 Z Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ] 3: Z= X+ F ( P34) 1: 2 X Loc [ PANEL_ T 2 : 32 F 3: 2 Z Lo ; ; CONCRETE 1 ; T ; 4: Thermocouple Tem 1: 1 Reps 2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Ran 3: 1 DIFF Channel 4 5: 1 Ref Temp 6 7: 1.8 Mult 8: 32 Offset ; CONCRETE 2 ; Thermocouple 2 temp in F ; 8 0 5: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) : 1 Reps Slow Range : 2 DIFF Channel pper- Constantan) mp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] Thermocouple 3 temp in F Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) eject, Slow Range : 3 DIFF Channel ; e T ( Copper- Constantan) PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] : 11 Loc [ OUTSIDE_ TEMP_ F ] Thermocouple 4 temp in F s ange : 4 DIFF Channel ANEL_ TEMP_ C ] : 32 Offset ---------------------- HMP45C TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY PROBE SECTION emp/ humidity probe on gh citation ( P22) : 0 Delay W/ Ex ( 0.01 sec units) : 0 mV Excitation 1 2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, 3 4: 1 Type T ( Co 5: 1 Ref Te 6: 10 Loc [ C2_ TEMP_ F ] 7: 1.8 Mult 8: 32 Offset ; OUTSIDE ; ; 6: 1: 1 Reps 2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz R 3 4: 1 Typ 5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ 6 7: 1.8 Mult 8: 32 Offset ; ENCLOSURE ; ; 7: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) 1: 1 Rep 2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow R 3 4: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan) 5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ P 6: 12 Loc [ BOX_ TEMP_ F ] 7: 1.8 Mult 8 ; ---------------------------------- ; ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; T ; 8: Do ( P86) 1: 41 Set Port 1 Hi ; Delay for probe stabilization ; 9: Delay w/ Opt Ex 1: 1 Ex Channel 2 3: 15 Delay After Ex ( 0.01 sec units) 4 ; Temp from probe ; 10: Volt ( Diff) ( P2) 1: 1 Reps 8 1 2: 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range EMP_ C ] : .1 Mult elative humidity from probe eject, Slow Range _ HUMIDITY ] : 0.0 Offset robe off 2: Do ( P86) rt 1 Low C to F ( P37) C ] : 1.8 F : 4 Z Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ F ] : Z= X+ F ( P34) E_ TEMP_ F ] MP_ F ] -------------------------------------------------------- LVDT SECTION ( MUX) ------------------------------------------------------- T measurement loop ( 10 measurements) ( P87) y Clock pulse - switch between ports LVDT's 17: Do ( P86) t 4 DT stablization 18: Delay w/ Opt Excitation ( P22) 3: 7 DIFF Channel 4: 3 Loc [ PROBE_ T 5 6: - 40 Offset ; R ; 11: Volt ( Diff) ( P2) 1: 1 Reps 2: 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz R 3: 8 DIFF Channel 4: 5 Loc [ REL 5: .1 Mult 6 ; P ; 1 1: 51 Set Po ; --------- ; Convert probe temp from ; 13: Z= X* F 1: 3 X Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ 2 3 14 1: 4 X Loc [ PROB 2: 32 F 3: 4 Z Loc [ PROBE_ TE ; ; ; - ; Multiplexer on - power ; 15: Do ( P86) 1: 43 Set Port 3 High ; Begin LVD ; 16: Beginning of Loop 1: 0 Dela 2: 10 Loop Count ; ; 1: 74 Pulse Por ; Delay between pulses for LV ; 8 2 1: 2 Ex Channel 2: 0 Delay W/ Ex ( 0.01 sec units) r Ex ( 0.01 sec units) V Excitation w/ mV to V conversion OTE: F4 is used to add "--" ( location incrementor) 2: 45 5000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Fast Range DIFF Channel 4: 24 -- Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ V ] et 95) VDT Factory Calibration ( V/ in) 2: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) : 0 n, Exponent of 10 RATION_ 1 ] 3: Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) ON_ 2 ] LVDT # 3 : Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) LVDT # 4 : Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) 3: 1 Delay Afte 4: 0 m ; LVDT displacement voltage reading ; ; ; N ; in step 4. ; 19: Volt ( Diff) ( P2) 1: 1 Reps 3: 10 5: .001 Mult 6: 0.0 Offs ; End loop ; 20: End ( P ; Multiplexer off ; 21: Do ( P86) 1: 53 Set Port 3 Low ;------------ ; L ; ; LVDT # 1 ; 2 1: 9.932 F 2 3: 14 Z Loc [ CALIB ; LVDT # 2 ; 2 1: 9.959 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3: 15 Z Loc [ CALIBRATI ; ; 24 1: 9.926 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3: 16 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 3 ] ; ; 25 8 3 1: 9.914 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3: 17 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 4 ] ; LVDT # 5 : Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) LVDT # 6 : Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) LVDT # 7 : Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) LVDT # 8 : Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) LVDT # 9 : Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) LVDT # 10 : Z= F x 10^ n ( P30) ------------ ding ( V) / Calibration Factor ( V/ in) Linear Displacement ( in) 2: Z= X/ Y ( P38) oc [ LVDT_ 1_ V ] : 14 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 1 ] ; 26 1: 9.875 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3: 18 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 5 ] ; ; 27 1: 9.938 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3: 19 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 6 ] ; ; 28 1: 9.885 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3: 20 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 7 ] ; ; 29 1: 9.980 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3: 21 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 8 ] ; ; 30 1: 9.918 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3: 22 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 9 ] ; ; 31 1: 9.926 F 2: 00 n, Exponent of 10 3: 23 Z Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 10 ] ; ; LVDT Rea ; = ; ; LVDT # 1 ; 3 1: 24 X L 2 8 4 3: 34 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ] 3: Z= X/ Y ( P38) Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ V ] ALIBRATION_ 2 ] : 35 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ IN ] ] : 36 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ IN ] : 27 X Loc [ LVDT_ 4_ V ] TION_ 4 ] VDT_ 4_ IN ] 6: Z= X/ Y ( P38) VDT_ 5_ V ] ] Loc [ LVDT_ 5_ IN ] LVDT # 6 ] P38) : 20 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 7 ] IN ] : 31 X Loc [ LVDT_ 8_ V ] ALIBRATION_ 8 ] VDT_ 9_ V ] ] ; LVDT # 2 ; 3 1: 25 X 2: 15 Y Loc [ C 3 ; LVDT # 3 ; 34: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 26 X Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ V ] 2: 16 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 3 3 ; LVDT # 4 ; 35: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1 2: 17 Y Loc [ CALIBRA 3: 37 Z Loc [ L ; LVDT # 5 ; 3 1: 28 X Loc [ L 2: 18 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 5 3: 38 Z ; ; 37: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 29 X Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ V ] 2: 19 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 6 3: 39 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ IN ] ; LVDT # 7 ; 38: Z= X/ Y ( 1: 30 X Loc [ LVDT_ 7_ V ] 2 3: 40 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 7_ ; LVDT # 8 ; 39: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1 2: 21 Y Loc [ C 3: 41 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 8_ IN ] ; LVDT # 9 ; 40: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 32 X Loc [ L 2: 22 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 9 8 5 3: 42 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 9_ IN ] LVDT # 10 [ LVDT_ 10_ V ] 0 ] : 43 Z Loc [ LVDT_ 10_ IN ] Average reading ple 1 [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ] : 44 Z Loc [ S1_ AVG_ IN ] = Sample 2 [ LVDT_ 4_ IN ] P37) 2_ AVG_ IN ] [ S2_ AVG_ IN ] LVDT 5 & 6 = Sample 3 ( P33) VDT_ 5_ IN ] c [ S3_ AVG_ IN ] 7: Z= X* F ( P37) VDT 7 & 8 = Sample 4 [ LVDT_ 7_ IN ] ] _ IN ] 4_ AVG_ IN ] ; ; 41: Z= X/ Y ( P38) 1: 33 X Loc 2: 23 Y Loc [ CALIBRATION_ 1 3 ; --------- ; ; ; LVDT 1 & 2 = Sam 42: Z= X+ Y ( P33) 1: 34 X Loc 2: 35 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 2_ IN ] 3 43: Z= X* F ( P37) 1: 44 X Loc [ S1_ AVG_ IN ] 2: .5 F 3: 44 Z Loc [ S1_ AVG_ IN ] ; LVDT 3 & 4 44: Z= X+ Y ( P33) 1: 36 X Loc [ LVDT_ 3_ IN ] 2: 37 Y Loc 3: 45 Z Loc [ S2_ AVG_ IN ] 45: Z= X* F ( 1: 45 X Loc [ S 2: .5 F 3: 45 Z Loc ; 46: Z= X+ Y 1: 38 X Loc [ L 2: 39 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 6_ IN ] 3: 46 Z Lo 4 1: 46 X Loc [ S3_ AVG_ IN ] 2: .5 F 3: 46 Z Loc [ S3_ AVG_ IN ] ; L 48: Z= X+ Y ( P33) 1: 40 X Loc 2: 41 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 8_ IN 3: 47 Z Loc [ S4_ AVG 49: Z= X* F ( P37) 1: 47 X Loc [ S4_ AVG_ IN ] 2: .5 F 3: 47 Z Loc [ S 8 6 ; LVDT 9 & 10 = Sample 5 50: Z= X+ Y ( P33) 1: 42 X Loc [ LVDT_ 9_ IN ] 2: 43 Y Loc [ LVDT_ 10_ IN ] : 48 X Loc [ S5_ AVG_ IN ] [ S5_ AVG_ IN ] F ( P34) : 49 Z Loc [ S1_ TOT_ DISP ] 34) : -. 011948 F : 46 X Loc [ S3_ AVG_ IN ] 5: Z= X+ F ( P34) c [ S4_ AVG_ IN ] 2: -. 025067 F 3: 52 Z Loc [ S4_ TOT_ DISP ] ; Sample 5 56: Z= X+ F ( P34) 1: 48 X Loc [ S5_ AVG_ IN ] 2: -. 12509 F 3: 53 Z Loc [ S5_ TOT_ DISP ] ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; LOAD CELL SECTION ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; Load cell reading ; 57: Full Bridge ( P6) 1: 1 Reps 2: 11 10 mV, Fast Range 3: 12 DIFF Channel 4: 1 Excite all reps w/ Exchan 1 3: 48 Z Loc [ S5_ AVG_ IN ] 51: Z= X* F ( P37) 1 2: .5 F 3: 48 Z Loc ; --------- ; Total displacement ; Sample 1 52: Z= X+ 1: 44 X Loc [ S1_ AVG_ IN ] 2: -. 026186 F 3 ; Sample 2 53: Z= X+ F ( P 1: 45 X Loc [ S2_ AVG_ IN ] 2 3: 50 Z Loc [ S2_ TOT_ DISP ] ; Sample 3 54: Z= X+ F ( P34) 1 2: -. 022722 F 3: 51 Z Loc [ S3_ TOT_ DISP ] ; Sample 4 5 1: 47 X Lo 8 7 5: 5000 mV Excitation 6: 6 Loc [ LOAD_ CELL_ 1_ LB ] 53 ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; PRESSURE SECTION ( PUMP & RAMS) ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; Pressure output ; ( 3000 psi / 2 V) * ( 1 V / 1000 mV) = 1.5 psi/ mV ; 58: Volt ( Diff) ( P2) 1: 1 Reps 2: 15 5000 mV, Fast Range 3: 6 DIFF Channel 4: 7 Loc [ PRESSURE_ PSIG ] 5: 1.5 Mult 6: 0.0 Offset ; --------- ; Convert pressure into force using ram's effective area ; = 7.22 in^ 2 ; 59: Z= X* F ( P37) 1: 7 X Loc [ PRESSURE_ PSIG ] 2: 7.22 F 3: 8 Z Loc [ RAM_ FORCE1_ LB ] ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; BATTERY MONITOR SECTION ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; Monitor battery voltage ; 60: Batt Voltage ( P10) 1: 13 Loc [ BAT_ VOLTAGE_ V ] ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; DATA COLLECTION SECTION ;--------------------------------------------------------- ; Collect data and put into table format ; 61: Data Table ( P84)^ 27244 1: 0 Seconds into Interval 2: 0.0 _____ 3: 0.0 ( 0 = auto allocate, - x = redirect to inloc x) 4: EpoxyRebarData1 Table Name ; High resolution enabled ( 5 character) ; 62: Resolution ( P78) 1: 1 High Resolution ; Store average into table ; 63: Average ( P71)^ 25775 1: 13 Reps 7: - 26444 Mult : - 1.49 Offset 8 8 8 2: 1 Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] 64: Average ( P71)^ 2342 1: 20 Reps 2: 34 Loc [ LVDT_ 1_ IN ] ; ********************************** TABLE 2 ********************************** ; ; Collects data every 3 seconds and stores into limited storage. ; 8 hours of data collected, but will continue to update w/ o storing. ; * Table 2 Program 01: 3 Execution Interval ( seconds) ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; TEMPERATURE SECTION ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; Reference temperature ; 1: Panel Temperature ( P17) 1: 1 Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] ; Convert reference temp from C to F ; 2: Z= X* F ( P37) 1: 1 X Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] 2: 1.8 F 3: 2 Z Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ] 3: Z= X+ F ( P34) 1: 2 X Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ] 2: 32 F 3: 2 Z Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ F ] ; ---------- ; CONCRETE 1 ; Thermocouple 1 temp in F ; 4: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) 1: 1 Reps 2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range 3: 1 DIFF Channel 4: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan) 5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] 6: 9 Loc [ C1_ TEMP_ F ] 7: 1.8 Mult 8: 32 Offset ; CONCRETE 2 ; Thermocouple 2 temp in F ; 5: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) 1: 1 Reps 2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range 3: 2 DIFF Channel 8 9 4: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan) 5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] 6: 10 Loc [ C2_ TEMP_ F ] 7: 1.8 Mult 8: 32 Offset ; OUTSIDE ; Thermocouple 3 temp in F ; 6: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) 1: 1 Reps 2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range 3: 3 DIFF Channel ; 4: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan) 5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] 6: 11 Loc [ OUTSIDE_ TEMP_ F ] 7: 1.8 Mult 8: 32 Offset ; ENCLOSURE ; Thermocouple 4 temp in F ; 7: Thermocouple Temp ( DIFF) ( P14) 1: 1 Reps 2: 21 10 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range 3: 4 DIFF Channel 4: 1 Type T ( Copper- Constantan) 5: 1 Ref Temp ( Deg. C) Loc [ PANEL_ TEMP_ C ] 6: 12 Loc [ BOX_ TEMP_ F ] 7: 1.8 Mult 8: 32 Offset ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; HMP45C TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY PROBE SECTION ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; Temp/ humidity probe on ; 8: Do ( P86) 1: 41 Set Port 1 High ; Delay for probe stabilization ; 9: Delay w/ Opt Excitation ( P22) 1: 1 Ex Channel 2: 0 Delay W/ Ex ( 0.01 sec units) 3: 15 Delay After Ex ( 0.01 sec units) 4: 0 mV Excitation ; Temp from probe ; 10: Volt ( Diff) ( P2) 1: 1 Reps 2: 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz Reje DIFF Channel : 3 Loc [ PROBE_ TEMP_ C ] 5: .1 Mult ct, Slow Range 3: 7 4 9 0 6: - 40 Offset e humidity from probe ; ; Relativ 11: Volt ( Diff) ( P2) Reps : 24 1000 mV, 60 Hz Reject, Slow Range 3: 8 DIFF Channel 4: 5 Loc [ REL_ HUMIDITY ] 5: .1 Mult 6: 0.0 Offset ; Probe off ; 12: Do ( P86) 1: 51 Set Port 1 Low ; --------- ; Convert probe temp from C to F |
| PDI.Date | 2006 |
| PDI.Title | Seismic, creep, and tensile testing of various epoxy bonded rebar products in hardened concrete |
|
|
| B |
| C |
| I |
| S |
|
|